We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
AIBE is quite honestly a cakewalk. It is easy. If you can manage the same however, do try and attempt a paper or two (you could get the past papers online, I guess), and IF POSSIBLE, try to do the same within the actual time-limit and in the actual setting. AIBE is less about preparing for the exam, and more about how you take the exam.
BEFORE THE EXAM/ EXAM-PREP
1. Read the contents of the Bare Acts.
2. This might sound as if I am pulling your leg, but in all honesty, know the names of the Acts which you would be carrying
3. I had put flags/ Post-It type notes on the first page of the Bare Acts I was carrying. This helped me pick out the one which I really wanted for a particular question, instead of having to turn to the cover-page. Saved me a ton of time
4. As stated earlier, try and attempt 1-2 past papers. The answers- you might not even have to reach out to the Bare Act/s. OMR sheet marking EATS into those three hours.
5. Be prepared to attempt some questions pertaining to landmark judgements.
DAY OF THE EXAM/ DURING THE EXAM
Naturally, carry the necessary documents, stationery material, etc.
1. Reach your centre early. Gives you time to set up your workspace the way you want it. Setting out 15+ Bare Acts in the most easily accessible manner, given the space constraints at some centres is no joke.
2. Be very careful and meticulous in filling up the necessary details on the OMR sheet.
3. No negative marking. So attempt every question.
4. Keep an eye on the watch. Time does seem to go veeeeery slow in the first 2 hours, and within a flash, it is time to turn in your OMR sheet.
So, marks (wont matter during lateral hiring) > Internships > Publications/Int moots > Other moots
Note: moots don't hold weight if its a mere participation; either you win or you lose.
Best of luck friend!
I graduated from GNLU in 2016. Due to some health issues/ family reasons had to join LPO now Regretting like hell. Salary/increments are chillar. Very much worried. Why I stayed here for 7 years? Was bound to. Can't reveal here. Please advise guys how to move to In-hoise or law firms. Anybody has sailed through such boat? Help, depressed. I don't mind working even as an A0 or half salary in begining. No troll please
1) SAM (Mumbai and Delhi)
- Delhi saw mass attrition recently but still hasn't recruited people until now
- Mumbai is on a freeze
2) IndusLaw (Mumbai, Delhi, Bangalore)
- Mumbai is always hiring
- Delhi is terrible
- Bangalore is a small team and never loses talent
3) KCO (Mumbai, Noida, Bangalore)
- Mumbai is on a freeze; prefers laterals
- Noida is a good option
- Bangalore is a small team and never loses talent
4) CAM (Mumbai and Bangalore)
- Only does campus i.e. picks up toppers who are terrible with work/have no idea about ECM or picks up paralegals from GLC who are later given the offer
5) S&R (Mumbai and Delhi)
- Very very picky and top heavy; recruits the cream of the crop
6) Trilegal (Mumbai)
- Richa's team is on a freeze
- Bhakta's team has a very few mandates
7) JSA (Mumbai and Gurgaon)
- Sweatshop for law students tbh; will make you a "junior associate" which is a glorified paralegal job after 6 months of an assessment internship
- Prefers laterals over freshers
8) AZB (Mumbai and Noida)
- Mumbai has not lost talent
- Noida's dealmaking is non existent
8) Saraf (Mumbai), Luthra (Delhi), Bharucha (Mumbai)
- Very small team, very few mandates
9) SNG (Delhi), Rajani (Mumbai), CrawfordB (Mumbai)
- Lot of mid markets and small markets work; very very picky with PPOs
😂😂😂
=================================================================================
https://www.indiatoday.in/trending-news/story/internet-slams-ahmedabad-crowd-for-disrespecting-players-during-world-cup-final-2465095-2023-11-20
I suggest we don't make Gods out of cricket team in India. Imagine NZ and Aus loosing and not being accountable to 1.5 billion? I don't think Australia Law website like LI would have discussed their loss had they lost lmao.
We try to hide our failures in other sports by our attempts at silverware from our cricket which is no doubt world-class. But the added pressure just suppresses then even more and it's a vicious cycle.
Still feel Aus as a nation is one of the strongest mental sides across sports, it's in their culture. Sadly the Gujju crowd and Gujju state was in attendance only for photos and insta snaps, pure show of no cricketing heritage.
Note- If 2011 and period thereon has been a sign of rise of India as a cricketing superpower and yet it's Aus who has the WC twice, in such case we can assume India might still go on to dominate cricket for the next 100 years but what Aus has done for the last 100 till date is nothing short of legendary.
BCCI is a shambly run org and with the funds we have india should maybe have become undefeatable or v close to that, the funds distribution even in top 3 nations is vv vastly in our favour.
For me Rohit Sharma deserved the man of the tournament given his change in approach and he was the captain as well. Kohli again legendary but a tad selfish in several phases (didn't hurt the team thankfully).
Proud of Indian team and not the board, but the years of RCB fandom will surely help me cope this better.
No shame in accepting Aus > India in cricketing heritage and clutch performances from players who aren't treated as God but are nothing short of being one. We lose due to players worshipped as God but can't show up on festival due to everyone praying for their visits. :)
https://www.livemint.com/news/business-of-life/loneliness-in-the-city-1541394566948.html
You are mentally sprinting and probably dealing with 100 issues at your law firm job, so when you come back home, you need immediate respite, which is why several people often turn to drinking or other harmful activities. This gets worse when you see your peers/ friends having fun on Instagram while you are miserable at home.
Actionable advice: Join a yoga session, dance class or some cycling group. You can also try going for the weekend excursions organised by local groups (Several groups on Instagram - just search them)
The idea here is to join some group where:
1. You have a guide/ mentor actively teaching you and tracking your progress and checking up on you (unlike most seniors at law firms)
2. You have a peer group of your age with whom you can bond in a social casual setting, and talk about something apart from work (as corporate settings does not always allow us to let our guard down)
Keep these two things in mind, and I'm sure you will notice a mood shift.
All the best!
Hope this helps
1. Recruiters cannot help as they mostly post for vacancies from PQE 1,
2. Tap alumni network: Try reaching out to your college seniors and ask if there is vacancy for you in their team
3. Tap friend network: If you have friends from other colleges, ask them about vacancies in their team
4. Partner specific: If you have any particular partner in mind, try reaching out to the SA/ PA in the team. You may even try to directly email the partner (Not the best way, but I know people who have got in through this approach. If they reject you/ dont respond, you have nothing to lose)
5. In house: Lot of companies hire A0s for Inhouse, so you can try connecting with the legal counsels in In House positions to get a sense if they are hiring
All the best!
https://www.legallyindia.com/convos/topic/164466-book-recommendations-for-lawyers (personal suggestion, go to comments posted by 'teen baar' and 'wut')
https://www.legallyindia.com/convos/topic/233228-reading-list-for-fy-law-students (++ for the comments regarding reading material on logic)
https://www.legallyindia.com/convos/topic/185058-recommended-books-for-disputes
https://www.legallyindia.com/convos/topic/246895-reading-list-for-freshers-to-law-school
https://www.legallyindia.com/convos/topic/165851-do-corporate-lawyers-get-time-to-read-non-law-books-if-so-please-recommend-some-good-ones
https://www.livelaw.in/columns/the-reading-list-project-must-read-books-for-law-students-lawyers-159777
Shekhar Bobby Saraf (Calcutta HC)
Suraj Govindraj, MI Arun and Sunil Dutt Yadav (Karnataka HC)
Aditya Sondhi was also recommended but name was blocked by current Govt.
So it is an organic process which is bound to continue as more graduates establish themselves in the profession.
Ayan Gupta has won from NLU Delhi
Check it out here: - https://www.legallyindia.com/convos/topic/303000-Rhodes-India-2024-Results
Tier 2 : SAM, Indus, Spice Route, BTG Legal
Tier 3: CAM, Khaitan, AZB, Kocchar, Obhan
Tier 4: Anand & Anand, TMT Law
Ayan Gupta (NLU Delhi)
Mohammad Zayaan (GNLU)
Third Rhodes Scholarship for both NLU Delhi and GNLU. Previous Rhodes scholars from NLU Delhi and GNLU:
NLU Delhi
— Rishika Sahgal (2016)
— Anupriya Dhonchak (2021)
GNLU
— Sameer Rashid Bhat (2018)
— Hatim Hussain (2020)
I really need to get a life
Stop trolling with the coding bit.
No you don’t need any typing lessons. You will be at the desk for so long you everyday will end up typing fast. Rather invest in a good chair with lumbar support when working from home.
Okay, here’s what you need to know:
MS Excel
For law firms, if you’re in capital markets, you need to know MS Excel - just get familiar with adding text, numbers, tables. Excel has lot of automatic copy function where if you drag and drop, it can generate automatic serial numbering, can copy formulas across cells etc. (not advanced formulas) Having some practice of data entry in Excel is important as this can otherwise slow you down while working (it’s slightly different than typing in MS Word)
MS Word
Otherwise, lawyers mostly use MS Word.
Know how to change font size, para spacing, create tables, create numbered lists, alignment with the ruler etc.
You can Google the shortcuts used to copy paste, select entire para/ page etc, page up/ down
Law firm Task specific - for redlines - check Word Compare on MS Word/
Review docs - Split screen
Foreign firms - often use linked cross references for clause references in documents, so you can check Google that
MS PowerPoint
For client/ internal presentations - working knowledge- how to write text, create tables, shapes, add pictures etc.
All the best!
Surprisingly I was asked about clat rank and I mentioned somewhere around 150ish. So do remember it anyway.
Now that I read this in the morning, I see that my rant here appears to be quite childish and kinda misogynistic. You may mark this trollish, or do whatever action it is you do, because I don't want to start some gender war here or discount the struggles girls go through. Maybe it's me :)
For OP, I suggest you apply for assessment internships at T1 and T2 firms and of course law firms and chambers will definitely grab you (NLU Tag). All the best :)
For basic ideas: - https://www.hotcoursesabroad.com/india/find-your-course/how-to-choose-the-right-course/6-vital-facts-for-international-students-eyeing-american-law-courses/
There is another course in Northwestern University which provides accelerated JD. Again you need to have an amazing Lsat score to even knock the doors for this programme. This has been substantially discussed in LI as well but ofc the mediocrity showcased here won’t let you know that.
Some threads that can help you:-
https://www.legallyindia.com/convos/topic/261752-jd-vs-llm-vs-mba-a-mega-thread-is-demanded
https://www.law.northwestern.edu/academics/degree-programs/jds/jd2/#:~:text=Northwestern%20Law%20is%20one%20of,for%20their%20foreign%20law%20degree.
One problem that you may face is the visa issue. So tailor your interview accordingly. Indian students apart from not being to crack lsat, faced another issue and that’s VISA.
Also LSAT as an exam is said to be (in American standards) more competitive/rigorous than GMAT. I hope this helped.
1) DCM and Structured Finance
- Manisha Shroff (KCO)
- Sonali Mahapatra (TT&A)
- Gopal Bankar, Nihas Basheer (Wadia Ghandy)
- Shubhangi Garg (SAM)
- Amit Aggarwal (SNG)
2) Project Finance
- Jatin Aneja, Deepto Roy (SAM)
- Hemant Sahai (HSA)
- Santosh Janakiram (CAM)
- Abhir Lal Dey (Saraf)
- Pallavi Bedi (Phoenix Legal)
3) General Banking/Consortium Work
- Kumar Singh Saurabh (KCO)
- Anand Shah, Gautam Ganjawala (AZB)
- Aashit Shah (JSA)
- Kannan Rahul (Trilegal)
- Karan Mitroo & Girish Rawat (L&L)
4) Derivatives
- Smrithi Nair (Juris Corp)
- Rahul Gulati (TT&A)
- Veena Sivaramkrishnan (SAM)
5) Insolvency & Restructuring
- Ashwin Bishnoi (KCO)
- Bikash Jhawar (Saraf)
- Nilang Desai, Suharsh Sinha (AZB)
- Siddharth Srivastava (KCO)
- Divyanshu Pandey (S&R)
6) Fintech
- Gowree Gokhale (NDA)
- Namita Vishwanath (IndusLaw)
- Probir Chowdhury (JSA)
- Rahul Matthan (Trilegal)
- Anu Tiwari (CAM)
Hope this helps!
PPO: They prefer lateral hiring. Interns are taken on a monthly basis and based on feedback/presentation or something may be called back as a paralegal and then a trainee associate. The chances of PPOs are less but not impossible.
Pay: Interns 10-12.5k not aware otherwise.
Indian Society of International Law
Centre for Policy Research
Carnegie India
Centre for Internet and Society
Asian African Legal Consultative Organisation
PRS Legislative Research
Migration and Asylum Project
Centre for Communications Governance
Human Rights Law Network
Naz Foundation
And many more which I can't recall at this moment
https://www.legallyindia.com/convos/topic/300654-topics-to-write-articles-about
1. SAM Mumbai is known to offer callbacks over callbacks and making offers at the end of 5th year/ mid 5th year, which again may or may not happen.
2. CAM Noida is very stringent with PPOs and doesnt usually hire (in this season, dont see them offering at all)
3. KCo Kolkata does NOT hire, shift to Mumbai ASAP
4. Online internships at a tier 3/4 is equal to none, they aint giving you work at all, assessing you tu dur ki baat hai
5. ICUL Funds- very stingy in PPO department
6. Singhania- pay too low, too many interns
One thing I can guarantee about Jindal is that the opportunities are endless but it's all about what you seek to achieve at law school. Jindal offers electives that are far better than any other law school in the country. Our faculty is known to be the best. Our placements are of course not great when you consider the entire batch strength but its necessary to note that not everyone joins Jindal to secure a job in law, a lot of students just need degrees to carry on their family businesses. While a lot has been said about distractions and ROI, I truly believe that you can do well at Jindal but that would probably be true about any law school. All of it boils down to your efforts.
All-in-all, if you need to take out a 30L loan, then avoid enrolment, you can succeed at other colleges like Symbi & Christ. All the best!
Maybe you can and should change.
In regards to your second question, I guess the following threads can be of immense help: -
https://www.legallyindia.com/convos/topic/160181-is-it-worth-taking-a-loan-to-study-at-jgls-or-save-for-an-llm
https://www.legallyindia.com/convos/topic/265788-lsat-results-announced-still-wise-to-join-jindal
https://www.legallyindia.com/convos/topic/234788-worth-taking-risk-of-10-15-lakh-9-education-loan-to-continue-at-sls-pune
https://www.legallyindia.com/convos/topic/175083-scholarships-at-jindal
Salaried/Junior Partner - Strategizing the execution of the mandate and attending client calls.
PA/Counsel - Answerable to the salaried/senior partners and handle the entire deal execution.
SA - Answerable/give the 80% finished deliverables to the PA/Counsel who handle the rest after back and forth with the salaried partners.
Associate - Due diligence, research, filing and execution.
Intern (Merit) - Assist the associates with the research/due diligence. Not given filing and execution work unless they are on assessment basis due to confidentiality of the deal.
Intern (Contacts) - Mostly their parents are the clients so they go for multiple rounds of coffee, 100 smoke breaks and are later given the PPO.
Then, under All India Rank 70 you can expect GLC/ILS.
Cutoff drastically changes in MHCET, and as OMS carries only 24-24 seats in GLC and ILS, so work hard and ace it.
Cut off marks trend past years:
2019: 110-112
2020- 112
2021- 127 ( As exam was very easy, they asked questions like, "Taj mahel is situated on which river")
2022- 110
Above cut off marks are for OMS, MHCET is a game of luck for OMS. No matter how much you are prepared, but this is what it is.
(I've prepared for various Law entrance, and got a rank of Under 50 in MHCET 2022, however, I gave this exam in 2021 as well, and even was more serious back then, but didn't got GLC bcz of 127 marks cutoff for OMS)
2. Never join any other college, except GLC/ILS. Even think twice before these two too.
Have a nice day.
Short, easy article
Long, easy article
Short, more complex article
Longer, more complex article
Etc etc
Same thing for writing. I found writing case commentaries to be useful practice. Even if you don't publish them your writing will improve and you will learn some more law in the process.
Anirudh S Krishnan
Nitin Kishore
Suhana
https://www.adityabirlascholars.net/shortlisted-aditya-birla-scholars-2024/
This is the first time they are participating. And they did participate and knocked out NLIU and Nujs and right ahead.
NLSIU as usual bagged the highest number of ABS scholarships (5 out of 7- not bad)
NALSAR and NLUJ remained pretty consistent. So as GNLU
Congrats NLU Delhi for making it into the first time in ABS.
What’s shocking is that around 6 people applied for the NUJS ABS scholarship and none of them got one! What went wrong? Maybe someone can explain.
All in all meritorious students getting selected day by day. Good job!
Aadhya Rajesh
Aparna Vats
Apurva Thakur
2:30 Manshoor Nazki, Cap marks partner at Indus.
2:30 and 18:00 Sandhya Surendran, Partner at BTG.
3:08 Sowmya Kumar, Partner at Indus
3:52 Brajendu Bhaskar, Cap marks Partner at Trilegal
3:58 Nikhil Chary, Corp Partner at Addleshaw
5:10 Manish Agarwal, Partner at Three Crowns
8:10 Neha Mahyavanshi - GC, Syngene
10:14 Shehryar Khanum, Ex-CAM, Entrepreneur.
10:25 Abhinav Shankar, GC, Dvara Holdings
11:00 Sneha Jha, Counsel, Golub Capital
11:18 Aditi Singh, Associate Partner, Dalberg
20:08 Vidhu Gupta, Linklaters
I will suggest OP to consider NUS after Oxbridge/UCL. The application link is provided above. Prepare all and all the best for Clat!
Rajshekhar Rao
Dayan Krishnan
Jayant Mehta
Tanmaya Mehta or his younger brother
Satyajit Sarna
Diya Kapur
Shyel Trehan
Balaji Subramanian
Samar Bansal
Aman Ahluwalia
Karan Lahiri
Aditya Vijaykumar and his wife
Anand Varma
Tuition per annum is £25,750 (https://www.durham.ac.uk/study/courses/law-m101/#fees-and-funding) and cost of living would be £9000, so cost per year should be budgeted at £35000, so the total cost in 3 years would be 1.05 crore INR, there will be some India specific scholarships but nothing will bring it down to half of the cost
the problem with pursuing UG in the UK is low availability of scholarships, they are few and far between for international students. There are some unis which have UG scholarships for international student where they reduce it to the UK level of £9250 pa, but there is no consolidated list and these are dependent on individual schools so you should look at each school and have a chat with the admissions tutor at all LNAT schools and ask them if they would have a scholarship or partial fee waivers.
https://www.nus.edu.sg/oam/apply-to-nus/application
https://www.legallyindia.com/convos/topic/264496-guidance-uk-law-schools-lnat
In the US, law is a PG subject, so only possible after 4 years of UG
Your goals matter a lot in choosing the place where you want to study UG law, do you want to settle there? do you want to come back to India? do you want to be a solicitor or a barrister? how much can you spend? etc.
Also what about Germany?
You are doing this to gain some short-term trade-off, but your core is revolting
I will advise you that you take some time to introspect and find what you really want to do instead of blaming an entire industry as toxic etc
There are people who will thrive in the same environment, let them
Don't put the responsibility on outside factors, it is your responsbility to discover what suits your own constitution
You look at yourself and introspect about what is the environment where you will thrive and find that
Then act with conviction
I wish you all the best :)
Take a bow Shishir. The trolls will find something to snipe at you with, but I hope you write on. So proud that a practicing lawyer wrote it.
Then there is Somesh taori who cracked Oxford the same year he cracked clat (AIR 83)
At 2.29 and 5.08, that's Alok Prasanna, Co-Founder, Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy
At 2.55, that's Divya Mundra, M&A Partner at AZB.
At 7.47, that's Priyanka Dahiya, public policy with the World Health Organization in Geneva
At 8.18 to 8.40, that's Suhasini Sen, very successful supreme court advocate.
At 8.45, that's Shivaji Bhattacharya - Counsel, IFC (previously Partner at S&R)
At 9.45, that's Sayantan Datta - Partner at SAM, At 9.46, Shreya Rao, Partner at AZB,
At 9.47 Pathik Gandhi - Partner at Linklaters, London
At 11.04, Yasha Kumar - GC of Innoterra
At 12.45, the moot court team:
Mihira Sood, Prof of Law at NLU Delhi; Executive Director, Centre for Child Rights, NLU Delhi
Anuradha Agnihotri, Herbert Smith, London (previously Partner at Trilegal in Bangalore)
Rohan Kaul, Asia-Pacific GC of Restaurant Brands International (previously at Freshfields and Simpson Thacher in New York/ London)
At 13.30, Mahfooz Nazki (very successful Supreme Court Advocate). Still a heartthrob!
At 16.50, that's Nandini Ravichandran, Pro-bono work in New York
2. International Organisations?
3. Full-time (not part time lol) research assistants at IVY?
4. Under honourable judges and eminent senior advocates?
Each story pivots around Edamarra Edwin and his detective-style approach to solving problems; but while each story is a separate episode, with its own thrills, together they all cumulatively reveal a lot about its enigmatic protagonist and the world he inhabits.
As a corporate lawyer, I found the book quite enjoyable and thought that the solutions found in each story were quite brilliant. A partners job is to know the law but to also know the situation better so as to apply and bend it as required to meet the client's requirements. Overall a very good read I thought although one does need to keep a dictionary at hand!
NLS, NALSAR, NUJS, NLUJ, GNLU
NLIU, RGNUL, HNLU, RMLNLU, NUALS, NLUO
TNNLU, CNLU, MNLU(mumbai),
DNLU, DSNLU, Nagpur and others - instead of joining those lower than MNLU mumbai, you can join any pvt unis like JGLS or Symbi or Christ.
Books
1. Securities Regulation: A Primary Market Offerings (1st Ed.) By Anil Chaudhary, Rajnesh Deka.
2. Fraud, Manipulation & Insider Trading in the Indian Securities Market By Sandeep Parekh.
3. Regulatory Mechanism for the Capital Market in India By Abhishek Mishra.
4. Agrawal & Baby on SEBI Act: A Legal Commentary on Securities Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 By Sumit Agrawal and Robin Joseph Baby.
5. Securities Laws & Capital Markets, ICSI Module, CS Executive Programme By Institute of Company Secretaries of India (ICSI).
6. Handbook on Securities Laws, By Gaurav N Pingle
Newspapers
1. Financial Express
2. Business Standard
3. Economic Times
4. Moneycontrol Pro
5. TheCapTable
Journals & Blogs
1. The Indian Review of Corporate & Commercial Laws
2. Centre for Business & Financial Laws, NLU-D.
3. Centre for Business & Commercial Laws, NLIU Bhopal
4. India Corp Law
5. Indian Journal of Research in Capital Markets
6. Journal on Corporate Law & Commercial Regulations
Magazines
1. SEBI & Corporate Laws: An Insolvency & Company Law Fortnightly: Taxmann
2. Corporate Professionals Today
Certifications
1. NISM Series I: Currency Derivatives Certification Examination
2. NISM Series II A: Registrars and Transfer Agents (Corporate) Certification Examination
3. NISM Series II B: Registrars and Transfer Agents (Mutual Fund) Certification Examination
4. NISM Series-III-A: Securities Intermediaries Compliance (Non-Fund) Certification Examination
5. NISM Series IV: Interest Rates Derivatives Certification Examination
6. NISM Series V A: Mutual Fund Distributors Certification Examination
7. NISM-Series V-B: Mutual Fund Foundation Certification Examination
8. NISM Series VI: Depository Operations Certification Examination
9. NISM Series VII: Securities Operations and Risk Management Certification Examination
10. NISM-Series-VIII: Equity Derivatives Certification Examination
11. NISM Series-IX: Merchant Banking Certification Examination
12. NISM-Series-X-A: Investment Adviser (Level 1) Certification Examination
13. NISM-Series-X-B: Investment Adviser (Level 2) Certification Examination
14. NISM Series-XII: Securities Markets Foundation Certification Examination
15. NISM Series-XIII: Common Derivatives Certification Examination
16. NISM Series-XV: Research Analyst Certification Examination
17. NISM-Series-XVI: Commodity Derivatives Certification Examination
18. NISM-Series-XVII: Retirement Adviser Certification Examination
19. NISM-Series-XVIII: Financial Education Certification Examination
20. NISM Series XIX-A: Alternative Investment Funds (Category I and II) Distributors
21. NISM-Series-XIX-B: Alternative Investment Funds (Category III) Distributors
22. NISM-Series-XX-Taxation in Securities Markets
23. NISM Series XXI-A: Portfolio Management Services (PMS) Distributors
24. NISM Series XXI-B: Portfolio Managers
25. NISM Series XXII: Fixed Income Securities
26. NISM-Series-XXIII: Social Auditors
Law Firm Publications
1. Amit Desai & Co.: Knowledge -> Newsletter
2. Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas: India Corporate Law
3. Vinod Kothari Consultants
a. Resources- Financial Services
b. Resources- Capital Markets
c. Resources- Corporate Laws
4. Trilegal: Knowledge Repository -> Advanced Search: Capital Markets, Financial Regulatory
5. NDA Hotline
a. Capital Markets Hotline
b. Regulatory Hotline
c. Regulatory Digest
d. Companies Act Series
e. Corpsec Hotline
Shubham Thakare
Navya Nair
Arpanjot Kaur
Ayesha Khan
Piyush Gupta
The people who got in were all rounders who usually had good positions of leadership.
People who got in usually planned in advance to make it work.
You need to calm down and listen to some Arctic Monkeys: -
https://open.spotify.com/track/0DKvcH4SCRdhVYTxStKx9h?si=jNLnHfheSTKYyQDY__mVHA
Here you go 🤌
1. NLS
2. NALSAR
3. NUJS
4. NLU-D
5. NLU-J
6. GNLU
7. NLIU
8. HNLU
--- Don't join an NLU below this ---
3-NALSAR
3-GNLU
3-NLUJ
1-NLUD
a) Step up hiring of good-quality alumni as faculty
b) Encourage students to pursue meaningful, non-corporate careers.
https://www.latestly.com/agency-news/india-news-centre-nominates-justice-s-muralidhar-8-others-as-members-to-nalsa-5537767.html
Shouldn't the international relations of a democratic country be influenced and take into consideration the will and the wishes of the people? Isn't that the whole point of a protest? To make one's voice heard?
You may disagree with the actual political stance here but you can't possible in good faith argue that no one should be allowed to voice dissenting opinions.
Our textual dalliance of wit and words culminated in a rendezvous amidst the colonial charm of Colaba. Yet, alas, it was not the face but the intent that was the grand illusion. My enchantress, it turned out, had a very real-world script in mind, with a twist that would have made Mr M. Night Shyamalan blush. I was quoted a clear-cut tariff of Rs. 8000/-, a friend’s price (it seems), for the desired company in the locale of my choosing.
The chivalrous (and almost broke) budding lawyer that I was, I found myself quickly mulling over the fiscal dynamics of this amorous enterprise. With masterful sleight of hand, I furtively inspected the meager contents of my wallet, followed by a fleeting glance at my banking app beneath the table's shroud. But the coffers of a budding legal eagle aren't exactly the stuff of fortunes. As the negotiation unfolded, I found myself in the throes of an absurdist play, where the cost of courtship had been unveiled devoid of any sentimental baggage.
So there I was, retreating to my grand 1 RK, poorer by Rs. 5000/- and my dreams of love punched in the gut. I couldn't help but snicker at the joke life had just played on me. In this bizarre bazaar of ‘lou’, buyers are to beware.
We have started out in 2019 just as an unregistered partnership firm to provide M&A consultancy only (Copy has been provided to cyber police). We got some clients & decide to start LLP business in 2022 only. In 2022 our website was very organic & simple looking created using google sites (Our hosting server & Godaddy domain details provided to Cyber police already) but we have decided to start full-fledged Law firm only this year in october (Our client details & services we have provided to our geniune clients already submitted to police). In last week of october 2023 we have hired a coder or IT expert to create a proper website for our firm with name barutha&barutha.com but he advised us that he can convert our old www.BaruthaLLP.com website into good looking portal in 1 day, with small fee charge. On 28th october, we have asked him to create a career section for some hiring of 10 employees only but he superficialy created large opportunities for which we have emailed him to delete it (We have supplied this email copy to cyber police also) but he replied, do not worry i will delete it & i am just checking the portal efficiency. You guys can also check our Managing partner linkedin page he had also posted about job opening but didn't mention any superficial number. After 10-20 minutes, he then uploaded some fake pictures & profiling of team members and this is the moment we came to know that he has misused us. Even he got the linkedin access of our partners because he wanted to do some social media integration with website and changed some of the Linkedin's profile pictures of our partners without seeking consent (Abuse report from linkedin is submitted to cyber police). We have emailed hi again & he again replied that some fake pictures will be better for attraction (Copy of email has been supplied to cyber police). We have asked him to delete it immediately and handover the email id & password to us but he never replied (Copy of email supplied to cyber police). He even managed to changed the linkedin password of one of our partner. Moreover Mobile number he has provided to us went unreachable. He started threating us that if we don't pay him 10 Bitcoin as ransom he will ruin our career completely. And he did it successful. On legallyIndia platorm everyone is showing hatred to us & even we have received so many hatred emails. we initially ignored this and started taking actions to strike down the site. We now came to know that he is from sri lanka. We have been honestly doing our work from last 4 years and have some GST, M&A and taxation clients. Why we will do this to damage ourselves. What can we achieve by creating a fake superficial website. It all happened so quickly that we were in chaos. We have now decided to file Criminal FIR and Court Case to proceed further. Even that hacker is constantly updating our page and seeking ransom. Our 4 years of silent hardwork completely ruined now. We are afraid that none of our partners might take a wrong step on his/her life. We want all the members please do not spread hatred. please listen our side too. Thank you !!
Views?
Further, this pseudonymous IP encryption key gets reset and thrown away every 24-48 hours, so even if we were really clever and really wanted to we couldn't deduce your actual IP from this after a day or two.
Of course, end of the day, you kind of have to trust us on this and despite our measures to safeguard your anonymity and using an encrypted https connection, it's theoretically probably possible for tracking at your ISP, law school, firm or Pegasus-spying or NSA level to deduce posts that you make.
In short, if you're really really really worried about this or you're leaking state secrets, probably don't use the internet, or if you are, use a VPN and/or Tor and other measures to protect your anonymity...
To youngsters reading this: 70 hours is a joke. Do your 40, go live your life. Your parents are the youngest now they will ever be, your relationships still stand a chance and your back pains haven't set in yet. Hustle and grind but never at a personal cost. Cheers to your generation and thanks from mine.
There is already an ongoing discussion regarding this very issue.
Here’s an article: - https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/jobs/cos-make-a-beeline-for-national-law-school-graduates/articleshow/5574180.cms
NALSAR/Nujs also did well later on.
My point is that if you are decided about law, make sure you crack the top 5 and then get your degree. There will be no remedy if you join other nlus. Maybe HNLu will also work. So prep well
Since clat is unpredictable, buck up your attitude for MBa as well (CAT is tougher but there are better MBA colleges in totality than law) for a backup. You need to smoothly transition into law. And if that means law firm, then you are on a right path. Your degree is your strength not weakness. There are a lot of people out there who did the same thing. Some other person suggested to take the CUET five year llb as well. Not bad! Keep your options open. Maybe give ailet so that you don’t miss the Delhi culture.
I am personally a political conservative and BJP supporter, but I want to intern with a left-liberal INDIA alliance opposition MP as that gives more credibility when applying abroad. I also want to intern with an English-speaking MP, as English is the only language I am comfortable working in. I made the shortlist below. I had Mahua Moitra and Praful Patel as well, but I have removed Mahua as she is likely to be expelled and Patel because he is about to join the BJP.
Any suggestions on who I can add to the shortlist? Also, more importantly, how do I apply? Do I just call/email their office? Is an NLU tag enough? Do I need to go through a contact?
- Shashi Tharoor
- AM Singhvi
- KTS Tulsi
- Raghav Chaddha
- Gaurav Gogoi
- Derek O'Brien
- Priyanka Chaturvedi
- Manish Tewari
- Karti Chidambaram
Imagine this- NLS+NUS….Employers and Rhodes will have an org**m to say the least.
Also the accelerated JD programme at Northwestern is pretty good (although good GPA and excellent lsat scores).
Check this one: - https://www.legallyindia.com/convos/topic/261752-jd-vs-llm-vs-mba-a-mega-thread-is-demanded
1. Read your memorials well. Some if not most judges have looked at them beforehand so you need to be on top of your argument.
2. Make eye contact with the judges - if there is more than one, keep switching. Observe our reactions closely - most of us are not pokerfaces and you will be able to tell if we're bored or find your argument interesting.
3. Elocute, don't read. If you merely read out your memorial it reflects rather poorly - why have an oral round then? You should have the outline of your argument in your head and only refer to the memorial or notes for support (say, a citation). It helps if you draw judges' attention to specific paragraphs or parts of the memorial - it shows us that you know your submissions.
4. Don't get flustered when you're asked questions. Practice with a friend beforehand on this. If you need a moment, ask for permission and take one - we won't pounce.
5. If you're doing a rebuttal or sur-rebuttal you need to engage with the opposite side's argument and provide a convincing response. Focus on the parts of the memorial they bring up during their oral arguments.
2) Although T1 law firms are lala setups where your attire/smell/bags/watches will be things which your peers, partners and clients will judge you for; be modest with your expenditure in your first 3 years but remember to look sharp and not shabby or loud.
3) Function like a team, help your peers out with bulky assignments, seek feedbacks and most importantly make sure the client and reporting partners notice your contribution during meetings - all of this will be factored during promotions.
4) Remember that not all your team members can be trusted as colleagues, simply stay away from office politics, bitching about people and opening up about personal details since you never know what goes against you in any given moment. In this regard, avoid too many smoke breaks and don't find an excuse to abuse alocohol in your system during team/deal closing dinners.
5) Lastly, do not ever get too close to an intern; if you know what I mean.
https://www.nus.edu.sg/oam/apply-to-nus/transfer-applicants
Here you go :)
For instance my parents kicked me out on my birthday. I have no incentive to lie here. It was a rough time and I was barely 19 at that time. I did odd jobs (like waiting tables, helping in plantation drives, sweeping sometimes and funded my law school like that). I won’t mention the batch and which nlu to keep my anonymity intact. I did academically well and till only two frnds know about this. I also got decent scholarships from college to flourish. Currently working at a tier-1 in Mumbai. I still did bartending as I didn’t want to forget my roots of struggle and tbh I will restart it again.
What I am saying is that no one will give a damn. So instead of coming on legally india and asking about a recourse- find out where you are good at (assuming you are a law student, pardon for undermining the sample viewership of LI), do odd jobs(trust me it helps the economy and respects those who are in the profession), and maybe for your own mental health- don’t contact your parents. But if you have already reconciled (which should be the primary step anyway) then it’s good.
All the best brother! Any help you need, you can text here.
One of frnds had to undergo a 2.5 year drop (clat happened 6 months early last year and this year as well for 2024) due to his silly OMR mistakes. He was a tad bit concerned about him being around 19-20. But some students informed him that it was very common and in fact entering law school around 19.5-20 has become streamlined to a substantial extent now. He cracked clat with a flying score, bagged tier-1 and no one even questioned about his age. But he did get a lot of hype (more than me) because of his result. He even cracked lnat and bagged a decent scholarship to go to a decent UK Uni. He became more famous. Use this situation to your advantage not as an unnecessary burden.
Thanks everyone who responded. I have read the threads that people have referenced here. You all have helped me gain a little perspective and have eased my worries to an extent. While I still have a few things to be concerned about, I will no longer dwell on my age (as a commenter said I'm not "prehistoric" afterall haha).
I also feel well enough to fill the registration form.
And if I clear clat, just know that your encouraging words helped me gather enough strength to do it.
Thankyou folks.
In fact one of the graduates whose age range was 24-25 got a good LLM scholarship plus now working at a magic circle.
Plus you can offset some credits after an exchange, get extra credit to reduce a semester (you may participate in an international moot and can have it evaluated - it happened with one of our junior batches) and even perform brilliantly well to spend the final year at a foreign Uni to negate the factor of ‘being old’. This can be a good ripple effect. But honestly you are relatively young. My advice would have worked for a 23-24 old incoming student (although I will never judge them) but you still have time. I don’t know why y’all are getting worked up for this.
Here you go 👍
There is a very beautiful response (and ofc others as well) by a graduate (current student my bad) from NALSAR. As you already know that till 20/20+ the first year is pretty much secure and normal as well. But don’t worry. There will be a couple of people who will be/who already were 21 when they entered law school. I can understand the anxiety. When I joined law school around a year back, I was 20. I had a ‘phew’ reaction because I wasn’t 21 yet- so I wouldn’t feel old. But honestly that’s quite immature. I saw a bunch of 21 year olds doing well in law school from the first year. In fact one of them is a topper already. And it won’t matter because anyway 50% of the graduates will be around the age limit of 23-25. You will be just a year older.
If you are doing well on your mocks - just focus on that and secure your career. No one will remember. Rather what will be remembered is if you get a single digit rank in clat. Right? Think like that. There are a lot of options (some uncertainties as well) in a tier-1 nlu. Don’t worry. And don’t feel old. You will be a year or a two older than the bunch. It’s not like you are pre-historic or something!
2) Creating dockets and backup security options for the BRLMs to the issue; it involves bearing the grunt of understanding the issue process and underlying risks which may arise accring to default; owing to which you create security and backup options - involves a lot of back and forth (on calls) with IBs, most of which is too gibberish to understand as an AO. Thus, reading intricacies of ECM is very very very important.
3) Understanding CIBIL searches, Watchout Investor Searches and Requistion CList Formulations since the due diligence report will have an aspect of the same (discretionary as per the firm's call).
4) Creating key difference tables when master circulars pop in: this shall include the "old circular number, new circular number, previous position of precedent and new material changes, if any" in that order - this is kind of tricky since you have to know how to read one circular as against the other and figure out what has been changed in a MC which has a lotttt of circulars mentioned. You get one thing wrong and you fuck up the transaction and the nature of disclosures involved.
5) Comprehensive PPTs on investor decks, KPIs, risk analysis and business overview - mostly done by foreign counsels but being well versed with the same helps a lot during negotiations.
6) Understanding the nuances of each chapter on the ECM offer document; therefore, a firm grasp of the latest amendments to the ICDR and LODR will be your bread and butter.
7) Knowing shortcuts on Word and Excel is a must because you will be working with IBs and allied finance tycoons which operate solely on Excel and not knowing anything here or there will leave a bad impression on behalf of you & the firm. Do not act as if you know it all or else you'll get fucked.
8) Lastly, please let it sink that after choosing this menace of practice - long hours are common, bonuses are slightly stagnated as against your M&A/B&F peers & chances of switching to GC/M&A is very sleek. Best part is that the work is cyclical and you will have days when you can go and tailor your suit, get that bag/watch for your next listing ceremony that will make headlines.
9) Word of caution - know what you are getting into since that life is not easy. You might glorify folks like Manan Lahoty, Yash Ashar, Sandip Bhagat etc; but trust me it will take years to reach that kind of level. So take one step at a time, seek redress if needed and learn to find joy in discomfort.
10) Breakup of Indian ECM firms in my honest opinion:
T1 Firms - CAM, IndusLaw, S&R, SAM, KCO
T2 Firms - JSA, AZB, Trilegal, Saraf, L&L
T3 Firms - CrawfordB, Bharucha, Rajani, SNG, Juris Corp
My sincere apologies for this long message but I hope this helps.
https://www.legallyindia.com/convos/topic/288175-nalsar-grad-kirkland-partner
its the LI of the UK
Are there any vacation schemes I can apply after my 7/8th semester?
https://www.legallyindia.com/convos/topic/183992-suggestions-for-good-tmt-teams-to-work-with
https://www.legallyindia.com/convos/topic/274628-what-are-some-actual-technology-law-firms-with-good-client-work-and-how-much-do-they-pay
Threads that can help you frame a decision! All the best :)
My dear friend, your concern for others is appreciated, but it doesn't identify the entirety of problems.
The fight is for changing the system. Problems with Tiers are just one of the results of the flawed system. What Tier 1, Tier 2, Tier 3. NLUs are failing. And not just Tier 2, Tier 3. But ALL OF THEM including Tier 1. People from Tier 1 come and bicker here to prove why one University is above the other. All NLUs and not just Tier 2 & 3 promote exclusionary education system. You would rarely see people from humble background taking admissions in these universities. If 5 people out of 120 belong to such background, then it's an exception not a norm.
Fees: Every NLU and not just Tier 2 & 3 charge exorbitant fees. Rs. 2.5 lacs per year could be now easily called as average fees for NLUs. Majority of people in this country don't have an annual income to that amount. And one wonders why does a degree in law require such heavy fee burden.
Every NLU and not just Tier 2 & 3 have admin issues. While I may agree that the authorities at 2 & 3 (generally) are more tyrannical (due to lack of proper representative authority of students, no pushback from Alumni base), Tier 1s have not completely shrug of such issues.
All NLUs promote corporatisation of legal system. While money remains one of the foundational ideal goals of an individual, NLU system has struck a deep blow to the traditional practice of law.
Not to mention, how NLUs have converted themselves into a place where students with deep pockets, who are brats of wealthy advocates and judges, take over the system and virtually diminish the balance which might be caused by an organised system.
And there are concerns. You yourself can better recall and summarise them.
IF you feel nervous to retake clat, actively work hard here. Reach out to professors and practitioners on LinkedIn, most importantly your alumni who made it into tier-1/2 law firms (I am sure there must be some) on how to improve your CV and portfolio.
Reach out to folks pursuing LLM at a decent foreign university. Make new connections with T-1 NLU ppl.
Improve your writing skills and article constructing style. Work really hard. Maybe you start your journey at a boutique firm but from there you can even go toe in toe with other law schools’s alumni if you are really that good.
Best of luck bro/sis.
2) KCO CM Mumbai - mass recruiter, always hires freshers due to heavy attrition
3) KCO CM Bangalore - very small team, not hiring
4) KCO CM Noida - very small team, not hiring
5) SAM CM Delhi - despite the attrition they are not hiring
6) SAM CM Mumbai/Delhi NCR - offered a lot of callbacks, might be looking to hire
7) JSA CM Mumbai - laterals preferred, freshers not entertained, not hiring
8) JSA CM Delhi NCR - very small team, not hiring
9) Bharucha CM Mumbai - very small team, not hiring
10) S&R CM Mumbai - very selective for internships, no clue
11) CAM CM Mumbai - very selective for internships, no clue
12) TT&A CM Mumbai - very selective for internships, no clue
13) L&L CM Delhi - not hiring because of huge intake last year
14) Trilegal CM Mumbai - simply avoid, too many people, very little work, no clue about hiring
15) Saraf CM Mumbai - not hiring
I still remember the hate these women got for some prizes they won, like why? They won legendary cases. Its the same hate i see with Greta Thunberg, Malala and all other such women that they didn't do much and use the women card. Its weird because women like mother Teresa and Aung Syu ki who took more traditional and "silent" roles were applauded more, while revolutionary women are seen as disrupting the world or talking nonsense. As for men, they can do anything and still take the whole credit.
Also they have definitely argued the best arguments, not just for today but previous judgments as well and have been more successful than the likes of male lawyers, who dont get this hate.
Can you look at the facts with more maturity and comment?
https://www.barandbench.com/news/breaking-supreme-court-to-pronounce-judgment-in-same-sex-marriage-case-tomorrow
https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/supreme-court-to-deliver-verdict-on-legality-of-same-sex-marriage-tomorrow-101697459951685.html
First of all, you're framing your question wrong. It's not just about what to order. The more important thing is what NOT to do. You need to just get the basics right, and not be laughed at.
Here's everything you need to know.
1. First, as someone said, only wine, whiskey and gin carry cachet.
2. Do not order beer. This is the easiest way to appear nouveau riche/ clueless. Only college kids order it. There are plausible exceptions for craft beer and other hipster things, but its easiest to just ignore beer.
3. Do not order rum. This is the second easiest way to appear clueless. Only college kids order it. Work meetings are the wrong time to revert to Old Monk Nostalgia from college. Again, there are exceptions like Kraken and some Spanish rum, but that is for advanced drinkers, so avoid for now.
3. Do not order vodka. This is the third easiest way to appear clueless. It is uncool and has no cachet.
4. Whiskey. First of all, do not order soda. See above comments about college kids.
5. Only have whiskey with ice ("on the rocks"). It's also OK to have whiskey with some water, but just a "splash". 1 parts whiskey to 3 parts water is generally a good ratio. Any more water and you'll open yourself up to ridicule.
6. DO NOT DRINK WHISKEY LIKE WATER. Sip it slowly. The snobbish whiskey journals advise you to take nothing more than a sip of around a few drops, and let it coat your tongue, before swallowing it. A 30 ml pour should last you around 15-20 sips.
7. It's OK not to know the intricacies of whiskey brands, but here's the basics. Whiskey is divided into "single malt" (it is only made from one distillery) and "blended whiskey" (whiskey from many distilleries is blended into a consistent taste). Single malt is way up there on snob value, because of the "purity" and "unique character".
8. If you're a beginner, it's OK to stick to blends, but order the right brands. Price is generally a good indicator. Just download a few bar menus from Zomato and learn about different brands, then order things that are close in price to the brands I've listed below. But that comes with caveats. Firstly, DO NOT go for Chivas Regal or Johnny Walker Red Label. These are for nouveau riche types who dont understand whiskey, and it is mostly uncles who drink these along with chicken tikka. Order Johnny Walker Double Black ("it is slightly smoky, but not too smoky") or Monkey Shoulder. DO NOT order Johnny Walker Blue Label, unless someone offers it to you first.
9. If you're a beginner, there are some good single malts that are not too intimidating. Avoid Glenfiddich (pronounced Glen-fiddick, DO NOT say "fiditch"), since too many people know it. Glenlivet, Jura or Talisker are all good brands. It is also OK to order Amrut Fusion (Indian brand, but well regarded) or anything Japanese.
10. If the above brands are not available and you're stuck, don't worry. Audibly ask for JW Double Black or Talisker, and if they say that's not available then just pick something at random that isn't Chivas Regal or Glenfiddich.
11. Openly say you've mostly only had (insert brand from above) because you love the taste, but have not had too many other whiskies. Don't try to fake it beyond that. If you've done everything above, you've done enough to blend in (sorry not sorry) and not become a laughing stock.
12. Gin. First of all, the most important thing with gin is not the gin . It's the tonic water. Start by asking what tonic water they have. Fevertree is the gold standard, but Franklin is also good. Otherwise get Sepoy or Jimmys. If you don't want it too sweet, get Svami. As a last resort, take Schweppes. DO NOT ORDER SPRITE OR 7 UP OR COKE WITH GIN.
13.You can drink whiskey without ice, but you need ice for gin. At least 3 cubes, though even 8-10 cubes is OK. Use that to decide when to order what (time of day, weather). Generally, cold weather= whiskey with single or no ice cube, warm weather = gin. Daytime= gin, night= whiskey, but gin is also OK at night.
14. With gin, there are lots of brands, but there are a few that are "safe". Bombay Sapphire, Tanqueray, Hendricks are all good in foreign gins. For Indian gins, Hapusa and Stranger and Sons are good. Avoid Beefeater, Gordons and Greater Than.
15. Most gins are citrusy, so you can have them with a slice of lemon. The exception is Hendricks. You need to have Hendricks with cucumber, and preferably with cucumber tonic water. DO NOT HAVE HENDRICKS WITH LEMON.
16. Avoid cocktails, unless the people you want to impress are also having them. DO NOT ever order Long Island Ice Tea. They use cheap alcohol and you will get a headache. Avoid Margaritas and Mojitos. Avoid anything with Blue Curacao. If you don't have an option with cocktails, just order a martini. Read the room and see if you can order a pinacolada. It's also very safe to ask the server if they can make a hot cocktail for you, and then go with whatever they recommend.
17. Slowly start reading about whiskies and gins, and trying them out with friends or even on your own. Use the above tips, until you get there.
Hope this helps. Will do a Part 2 on wine if I have time.
https://www.legallyindia.com/convos/topic/274019-Chambers-or-law-firms-Please-solve-this-dilemma-
I am assuming you are talking about financial aid which can be handed (although in few numbers) by the college itself. Yet the total fee after financial aid will somewhere halt around 70-75 lakhs. (https://www.lse.ac.uk/study-at-lse/Undergraduate/fees-and-funding/undergraduate-support-scheme)
LSE does not have a system of streamlined scholarship offers unlike some other uk unis (like University of Nottingham,UCL or KCL). You can strive to get into these unis and then apply for a moderate loan once you get in. All the best!
We expect extra cautious moderation on sensitive threads like this one. Which means no rape innuendoes, jokes, porn references, body shaming directed to the victim, nor anything identifying to the victim (literally illegal). Longer moderation periods is not an issue here.
Please ensure this and just not allow trollish comments.
https://www.legallyindia.com/convos/topic/180714-my-advice-as-a-headhunter-to-foreign-llm-aspirants
https://www.legallyindia.com/convos/topic/209634-llm-in-the-us-and-opportunities-to-settle
https://www.legallyindia.com/convos/topic/213499-foreign-llm-and-bar-exams-grades-required
https://dalalstreetattorney.wordpress.com/
You’ll find all the posts at one place here.
Law School’s achievement of churning out 25 scholars has been sensational no doubt 🫶.
BUT
Speaking of world record - Harvard dominates every other university by a huge margin. So I really hope you are not trolling 🤌
https://www.rhodeshouse.ox.ac.uk/media/44935/2020-rs_number-of-winners-by-institution.pdf
Nope. He wasn’t the sole editor of that journal.
https://superlawyer.in/vikram-raghavan-lead-counsel-world-bank-work-experience-authoring-legal-books-articles/
This benevolent matriarch, let’s call her 'the Puppet Mistress,' was an expert at dangling dreams in front of these pros. She led this ragtag team of would-be partners in a dance of hope, always hinting at the tantalizing vision of the promised land: partnership at the firm they started their careers with. A designation to brag about and signal their arrival on the scene. These desperate dreamers were none other than the generously titled Associate Partners and Managing Associates of that hope-dystopia we loved coming to every day.
As the greenest sprout in this forest of disillusionment, I struck up unlikely friendships with a few of these wily old foxes. Our bi-weekly therapy sessions were held at the pride of Lower Parel, 'Ambiance Restaurant Ani Bar'. A place where Blender’s Pride with chakli (murukku) and schezwan chutney flowed freely, where frustrations were voiced loudly, and where promises of greener pastures seemed just a drink away. I sat there, nodding like a bobblehead, absorbing tales of woe and promises never kept.
Shortly after completing my two years at the firm, I started eyeing the exit. Then came the fateful Goa off-site. Between sips of heavily watered-down whiskey and the sound of crashing waves, the Puppet Mistress happily announced a merger with another firm. To say it was a bigger, badder shark in the legal ocean of mid-tier firms would be an understatement. Any illusion of our firm's autonomy was about to be swallowed whole. The only person who seemed to have secured a golden parachute out of this crash landing was our beloved Puppet Mistress.
Three months after this revelation, I had moved out of this firm, but not without pocketing a few friendships. Over time, these connections faded, with only a line on my CV reminiscent of that darkly comic chapter. Word on the street is that the Puppet Mistress took an extended sabbatical and handed her clients (and perhaps her puppet strings) to the new alpha shark. As for my old comrades, they drifted to other firms, which, for all I know, had their own puppet shows and pie-dangling matriarchs/patriarchs. The circle of life, I suppose.
For jobs- NALSAR NLS AND NUJS are almost par (barring the LI big dick battles which happen everyday)
Then there is a string of other T1 colleges which will give you the same opportunities given you put in work, with their own downsides ofc, like GNLU has a huge batch size. But these 2 are generally same tier- GNLU and NUJS
NLIU again at intersection of Tier 1 and Tier 2, you can go here without worrying too much. But not quiet the same level as the former 6.
After this SLS Pune and Jindal in herirachy (confirmed from treatment at internships, still you can choose these two as well)
For placements NLUO followed by HNLU and NUALS to an extent (trilegal goes to campus at NUALS)
Below this RGNUL RML MNLU are sold by coachings but vv bleak job prospects. Uske niche mat hi jaoo, infact in colleges mei bhi mat hi jaoo.
The top 5-6 followed by HNLU/NLUO should be your last resort. Goodluck
I believe my Post 1, Post 3, and Post 3.5 will be helpful for interns. My other posts are mainly aimed at A0s. As an intern you can read the other posts, but since you haven’t faced those specific issues yet, it may not make much sense to you. I may have some biases due to my own experience so please don’t let my posts stop you from taking a proper shot at B&F. Your learning depends a lot on how your team and your immediate seniors are.
All the best!
2. Would love to hear the opinions of practitioners, too.
Short term (1 Year) can include taking your family for a Vacation to Dubai/Singapore, Buying the latest Iphone
Mid Term ( 2 - 5 Years) can include Buying a Car, setting up your independent office, renovating your house etc
Long Term (10 years or more) - Buying Your Own House, creating a corpus for kids ( assuming you would like to start a family), retirement plans.
Basis the aforesaid, you can divide your income and start investing in instruments which give you return atleast 10% or above. You can start an SIP in equity Funds, (you can browse Kotak Mutual Fund's Website, SBI, HDFC, Motilal Oswal, White Oak) to get an idea about the estimated returns in 3 - 5 - 10 year period. Invest a minimum of 10K per month into Mutual funds to get substantial returns. I would however advise you to keep your personal expenses to minimum - <5k a month.
You may also consider investing in stocks of Blue Chip Companies - Axis Bank, IRCTC, BSE, CDSL, Reliance, HDFC, Kotak - (May by 5-7k a month)
Once in 3 months, you may buy a biscuit, keeping in mind the prices of gold
Rich people do commit crimes but they usually go to big lawyers. You may intern or join them but you can't be them on day 1.
Paperwork is tough to keep track of. Handwritten applications with stamp court fees is a major skill that's required. Court staff are usually helpful.
Examinations are fun to watch once you understand who's good and who's just noisy.
Quality of lawyers is good but as they don't make as much as appellate court lawyers do, they may not appear as sharp. But once they open their mouth, you know they have substance.
Everyone knows trials go on for years but actually sitting through those dates can seem pointless at times.
Your perception about procedural aspects change. When you read criminal law articles on livelaw, you start asking yourself simple questions like how much do you really know about FIR?
Judges are mostly very patient and sharp. This can't be generalized but without giving away location details I want to say that often judges are present but witnesses are not available - which means trial can't go on.
is one of the finest human beings. India and the world are a better place with him in it, doing what he does--fighting for justice everywhere.
https://twitter.com/tarunkhaitan/status/1710234622196637829
My advice, as our friend above has said - stay grounded, work hard, fee or no fee - do your best in all your cases - as that you owe to your client and live each day as it happens. Make a monthly budget and stick to it. Always try to save first for the current month/ week and if there is still something extra - save it for the next. Splurge only and only if you have saved for the monthly allocation for the next 2-3 months. The theory of comparative advantage is valid for us lawyers as well. No two persons, even if coming from similar backgrounds, will have the same journey. There are many factors that come into play. So never compare yourself with someone else. You are the only standard for you to compare. If you are better than what you were earlier - you are growing.
Lastly, relax. we all survive and there is nothing better than litigation - that moment when you stand at the dias and argue - it compensates for every hardship one may have faced to reach there. We are performers thats why we are litigators.
If you have already got your PhD from here, then you should start by applying for the various post-doc fellowships abroad. If you have got regulatory experiences (SEBI, CCI, TRAI etc.), scholarships and fellowships are easier to get. Also start participating in international conferences for both exposure and networking purposes. Several foreign law journals issue open calls for guest editors, visiting editors etc. Try applying for those too. It's an incremental process.
Have you ever interned at a firm for 4 weeks, but wondered what is it that you actually did?
Like you know you researched on several legal issues, but apparently that’s not what most transactional lawyers do.
Well, it’s not completely your fault. This is partly done on purpose by law firms because they are dealing with confidential information and they don’t want to involve interns too much. So, if as an intern you felt confused and you want to know where your work fits in, this post is for you.
For A0s, this is going to be a very basic post. The reason I’m writing this post is because our first brush with the banking team often happens as an intern. Internships are supposed to give you a flavour of what work you will be doing in the future. But unfortunately, most interns never get a proper understanding of how transactions happen as they are usually assigned some research work with no visibility about the transaction. Even if interns have been involved in due diligence, the scope may be restricted to only doing clerical work like summarising a contract or preparing list of documents. This can lead to a very skewed idea for someone trying to make a decision about their career basis just their banking law internship.
DISCLAIMER: This post doesn’t cover the work done in litigation related or capital markets team. Also, since this post is just about the process, this will be slightly boring, so I recommend you play the song “Perfect Day” by the Constellations while you read this.
Alright, so first - an overview. Broadly, the work we do in law firms can be classified as:
1. Advisory work (around 10%)
2. Due diligence (around 50%)
3. Transactions (around 40%) - with due diligence often being part of this
ADVISORY WORK:
This is the most interesting kind of work because it’s heavily researched based. It can be as simple as getting a mandate from a foreign client who wants to incorporate a company in India but isn’t aware of the laws. The client has approached your firm and sent 10 questions - what laws and processes are involved to incorporate a company in India.
Basis the questions, you research each question and prepare a memo and send it to the client.
Most lawyers find this interesting because it is:
1) Research based
2) Scope of work is limited
3) Timelines to submit this aren’t crazy as it’s just one document/ memo
Intern Overview: It’s like getting a question paper from your college teacher and filling out the paper, but it’s an open book exam.
So, here is where the work of an intern fits in:
An associate might call up an intern and give them 2-3 questions to research out of 12 questions in the memo and then incorporate the intern’s research in the memo. However advisory work is rare to come by in banking teams and slightly more common in general corporate teams.
DUE DILIGENCE:
This is the work mostly assigned to interns and younger associates. Sometimes it can be very mind numbing because all you are doing is preparing a List of Documents (explained below). Working on a DD gets overwhelming because you have to go through and review hundreds of documents. Since you’ve just switched from college, this can be jarring as you were never used to consuming so much information at one go.
To think about it another way, remember that iconic scene in Suits when Mike Ross meets Harvey for the first time? That scene where Mike is escaping the cops in a hotel and stumbles into the Harvard law interview?
Harvey is so impressed with Mike he says he’d hire Mike if he were from Harvard, but he can’t as Mike hasn’t even passed the bar. That’s when Mike tells him -
“What if I told you I consume knowledge like no one you’ve ever met and I’ve actually passed the bar.”
Well, you have to become Mike Ross. You have to be able to go through 50 different contracts of 200 pages each and be able to note down what red flags need to be highlighted to the client. If your partner randomly calls you into her office and asks you what issues you have noted in the contracts, you have to be able to say that from memory and also tell her which page the problematic clause is located (well not exactly, but you get the drift).
While reviewing the documents, you will have to simultaneously prepare a report called the Due Diligence Report or DDR - the final report is sent to the client.
Basically what happens is - one company uploads various internal documents in a one drive folder, and we lawyers are given access to review the documents. These documents can range from MoA, AoA, statutory forms required to be filed under Companies Act, SEBI, etc. to various registers required to be maintained under Companies Act, to various loan agreements, security agreements, shareholders agreements, any other ‘material agreement’ like insurance contract, lease agreement etc. to even things like pending litigation against the company. If there are items like 200 page annual report, financial statements in the DDR, then it gets tricky to figure out what to review, but ideally your senior should tell you what to review and what to skip.
As a lawyer you have to check that:
1. Whether all documents are in order,
2. If any form has to be filed, has it been filed within the required deadline,
3. What other forms/ licenses had to be filed.
4. If there is any pending litigation against the company, does it involve a huge sum of money, or is it under (let’s say 5 lakhs) a limit and can be ignored
5. Any onerous clauses mentioned in the contracts
6. Any other deal specific legal issues
List of documents: While all this happening, you also have to maintain a list of documents you have received from the company and reviewed, and also a list of pending documents that you have requested the target company but not received. (BORING WORK ALERT!)
Intern overview: Unless you are very deeply involved in the DD, you will either be involved in:
1. Research - Let’s say the associate needs to know the check if some contract is adequately stamped so they ask you to research stamp duty of Deed of Hypothecation in Karnataka
2. Review and Record - Maybe you’ve been given 4-5 contracts and asked to check dispute resolution clause and just fill the ‘seat of arbitration’ in some Word document in a table format. Now, this standalone document you are working on is going to form a part of the 200-500 page Due Diligence Report which is compiled by the team later.
3. Mind numbing work - As an intern, you’ve been asked to just download 40 documents from one drive folder or only prepare a list of documents to the documents in the one drive folder.
Hope this has been helpful for some of you interning/ working at law firms. I know even though it’s a great opportunity to work in big law firms, initially it can be very intimidating to work in such settings and we often don’t ask questions because we think it’s too basic. But it’s important to understand where the work fits in because your work matters.
Since this post has already become too long, I’ll explain the deal flow and the documents involved in a banking transaction in the next post.
One more thing - just to get an idea of my audience, would really appreciate if you could list down in the comments - what year of college/ law firm you’re in, and what kind of firm you worked/ are working in. This will help me frame my future posts better.
Dalal Street Attorney,
XOXO
Here are few things to do
1. Don't compare your success/ failures with others. Especially with those who have previleged background. Remember their starting points are different then yours. You have your own journey to complete
2. Instead of comparing the failures/ successes, strive to achieve excellence. Work hard.
3. Read. And not just law. Gather knowledge and information. You don't know whom you meet next and what conversation could lead you to a jack pot
4. Choose your role models wisely. There are several to choose from in the legal fraternity. While they are all successful, not many may be able to contribute to your overall growth. I don't mean growth as a lawyer. I am told Palkhivala was far greater individual than he was a lawyer. Similarly, Tulzapurkars in Mumbai are known to lead a uniquely simple lives but are legends in law.
5. Travel. You don't need to spend on abroad trips. Do a simple trek once in a while.
6. Lastly, if nothing of these help, read/ listen to struggle stories of other legends in law. Eg. Roses in December book of J. Chagla. You will find several you tube videos of others as well. Even if they are peppered for viewers, it leaves a hope.
I know these sounds like unwarranted, overused and abused advices. But it might help.
2. Calcutta Uni students get an advantage in that they normally join a counsel and start with chamber practice during college days itself
https://www.legallyindia.com/convos/topic/287255-rhodes-2023-keep-it-civil-predictions-gossip-possible-dates
https://www.barandbench.com/amp/story/news/corporate/kirkland-ellis-elevates-nalsar-grad-sandipan-de-to-partnership
https://mpowerminds.com/about
https://www.ensowellness.in/
https://www.mansitherapy.com/our-team/
https://in.linkedin.com/in/dreradutta
A friend of mine who has a son in the final year of college sent me a link to this thread saying that this reflects the doubts that many young people have about starting in the profession, and that maybe I should pen my thoughts down. While I have a more modest claim than others to weigh in, my little bit may help some lost soul. I didn't find a platform more apposite than this one, so here goes.
FIRST, the SENIOR DESIRE:
Many of the queries here are of those who want to join a senior and at some point become a designated senior advocate. Maybe its relevant to consider that there are several thousand senior advocates across the country and the large majority of them are not really considered brilliant - they just got to a stage when they were given the designation for one reason or another, but they are not in a position to command a great quantity of high level work or have an output that would justify a higher fee or even have the respect of the Court or their peers. As a consequence, nearly 90% of the designated crew do outstation and tribunal work far removed from the courts that designated them. Many are unscrupulous and do distasteful things, including directly approaching clients, soliciting work and paying commissions, not to mention choosing political affiliations to get some prominence. And yes, many of the so-called "successful" ones do all this as well, but each to her/his own.
Note that all of this is just those who DID make it to seniors.
Now look at someone who enrolled in the 80s or 90s with the light in their eyes of being a Fali or Soli or KKV. That young man or woman makes it 25 years into the profession while watching a few of his peers (less than 0.15%) becoming seniors while his/her own recognition has not come. But this individual is far from discontent. You know why?
It is because he/she didn't make the destination of a flapped gown the priority. They choose to have a balanced life with books and friends and fruitful relationships and kindness. Of course they worked - honestly and industriously and sometimes with great imagination. If the recognition is to come with all of that, it will. If it does not, at least you did not waste the most important years of your life yearning for a goal in which a large part is played by lady luck.
This illustration is not just fictional - three of my peers - Haripriya Padmanabhan (1998 NLS), Gaurav Agrawal (1999 NLS) and Aman Ahluwalia (2002 NLS) are the finest advocates I know. Whenever I have doubts in commercial law, in practise and procedure or in private law, I turn to each of these respectively. They all have everything that I believe a senior needs - integrity, intelligence, imagination, rigour, tenacity, wisdom, honesty and goodwill. I rate them higher in their disciplines than ANYONE in the country. Note the words I used - ANY ONE. I am in the blessed position where I can pick up the phone to literally any lawyer in this country to get advice or counsel, but I am not picking up the phone to ANY ONE else. The reason is that in my assessment, the senior gown is not a guarantee of the best advice - most times it is only a measure of indemnity for a solicitor besieged by an anxious client. And for some things like decency and culture, there is no senior gown. These three wonderful lawyers best demonstrate the fundamental flaws underlying many of the posts here which require correction: (1) Do not keep the senior gown as your goal, but allow it to be a happy marker on the road well travelled. (2) Do not believe that only working with a senior will be some sort of magical passport in your career - just look for an office which is not toxic and where there is a learning curve.
SECOND, the IDEAL PATH.
Friends, if I knew the answer to this one, I would have cashed in on it. There are broadly two routes that young lawyers take - they either start at the trial courts and then over the years move on to the High Court or Supreme Court OR they start directly at the court they want to make their final destination. As a Bangalore boy who started directly at the Supreme Court, I chose the latter. Over the last 20 years, I am happy to say I have found many young people (including all 6 of my current chamber juniors) starting directly at the Supreme Court and acquitting themselves well. Of course, we may not know the high skills of cross examination or the intricacies of a home food memo, but the system at the Supreme Court makes huge allowances for territorial peculiarities and permits some good reading to bridge the gap. However, as a High Court or Trial Lawyer, you get to spend so much more time on building a case from scratch, in making sure all the necessary grounds are taken at the outset and in poking holes in the opponent's case. Coupled with Tribunal work, these breeding grounds are second to none for a seasoned litigator. I dont knock either avenue, but I shed light on them only to the exclusion of a third.
My views on mentorship you can glean from this interview a few years ago:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=caRV65oSAzE&t=2s
[See from 23:57 till about 31:00]
THIRD, the OFFICE
If there are no financial burdens on hand, I would suggest starting off in litigation right away. But be careful in looking for an office.
The ideal mentor's office should have the following:
a. A busy boss - who has reason to go into court at least 4 days a week;
b. A colleague or two - for the company;
c. A decent pay - which does not require you to borrow
d. Freedom to do your own work - without any compulsion of routing it through the office or the boss
e. Reasonable free time when there are no pressing matters on hand
f. A boss who will try to clear doubts and not be dismissive of contra view points
g. Reasonable vacation spells
h. Sprinkings of Pro-Bono work, to show that the boss has a heart
The ideal mentor's office should NOT have:
a. A toxic atmosphere where one lawyer is played off against another to foster insecurities
b. Abuse of any sort - that is a complete non-starter
c. Associates being policed - being told not to go into courtrooms or canteens or meet friends, etc
d. Chauvinism, casteism or prejudice of any sort
e. Too many associates - this would appear to be only decorative and not really as a means to guide or educate
THE BONUSES (not necessary dealbreakers if absent)
a. If the office goes to multiple courts or tribunals
b. If the office covers a large swathe of areas - civil, criminal, corporate, etc
c. If the office has a coffee machine, cafeteria, gym, etc
Most important, below is what DOES NOT matter to most litigation offices that you apply to:
YOUR GRADES. Sorry, but thats a fact. Your excellence in cracking an exam does not necessarily mean you can process and research propositions or be innovative when a jurisprudential problem presents itself. Hardened litigators know the "Topper's Fallacy" well, and would be impressed only with good internships or written work that shows your ability to analyze and grasp complex issues. There is a reasonably well-rooted belief that a law graduate knows nothing useful until he starts the practise, and so the expectation of him or her is not a prior knowledge of the law, but an aptitude for court work. The evaluation parameters of the latter are entirely different.
Remember, this is not a competition - dont bother what anyone else is doing. When you are 40 or 50, you will regret having thought of it as a race when you were in your 20s. Each person has a distinct personal and professional journey ahead - tread sensibly and it should all work out decently.
I hope that in some small way these thoughts help all of you on your journeys.
All the very best.
Gopal
P.S. My reference to 3 NLS peers is not to judge or exclude any college - it is only to identify my own milieu. Each of you will have stories of a similar nature wherever you come from.
https://academic.oup.com/slr/article-abstract/44/2/hmad004/7202008?redirectedFrom=fulltext
https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/rouc20/current
https://journals.library.columbia.edu/index.php/cja/article/view/11115
There are plenty of other students who have published at peer review journals like NLU Delhi Journal of Legal Studies, NUJS Law Review and more...
Batch of 2026 is exceptional for sure
Alternatively, I have the option to join a good chamber as a long-term intern and slog there.
What should I do?
[Side question: Would having long-term internship experience at chambers help me get a job under the disputes team of a law firm?]
Follow this for more updates. The application date already closed around 1st August 2023. So the results will be declared around late September or November maybe.
This has been the tradition for 2020 , 2021 and 2022.