Read 30 comments as:
Filter By
Hello, so I have a friend (Muslim woman) who recently started wearing hijab but she's quite worried whether firms would allow her to do so. Asking on her behalf as she has no clue what LI is
CAM has a policy against any overt religious accessories.
Hope that applies to vermilion/bangles on married women, rings by all genders, and lockets etc.
As much as I have issues with CAM i call bull shit on this!

There have been blue eyed kids of the firm who had some form of hijab and it was nothing. Stop spreading bullshit.
During my internship orientation, the HR told me to keep my Christian cross chain tucked under my shirt, citing a policy against "overt religious accessories"
We have stringent anti-discrimination policies. She can work at JSA, provided she's good enough for us :)
How can someone with 3Year Lit experience , but no internship become JSA corporate worthy ?

Prime reason to stop litigation is that I have started to dislike courts.
Crap. One JSA EP is known for telling women to not put vermilion or wear bangles.
so a full burqa (face visable) is out of bounds I'm guessing?
It's funny to see the RW bigots fuming and downvoting these comments, but not being able to do anything to change firm policy for the worse.
Why so many downvotes on this?

"But people are retarded"

- Osho
Islamic colonization was worse than white mans. Speak louder for it too
A full hijab should definitely not be allowed. It is oppressive to women. Why should any organisation permit misogyny. At best a headscarf, with professional corporate attire.
You don't get to choose what's oppressive for women. Let the woman choose what she wants.
A 22-word comment posted 2 years ago was not published.
A 16-word comment posted 2 years ago was not published.
Please don't feed the bigoted troll, the previous post has been unpublished.
Not the person who wrote that comment but I don't agree with the second point. Why drag in colonialism into everything? It is not that the lifestyle choices of "ancestors" are superior in any manner, when they had done their own share of oppression.
Hijab is not Indian tradition. Islamic rulers were colonialism too.
There's no one Indian tradition. Educate yourself better. Hindu Brahminical tradition is not the same as Indian tradition.
A 12-word comment posted 2 years ago was not published.
A 4-word comment posted 2 years ago was not published.
A 14-word comment posted 2 years ago was not published.
A 18-word comment posted 2 years ago was not published.
A 9-word comment posted 2 years ago was not published.
A 22-word comment posted 2 years ago was not published.
A 47-word comment posted 2 years ago was not published.