My opinion may seem biased but I will try to be impartial as possible.

Fee structure: - Regardless of how rich you are, the fee structure will always be an issue in terms of decision-making. GNLU is bloody expensive, one of my juniors mentioned that it’s apparently 14k USD 💀 for just the tution fees. NUJS on the other hand, has an advantage as the total course fee won’t exceed 45-50 lakhs over the course of your duration. The ROI will be automatically a bit better

Placements: - I always keep on saying this that NUJS has an exceptional placement record. It has a slight edge over GNLU in terms of domestic placements, still, the difference is quite marginal. Plus within the T-1 NLU cohort, there isn’t much of a difference with regards to placements.

Scholarships: - GNLU wins hands down here, you will get a variety of academic scholarships, they have a separate scholarship dedicated to litigation and most importantly some of them don’t even need the income criteria. NUJS lacks a concrete scholarship which can dampen your chances of motivation, considering you are the NRI-S student.

Infrastructure: - As I have heard from my pals, the NUJS BH isn’t that pathetic. It’s tolerable, some rooms are nice while some other rooms are comparatively pale. The GH is terrible btw, however, from the second year everything gets sorted. My biased mentality will creep in here. Please don’t choose a college based on Infra, doesn’t make complete sense. If you are really into luxury, then GNLU can’t offer that either, some rooms are still cramped up.

Location: - Gandhinagar is growing, no doubt about it. But, again by the time you graduate, you are still gonna be hopped up on Kolkata as nujs is still stable and it’s anyway in the heart of Cal.

Final verdict: - Nujs wins, considering your situation, I still feel nujs makes more sense compared to GNLU, although again the difference between them is marginal. Yet for a NRI-S candidate, nujs is proving to be more fruitful.

Where they are coming from is probably how any minority feels when they are sexually shunned. But they should not have said that to you. Personally, I had a wake up call when a friend pointed out that the people I seem to prefer are all upper caste, but they just observed it without calling me casteist. The observation made me reflect and over time change.

You'll do fine OP. It can be difficult to filter out emotions triggered by other people's lashing out and it is human to want to protect oneself. You are already getting there. Remember that you can work to understand why they are angry and where they are coming from without presenting yourself as a target for their anger. I think you are a kind person that hope that you run into more people who see and value your kindness.

Op here, I actually have been called transphobic by a non-binary friend for exactly this. They asked me, "Would you date a trans man?" And I answered with a vague "I don't know... " and they immediately went "If you're a straight woman you have to date trans men, it's extremely transphobic to not be willing to date trans men."

Now, I acknowledge what other people have said, that letting resentment build and then saying hostile things anonymously is not helping anyone. It's possible that the non-binary people I know are just bad people, and not necessarily because of their gender. This thread has given me a lot to think about and read up on.

I don't fully know what my stance is on this issue. I still think that there's a large overlap between difficult mental illnesses like bpd (really hard for the people around them to handle!) and identifying as non-binary. Whether one causes the other, I have no idea. Not my place to comment on this, I understand.

I'm less angry now than when I first started this thread, time and space really helps. Anyway, thank you to everyone who gave me perspective! Some of the recommendations of material to read has been really illuminating. @LI I'm sorry this thread became an extremely angry and hostile space, I honestly wasn't trying to stir up some controversy. Surrounded by enough drama as it is, definitely don't want more.

I will be joining a T1 firm. The practice area is not finalised yet but most likely Gen Corp. I want to know what should I keep in mind before starting? Is there anything I should read up, practice, basically anything? I have not worked in Gen Corp a lot and I'm pretty clueless about what kind of work I'll be expected to deliver.

I want to perform good. In spite of all the toxicity, long hours, etc. I really want to give my best shot at this. I am come from a lower middle class background and the money is very very important to me. I don't want to look or sound stupid when I go there. I am already very intimated by the kind of people you find at T1 firms.

Even non-work related tips would help. Anything I should read/learn/do to fit in well in the firm? Things that are appreciated/frowned upon. Please don't put trollish responses. I really need some valuable inputs. Sincere responses here will decide how I spend my days before joining. Will be grateful to the LI community 🙏

Also, Mods I feel a lot of kids are in the same boat currently. Could you please mark this as featured so that more people can benefit from this thread? Thanks a lot.

They were a little sad in 2019 when I got my results, but they've just asked me to keep my head down and focus in the T2 NLU I got. They were just sad because all of us knew I had it in me to get to NLS, I just got burnt out due to multiple exams I was forced to take + other family stuff + exam hall shenanigans (the invigilator fucking brought her kid to the hall + the person beside me kept trying to ask for my watch, he was a very weird kid).

My family recognised that I was still in a relatively good position, just that I would need to work harder to get to where I am now as a recent graduate vs if I were in NLS. I am proud for reaching where I am, but I also recognise that luck was a factor as well in this shitty job market.

Even in T3, be in the top 3-4 of your batch, there can be no excuses. Your parents just want to be able to boast that "my kid went to NLS/NALSAR". Fuck that, you do you. Embrace your past, climb to the future.

Hi, need some help.

I currently work in capital markets team in a tier-1 firm.

Does any tier-1 or decent paying tier-2 law firm (or any particular team- corporate/capital markets) allows permanent work from home with decent working hours (no specific team preference)?

Wanted to understand so that I can consider shifting to my hometown for personal reasons.

Alternatively any WFH role in decently paid policy tank.

Thanks in advance

Your (probably valid) desire not to bear their emotional load all the time does not negate their experience. They may have serious mental problems resulting from dysphoria or the world's reaction to it or coincidentally. But then what? Does that confluence mean that they are simply attention seeking and that they should "get over" their gender identity? Some people have near incurable depression (or even physical illnesses) and their friends and family and caregivers may feel a tremendous emotional burden as a result. Should they simply "cheer up" or "get better"? I think that you are mixing up cause and effect.

I'm not saying what you're going through isn't difficult. The problem with your thinking is that you are attributing behaviours you don't like to one characteristic of the individual, that they are non binary, and then you are suggested that all non binary people are like this.

Firstly, all the non binary people I know are extremely kind and gracious about mis gendering slip ups. They are not about people who persistently and deliberately misgender them after being corrected but that is understandable.

Secondly, your people are probably reacting to their environment. Everything you are saying now was said 20 years ago about gay and lesbian people. Being bullied and having to erase essential parts of who they are got to them. It was not their fault. Anyone would react to being treated that way. It is your institution's fault for not creating a better environment for them. It is also your institution's fault for not extending support to them as they struggle.

If you are too depleted to help, you can compassionately express your need for time and space. Letting resentment build and then engaging in what is effectively hate speech against a whole group isn't good for you and it definitely isn't good for the person you refer to.

And finally, no they don't all come from privilege. The ones who don't just suffer in silence because intersectionality makes everything worse. You probably have no idea who they are and may be saying these very hurtful, dehumanizing things to them.

Everyone is aware of influential political, economical and sociological philosophers like Socrates, Aristotle, Keynes, Marx, Hegel etc. However, when it comes to law, who would you put on your Mt Rushmore of legal philosophers? They could be ancient, mediaeval or modern. They could be foreign or Indian. They could be from any legal field.

Mine would be Aristotle, Groitus, Austin and Dworkin.

OP says they want to understand but instead of looking up the question and reading it, writes this post that undermines non-binary people suggesting they have mental health problems! You can't start a respectful conversation after calling your interlocutor potentially crazy.
If you are truly interested in understanding, please read Judith Butler. You can start here https://www.jstor.org/stable/3207893?origin=JSTOR-pdf&seq=3

Bear in mind that women and gay people were all called crazy and attention-seeking when they questioned being treated as sub human or abnormal. Your second explanation is the one that fits. It may be tiring to understand and adapt but it is even more tiring to live among people don't recognise your personhood.

I know you won't think this to be an answer to your question. But I will just make this observation. I study law in England, so remember that when you are thinking about my observation in the context of societal pressures and so on, which are (at least in some respects) likely to be different from those in India, even if there may be similarities to a certain extent. What I have noticed here at least (and obviously my experience may not reflect what is uniformly happening across the board) is that some of the best teachers I have had at law school and some of the most successful and intellectually high-flying lawyers I have met - solicitors and barristers - are extremely humble people and talk about their achievements in extremely Deprecatory terms.

I suddenly thought of this question - what could an academic do to make their classes more accessible - and remembered something very important that I forgot to mention earlier. Screen reader software packages can't access materials shown via the screen sharing options available on the typical online meeting platforms (Teams, Zoom, Google Meet...). Therefore, if you are conducting a class online and will be showing any material using screen share, you would be well-advised to send it to a blind student in advance, at least if you'll be starting to teach in the next couple of years (these software packages might develop in the time being, hopefully). Please don't forget this, even if you take away nothing else, it can cause so much headache, both for student and teacher, if you do. Relating this to previous points made about listening to your disabled student and seeing what works for them while also making the most of institutional memory and knowledge, obviously you, as a lawyer (and therefore a non-specialist in assistive technology), don't have capacity to keep up with developments in assistive tech, knowledge which would help you greatly in knowing what is the best way to communicate/work with your blind student. Therefore, keep your communication channels with your student open. In addition to this, consult (where available) your university's assistive technology specialists/disability advisors on best practices in working with assistive technology. If you are at an educational establishment where the institutional knowledge levels on this stuff are low (i.e., the vast, probably the overwhelming, majority of institutions in India at this time), please, for the love of Mike, don't get trapped by this stupid chip-on-the-shoulder that is culturally present in India of being opposed to using the best practices in this regard that have been used overseas. If you want some (mild) directing, the Accessibility and Disability Resource Centre (ADRC) at Cambridge (the admin department there supporting disabled students) and its counterparts at Oxford (the Disability Advisory Service (DAS)) and at Queen Mary University of London (the Disability and Dyslexia Service) have excellent online advice on course materials' accessibility (if I remember rightly, the DWS at LSE has a specific document on its website collating knowledge on accessible document construction).

Humility has no connection with success and failure. Successful people can be both arrogant and humble.

Be humble if you’ve achieved something. People get brownie points for “not” doing something they have the power to do.

OTOH, if you’ve not achieved anything, don’t be humble. You aren’t that important ;)

Hey,

This is my take on it. I feel that when people are humble in general, they are not irritating. They do not rub salt in other's wounds or put them down in any way or make them feel bad about themselves or cause trouble for others.

Same time you do the contrary, they will make it their goal to put you down. When you are neutral and not in their way they simply don't care, you are just another side character they encounter. But when you actually instigate/ boast/ put them down, it becomes their focus in their journey.
Everyone likes a confident person, Nobody likes an over confident person. It becomes their objective to prove the confidence wrong.

Thoughts?

Better him than that ▮▮▮ ▮▮▮ ▮▮▮.

https://www.barandbench.com/news/kapil-sibal-contest-scba-president-two-decades

Don't listen to the naysayers and pessimists here. As a lawyer or someone associated with the law, our job literally requires us to read more than any other profession. So definitely expand your reading. What's the worst that can happen ? You'll disagree and criticise the author. The best that can happen is you'll learn something new or be inspired. Never limit reading and researching based on your opinions, perspective or ideologies. Read as much as you can. The best jurists, advocates and academics that I've met are well read across the field, irrespective of ideology. Don't box yourself in what anyone says. Plus if it's someone from a different ideology than that's even more important to read as it challenges your perspective and strengthens your beliefs. Don't listen to the echo chamber idiots.

Having gotten a PPO from a Tier 1 firm (interned via Recruitment Committee) I can tell you what NOT to do. In other words, things which have ABSOLUTELY ZERO value to your prospects or your network and might actually have negative value because it annoys people and they may remove you from their network and just generally take you less seriously.

1. Do NOT post stupid posts like "happy to share I have received an internship offer from xyz", or "share your new position" as an intern with your "network". Only one kind of post is decent enough for people not to hate you and that's a post-internship post where you thank folks in your team and HR and summarise what you did or learnt. Please don't be cringy enough to upload your internship certificates either as posts or in your profile.

2. Do NOT like random posts by others (like the above, jokes {yes even law related} and "my struggle" posts that don't culminate in some specific recent achievements or selfies by attractive people in formals posted purely to increase engagement). People unfollow you and might even remove you as a connection.

3. When you post an internship on your profile, also mention your team and a few lines on the work you did.

4. Please for the love of God have a professional photo and cover photo. Using pictures of scales (⚖️), suits/ties and collar band is extremely cringe and gives "class 12 CLAT aspirant" vibes. Please no selfies and no Snapchat filters.

5. Please never use the word "ante-penultimate" for 3rd year.

Not at all 'stupid questions'! The only error I think you have made is that your questions are predicated on the assumption that I have (or have had) to 'adapt' to blindness. While this may be the case for a number of blind or partially sighted people, that isn't so for me. I have been blind since the age of four, so the method of working I have described is my natural way of doing things, just as yours is the natural way for you to do things.

Thanks! Thats useful. To answer your last question- I think I rely on sight a lot when i footnote or edit- I dont use zotero so I just footnote by sight. Obviously I cannot remember what the citation is so I copy paste and then edit. I would think if I couldnt see- if I had to keep going back and forth in the word doc figuring out what footnote to put where and figuring out what the citation is over and over- I would get pretty exhausted.

Maybe its not awkward but it seems it would be time consuming for sure.

With editing as well, yes it does help to hear your work read aloud some times, but more often than not I need to see the different paragraphs and how theyre structured when I edit. I move around sentences a lot and it would be annoying to me if I couldnt see and had to rely on screen reader to know whats going on. Perhaps im not taking into account how well people can adapt.

In any case Im glad you find these tasks to be doable and not too cumbersome. Good Luck to you! and thanks for answering stupid questions!

First of all, thank you. Absolutely, LI should really be given credit for publishing this and for asking good questions themselves (and this is before giving them credit for allowing lengthy comments/responses, a lot of the questions here are very thoughtful indeed and deserve good answers).

Second, I am sorry we didn't get to read your (non-abusive, of course) pun! Laughter is always a nice way to smash barriers, of whatever type. Call me ghoulish if you like, but I actually kind of want to read some of those comments marked "trollish" and placed into the "unpublished" pipeline by mods (out of a morbid sense of curiosity just to see how badly those people would have embarrassed themselves if they had been published) :)). Also, I am glad that you seem to have learned/taken away something useful from this yourself.

I think the following points of broad, general advice should help you to a certain extent (apologies, I know this is a lot to read):

1. If you work at an institution with reasonably good accessibility infrastructure and a good disability service (I know this sounds largely like an institution in the west at this point, but let's go with it for the sake of argument, as such things should slowly be coming to India, and this point would translate well if you were to work as an academic in the west), follow all reasonable/sensible advice you receive from those in your institutional administration to make your teaching materials accessible. For example, if they tell you that the best accessibility practice would be to upload/assign a PDF as a reading on a Virtual Learning Environment after putting it through SensusAccess or some equivalent accessibility conversion package first that converts image-based PDFs into accessible typed text, it might be better to just do it, rather than see it as “another useless request from the administration”. Remember if you don’t, your student will have to, only increasing the unfair burden on them. At the same time, use your discretion wisely and follow your instincts. Ask yourself, "Is this advice necessarily the best way to do things for a blind person?". This might especially arise if, for example, a document with lots of Mathematical symbols is involved. Therefore, in one sentence, listen to your student, good advice on accessibility practices and your instincts.

2. I think any student with support needs would appreciate if you asked them what they needed in a classroom to better facilitate their learning. Even if you know, just ask, because the answer might be different from blind student to blind student, as not all blind students are the same (one may have a tiny amount of vision where another has none, one might have learned Braille where another hasn’t, one may choose to ask a fellow student to support them by being a notetaker while another might be able to juggle hearing the professor speak while at the same time typing out their notes and listening to the screen reader… you get the point, we aren’t a monolith). But never, ever, ask about or discuss things like accessibility or exam/assessment adjustments in front of other students. You are opening your future blind/disabled student up to potential humiliation and bullying, which you don’t want. In addition, if you are going to do some kind of exercise that may not be the typical back-and-forth of students discussing and answering the teacher’s questions, e.g., getting a student to read something aloud, ask again in advance how your blind student can/will do it. To go with the reading aloud example, some blind people may not find it easy to read aloud, either because they haven’t learned Braille/don’t use it often or find it hard to coordinate between listening to a screen reader, while at the same time reading, which might make them feel embarrassed or humiliated in participating in such an exercise.

3. Learn to be as verbal as you possibly can. Remember, everything you do visually (writing on a board, illustrating how price elasticity of demand works etc.) has to now be described. Get very good at describing in a way which isn’t spoon-feeding. One very embarrassing thing that often happens in classes with blind students is that, when there is a show of hands to answer a question, the teacher says ‘yes’ while looking at/pointing to the blind student. This will leave a blind student confused as to whether you want them to answer or not, leading to awkward pauses. Always say the name, or if you really have trouble remembering names, don’t break these awkward pauses with impatience; remember your student is navigating layers of judgementalism from their fellow sighted course-mates, in a classroom designed for and by sighted people, in conformance with the expectations of a sighted society, in a sighted world.

4. Returning to point 1, it is always good practice to let your student, university library and university disability service (if and where any such thing is available) know of what textbook(s) will be assigned in class in advance. If chapters from multiple books will be assigned, this is also fine, just let all applicable stakeholders know. This gives time for accessible copies of the set text(s) to be procured well in time from publishers if and where available, or scanned by librarians/disability support officers where that is needed.

5. If you are teaching a class on legal research/database usage, learn how databases are perceived by screen reader users. In simpler terms, understand how to navigate legal databases using only keyboard keys/shortcuts, rather than a mouse. Instructions such as “scroll here” or “click on the red arrow” won’t work, with workable alternatives being things like “Scroll using tab/arrow keys [where appropriate]” or “select the ‘advanced search’ option”, because screen readers can’t be used with a mouse meaningfully, and they read out the names of icons/buttons to their users, and do not describe colours/arrows. If you are training your student to use one of the prominent western legal databases (Westlaw, Lexis Nexis etc.), find out if your university/law school can arrange for your blind student to receive training from specialists who work for those databases who know how to train blind people to use them; if your law school hasn’t done such a thing before, get them to do it. Relating to verbalising and descriptions above, remember that stuff their sighted counterparts will take in by looking will often have to be told to a blind person. For example, the convention of underlining case names in the OSCOLA citation style is something the sighted will pick up organically from looking at articles/books’ footnotes/end notes, but something you may have to tell a blind student. Don’t be afraid to mention this as assignment feedback, if necessary. Suppose you are marking a Tort essay that is to be written using OSCOLA and you see that a blind student isn’t underlining case names, something they should have learned about in legal research classes, just give it as feedback, they may not have been told by a careless sighted colleague of yours and may not be told again by colleagues who may take pity or whatever, but instead have such things come back to bite them later.

Not the OP here, but spectrum is one way of putting it. Queerness manifests differently for all of us. For some, it is sexual attraction, for others, it is rejection of some societal norms, for others, it is about love and relationships that cross traditional boundaries of gender. All of these things also interact in different ways (look up "demisexual" to get an idea).

Also, there are plenty of resources online to read up about queerness, including several created by queer people or groups. Make use of them.

I am very glad you chose to ask this question. Thank you for your openness to feedback. Except for one major thing, my accessibility experience with LI has largely been positive. When I sign in with my username and try to view threads, it doesn't allow me to view them properly or comments in cronological order. When I click on a thread, it takes me to something called "Commentariat". I have to then try and click on multiple unlabelled icons which my screen reader just reads as "button" (rather than telling me what "button" or buttons those are) in order to view comments, which makes the entire thing quite time-consuming. Therefore, I choose to view stuff on LI being signed out. The workaround I have found for commenting is to change the default display username from "Guest" to "Blindlaw2003", as I have done in this example when I am commenting multiple times or responding and wish to be identified as a previous person who commented/the OP, rather than signing in with the account which I actually created, which has an entirely different username.

NB: If in any of the other replies I have given above, if you have received a reply from "Guest", that is likely because I forgot to change the display name from "Guest" to "Blindlaw2003".

I use a screen reader software both on a laptop and on a smartphone. On the smartphone, as I use an iPhone, I use the built-in screen reader, Voiceover. This reads out everything that's there on the screen to me, including when I type, and when I navigate by swiping my finger.

Depends, from document to document. I use a screen reader on a computer to read. While I say "depends", go by the following thumb rule: if you, an average sighted person, take 7 minutes to read a document, I would need 10 to 11 minutes. With very large PDFs (a typical book, e.g.), more time needs to be set aside. This is because opening a PDF with a screen reader isn't like opening a book or a PDF for the sighted. The PDF must be prepared (even if set to "Searchable" mode) to "interact" with a screen reader, a process called "tagging". For an 800 page book, this "tagging" itself can take as long as six minutes to complete, only after which can the PDF even be read.

1. Being given reading materials in an inaccessible format: Universities and their administrations should give better advice to members of academic staff on how to make materials accessible. I often receive PDFs that are scanned/image-based, which must be converted into typed text format, like the text of this comment. It isn’t students’ responsibility to make materials accessible for themselves. While academic freedom must be balanced, there should be stronger rules/frameworks surrounding when materials should be given out to students with support needs, made accessible etc.

2. Following from no. 1, better training should be given to academics on how to communicate accessibly (e.g., describing slopes of demand/supply curves in an Economics class).

3. Networking problems: I often find it hard to network on my own in various situations, because the nondisabled feel uncomfortable to come talk to me for various reasons. Law schools can easily solve this problem by introducing a system such as having a blind person be accompanied by a sighted guide in a networking situation who can help them navigate around the room, while at the same time, helping them find and talk to people. There are precedents for this being done, read a book called ‘Haben: The Deafblind Woman who Conquered Harvard Law’, by Haben Girma (the first hearing-impaired and visually impaired person to attend and graduate from Harvard Law School with a J.D.). She describes how the Office of Career Services sent a careers advisor with her into an employer networking event to help out precisely with this.

OP here. My medical problem is, unfortunately, genetic. So even if I wanted to, I can't do anything about it. Also, can't be a "real" man since I am not a man in the first place, and I prefer being soft, squishy and cute. Take care.

*Sad to see, a "Lawyer" jumping to conclusions without proper investigation.

Reeba Chacko is the undisputed boss. Nivedita Rao is also excellent. They are head and deputy head of the entire corp and M&A practice across all offices in CAM.

Trilegal also has some partners with really good work as well (Arjun Ghose and Kosturi Ghosh etc.) and KCO has a strong presence.

AZB Bangalore has had a lot of attrition at the partner level recently, but still decent with Srinath etc.

SAM has a growing presence in Bangalore with some really good corporate partners. But it’s a much smaller presence than what is listed above.

JSA and Indus also have decent and strong offices in Bangalore.

The above is purely listed based on work quality and not basis the toxicity and work hours.

As the subject indicates, I am a blind person and a law student, in my third year of my undergraduate law degree. Inspired by another LI thread and angered by the amount of ignorance and openly discriminatory assumptions I have faced, I decided to post this thread. Basically, ask any questions you have - any at all - on how I navigate life as a law student while being blind, my aspirations... or any other topic you think might interest you. I promise that, however rediculous or rude the question, I will respond as maturely as I possibly can. Abuse (if published) will, naturally, be ignored. Mods, please moderate comments (even obviously problematic ones) with a light touch, if you can. I'd rather maturely respond to ableist assumptions on my own terms (I chose to open the pandora's box) than have them papered over or covered up. Looking forward to responding to questions (if this is published)!

Some tax benefits. You can earn back most of what you pay as TSD when you file for taxes. Plus, allows you to keep your Bar Council enrolment active. You can't be a licensed Advocate if you are an employee on the payroll. Lastly, as someone else mentioned, here you are being retained and hired for your services (retainer being a contract for services; the contract and firm policies determining your rights), unlike an employer-employee relation (which is a contract of service; the labour law statutes and company policies governing your rights).

I am not going to address the substantive point about the BMTC. I will confine myself to addressing just one word of this, "immigrants". Heavens above! As a former resident of this city, I will say this: the attitude that the use of such language demonstrates is unworthy of you. To those who have felt excluded in Bangalore, I absolutely get it. So did I. I am happy to report, however, that I am now living in a place where I, at least, haven't experienced this kind of snobbishness (though it has its own unique problems). I hope I never have to return to Bangalore.

PS: If anyone wants to know how/why I felt excluded, I'll say only this: try to imagine navigating the city, either on foot or by public transport, either on your own or in company, if (1) you were to be completely blind; and (2) you have Cynophobia (have dog/cat phobia) (hint, Bangalore has a street dog problem, whatever its other virtues, also think about street/public transport accessibility).

I used to work for a Tierless corporate law firm in Mumbai. I joined the firm at a pay grade which was just ok. I agreed to the salary, as they said they would increase the pay much more within a year. I was anyway not getting many opportunities in my hometown.

I used to stay alone, it was a non-negotiable, in my hometown I had my own room, and it was just my grandma and parents. So I took up living in an SRA, I didn't have any furniture, zilch. I used to have one thin mattress, no gas connection, no fridge, no other appliances, 2 plastic plates, 1 bucket. No almirah, Used to live out of 2 suitcases and a laundry bag. I used to hand wash my clothes and iron them. It was a fuck all living situation. I moved out soon to Delhi after 2 years of living that way. Rent was almost half of my pay.

The other major expenses included, taxis, alcohol and cigarettes and food. There were days I had spare change by the end of the month.

I then started obsessively tracking my expenses, it helped me bring in control a lot of my wasteful expenses like swiggy and faasos, taxis and so on. Eventually helped me to build a bit of saving as well. But at the cost of almost no going out with friends, no vacations, no splurging, no entertainment like OTT and so on.

You still have some time left in law school. Pull your socks up and work hard on getting the very best grades you possibly can get at this point. Don't take this fatalistic attitude of saying that your grades can't improve - they still can. While the damage is, to a certain extent done, it can be limited or even undone to a certain extent as well if you can massively push up your grades in the remaining time you have. Maybe also try getting in a few more publications and competitions if you can, though I'd focus much more on the grades at this point. Do whatever is within reason, while being legal, allowed by your uni regulations and ethically right to get good grades - reaching out to previous toppers in the courses you are taking, asking professors to mark and give constructive suggestions on mock exam essays or give you feedback on where you previously went wrong, reading more widely than your law school course reading list etc.

I have found that the following works for me (caveat: grew up a fluent English speaker, what happens to you with English happens to me with Hindi and Bengali).

1. You could possibly have 'queue cards'. Little cards or pieces of paper where you have a key word or phrase about each topic or sub-topic you will cover written down. You briefly look at each card during your presentation and it will help jog your memory.

2. Speak in front of a mirror. Time yourself. If you've got a ten minute presentation, make sure you are doing it within ten minutes. Don't rush - by speaking too fast - or slow down too much. Keep on practicing until you can say your lines within the stipulated time-limit with minimal (or no) stumbling or hesitation.

3. Record yourself a couple of times. I have found that the knowledge that I am speaking for a recording is a realistic simulation of what I will feel when speaking in front of lots of people. You'll feel the nervousness and everything. However, if you can breathe, relax your mind and body and speak calmly for the recording, you can do it in front of a live audience.

4. Try summarizing (in the target language, i.e., the language you will be delivering the presentation, English for you) the topic you'll be speaking about to someone who knows nothing about the topic, if possible - a friend or family member who has some level of familiarity with the target language. As a bonus, maybe even do a mock presentation in front of them. Again, this gives you a simulation of what the real thing will feel like. In a good scenario, if your friend or family member is fluent in the target language, they can give you some feedback on your grammar, syntax etc as well afterwards!

make a list of universities in the UK which have full PGT scholarships, there are around 20 such universities, hint - start with the russell group and plate glass uni, no need to check with post 92 universities, do not waste your time with oxbridge scholarships unless you are the batch topper or within top 1-3 ranks

it is difficult to prepare a research proposal and do your llm in the same year, so make contacts with the profs at the place where you do your llm and start discussing ideas, base your proposal on the disseration, and show the proposal to some of the indian origin academics who are in your area and ask for comments, there was alist made by some commentators

once you have the proposal ready, send it to all the unis which have pgr scholarships, most russells and plate glasses have half a dozen scholarships each which pay international fees + stipend

I bill this client quarterly. This quarter, the client racked up a 15L bill. This client has secured favourable orders in some of the cases that count. There were no losses. The other cases, relatively, aren't high stakes. There are 20 cases in total, not just one. I have incurred substantial personal expenses for flight tickets, hotel reservations, stationery, printing/scanning, etc. I have to pay my team and external vendors too. They are being remarkably patient and I intend to pay them within seven days - even if I have to dip into my funds. I might have to take out a personal loan to avoid fiscal instability after repaying everyone. I have a hunch that this client is taking advantage of my being stretched and is arm-twisting me for a shakedown/discount. I say this because the client doesn't respond to messages about other ongoing cases. Also, because this client has cleared bills of other external vendors that bill it directly in these cases (including senior counsels). I get the blue ticks but no reply to my updates on matters related to other ongoing cases now. I feel like he's doing ground work to replace me and default on my payments. This client has only one follow-up message on this default. It was sent after two weeks (after the invoice issuance date). It was replied to with an assurance that the matter would be addressed soon. It has been some days since this reply. Has anyone been betrayed or arm-twisted in this fashion by a client after securing favorable orders?

What should I do? I still some have his very valuable papers. I know what you all are now thinking and I don't want to be that person. I don't wish to shred them just yet. I just want to do great work and be paid fully and on time.

A genuine question to the LI hivemind. I know a person who has been assisting my father in his chamber for a long time now. He is around 55 years, knows a lot of the practical aspects of law. He really wants to get an LLB degree so that he can practise in smaller courts and earn a little more. He can't quit his present job because he has got a family to support. I am looking for some lesser known college anywhere in India where he can get enrolled, pay the fees, but will not have to attend classes other than maybe a week in every semester if required. I can help him with his studies as much as he needs to do well in his exams etc. Preferably not somewhere that costs a lot (maybe less than a lakh a year), as I will be trying to sponsor his fees from my own personal savings as a student. This person already has got a Masters degree with English Honours. He is not looking to get a degree by doing nothing, but is willing to work hard on his studies, just cannot attend formal classes for aforesaid reasons. If anyone has got any suggestion, please be help. Please be kind and don't troll. TIA.

@Mod: Please allow the comments here as quickly as you can, will be grateful.

Buddy, folks at Google and Meta who thought they were changing the world got laid off. This is nothing.

Chin up. Apply for another job. Just say - you wanted to try out a new practice area/ field of work. Took a break in between. Don’t bitch about your previous employer during the interview.

Life is about falling and picking yourself back up. Topping in exams doesn’t teach you this. It’s ok.

All the best!

Try the following - books and articles. As you said "law and legal theory", I understood you to mean you wanted Jurisprudence/legal philosophy readings (apologies, haven't abided by usual bibliographical conventions, just listed stuff which came to my head).

Books:

1. H.L.A. Hart, 'The Concept of Law'.

2. Ronald Dworkin, 'Law's Empire' (maybe also try 'Justice for Hedgehogs').

3. Lon L. Fuller, 'The Morality of Law'.

4. John Finnis, 'Natural Law and Natural Rights'.

5. J. Lear, 'Aristotle: the Desire to Understand'.

Articles:

1. H.L.A. Hart, 'Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals'.

2. Noam Gur, 'Ronald Dworkin and the Curious Case of the Floodgates Argument'.

3. Kristen Rundle, 'The Impossibility of an Exterminatory Legality'.

*4. Eric Heinze, '*The meta-ethics of law: Book One of Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics'.

5. Brian Leiter, 'Legal Realism and Legal Positivism Reconsidered'.

https://twitter.com/SandeepParekh/status/1786264498505986201

He has not disclosed which magazine/website sent him the mail, but Google shows that a website/magazine called Enterprise World gives an award by this same name:

https://theenterpriseworld.com/sahiba-ahluwalia-a-rising-force/

NOTE: Not suggesting that the lady featured in the link above paid for publicity.

I think they aren't all that interested in this stuff right now. You might be doing a lot more thinking on it than they are :). There are local elections going on here at the moment (not the GE, which happens later this year). The UK PM is potentially facing a battle for his own survival, in case the local elections, which took place yesterday, go badly for the current political dispensation (results declared until now certainly show things not looking too good for them...). I think Sunak is more concerned, at least for now, about whether (i) the Tories win two key mayoralty contests; (ii) how badly the Tories lose various local councils; and (iii) if they perform badly in the electoral contests mentioned in (i) and (ii), if diehard anti-Sunak plotters can convince enough MPs to put in letters of no confidence, and, if they do, how to head off this potential coup. One of the only consolation factors for Sunak RN is the fact that, in the recent Blackpool South by-election, the Conservative Party, while being beaten by Labour, didn't come third - it was feared that one of the pressure-points for Tory MPs would be if Reform UK, a party even more to the right of the Tories, came second.

At least someone is concerned about the one thing that will impact the lives of most people who come and read this blog... else this website has almost ended becoming a glass door equivalent for students and jobseekers... :) no offences meant..

Sorry to say this, but SILF has won this round of the battle as well... despite rules having been made for the entry, no one followed up..

The Indian corporate law firm scene is likely to remain the same. Space currently occupied by the old ruling families will be ceded to new age gangs of boys, who will be no different. So sit back and try and enjoy the ride

Hi guys, hope everyone is doing well. I am a first generation law student in my 2nd year of LLB and I needed help, my areas of interest lay in media entertainment laws and intellectual property laws, I am located out of Mumbai, coming from a 3 year LLB and a tier 3-4 college I don't have much scope to get a placement through college or get into any tier1 firms, I have done all my corporate internships in tier1 or 2 firms so far and would appreciate any leads I can get on any media and entertainment or intellectual property firms that hire students from non-nlu/ tier 1-2 colleges and pay decent (non litigation firms who pay over 40k per month)

ps- please note that all my previous internships have been general corporate or Banking Finance related.

I am a banking lawyer who has worked as General Counsel/ Head of Legal with Indian and MNC Bank for long. Now nearing 60, i may be retired by my current bank in the near future.

Wondering what avenues/ opportunities are open for me and worth exploring.

Favour with your candid views and suggestions from various perspectives.

Not a lawyer, but can definitely resonate with you. Having graduated from a Tier 3/4 city and being an introvert, public speaking was always a challenge. One thing that has worked for me is the continuous/forced effort to push my boundaries and accept more often of such speaking opportunities. Ofcourse, you've got to start from a webinar before throwing yourself to a podium. Most important part is to practice and practice a lot! Be aware of what you are speaking and try to speak slow. This has worked with me and got me several speaking opportunities in a Tier I firm, where I am placed now. Wish you success in life and i am pretty sure you will overcome this soon. It's just a matter of time.

OP, there's just one thing you should hear regarding your experiences from anyone with even the smallest drop of humanity: simply, I am sorry that you faced this, it is unacceptable, full-stop. A few more things, however, need to be said regarding the responses to your comment where you have outlined your experiences. The amount of insensitivity and victim blaming (disguised as reasonable hair-splitting about definitions or what "actual" discrimination is supposed to look like) is as awful as your experiences. I am sorry that the mods haven't intervened in this and done their job properly either, by marking more of these comments "contested", "trollish" etc, and reminding people here about the value of kindness. They should be deeply ashamed of themselves. Very simply, you came to this forum looking for support, and all you got is more hate. Shame on everyone else who has indulged in this.

See threads on Chennai salaries

Chennai as a city has the lowest fresher corp law pay across India.

https://www.legallyindia.com/convos/topic/266717-highest-paying-law-firms-in-chennai

https://www.legallyindia.com/convos/topic/311680-meaningful-reviews-of-bangalore-and-chennai-based-offices-please-no-tier-restrictions-etc-if-you-know-either-of-a-great-place-or-of-a-major-red-flag-to-be-avoided-do-tell

Hi,fellow LI users. I graduated from not so known law school in tier-3 city situated in Hindi belt region and am currently working in a chamber.I can write and speak decent english but when it comes to presentation of legal things I fumble, not able to express/ recall things properly and at times I even go blank on a topic which I can easily explain in hindi.I don't know whether it is content or english but I am really suffering due to this and I really want to improve my presentation skills. Any tips on how to improve would really help. Thanks in anticipation.

I have been in the profession for 14 years now. The answer to your question is actually simple - learn to say no. If someone is giving you more work than you can handle, being abusive, intruding in personal life, long hair, etc. - just say no.

BUT, there has to be an order to things. Focus on being good/ indispensable in your work. I dont know what hair band you use or how you other wise dress - long hair cant be an excuse to look shoddy. Someone wearing red pant and green shirt (no matter howsoever formal looking and branded) will be asked to revisit his wardrobe.

Your question was a bit free-flowing (as if no one ever had this idea of keeping long hair during job), hence I believe the initial negative feedback. No one gives a crap how you keep your hair. Just dont end up losing your job because of this. In life, you will face situations where you will have to give up (hard earned) things that will be more valuable than hair. So, I guess, just take a chill pill for now, grow your hair, push your boss back a bit, then tell us in 6 months what happenned. Sounds good?

If moderators can't spare an hour each for moderation then we need a new set of mods. Some of us students depend on this site for actual life changing updates i hope you guys get the responsibility upon you. Other than the bs which takes place here it is actually used for good shit too this site.

Update: A hearing took place, as scheduled, on 24 April 2024. Liang was represented by NLSIU alum and Senior Advocate Jawahar Raja, AUD through Manika Tripathy and the survivor through NUJS alum Goutham Shivshankar. The judge (Justice Subramaniam Prasad) gave 3 weeks to AUD to file a reply and asked for rejoinders to the reply to be filed before the next hearing. The just listed 24 July as the next date of hearing.

Current status: 6 years, 14 hearings, still no hearing on substantive arguments by counsels. But at least some progress, so a decision by 2030 is possible, perhaps even earlier. Interesting that the survivor is not giving up but continuing to fight.

I am a reasonably senior IP lawyer. Earning pretty well and advising good clients in both lit and prosecution. Some advice I can share with students are:

- You need patience in this space. Starting salaries are low but will go up with time. Don’t be depressed early on if you get low pay. I myself am an example. Thought I don’t earn as much as a CAM corporate partner, it’s still very good pay. I started by earning peanuts.

- The top lawyers and law firms in this field survive entirely on foreign clients. Indian clients are 🤮 both in terms of work and billing. If you happen to be in a firm which advises mainly Indian clients, that’s not a good firm! Many small boutique firms have very good foreign clients. Join them.

- The future if this field is tech. Tech. Tech. Tech. You must keep yourself up to date with the latest developments in this space and get to know about the tech itself.

- Finally, just like in corporate law, there are some law firm owners who unfortunately are oligarchs in this practice area: keeping salaries low, promoting nepo kids and making no investment in continuing education and training. If foreign law firms come in they will hopefully fade away.

I graduated from a Tier-III NLU in 2022 and have a brief litigation experience. I always wanted to go for academia but low salary/ incentives and significant gestation period (do LLM then PhD) compelled me to not pursue it initially after graduation. But now I am thinking of changing trajectory and go for Masters. But I can't go abroad and can only go for NLU. I have shot for Tier-I NLU for Masters in coming academic year. But not sure whether Indian system encourages merit, as I see most of the professors getting appointed for posts through Jugaad.

Whether I should still go for it and try my luck?

I understand there is a dearth of information about niche practice areas such as TMT, IP etc., and I hope this response provides a bit more clarity to readers -

1) The IP practice in India is dominated by boutique IP firms who operate primarily in cities that have a branch of the IP office or a High Court that regularly takes up IP matters (typically Delhi, Mumbai, Chennai, Kolkata). These boutique law firms are involved in the bulk of prosecution work, which is the bread and butter of any IP lawyer.

2) A pure IP practice can be classified into three major areas - prosecution, litigation and transactions. Prosecution pretty much relates to all IP filing work (including responding to office actions, opposition proceedings) and corresponding advisory work. This accounts for a bulk of income for IP firms. Litigation, naturally, relates to IP disputes. Most firms work straightforward cases related to trademark, copyright or patent infringement. Since IP is still growing in India, complex cases involving various questions of law usually go to a few boutique firms who have a history of doing good IP litigation work (such as Anand, Remfry, Singh, Saikrishna etc.). These offices are primarily based in Delhi due to the IP Division having judges such as Pratibha Singh, who were former IP lawyers and have a deeper understanding of IP law. Transactional work is available with very few firms, but typically involves drafting and negotiation of agreements (licenses, assignments, co-existence agreements, JV agreements etc., that are IP centric). Such work is also very sector specific, with firms such as ANM Global, Khimani etc. dominating the M&E industry and regularly making production, artist agreements.

3) A few full-service law firms (T1 and T2) such as Khaitan, AZB, SAM and now CAM have fully functional IP teams. However, these firms (barring Khaitan) do not do a lot of prosecution work due to the clerical nature of work, and abundance of competitors who are willing to do such work for much lesser fees. These firms typically work on IP transactions (assisting M&A teams with IP portion of transactions), negotiating IP agreements and allied agreements for larger clients. They also tend to do a lot more advisory work across IP and allied fields. The IP team in AZB, for example, also handles a lot of pharmaceutical regulatory work whereas Khaitan seems to be doing a lot of technology related and advertising regulatory work. Can't comment on SAM, and CAM has recently started an IP team so not too sure about the kind of work they do.

4) Breaking into a boutique firm is SIGNIFICANTLY easier than joining a full-service firm with an IP team.

5) Ideally, one should always be very clear with IP prosecution before venturing into other areas of IP (including litigation or transactions).

6) The industry is slowly (but surely) becoming more sensitive towards IP as a practice area. This is also evident with the increased involvement of IP and Tech teams on commercial deals (go check any deal reporting by major law firms and see IP partners who have assisted such deals). However, understand that as a practice area, IP is very very concentrated and there is an over-availability of lawyers. If you wish to succeed and make it to the top (which is where the money is, unfortunately), you need to have a very deep industry / sector understanding, along with experience in allied fields such as TMT, Data Protection and Privacy etc.

7) Hours are not, as others claim, "chill". This is completely dependent on the firm you work for, and the quantum of work they have. This is especially true if you're working for a fullservice firm's IP / TMT team. Due to the smaller team sizes, the quantum of work often gets overwhelming.

8) Money, especially in early phases, is significantly lower than Corp Teams unless you manage to break into a Tier-1 firm. (Do your research about differential pay here too).

9) If you're interested in pure IP work, join a boutique firm. No better place to learn and do only IP work. Personally, felt that such work was very mundane and wanted to have a taste of all work under IP and related fields, thus chose to join a T1 full-service firm. Work is fun, regularly get to work across sectors including M&E, Pharma, Tech. This means work isn't purely IP, but also a lot of compliance, advisory and regulatory work.

10) DO YOUR RESEARCH about the kind of work the firm does. Boutiques may also place you in over-specialsed and demarcated groups such as 'prosecution' team, where you may be stuck doing purely IP prosecution. While you gain immense expertise in the prosecution field, I feel like you shouldn't limit yourself to only one area, especially as a fresher.

Just saw a similar thread for people teaching abroad. I would like to know about the people who are currently teaching full-time in the various law colleges and universities in India. Please feel free to contribute to the list. Kindly refrain from law school comparison and other related trolling. Here are the ones whom I know about. Kept the TLC/private university grads limited to post-2000s as that's the time most of the NLUs had been set up. You may add the LLM alumni of NLUs too. I have not included JGLS faculty here, as the number is high; I will try to post a separate comment on them down below later.

1. Aishwarya Birla (NALSAR grad, currently Assistant Professor at NLSIU)

2. Anupama Sharma (NUJS grad, currently Assistant Professor at NLSIU)

3. Aparajita Lath (NUJS grad, currently Assistant Professor at NLSIU)

4. Aparna Chandra (NLSIU grad, currently Associate Professor at NLSIU)

5. Arun K. Thiruvengadam (NLSIU grad, currently Professor at NLSIU)

6. Arul George Scaria (Mahatma Gandhi University grad, NALSAR LLM, currently Associate Professor at NLSIU)

7. Ashna Singh (RMLNLU grad, currently Assistant Professor at NLSIU)

8. Ashrita Prasad Kotha (NALSAR grad, currently Assistant Professor at NLSIU)

9. Atrayee Majumder (NLSIU grad, currently Associate Professor at NLSIU)

10. Balu G. Nair (NUJS grad, currently Assistant Professor at NLSIU)

11. Bhanu Tanwar (NLUD grad, currently Assistant Professor at NLSIU)

12. Darshana Mitra (NUJS grad, currently Assistant Professor at NLSIU)

13. Divya Deviah (JGLS 3-Year LLB, currently Assistant Professor at NLSIU)

14. Gauri Pillai (NUJS grad, currently Assistant Professor at NLSIU)

15. Harsha N (HNLU grad, currently Assistant Professor at NLSIU)

16. Kunal Ambasta (NLSIU grad, currently Assistant Professor at NLSIU)

17. Madhubanti Sadhya (CU grad, NUJS LLM, currently Assistant Professor at NLSIU)

18. Malini Chidambaram (JGLS grad, currently Assistant Professor at NLSIU)

19. Manish (NLSIU grad, currently Assistant Professor at NLSIU)

20. Meenakshi Ramkumar (JGLS grad, currently Assistant Professor at NLSIU)

21. Mihir Naniwadekar (NLSIU grad, currently Assistant Professor at NLSIU)

22. Mrinal Satish (NLSIU grad, currently Professor at NLSIU)

23. Nikita Ahalyan (DU 3-Year LLB, NLSIU LLM, currently Assistant Professor at NLSIU)

24. Nigam Nuggehalli (NLSIU grad, currently Professor and Registrar at NLSIU)

25. Padmini Baruah (NLSIU grad, currently Assistant Professor at NLSIU)

26. Pranav Verma (NALSAR grad, currently Assistant Professor at NLSIU)

27. Preeti Pratishruti Dash (NLUO grad, currently Assistant Professor at NLSIU)

28. Prerna Dhoop (KIIT grad, currently Assistant Professor at NLSIU)

29. Radhika Chitkara (NLSIU grad, currently Assistant Professor at NLSIU)

30. Rahul Hemrajani (Symbiosis grad, currently Assistant Professor at NLSIU)

31. Rahul Singh (NLSIU grad, currently Associate Professor at NLSIU)

32. Rashmi Venkatesan (NLSIU grad, currently Assistant Professor at NLSIU)

33. Sahana Ramesh (NUJS grad, currently Assistant Professor at NLSIU)

34. Salmoli Choudhuri (NLUD grad, currently Assistant Professor at NLSIU)

35. Sanyukta Chowdhury (NLSIU grad, currently Assistant Professor at NLSIU)

36. Sarasu Esther Thomas (NLSIU grad, currently Professor at NLSIU)

37. Saurabh Bhattacharjee (NALSAR grad, currently Associate Professor at NLSIU)

38. Sharadha R. Shinde (Karnataka University grad, NLSIU LLM, currently Assistant Professor at NLSIU)

39. Shreya Shree (NLSIU grad, currently Assistant Professor at NLSIU)

40. Smitha Krishna Prasad (Symbiosis grad, currently Assistant Professor at NLSIU)

41. Sudhanshu Kumar (CNLU grad, currently Associate Professor at NLSIU)

42. Sudhir Krishnaswamy (NLSIU grad, currently Professor and Vice Chancellor at NLSIU)

43. Rosmy Joan (Mahatma Gandhi University grad, JGLS LLM, currently Assistant Professor at NALSAR)

44. Sunishth Goyal (NALSAR grad, currently Assistant Professor at NALSAR)

45. Rohan Cherian Thomas (GNLU grad, currently Assistant Professor at NALSAR)

46. Hemangini Chandra Sharma (NLUJ grad, currently Assistant Professor at NALSAR)

47. Poosarla Bayola Kiran (DSNLU grad, currently Assistant Professor at NALSAR)

48. A. Sridhar (NALSAR LLM, currently Assistant Professor at NALSAR)

49. Niharika Salar (NUSRL grad, currently Assistant Professor at NALSAR)

50. Prakhar Ganguly (Vidyasagar University grad, NLUD LLM, currently Assistant Professor at NALSAR)

51. Prerna (NUSRL grad, currently Assistant Professor at NALSAR)

52. Nandini Biswas (GNLU grad, currently Assistant Professor at NALSAR)

53. Ishita Das (NLUJ grad, currently Assistant Professor at NALSAR)

54. Vivek Mukherjee (NLIU grad, currently Assistant Professor at NALSAR)

55. Varun Malik (Amity University grad, NALSAR LLM, currently Assistant Professor at NALSAR)

56. Rajesh Kapoor (Symbiosis University grad, currently Assistant Professor at NALSAR)

57. Sidharth Chauhan (NLSIU, currently Assistant Professor at NALSAR)

58. Ashwini Kumar Pendyala (Kakatiya University grad, NALSAR LLM, currently Assistant Professor at NALSAR)

59. Sourabh Bharti (DU grad, NALSAR LLM, currently Assistant Professor at NALSAR)

60. Shameek Sen (NUJS grad, currently Associate Professor at NUJS)

61. Shouvik Kumar Guha (NUJS grad, currently Associate Professor at NUJS)

62. Paramita Dasgupta (NUJS grad, currently Assistant Professor at NUJS)

63. Aman Gupta (NUJS grad, currently Assistant Professor at NUJS)

64. Anirban Mazumder (Burdwan University grad, NLSIU LLM, currently Professor at NUJS)

65. Lovely Dasgupta (NUJS LLM, currently Associate Professor at NUJS)

66. Sarfaraz Ahmed Khan (CU grad, NUJS LLM, currently Associate Professor at NUJS)

67. Tilottama Raychaudhuri (Symbiosis grad, NUJS LLM, currently Associate Professor at NUJS)

68. Faisal Fasih (CU grad, NUJS LLM, currently Assistant Professor at NUJS)

69. Sampa Karmakar Singh (Burdwan University grad, NUJS LLM, currently Assistant Professor at NUJS)

70. Vijay Kishor Tiwari (DU grad, NLSIU LLM, currently Assistant Professor at NUJS)

71. Surja Kanta Baladhikari (CU grad, NUJS LLM, currently Assistant Professor at NUJS)

72. Anup Surendranath (NALSAR grad, currently Professor at NLUD)

73. Roopa Madhav (NLSIU grad, currently Professor at NLUD)

74. Daniel Mathew (DU grad, NLSIU LLM, currently Associate Professor at NLUD)

75. Vishal Mahalwar (MD University grad, NALSAR LLM, currently Assistant Professor at NLUD)

76. Dakshina Chandra (NALSAR grad, currently Assistant Professor at NLUD)

77. Kheinkor Lamarr (NLIU grad, currently Assistant Professor at NLUD)

78. Dinesh (GGSIPU grad, NLUD LLM, currently Assistant Professor at NLUD)

79. Garishma Bhayana (NUJS LLM, currently Assistant Professor at NLUJ)

80. Ruth Vaipei (NE Hills University grad, NLUJ LLM, currently Assistant Professor at NLUJ)

81. Aniruddh Panicker (NLUO grad, currently Assistant Professor at NLUJ)

82. Vini Singh (HNLU grad, currently Assistant Professor at NLUJ)

83. Sayantani Bagchi (CU grad, NLUO LLM, currently Assistant Professor at NLUJ)

84. Kritika Singh (RMLNLU grad, currently Assistant Professor at NLUJ)

Quoting the above comment:

"if [sic] you are disabled, won't you find it problematic to do the kind of document work in law firms? Law firms dont [sic] have special systems for the impaired and especially clients arent [sic] willing to accommodate the same in costs as well.

"Might as well prepare for the judiciary or IAS? (hint hint PWD)

"Pls dont [sic] take this the wrong way, its just a suggestion/ comment jk"

Lots to unpack here, apologies (especially to mods) for the length of this. Glad that someone marked this comment as "contested", despite the disclaimer. I am a blind person and a law student and find this deeply problematic in many ways.

1. Most obvious: problematic implications re reservations.

2. Accommodation and costs: Most blind people use computers with screen readers (read-aloud/text-to-speech software) that reads out everything to them that's displayed on a screen, including what they type. I myself use one such software package, called Non-Visual Desktop Access (NVDA). I use this software for everything: from reading the above-quoted comment to typing my response here on LI, and to do everything I need to digitally, whether academic or personal work. Making documents accessible to such software isn't all that difficult. Platforms/software such as SensusAccess, Brickfield Accessibility Toolkit and ilovepdf.com can convert inaccessible (i.e., image-based/scanned) PDFs into accessible formats (typed text). All these software packages are well within the reach of most reasonably performing firms, financially. There are methods to communicate the substance of more visual documents (e.g. maps, patent designs/diagrams etc.) to the blind. These have included (in the U.S., particularly) using paralegals/interns as human readers (I know of someone using these very methods as a blind person for IP work in India). Law firms anyway take on such people, so this isn't too difficult either, is it? Hope that sufficiently addresses your "special systems" point.

3. Further, people in India and beyond have been working at law firms for some considerable time. The first blind person to get the Rhodes scholarship from India worked at a T1 law firm before going to Oxford and has recently returned to law firm life. Others have commented in this forum and this thread about blind lawyers who are/have been doing it in India right now or in the recent past - see above. I myself have commented, in encouraging the OP to think about all opportunities, including TC's in London, about visually impaired people working at some of the world's most competitive firms (specifically, Clifford Chance and Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer). Therefore, I encourage the person who made the above-quoted comment to please engage in some deep reflection on whether they are, intentionally or not, acting as a gatekeeper to the legal profession.

If you are looking at foreign law firms for a TC at some point, I know somebody that's at Clifford Chance who has a visual impairment (the individual was educated in England itself though, but that shouldn't make too much of a difference TBH). A grad rec guy from Freshfields who came to my uni to deliver a talk about a year ago told me about somebody there as well who is blind. As a fellow blind law student, just putting this out there so you don't make the mistake of assuming that some career options/opportunities that your sighted counterparts aspire for are out of reach for you just because of your blindness.

Here is an informative list of TMT law firms from an earlier thread on Legallyindia:

1. Trilegal: Rahul Mathan at the helm ensures a lot of government work but he is less active on client work than before. ‘Statesman’ status. Generally a very well regarded and busy team. Nikhil Narendran, Jyotsna are good partners to work with. Nikhil is particularly focussed on telecom. Jaideep Reddy for fintech/crypto. Team is nice to work in.

2. CAM: Arun Prabhu is good. But the practice is not the same tier as Trilegal.

3. Ikigai: Cutting-edge work in a lot of new areas like AI, metaverse, blockchain. Works with almost all big-tech companies, especially in social media, ecom, cloud, satcom, fintech. Strong data practice too. Anirudh Rastogi is the managing partner, known for emerging tech/blockhain, Nehaa Chaudhari for policy/data, Aparajita Srivastava for fintech. Sreenidhi Srinivasan for data.

4. NDA: old tech and media practice with good clients but several good lawyers have left or are leaving the firm. Better work-life than at other big practices. Works in a lot of new areas of tech like crypto, drones etc. Gowree Gokhale is good for media and gaming. Huzefa for new areas. NDA puts a lot of writing on areas of tech.

5: Indus: It is a gaming and entertainment practice led by Ranjana Adhikari from NDA. Well known partner but in the gaming circles.

6. Spice Route: Key areas are fintech and data. Mathew Chacko heads up both practices in the Bangalore office. Mumbai office doesn’t do as much tech. Do a lot of vc investment work in tech startups too, headed also by Mathew. Senior Associate Aadya Mishra also known for data work.

7. Saraf: Building it out. Too early in the game to comment.

8. SAM: low key but good TMT team with big clients. Sahana Chatterjee does a lot of TMT policy work. Tejas Karia’s team does TMT litigation for large clients, but can be quite routine for the most part.

9. TMT Law Practice: Abhishek Malohotra has an established telecom litigation practice. His team also does gaming and data.

10. Anand & Anand: been building a tmt practice, but still best for IP aspects of TMT.

Update

So we sent the email and the student bar council took charge. Our vice president voiced our concerns to the administration and our VC agreed to make a committee to sort this matter.

Yesterday, our registrar also visited our accommodation and took a headcount of our current batch.

To trolls who are throwing personal attacks, try to understand one's situation before talking shit. Even our faculties are scared to raise their voice (despite not getting full salaries for the past six months),what the hell do you expect a single first-year student just out of high school to do? Had my identity been compromised, I'd have been thrown out of this uni for the violation of the "academic code of conduct"

Today was the first day of our end-semester examination. We're still waiting for positive results. Thank you to everyone who genuinely helped us. Though we didn't mass boycott the exams, there were a lot of useful actions that I was able to take because of the clarity some LI peers gave.

Navajyoti Samanta (NUJS, Associate Professor at Leicester)

Shubhankar Dam (NUJS, Portsmouth)

Saptarishi Bandopadhyay (NUJS, Osgoode, York)

Avantik Tamta (NUJS, lecturer and PhD candidate, Melbourne)

Supriyo Routh (NUJS LLM, Victoria)

Chinmayi Arun (NALSAR, Project Director and Research Scholar, Yale)

In light of the Courts and Constitution Conference (Panel 6 on Shamnad Basheer Memorial Roundtable Conference on Disability Law) held at NALSAR, few lawyers and a student highlighted the barriers faced during recruitment or internships. However, there seems no public discussion on the issue. What can the legal community do to make sure the market is more inclusive for PwDs?

Hi, I was in a similar situation. I currently work at a Tier 1. These are the tips I can give you: (1) intern as much as possible (specially if you go to GLC) - I did not utilize my time interning and in hindsight, the experience would have helped me; (2) don't hesitate in cold calling/e-mailing (you never know when you get lucky); (3) make sure you spend time understanding basic concepts with respect to the field of law you choose; and (4) focus on learning as much as possible and from wherever possible (I started my career at a T2 and realized that there is lots of learnings to pick up from juniors to peers to seniors).

All the best, you got this!

It’s an unauthorised encampment. They were harassing Jewish students. And waving banners of Hezbollah and Hamas - both terrorist groups. And they were burning the American flag. Go to Shai Davidais Twitter and you can see videos. They were told to leave and warned several times. The president of Columbia went to congress and lied about the action she was taking against them at the time.

It is not in good faith to claim “Palestinians are not all Hamas “ when you don’t stop people in your movement from waving the hezbollah and Hamas flags. It’s not in good faith to claim that there are innocent Palestinians and babies that have been harmed ( which anyone would be sympathetic to) But then to use that sympathy to sloganeer about how you’re proud of the martyrs of oct 7.

Mods : you clearly cannot moderate these topics. You always let these conversations start and then fail at moderating fairly mid way through. It would be better to not allow the misinformation in the first place. You’re under no pressure to let someone post some nonsense about this culture war in America every week or about the real war in Israel. It’s the honourable thing to go : “we just are not equipped to keep moderating these arguments” and just stop.

In fact, I'm surprised why this didn't happen earlier. Sounds win-win. For example, pay associates 60K in Nashik instead of 1L in Mumbai. The firms save money and the associates probably save more than they would in Mumbai and live in a better apartment. If there is an important physical meeting in Mumbai, the associate can travel by train. In fact, you can even keep associates in Raipur or Ranchi at 50K and ask them to fly down for physical meetings (at the firm's cost). It will still cost the firm less.

https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/jobs/hr-policies-trends/top-law-firms-rule-in-favour-of-smaller-cities-plan-to-hire-local-talent-in-nashik-pune-indore-jaipur-chandigarh/articleshow/109443643.cms?from=mdr

Hello,

Personal details -

I am working in a Tier 2 law firm in Mumbai in IBC Practice. I have 4+ years work experience here and there. I started with a Litigation lawyer, climbed up to a firm. I took this job due to family financial issues. Currently earning 12 LPA. But I don't have savings due to family reasons - I had to support them for these many years. My age is 26.

Not giving exact details for privacy reasons.

My dream was to became a Judicial Officer. But currently I have done zero prep. I have mostly done SARFESI, IBC work and have forgotten every important law over the time. I only go to NCLT and DRT.

Is it possible to prepare for Judicial Services Exam with a job?

My working houses are 10 to 8, luckily weekends are off (Saturday and Sunday)

How to prepare?

Should I leave my job for preparation?

I am looking for UP Judicial Services Exam.

Kindly tell me if preparing with full time job is possible.

I have heard that for UPSC exams it's very difficult to study with full time job. Is it the same for Judicial Services?

I can quit the job but I only have 4L savings enough for 1 year.

Moderator, can we please get a sticky LI thread clearly stating the moderation rules and standards? Because of late, at least part of the moderation seems quite random and arbitrary. I am stating this as an objective reader, setting aside law school petty rivalry or political affiliation. If you don't want anyone to name others, then the same standard should apply throughout, for example. If universities can be named, but law firms are off limits, please mention that clearly. Basically, let the readers and posters know about the rules and be objective and clear about those. Kian used to do that once upon a time.

https://www.indialegallive.com/top-news-of-the-day/news/law-colleges-universities-bar-council-india/

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/education/news/bar-council-of-india-calls-for-stricter-measures-to-uphold-legal-education-standards/articleshow/109387688.cms

https://www.hindustantimes.com/education/news/bar-council-urges-higher-education-institutes-state-governments-to-uphold-sanctity-of-legal-education-101713416328771.html

BCI writes to state governments (their respective Departments of Education) about the fall in the quality of legal education. It urges state governments to be very prudent in approving new law colleges and their affiliation. As expected, the note is only for the state governments and state universities. It covers state NLUs that are mushrooming now. It excludes national universities that are INIs (obviously).

This seems a little outdated.

You guys can volunteer to update the spreadsheet for each other's convenience while referring to the updated threads, thank you! ⭐ https://www.legallyindia.com/convos/topic/347477-mega-thread-updated-2024-salaries#comment-347477

https://www.legallyindia.com/convos/topic/261285-honest-a0-salaries-for-tier-1-and-tier-2-law-firms-2023

Be an understanding professor first. In our college, some new professor's inundate student's with work and are very bad and disrespectful towards students in their demeanor. If you want respect, then be respectful and understanding the the students too. The profession is to teach and not about making it everything about yourself or taking your frustrations out on the students.

Also, read well and teach well too. Don't just read from the book. Nobody respects that. Students can do it on their own too.

Should I be the silent, strict, no-nonsense kind or the bat shit crazy genius unpredictable kind ? As a young assistant professor I always wonder which kind students prefer ? The strict ones are great to keep a distinction between professional and personal life. However the crazy weird ones are interesting.

No political background. As someone else pointed out he's a graduate from NLS and went to Bishop Cottons which is one of Bangalore's poshest schools. He has made good use of those networks. Of course he is also an excellent speaker with great clarity of argument - both inside and outside court.

Given your interest in pursuing an MBA abroad, it's important to consider some key differences between law and business studies, and how they might impact your preparation. While the MBA is often viewed as overhyped in India, primarily for its placement opportunities, the true value of an MBA lies in its broad approach to problem-solving and emphasis on collaboration.

Law focuses on learning rules and procedures within a competitive environment, whereas an MBA will challenge you to apply simple, effective rules across various aspects of life and work. This teaches you to think broadly and work collaboratively, skills that are crucial in any business setting. This is not something which comes easy to lawyers and the more you be a lawyer in a law firm, the more difficult this transition will take.

However, if you want to make your MBA experience truly enriching, consider diving into subjects like accounting and finance, which are fundamental to understanding the language of business. Additionally, running your own business, even on a small scale, can provide invaluable real-world experience that enhances your learning in an MBA program.

Before you decide, it's crucial to reflect deeply on why you want to pursue an MBA. Understanding your core motivations will help you determine if this degree aligns with your professional goals. Once clear, choose a business school that aligns with your learning approach and where you aspire to relocate and work.

Rather than looking for a specific area of law that might prepare you for an MBA, focus directly on gaining experiences that align with your interest in business. As Warren Buffet suggests, align your actions closely with your goals to make the most of your time and efforts.

Reflecting on my personal experience, completing my MBA over a decade ago significantly changed my perspective, enabling me to integrate a business viewpoint in all my professional endeavours. This shift might well be something you find equally transformative, should you decide to proceed with an MBA. Speak to lawyers who have done an MBA to get the right insight. No blogs or posts here can serve that purpose.

All the best with your future plans.

Get an iPad - it's a sine qua non to be a disputes lawyer in today's age. In addition to the massive help in courts, use it as a second screen. Store your files in a drive/cloud and access it from both your work laptop and your iPad. (If your work laptop is a new gen MacBook and you get a compatible iPad, it actually acts as a second screen wirelessly.)

Have a meticulous file organization system. If your firm is lackadaisical about it, have your own system and stick to it.

Also, today you get many screens which connect to your laptop/desktop via USB. They're sleek and portable. A good option - and I'll argue better than two monitors stuck together at work.

Hey folks,

What are some everyday, irksome tasks in your workflow, and have you found any clever workarounds? For example, at my previous firm, the restriction on using a second screen/ monitor meant one was doomed to endless switching between tabs and documents. The Word split-view feature at least made life a tad easier. Or perhaps you've experienced the hair-splitting task of finding that one email from a cesspool of a mailbox you inherited.

Would be interesting to hear transactional and disputes lawyers' tech/ workflow struggles, uncover common pain points (maybe associates/ partners face the same or wildly different problems!) and hopefully, discover solutions to those pesky everyday tasks.

Ok here goes, as far as direct tax is concerned at least

Established Seniors:

Delhi - Arvind Datar, Ajay Vohra, Preetesh Kapur, S Ganesh, Salil Kapoor, RV Easwar

Mumbai - Percy Pardiwalla, JD Mistry, POTUS Kaka, Farrokh Irani, K Shivaram, Vikram Nankani, V Sridharan (VS and VN do more indirect tax, but also have many direct tax matters)

Ahmedabad - Saurabh Soparkar, Tushar Hemani

Bangalore - KK Chaithanya

Kolkata - JP Khaitan

Rising Juniors (of age bracket approx 35 to 45: so those who are just on the cusp of getting really busy to those on the cusp of senior designation):

Delhi - Kamal Sawhney, Sachit Jolly, Gautam Swarup, Ananya Kapoor

Mumbai - Nishant Thakker, Nitesh Joshi, Sunil Lala, Madhur Agarwal, Mihir Naniwadekar, Harsh Kapadia, Rahul Sarda, Dharan Gandhi, Devendra Jain

I am not aware of rising Juniors in Bangalore/Ahd/Kolkata. There will be some, but none that I know of.

So you will think that there's a fair bit of options. The problem is that practically all the quality work is with one of these names... So come to think of it, not so many options then, if this is the entire pool...

It means they are preparing for the Solicitor exam wherein you have to undertake a three year internship like program called articled clerkship under a solicitor. You'll have to work under the solicitor for three years like a CA article and then write the exam. The exam is generally intensive and the clearance rate is pretty low..Have heard that you need contacts to get signed up as an article and even clear the exam because people fail in a subject or two by a thin margin.

First suggestion, do not enter ip prosecution. Once you enter there is rarely an exit from the practice and after the ROI does not justify the salary increase as majority of IP prosecution is done by boutique firms so the corporate T1s don't really want to enter it (other than KCO).

My suggestion would be to enter IP transactional or litigation. Try to get into the relevant teams in Anand and Anand or Saikrishna. Remfry is also great provided yothey don't push you in prosecution.

Disclaimer - this is a personal opinion. There are many who have found their footing in IP prosecution and are earning really well.

Heyy, NLIU is still in Tier 1. I know its NIRF rankings have fallen but i genuinely would say that it has a good academic, mooting and sports culture, placement rate etc. the decision is yours, but i think NLIU is a very good choice. NLIU cannot be compared to colleges like HNLU or NLUO. NLIU is far better.

P.s. There is no such thing as Tier 1.5, its either 1 or 2.

Hope this helped :)

Nivedita Nathany from GLC, Mumbai.

She died in an unfortunate accident near NCPA, Marine drive while she was trying to cross the road to the other side of the drive. Now GLC has an award under her name given out to the best student who qualifies all the laid criteria and after a panel interview.

I don't know what's the point at laughing at other's silly mistake? And then people wonder why others get depressed or can't speak up more. Grow up.

Don't worry about the replies OP, it happens. You'll meet more A-holes like this in law school & in the profession. Simply avoid them and toughen up.

Regarding your query, I assume you meant NLIU Bhopal. Well, it definitely is a tier 1 but well below NLS, NLUD, NALSAR, NUJS & maybe at par or below GNLU & NLUJ. Having said that, it's not a bad NLU, there is plenty of opportunities to do well. Sure the higher the NLU tag, the more opportunities you get. However that's absolutely upto your hardwork and networking. If you're interested in litigation, judiciary, civil services or academia, it's fine to continue there. Top NLUs mostly help in corporate placements.

My advice would be to join NLIU, then appear for clat again if you wish. In case you get a better university you can move, albeit you lose a year. If not you can continue at NLIU and you won't be wasting a year.

Whatever your choice, keep in mind beyond the next 5 years, as to where you want to see yourself. All the best.

In NLUO, there was one person named Ritwik Das, he died while playing football during NUJS Invicta due to cardiac arrest in 2019. Every year since then his birthday is celebrated by students as a tradition. I don't think anyone on campus now knew him personally but they celebrate his birthday without fail. His parents too have instituted a Gold Medal in his honour. The gold medal is awarded to best sports person from every batch during convocation.

Sorry for this depressing topic, but i’ve been thinking about this a lot, after the sad news of two more tragic deaths of Jindal students a couple of days ago.

Although these deaths are no doubt very sad, you will see that across law school batches past and present there are premature deaths, whether in college or after graduation. Just speak to people from Gen X to Gen Z. Almost everyone has a batchmate who is no more. Some had cancer, some had a heart attack because of work stress, some had COVID, some were in an accident, some took their own life. Even if you look at it mathematically, in a batch of 100 students there is a reasonable chance one person may die before reaching 40/45 years, or even 25 years. Sounds terrible, but it’s perhaps true?

So I was just thinking about these people who left the world too soon. Do you know any of them? Do you remember them? Does your college have medals and competitions in their name? How were they as people? Smart? Funny? Introverted? Troubled? Sad? I mean, we barely even remember COVID! Do we remember our friends who died of it?

Sorry, but just thinking about this a lot today.

That's how recruitments work right? Why did ISRO go to IITs for direct recruitment and not to other Enginerring colleges? (https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.businesstoday.in/amp/latest/story/iitians-not-joining-isro-60-students-walked-out-of-recruitment-drive-after-seeing-pay-structure-s-somanath-401614-2023-10-11)

Why do big law firms go to top NLUs and not to other colleges? The recruiter decides it.

Okay, I have a habit of overthinking again and again, if someone shouts at me, talks rudely or humiliates me. Basically the entire day is gone. I loose all interest and concentration for work. I just wanna run home, dumb-scroll till I sleep just to distract my mind from the incident. Most incidents are gone in a day though some remain for two-three days a minimum. I tried sharing with my friends but they are busy as well and tbh I feel like I am just whining. Therapy takes a lot of time and money. At this point I know no matter what I do, how good I become, I cannot expect everyone to never shout at me or humiliate me or be rude. It seems to be an inherent part of this profession or maybe life in general. I can't afford to waste time feeling sad for entire day and loose focus. How can I get back to work quickly and stop overthinking. Thanks

What is wrong with Gen Z, man?? You guys are constantly fighting with each other and waging woke wars on campus. College is supposed to be FUN. College means sports, fests, theatre, debating, quizzing, music, dance etc. College is not meant to be a toxic place where you are branded and segregated on the basis of ideology. Is there any wonder we see such high levels of depression and loneliness on campus???

If someone supports Modi, let them. If someone supports Rahul, let them. Stop basing your whole life on politics!!!

You know, what I don't understand is, why so much spite and hatred? I understand this post is for trolling. Some kid writes, then some kid responds and this cycle continues. But, someone must have had this original thought to type and post this and enjoy the upheaval, even when their syllabus and study load is allegedly so much.

Kid, dekho. I was introduced to law after reading Constitutional law in UPSC CSE preparation. Unlike lawyers who have others laws to understand, for us, Indian constitution has to be mugged. Vaise bhi UPSC aajkal interpretation level pe chali gyi hai. Till that time, it was unthinkable in my friend circle to take law or study for CLAT. Unthinkable. I would have been a pariah. No one in my extended friend group is a lawyer. All are Engineers. Once I did engineering I realized, I don't like it.

How hard is it to understand? I had no clue that some world beyond IIT exists. Now, let me answer some of your questions because of which you write some much again and again.

Q1. You get NLU tag without cracking CLAT.

No, we are not in this for the NLU tag. Actually, most of us are here for the good legal education which NLS can provide. For any engineer in India, any IIT>IIM ABCL, BITS Pilani, IISc > ISB H, FMS, XLRI, SRCC>other IIMs>LSR,MDI. That's it. For us, NLU tag has literally no value. No value. 0. Ask a Product Manager at Flipkart if he has heard of NLUs in his state. He will say no. Actually, Faculty of Delhi University is more well known to us as many who crack UPSC CSE, attend that college.

So, we are not in this for the tag. Bar 3y law students from buying your hoodie/shirt. I will support it.

Q2. You will steal our jobs.

A. Dekho, firstly, most people who come in the 3y course, actually have jobs. Maybe not earning 20-30 lakh per annum, or not working at McKinsey, but, they have good enough jobs, which when supplemented with a good MBA can earn 40-50 lakh in 3y. So, it is not that people who come for the 3y course will die if they don't practice Law.

B. I do agree that anyone who invests 3 years will want a placement and this will lead to more competition for the almost same number of jobs. But, there are 4 points -

- 1. These are private firms. They make their own decisions. No one, (maybe, except top party brass), dictates terms to them. Their HRs and hiring team won't exactly be swayed, no matter how much the VC advocates for the 3y admits. So, it is their own decisions.

- 2. Private firms don't care about you. For them, we all are - resources. Nothing more, nothing less. So, stop attaching so much of your self worth to them. I read about how the supposed happiest place on earth (Google HQ), shut off access to employee email accounts and sent a list to people who were laid off.

- 3. You came to this college on "supposed" merit. Then, why are you afraid now? People will take cognisance of your superior skills (which the 3y LLB students (according to you) might never have), and will recognize you.

- 4. Even if we do not get a law job, I will (plead a bit) and come back to my current job. I am not dependent on the Law placements for living my life. Of course, if I was placed, it would be a good application of my 3 years.

You know, what people realize after preparing for UPSC CSE? That the difference in gyan, reading ability, knowledge, ability to summarise and research content, is really not that much between the 501st rank and AIR 1. It has more to do with interview and some luck. This awareness increases humility. This only comes with experience.

-------

All institutions, all ideas evolve. IIM A Director has emphasized that slowly, PGPX (1y course) will replace the 2y Flagship PGP. So, should we proclaim that the 2y students are smarter than PGPX course students? No.

So, ideas evolve. The objective of IITs was to produce Engineers. Engineering means applied science. Hence, till last 5y, their undergrad was the flagship. They were not suppose to be too research driven. Now, the idea has shifted to become a full fledged research institute as Indian Govt. is flush with money. So, slowly Masters and PhD is also improving.

Similarly, India needs more quality lawyers, more jurists to support the 140 crore population. See the world Quality. Quality can be provided only by the NLUs and some other Central govt. institutes. So, for inclusive growth, and for building a nation which follows Constitutional morality in her decisions, more legally educated people are needed.

How is this a bad thing?

-------

Q3. What will my advice be to you?

No one was there to guide me when I started preparing for UPSC. I shitted here and then I shitted there. Wasted time doing mistakes after mistakes. My advice is that if you have so much free time, don't waste it on us. Spend time with yourself. The university, the nation, no one gives one hoot shit about you. Your fests don't mean a thing. Everyone will continue with their lives. NLUs will continue to get applications. Even more in their 3y course.

So, search for Sleepy Classes. Buy it's Rs. 12k full UPSC package and start preparing for UPSC CSE. Complete the prelims syllabus before your 5 years end. This way you will have an edge once you enter job market and think of cracking civil services. Remember, you won't be fighting people like us, you will be fighting IIT B and IIT Delhi top rankers. Do you really think the topper of your class who went to IIT was not capable enough to crack CLAT? He/She chose not to.

So, mug the content. Solve the Vision IAS test papers and ratofy the solutions. Be iron ready. Aage aapki marzi.

----

Lastly, it takes guts to say no to a 1y MBA, leave your job, and sacrifice time to get a law degree later in life.

I will live my life. You will live yours. You will continue posting shit here and get some kicks, I will move on. The 3y students will move on. Your time, energy and emotions will be wasted which you could have used in reading Vision IAS current affairs magazine and later, serving lakhs of underprivileged communities through your ethical decisions.

Anyway, all the best! Aage aapki marzi. Continue posting shit here. I hope I have helped at least 1 person.

The Moot Court Committee is elated to announce that the team representing National Law University, Jodhpur has emerged as Winners at the 21st Willem C. Vis (East) International Commercial Arbitration Moot Court Competition, 2024 held at Hong Kong from 10-17th March, 2024. We are delighted to announce that they are the first team from the University to have won this competition!

The team, comprising Ms. Ananya Deshpande, Ms. Ananya Jaria, Ms. Disha Gandhi, Ms. Kavya Gupta, and Ms. Samiksha Lohia, also emerged as Winners of the Permanent Court of Arbitration Singapore Vis Pre-Moot, 2024 held at Singapore, where Ms. Ananya Jaria won the Best Individual Oralist Award and Ms. Disha Gandhi won the Second Best Oralist Award. Additionally, the team also won the First Runners Up Award for the Best Claimant Memorandum at the AIAC – APAC Vis Pre-Moot, 2024 held at Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, organised by the Asia International Arbitration Centre. Further, the team also emerged as Quarter Finalists (Round of 8) at the 13th Indian Vis Pre-Moot, 2024 held at Jindal Global Law School Sonipat, Haryana.

The team was coached by Mr. Karan Himatsingka, Ms. Lahar Jain, Mr. Sarthak Malhotra, Mr. Akhil Chowdary Unnam, Ms Puloma Mukherjee, Ms. Simran Bherwani, and Ms. Vipashyana Hilsayan.

We congratulate the team on this outstanding performance!

The National Law School of India University (NLSIU), Bangalore, is deeply shocked and saddened by the sudden and unexpected demise of one of our students, Mr. Dhruv Jatin Thakkar.

Dhruv was a first year student of the B.A. LL.B programme and hailed from Mumbai. He was a warm and compassionate person, and a bright and diligent student, well-liked by his peers and faculty.

The NLS community stands in solidarity with his grieving family and friends in this period of deep sadness. The University staff are working closely with the authorities and extending all support to his family members. We request all members of the community to respect the privacy of the family at this time.

As a mark of respect, the University will suspend all classes for the remainder of the week. We request all members of the NLS community to come together for a condolence meeting in the Old Academic Quadrangle at 11AM on Friday 22nd March, 2024.

The University welfare support service and counselling services are available to anyone in the community who needs to reach out.

Sudhir Krishnaswamy Vice Chancellor

The top 7 colleges have almost identical placements, with NLS, NALSAR, NUJS, and NLUD being the ones to aim for. Even if you end up at GNLU, NLUJ, or NLIU, it should still be worthwhile. However, how can you be so sure that you are suited for corporate law, law school is very different from what students imagine it to be. Even within these institutions, you need to be in the top 10-20% to live a stress free life.

Hi! Sorry for the delay.

I have been swamped with extra work for the last few days and couldn't moderate at the usual pace. I suppose it's the same for other moderators too.

As regards any fixed time of the day when I moderate - I just do it whenever I find free time. It may be different for other mods.

Relax guys. It is not an impending disaster if one faculty member is leaving, even if he is widely considered to be among the best teachers in India for Constitutional Law and Legal Philosophy. He was publicly lobbying for FM to get a third term (which did not happen) and has an old connection with the present NLSIU VC. Let us look at the bright side. SKDR has gone for fresh faculty recruitments since taking over and has added more than 20 teachers in the last one year alone. Many of them are new to the profession and will eventually grow into decent academics. There are also some experienced hands who have come from other law schools. Let us work together to rebuild the institution, instead of ringing alarm bells every month.

First, orient them towards receiving feedback constructively. You could say, "we should review your work, and here's what I think... please understand that this is feedback about the work and not you" or something on similar lines.

Second, stick to feedback about work. No personal attacks.

Third. Direction. Create an actual path and learning schedule to improve them. Can't type? There are websites. Can't read? Read a book/newspaper everyday. Can't speak? Help them join a club.

This is a pivotal moment not just for the intern, but also for you. The impression they carry will remain etched for years, and will also become your market reputation. Take genuine interest in their growth, and they will help you grow.

Theres a feature in word.

Insert -> Text-> Quick Parts-> Document Property.

There are default headings which you cant change like COMPANY, TITLE, FAX.

I just inserted these wherever details change and then change the headings by inserting what i want them to insert. Like DT Name, DT Address, CIN, etc.

Hence changing in one place will reflect wherever youve inserted the document property insertion.

Its a pain setting up. But makes life easier in the long run.

If you are the kind of idiot who looks at CLAT rank of a student instead of their CV and performance while in law school, then that is a clear indication of the fact that you are not in the recruiting team of any top law firm in the country. Nobody can promise a job to any BSc student, just like nobody can promise a job to any BA student. If a student works hard in law school, focuses on academics and co-curricular activities and does the necessary internships showing a desire to learn, then they will be given a job. You come across as an existing student who is feeling insecure, that's all.

I don't think you need to really care about anything except your work. If you're good - that's what's going to matter ultimately. I know ppl who have 6 pack abs and give absolute dumbfucks complex. This is a reflection of their insecurities not yours. Next time someone calls you fat - request them to order you desserts to maintain that "fat" they're making fun of.

More power to you!

Cheers

Feel ▮▮▮ thinking about doing this for the rest of my life. Looking at spreadsheets and documents for hours and hours and hours in a day.

Only good things are family and friends, barely get time to pursue my hobbies, longing for the weekends like a dog and a bone..

What kind of life do we live? I believe in a higher power and I’m sure they pity the lives we have. This isn’t what they meant for us to do. Most days once I’m out of the office I can’t remember where I parked my car, was it on the 1st floor garage? No I parked there last week, why am I remembering that today? Probably because everyday is exactly the same. I still can’t find my car.

Slaving my life away and for what? So these rich assholes can keep getting richer, our bosses and their bosses will get a decent cut themselves, so they keep mum, bragging about how they got to where they are by slaving their youth away, acting like the sun gets closer the more you chase it but really all they were chasing was a dim lamp at midnight, too ashamed to admit they wasted their life away so they compensate by making us waste ours the exact same way.

How about a change of scenery, that would be nice..no, it’s near-impossible to move laterally abroad in this field. Be it a masters degree or headhunting a headhunter, nothing even came close to guaranteeing a chance abroad, not in this job. I knew this would be the case, but that didn’t stop me from pursuing this profession. I wanted to be different. I didn’t want to work in finance like all the other kids in my school.

It’s not too late, I know it can be worse, much worse. I’m switching professions, I’m getting that foreign MBA, regain some youth and maybe waste away working in retail for a bit, get yelled at by some old white woman, mostly because she hates the color of my skin. I think I’ll enjoy studying and working again, making connections till I graduate, starting this same bs cycle again but this time I’ll go much higher. Manager, senior manager, COO, CEO. Hell maybe I’ll even join the board, make the chairperson. Why stop there? I’ll start my own company. Maybe I’ll lose everything I own but maybe, just maybe I’ll win it all. And then they can all slave away for me. The cycle repeats but this time I’ll have a nice padded seat to sit on and handles to hold.

https://www.livemint.com/news/india/germany-permits-smoking-cannabis-in-public-but-makes-it-hard-to-acquire-check-20-countries-where-marijuana-is-legal-11708748288266.html

Your thoughts? The war on drugs is a failed American foreign policy experiment. Weed is already rampant in almost every single college campus in India, including all top NLUs.

On the contrary, we need to strengthen leftist activism within law schools. I would also replace subjects like company law, IPR and arbitration with Law and Poverty, Refugee Law, and Gender and Law. These subjects are more important for the nation. We need lawyers who serve the poor and oppressed, instead of oligarchs like Adani, Ambani, Birla and Jindal.

As you may have already heard or read, Mr. Fali S. Nariman is no more.

This leaves only a handful of his contemporaries who are still alive and practicing.

Given that this would perhaps be the last generation of legendary lawyers who rose up to this stature, I would like the audience to contribute with any of their anecdotes (good, bad, and ugly) which make these legends unique amongst the countless many.

The thread is not limited to celebrating life of Mr. Fali alone.

Request trolls and timepassers to stay away for the sake of creating one good trail of a conversation. Thanks.

You do you.

As a senior who came from a village into a well known private university, I share your sentiments. I didn’t indulge in hookups, alcohol, cigarettes, non-vegetarian food or smoking up and wasn’t constantly chasing accomplishments in college. But I also did not look down on any of the above. I enjoyed hanging out with people so I participated in organising committees. I looked for people who could enjoy sober lunches and dinner and good food in city restaurants - and asked generally in class if people want to join. I hung out with smokers and had chai while they smoked. I hung out with alcohol enthusiasts and had virgin mocktails and offered cocktail making skills. I had a gala time with a category of intellectuals while they smoked up. You don’t have to hookup if you don’t want it - and you may look for a stable relationship. I accepted people are different and come from different walks of life and emptied my notion of life to learn more about them and there lifestyles. Humans - especially lawyers are lonely creatures. Most are always happy to talks about themselves, provided you don’t make them feel like you are judging them.

Again - you do you. Tier 1 or local government colleges, all have the same environments - you just have a base of accompalished alumni’s to reach out, competitive and ambitious circle of batchmates and promise of decent orgs showing up on campus. If you want to sleep for 7 hours do that. If you do not want to dedicate all your time to different competitions - don’t. If you do not want to pursue a corporate job - don’t. If you want to just focus on academics and relax - do that. Your activities will impact only you and not anyone else.

Only one thing you need to understand and imbibe. Make efforts in anything you finally decide to pursue and strive for excellence in that. You are in India (law school is irrelevant), and you will do fine if you decide to not put in effort or put in effort. But efforts will set you apart - in personal and professional life.

I had a fun college life - no moots, debates, ADR or papers only events and academics. I am doing as well as anyone in my year from best universities. A lot of factors matter in life - once you identify a problem, look for a solution.

I'm interning with the IBC team of a boutique law firm and I've just realised that for whatever reason, whenever I'm given a research assignment; i somehow end up finding out the appropriate judgement through Google much faster than using any of the Legal Databases. Am I just bad at using SCC/Lexis Nexis or is this a function of the practice area where a lot of NCLT/NCLAT Judgements can directly be accessed via Google?

Today, I came across this editorial in The Hindu, and I disagreed with a lot of it, so I thought of getting opinions from this community.

The article in questions: https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/op-ed/an-intervention-that-will-help-strengthen-legal-education/article67850437.ece

Some questions based on this article, from my perspective as an assistant prof at a small, private, law school in the South:

1) How bad is the regulation by the Bar Council of India (BCI), and is poor regulation the primary reason behind the prevalence of low-quality law schools in India? Or is it merely that the majority of students in smaller, lesser-known law schools lack a specific interest in law, enrolling primarily for the ease of obtaining a graduation degree, often a minimum requirement for many government jobs? So who is really to blame for the poor quality of indian law schools, the BCI or the students who have no interest in holding their institutions and professors to account.

2) Is the call for increased emphasis on 'research' in law schools, beyond Tier 1 NLUs, JGLS necessary? Considering that a vast majority of law school students aspire to work as in-house lawyers, practice as litigators, or join the government as civil servants, how beneficial is it to impose extensive 'research' requirements on these students? Furthermore, in my experience, 'research' at most law schools in India is little more than copying from already published articles on the topic and paraphrasing using chatgpt.

Why I believe more research must be conducted by Tier 1 NLUs, JGLS, etc is solely because of necessity; I do believe that legal research is important, and thus, some law schools have to carry it out. So, why not promote it primarily in the best law schools to maximize the efficiency of legal education as a whole?

PS: I am not implying that students from non-Tier 1 law schools cannot conduct valuable research; they most certainly can. What I am questioning is the productivity of spending money to sponsor research in those NLUs when better results can likely be achieved elsewhere. Of course, the argument of dispersing funds and therefore academic quality is valid, as most states would want their NLUs to provide good opportunities for their students.

I remember when I was in school, often during periods when class was cancelled, I would sit in class and daydream. Slide into my own world. Or maybe think of about some incident that had happened and rewind it in my brain to rethink how else I could have handled it.

In school/ colleges, “daydreaming” is looked down upon as it’s considered a waste of time. Seniors considered that maybe in that time the student could get so much more done. Hustle and don’t waste a single moment was the common refrain.

Since joining a law firm - your mind is constantly racing - there’s hardly any time to day dream. Instead it is replaced with stress, anxiety,

and a constant need to achieve efficiency in work.

Do you ever think - maybe our minds need a period of rest, when we can just be and not think about getting some work done. Maybe daydreaming is good for our mental health?

Maybe daydreaming wasn’t a bad thing after all?

As a first generation university degree holder from a primarily agricultural family from Punjab that most of you believe to be full of rich farmers I can say this -

1. On average a farming household makes Rs. 10000 per month per acre.

2. Around nine-tenths of farmers hold less than 4 acres of land in the country. In monetary terms, around Rs. 40000 per month.

3. This amount is not available monthly as the money only comes in at the end of a crop cycle.

4. With an average crop cycle of 4 months, the majority of the farmers make Rs. 1,60,000.

5. This amount is not really ‘income.’ It is revenue generated.

6. Part of it is reinvested in procuring seeds for the next cycle.

7. Another part of it goes towards paying ‘farm help.’ This is needed, at a minimum, to quickly reap the crop upon ripening and get it to the market before any unseasonal rain destroys it. Usually, the ‘help’ is in form of extra hands. Sometimes, combine harvesting machines.

8. Another part of the revenue generated goes towards repaying loans on things like tractors or submersible pumps (needed to irrigate the crop). These are loans that are occasionally waived by governments. However, till they are we do end up accounting for them from our revenue.

9. Another part of the revenue is used towards getting pesticides needed to keep the crop healthy over the next cycle. These are ones that are subsidized. But, we do pay for the part which isn’t subsidized.

10. Having removed all these costs from the revenue of Rs. 1,60,000 for every 4 month cycle, we are left with the ‘income’. This is not a single person’s salary like the one you guys get. This is the household’s income. The Indian government pegs it at 4 people.

11. Ab woh 80000/90000 per 4 months for 4 people comes to an income of around Rs. 5000/6000 per person per month. Kya dein isme se?

12. Lathi khaane ke baad doctor ka kharach isi mein se nikalta hai.

13. Namak, cheeni aur tel si basic cheez bhi yahin se aati hai.

14. Gai bhains ka kharacha bhi yahin se. If we don’t keep and tend to them, then milk and milk products ki cost padti hai.

15. My parents saved so much out of this to send to university. Couldn’t go a NLU like most of you because we never had the means to pay for it.

Bahut mehnat se iss zindagi bahar nikaala hai parents ne kyunki koi future nahin hai. Aur aap mein kuch isse ‘best career option’ samajhte ho. Sharam karo ki apne desh ke kisaan aur kisaani ke baare mein itna kam malum aur itni choti soch rakhte ho.

Dear Students,

I hope this email finds you well.

In light of the recent events that transpired on the University campus, it is imperative to understand the distinction between, being politically aware – i.e., knowing, reading, and understanding your politics, and doing politics – i.e., actively taking steps to propagate your political ideology in a way which is harmful to the social environment and the institutional values. Consequently, while students are encouraged to educate themselves vis-à-vis social, political and cultural issues, exhibiting your beliefs in any manner which is detrimental to the beliefs of others is absolutely prohibited. This is essential to fully take advantage of the egalitarian spaces made available on the University campus, which are meant to cater to the entire marketplace of ideas, and not to a few ideologies.

While JGU prides itself as an Institution of Eminence for providing safe academic spaces, at the same time we cannot ignore the inherent duty that this casts upon the JGU community for using such spaces in a dignified and responsible manner. This implies that while the academic spaces within JGU celebrate the right to free speech and expression, one cannot turn a blind eye towards the reasonable restrictions that must be upheld to ensure that the freedom of others is not violated. In this light, since its inception, the JGU administration has consciously kept the University space absolutely apolitical to cater to neutral academic discussions that explore all sides of an issue / debate(s).

In this regard, please note that:

1. Students are prohibited from officially associating the University with any political organization, even if such student(s) may be part of these organizations in their personal capacity. This is in sync with the fact that the University would not exercise any control over the actions of its students in their personal capacity, however, it is advisable that students exercise discretion and duty of care while they are within the University campus;

2. Students are prohibited from associating themselves with unofficial and unrecognized organizations seeking to do politics on the University campus, like the Safdar Hashmi Reading Circle, the Revolutionary Students League, and other similar student-groups. Consequently, if students wish to start a society, or student-run groups, then they must seek the approval of the relevant University authority;

3. Students organizing public events, including, but not limited to, public discussions, lectures, reading circles, and audio-visual exhibitions, would have an inherent responsibility of ensuring that they (a) take adequate precautions, including permission from the relevant University authority, to conduct such an event, and (b) do not conduct themselves in a manner that is derogatory of the personhood and participation rights of other University stakeholders, and undermines the safety and tranquillity on the University campus; and

4. Students are prohibited from publicly distributing and/or affixing posters, or other written media, that may be interpreted as disruptive of the safety and tranquillity of the University Campus. Accordingly, it is advisable that students get their posters, or other written media, vetted by the relevant University authority, before making it publicly accessible.

It goes without saying that any contravention of these regulations would be treated as a violation of the JGU Code of Conduct for students (“Code of Conduct”), and the concerned students would face appropriate disciplinary action under Clause 28 of the Code of Conduct.

Additionally, the violation of these regulations, in certain cases, may also constitute the violation of the law of the land, including the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and other laws preventing unlawful activities. It is crucial for the students to understand that in case they end up violating the law of the land, it would be difficult for the University authorities to provide any assistance to such students. Consequently, it is of paramount importance that the students understand the objective behind these regulations, and follow them diligently to ensure their own personal safety.

We seek your support in safeguarding and upholding the core institutional values of JGU. Thanking you for your assistance and cooperation.

Regards,

(Name redacted due to legally india policy.)

Brother there are examples of NLU students graduating at 26 or 27. Some great answers have been written on legallyindia.com by them. I suggest please google those answers by relevant keywords and decide for yourself. Don't listen to people doing age shaming on this thread. There are multiple factors at play here.

Graduating at 26 and making it to a T1 law firm is still much better than someone who bothered about age and graduated pristine young at 23 but from a Tier 3 local law school and still after 4 years not being able to get into a T1 law firm or get any good job for that matter. There are several factors at play, I suggest you research and find what is most applicable in your scenario. Exceptionally talented people with the right internships and right contacts can make it into T1 even if they are from local law schools.

Nope, brother. It is not economically viable for a salaried law firm partner to buy a 50 lakh car. In a city like Mumbai, 12 years PQE gives you the opportunity to save a corpus of 1.5 crores at max, provided you compromise a lot on luxurious lifestyle and foreign vacations. Spending 50 lakhs from that savings is utterly stupid and beyond recovery in a place like Mumbai where you’ll have family responsibilities and a home to purchase. Most salaried partners start at 80LPA which comes down to around 65-70LPA post taxes which is not enough to cover the EMI payments for such cars. Therefore, based on the general trend in lawfirms, Creta/Seltos/Verna is the most preferred choice among salaried partners with few exceptions going for a higher segment like Harrier, XUV, Thar. It is only the equity partners who can barely manage to afford an entry-level luxury car. It is not a norm in lawfirms for partners to drive around in luxury cars. Sorry to burst your bubble kids.

https://www.barandbench.com/news/foreign-law-firms-entry-how-get-over-supreme-court-judgment-ak-balaji-case-delhi-high-court-bci

Using someone else’s template is a bad idea, given the reason that you have to tailor your mail according to the requirements of each firm. But, still, you can follow this structure for drafting your mail -

Dear XYZ Sir,

[Greet the recipient]

[Introduce yourself. Specify the team, location and dates for the internship]

[Give reasons as to why you are applying in the team/firm and what you like about the team/firm. Specify a publication by the partner or a deal that they have worked.]

[Next, talk about how your experiences is fit for the internship. Talk about your previous internships, moots & publications that are relevant for the position you are seeking.]

[Conclude by saying you are hoping to work and contribute to their team]

This, and instead of thinking of it like a grilling session, treat it as you would treat a conversation about something you like and are well informed about.

When you don't know something at all, try reasoning it from first principles. Be frank. Tell the judges that you are not able to assist them with the exact authority on the issue at that moment. Then tell them what you think the answer should be and explain your reasoning.

Try not to be too evasive. Some people don't like it and will then try and pin you down till they make you admit that you don't know the answer.

You don't have to sound aggressive or dominant. Try and sound sure, certain, and self-assured. For that, anticipate lines of questioning like the above comment advises.

I really got into preparing a full speech after doing a few moots. Of course, I never read out from the speech but it helped to have a clear frame of reference in mind of what the rest of my speech looks like. This was a personal preference and might not work for you. All the best!

My client had me working non-stop for over 10 days on a 100-page NCLT Oppression and Mismanagement Petition (which is being filed by another lawyer), and I billed him INR 2 lakhs for the work. This client and I must have clocked at least 7 all-nighters together- to pull this off. I also handled another case, got a good order, and charged 35K. Despite daily legal advice calls (which come to this date), I've only been reimbursed expenses and received 20K last Saturday for my services. Have been short-paid by over INR 2.10 Lakhs. It's demoralizing. How do I talk to my neighbor-client about this, and keep things friendly?

I am Ezhava (currently an OBC caste). And Ezhavas technically fall within ambit of Dalits. Dalits in this context means outcastes. In most of India, outcastes still earned extremely badly and had very low social representation at time of Mandal Commision. Hence most outcastes were legally classified as SCs.

However in Kerala, the financial status of Ezhavas rose up because of various factors including mass social reformation movements, missionary education, legal reforms opening up newer business avenues, etc. And finally when we got our first CM( R.Shankar) from the community, we were declassified from SC and made into OBCs.

Hi - really hard to have a conversation on this forum. Please email. My contact details are on Linkedin. Brief responses:

1. Hiring process: Hiring is through internships. I'm taking one or two interns a month. They work with me closely and are selected on the basis of a technical round. All internships are assessment internships. All internships are eligible to a stipend (see above). That being said, I'm not planning to hire in huge numbers (only hiring 2 freshers in 2024, for eg.) so there's a one in 12 chance (maybe less than that) that internships will convert.

2. Pay Scale: 20% discount to Tier 1 scales. We are in the process of mapping what that means based on LI and other data. Let's speak - I recognise the importance of pay transparency so there are no unwelcome questions/ interventions.

3. Hiring for 2025: Yes

4. Long-term interns: Not sure. Let's speak.

hi mostly it would be cv based.

1. but do read arbitration laws of the place you are going to be based out of for eg. Singapore/ London (seat of the jurisdiction matters, they wont really ask but just to have a better understanding)

2. know arbitration principles - separability/ competence competence, etc.

3. study the arbitration act fully - you can watch youtube videos on the same.

4. read on landmark judgment - group co, stamping of arbitral award

5. make a word doc and summarize your understanding of these concepts there for easy remembrance.

6. for better intellectual acumen/ understanding you can also watch SIAC videos and similarly other videos of law firm partners relating to arbitration.

7. subscribe to arbitration newsletters

8. can follow/ read kluwer arbitration blog and other blogs of similar stature, etc.

Thanks

Thanks folks :-) Just to set some stuff straight:

1. Yes I have left AZB.

2. Yes I am setting up independently and will be focusing on international tax and private client work going forward.

3. Yes I am actively looking to hire, particularly if you love direct tax or are good generalists. Interns with the above profile are welcome also, but I’m only taking one or two a month. Feel free to look me up on LinkedIn for contact information + ask folks who’ve worked with me before if you’d like feedback. I’d like to think I run happy teams.

4. I’m currently pegging pay scales at a 20% discount to Tier 1 scales and interns get a 10K stipend per month. Again, pls ask if you’d like to know. Pay related questions are important and I’m happy to be upfront about them.

Mods, please make sure to clear this and feel free to get in touch if you need to verify that it’s me. Thx

Surprised to see no discussion on LI about this? This place seems to be only concerned with with salary and law firm talks nowadays. Lets see how well can LI engage discussions on actual law.

https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/bombay-high-court-judgment-it-amendment-rules-2023-social-media-fake-news-fact-checking-unit-kunal-kamra-vs-union-of-india-248120?infinitescroll=1

To give some context, I don’t hate Kolkata but again at the same time I don’t feel that there is a huge difference in terms of placements between these two colleges. Plus my father is a well-experienced lawyer in the Bombay high court and has good contact with certain tier-2 law firms in the Mumbai circle. Please help me get over this dilemma. I know it’s selfish to ask the moderator to feature this over all other posts, but after cracking nujs I am still figuring out what to do. Kindly help.