We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
Students getting caught for drugs - what do CCTV inside the classrooms have to do with it?
Surveillance is not the answer. The current admin fails to realise this. They've taken precipitative, dictatorial actions against students in the past (mostly because of hurt egos) which they had to roll back after protests from students and alumni. The fact of the matter is that the current officials in charge do not know how to administrate.
Also, what are some advantages of working in GC compared to other domains? I seriously don't get the GC/M&A supremacy.
Delhi has a team i guess and it's just one team.
-On behalf of a lot of people young kids getting seriously discouraged because of this forum.
My main goal is to land an in-house job, as I have seen my friends struggle in tier 1 or 2 law firms, having no life apart from work and facing health scares due to the stressful lifestyle. Pursuing a CS qualification seems like an easy way out, as it will add some credibility to my CV despite the lack of corporate internships. Moreover, if not in the legal department, I might secure a job in the CS department of a company.
I really don't know if I am building castles in the sand or doing the right thing, but it seems like my only option.
▮▮▮
- The infamous rape case
- The case where students were arrested by the Haryana police for distributing large quantities of drugs, including cocaine and heroin
- The disruptions by far-left students
Not even gonna talk about what the media has not reported...
If the students are united, then this equitable policy can be implemented.
*name was changed from UC Hastings because of Hastings' involvement in slavery.
I take a T1 salary to be ₹15LPA and above. From that perspective, especially since this is taxed differently than other salaried jobs, you will immediately be in the top 4-5% in India. In my book, that is already extremely wealthy -- relatively.
Everyone who is commenting otherwise, especially one individual who has written about how one needs to be an equity partner to be 'rich by every definition' already comes from huge privilege where their parents' or older siblings are earning enough to be in the top 1% or possess generational wealth. This delusion highlights the importance of classes in sociology and economics in law school.
The simple reality was that glass ceilings came in all shapes, sizes and even genders.
Trilegal has already wished Nisha well. There is only one side that is talking another side down.
As far as making excuse is concerned, take a sick leave of one day.
I want to know which will have more value as my goal is to go for a foreign LLM post my LLB
Businesses need to stop believing that they are above regulation.
During a drop year, especially for young people, the mind wastes away if you are not doing anything interesting. I have seen people become addicted to social media and other things, and struggle even when they have to go back to college.
My luck was so bad that even SLS Pune rejected me (mainly because of two gap years, lack of national level achievement and average board marks).
I have taken admission in NMIMS Mumbai. After talking to some seniors and peers, I don't think there are good chances of me getting placed. I am a first gen lawyer with absolute zero connections in the legal sphere. The idea of asking lawyers of high court and random NGOs for an internship is very intimidating. I feel very uneasy and running away from here. Because of the second drop year I have lost all the friends that I had. There is no support system whatsoever. Dad is busy most of the time and my mother feels I am capable enough to decide what is best for myself.
My question is should I write CLAT & AILET again? Will people accept someone who is joining college at 20 years of age? Will I be named as a old dog who can't learn new tricks? Is my story over?
I've seen my cousins do MBA from IIM C and ISB and trust me their roles are no cakewalk either. IIM C in hand is 1.8 and ISB because she had no work ex too is around 1.3 - and both cannot think of a minute when they're not thinking of work. Another friend who joined FMS tells how hectic even the program is. So all in all T1s give a neck to neck challenge to all jobs, mind you all class 1 corporate jobs we are talking like T1/2 MBAs and T1 engineers or CAs or doctors - all top in their game. Rest most of grads and post grads in India are sadly not able to touch the 5 figure monthly even in their 30s. Count your blessings and shift till you find a good partner. It'll be comparatively easier floating from there.
Secondly, remember the CWG-Kalmadi scam. Yes it was during congress, but my point is that this is the basic mentality of any Indians in power and nothing can change that.
Olympics in India will be a huge disaster.
Now, in your law firm career, you will at max make 1 crore after 10 PQE at least. Post-tax, I believe the income would be close to 7 LPM in a TIER 1 CITY.
This is a good-money but nothing spectacular given that it's a T1 city.
Also, help me understand how some people on LI are claiming that partners are driving premium cars that cost upwards of 60L? It is not possible unless they are being impractical.
I mean as a partner, a few years down the line, you can at best have a decent flat, a good car in the range of 20-25 L and a good lifestyle (depending upon how you are spending on expenditures).
OR is there anything that I am missing? I am underestimating what a partner makes or I don't understand how money works? Or, am I just on point? Help me understand.
HOWEVER, if you know in your gut that it is not and wont be since sls is fairly hectic in its schedule etc. then focus more on externals, I am telling you from experience your GPA matters, and the first year is crucial for a precedent that you will set for your self for your upcoming semesters. Decent GPA = Increased confidence and subsequent consistency. Sls is pretty messed up in their grading and so if you get a low GPA and spend the rest of the semesters covering for it or trying to figure why you cant go above a certain threshold, you will be suffocated.
Another factor is of course affordability, SLS is not cheap and so if affordability is a genuine issue for you then consider giving CLAT priority.
and no it will do nothing for your chances at a corporate law firm
Its sheer lunacy
If you did it in 2nd or 3rd year of college I could still understand
learn some practical skills and you could get a job in 6 months. For example, focus on contract drafting or something
Very interestingly, when a "star" Chair Prof at NUJS organised a PIB exit campaign (that scalped the then retired Justice Ashok Ganguly), the BCI sent an inspection team, which had the "venerable" NL Mitra (ex-VC of NLSIU and NLUJ) leading the committee. Mitra and Co overlooked the lack of BCI affiliation as also other stuff.
Last time when NALSAR admin got shredded by a review committee led by retd HC judges, it was the state bar council that whitewashed the admin (ofc VS had to go). Brilliantly covered by Kian then. That state bar council honcho later became a judge and even a CJ of HC.
NALSAR needn't worry about lack of BCI affiliation. Just pay the "fine" and everything will be fine.
Aur AP ke paise Tera baap dega?
My nephew recently gave CLAT and he took a drop year for this. Things have not gone well for him and he is not getting any decent NLU. He is asking for a second drop and his mother (my sister) and me are very concerned about this decision. His argument is people even take second or third drops in hopes of getting a tier 1 NLU.
Guys, is the condition in newly established or less popular NLU this bad? Even after so many years? Has the current legal market developed some positive outlook about drop years?
Kids from NLU and recently graduated students are requested to share their opinion. Thanks.
There are only two castes in India: rich and poor. We need to uplift the poor by boosting economic growth. That should be our only focus.
No words of appreciation for juniors even if the client is happy and partner had not contributed to that deal Cutting hours of juniors mindlessly even when the partner has no clue who did how much work on the deal
Taking away all the credit from the peers and juniors and pretending to know it all in front of clients
Calling up the attorney and screaming like a maniac for smallest of the mistakes
Projecting his or her own personal issues with spouse or a partner onto the team
Preferring associates from small town over south Delhi or south Mumbai associates because apparently small town associates don’t have any choice but to slog away
Last but not the least, they don’t let you take care of your health issues
a) oxbridge + lse
b) top russells (ucl + kcl + durham + warwick etc.)
c) mid russells (qmul + southampton + leeds + manchester + birmingham etc.)
d) low russells (newcastle + soas + exeter etc.) + plate glass
you should easily get into c and d, with a persuasive sop into b, with a good well rounded cv + reco to a
Also, part of the city can be pretty unclean, so your "foreign visitors" may not be all that surprised or put off. In the same trip where I had the bad experience with the train, I was staying at a hotel near the Porte d’Orléans. I am blind and use a white cane. My mother, who was accompanying me, told me when we came out of the metro station to fold up my white cane, allow her to keep it in her bag, allow her to (fully) sighted-guide me and, crucially, to not step too far to either side of the pavement at a certain point, as it was full of dog excrement.
Firstly, you're at the advantage of being at your home so you're gonna save a lot on rent and other expenses. Plus, your circle is probably wider and you are much more familiar with the way things work vis-a-vis say Mumbai or Delhi;
Secondly, Mumbai and Delhi are way too overcrowded with much supply of competent junior lawyers waiting to get a cut. Competition too fierce, rents too high and uncertainty of making it big in litigation- too much.
Better start out at Calcutta itself, don't restrict yourself only to the High Court but also gain experience in the subordinate courts as well. After let's say 4-5 years with a good mix of trial and Appellate experience, you may approach a SA in Delhi or Bombay, former being the better options due to lower costs of living and plethora of forums available. By that time you'll have a much better idea of what you want, a fresh graduate right outta law school is susceptible to making horrible decisions, so better take them when you're more mature.
All the best.
Only meritocracy amongst big law firms
It has its flaws, but it has managed to keep its senior partner flock together
Even a small competitive advantage when consistently compounded over the years can have huge effect like this
When I used to work there they had just 140 lawyers across 3 main offices. Quite some growth here.
it helps that all the other big law firms are antiquated, centralised and super scared of losing business to partners who leave, while trilegal has perfected its partnership model over the years
JSA could be competition but its run by a committee and everyone is risk averse
induslaw is one to watch out for after Trilegal
Also they don't need linkedin to land the jobs they want to land
Its more important for tier-2 kids with fewer placement options
Contrary to what people might claim, T1 Law firm salaries pretty much match other industries if not crossing, at Senior PA/ SP level in a good practice. Heck even in T2 probably. With good investment strategies, and living a frugal life for 10 years, working with good ratings in a GC/ B&F practice at SAM/ Tri/ KCO, you can definitely get rich. Ofcourse if your benchmark for rich is Investment Banking Director at JPM rich, no. But you can probably try moving to US Biglaw to get that level of rich, they pay exceptionally well. US not UK. And in Dallas and Texas not NYC.
Maybe they don't update their LinkedIn profile so actively? There is a taboo with showing off in NLS which is why people usually don't want to disclose their internships/publications. It's the case with most of my batchmates and my seniors as well. T2 NLU students rely on LinkedIn for getting internships which is why they are very active on LinkedIn, that's not the case with NLS students.
Medical batchmates some in 2 or 3 year and most not earning.
Many people did grad from DU and preparing for CSE or goverment exams.
There were a few smart ones who made it to IIT but they are too joining consultant roles and earning the same 1.5-2 lpm to start off.
I studied in an average school and my classmates didn't go abroad to Oxfords and MITs for their grads so my view is based off my peers, which is also most average peers around India I feel. Ofcourse if you had the kind of support to study abroad then even 3 lpm salary in India seems less.
In conclusion, comparing the amount of effort I put in competitive exams and law school along with the fun (yes dating too) and exposure I gained in law school. I cannot thank God's enough to start off at a 15 lpa most of which is in hand. I know work hours are tough but again compare with medical people and be happy. You'll be rich eventually if you're honest with work. Invest wisely but don't become a nerd who listens to finflucners only. Enjoy life. Work hard. Find the perfect someone to spend your life with. If you eventually find a decent team to work this profession will not keep you starving for money and even luxuries in later half. Upskill, devote time and balance it for family and friends. Goodluck.
Wish I had this perspective from first year to be grateful for the field I chose rather than cursing myself basis the stuff I've been reading over li. In firms many people are content if not happy. You'll barely sense the kind of depression you see here.
[PS: GNLU online PR army can cry me a river]
1. CGPA
2. internships
Everything else is just a talking point on your CV that a recruiter may want to discuss (unless you've won Jessup or been published in the HLR). Don't think participation in moots or writing blog posts is going to matter to recruiters much.
If there is a base - max 5-7 hours
Vendetta to rahega hi na...
You have my sincere apologies for such a long post and my general incompetence with the English language; however, I shall remain highly grateful to any response that could possibly offer me insight (even trollish or satirical ones, for I believe such responses can consist of the greatest wisdom:) into this question.
Idk much about the firm but it has to be said that such companies have somehow managed to get classified as tier 1 and have no qualms about telling the world that their workplace environment is not human life friendly. It’s insane that this is now the norm and no one is raising a concern against such explorative behaviour.
Should I switch to M&A just for the money even if I enjoy the work involved in capmarks (don't judge me lol).
Anyway, no way I am ordering this sh*t to office now!!
https://curlytales.com/flurys-launches-its-1st-tearoom-outside-kolkata-near-gateway-of-india-mumbai-psst-it-has-great-sea-views/
https://www.indiatoday.in/india/west/story/excise-department-crackdown-a-dampener-for-mumbai-rum-cake-lovers-125380-2012-12-25#
I still don't understand, what exactly is one needed to write in an answer to get the maximum marks possible?
Let's take an example. Say the subject is property law, and the hypothetical question of 10 marks is on the topic of adverse possession. In short the hypo is a mix of facts from various real judgements on adverse possession.
Now, it's obvious you have to write the cases, based on the facts and precedents of which the hypo was created. But I know at this point that writing the relevant cases and laws only gets you 5-6 marks. What did the top scorer write to get a 9 or even 10 on that?
Do i need to pick up a commentary on property law, and mug up as much as I can on adverse possession, and dump that info on the paper? Do I need to write many more cases, which even the professor has not taught? Do I need to remember the citation numbers?
Any help would be appreciated.