We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
Please take this to some other platform.
On @Linkedin
, @Microsoft
and their wokeness. As an Indian institution, Ola is for genuine actions on diversity. We run one of the largest women only automotive plants. Not 1 out of 10 lines, or a small section, but the whole plant! Almost 5000 women now and will grow to tens of thousands in the coming years. And regarding gender inclusivity, we don’t need lectures from western companies on how to be inclusive. Our culture didn’t need pronouns to be inclusive for thousands of years. .... On the other hand, the pronouns issue I wrote about is a woke political ideology of entitlement which doesn’t belong in India. I wouldn’t have waded into this debate but clearly Linkedin has presumed Indians need to have pronouns in our life, and that we can’t criticise it. They will bully us into agreeing with them or cancel us out. And if they can do this to me, I’m sure the average user stands no chance. As a founder and CEO, this western DEI system has a major impact on my business as it grows an entitlement mindset in our professional lives and I will fight it.
https://twitter.com/bhash/status/1789217759378993611
Will this now trigger a culture war in corporate India, with the right-wing/heteronormative/ 100 day work week camp of tech bros seeking Modi’s support?
https://m.economictimes.com/tech/technology/olas-bhavish-aggarwal-snaps-ties-with-microsoft-azure-in-stand-against-western-tech/amp_articleshow/110033377.cms
As far as SRL is concerned, I have no idea about it, so I can't help you out with that.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/books/2024/02/20/troubled-rob-henderson-luxury-beliefs-review/
The partner's definitely don't have time to look after each application.
Do you really think anyone looked at his photo and couldnt tell if he was a man or a woman? that men and women are indistinguishable on sight? this isnt a good faith argument.
So mine would be
IP Massey, Avtar Singh, Ratanlal & Dhirajlal ki jodi, RK Bangia
gay is about verifiable external behavior- they have sex with people of the same sex. Homosexuality is a real thing that we've found in every mammal. Nonbinary is purely an internal state of mind- a thing we havent found in other mammals. There is no way to verify. Gender identity is a very different kind of claim than sexuality. It worries me that you feel safe censoring people when you dont understand the basics of what kinds of claims are being made.
If someone claimed to me that they were gay but they continued to only be in heterosexual relationships- yes I would dispute if it was a reality based claim. I have a friend who claims to be bisexual but only ever dates men- she never dates women at all. I should have the ability to question why that is and whether she finds other women attractive even or if shes just claiming that identity for political clout.
No one is obligated to accept as gospel truth everything a trans person might say. To argue that they should because that is "kind" is essentially threatening social sanction for compliance.
Hindu- any religion- is about a belief system. Literally not scientifically provable. I can discuss how unbelievable I find the existence of flying monkeys or dudes who can turn water into wine or winged horses to be because we have free speech and we recognise that its okay for people to not subscribe to this belief system. If nonbinary people wanted to claim they were also a belief system- a religion- which i think is actually right- I wouldnt have any obligation to affirm their beliefs. I dont have any obligation to chant "allah hu Akbar" or "Jai Shri Ram' or " christ is king".
Many people on the internet claim they have multiple personalities and many people claim they have tourettes and many people claim they are a different race and many people claim they are a different age. It is not a necessary condition for a bona fide discussion to take their claims at face value. I am arguing in good faith- I actually have thought about it a long long time and cannot make sense of it. I
It is not in bad faith to argue that whatever experience one might be having - it might not actually be real. Leave trans aside- anorexics really really feel like they are fat. So much so that they starve themselves to death. By your logic- denying "the reality of their experience" - or doubting their beliefs would be unacceptable. How is trans/ nonbinary different?
If we are seeing that so many of these people claiming non binary identities are suffering from severe mental illnesses that in all other respects alter their perceptions of reality- I dont see why gender identity is sacrosanct.
Clearly people disagree with you. And if youre gonna keep censoring based on your belief system - and not on what is sayable within the parameters of free speech- you shouldnt be a moderator.
Firstly, all the non binary people I know are extremely kind and gracious about mis gendering slip ups. They are not about people who persistently and deliberately misgender them after being corrected but that is understandable.
Secondly, your people are probably reacting to their environment. Everything you are saying now was said 20 years ago about gay and lesbian people. Being bullied and having to erase essential parts of who they are got to them. It was not their fault. Anyone would react to being treated that way. It is your institution's fault for not creating a better environment for them. It is also your institution's fault for not extending support to them as they struggle.
If you are too depleted to help, you can compassionately express your need for time and space. Letting resentment build and then engaging in what is effectively hate speech against a whole group isn't good for you and it definitely isn't good for the person you refer to.
And finally, no they don't all come from privilege. The ones who don't just suffer in silence because intersectionality makes everything worse. You probably have no idea who they are and may be saying these very hurtful, dehumanizing things to them.
Agree this is a complex issue, but so is the mind and so are humans. There may be debate to be had about how the medical establishment and society should deal with this on a policy level, but if you start by denying the reality of the experience of all trans people, this is not a bona fide basis to the discussion.
Please keep on topic and on good faith.
Ayn RandMilton Friedman
Richard Posner,
Backup choices: Roger Scruton, Jagdish Bhagwati, Justice Scalia, Justice Clarence Thomas, Nani Palkhivala.
I'd call my mountain Mount CRUSH-More (i.e. crushing communism and leftism).
Literally kuchh bhi. I’d say 1-1.5 for a T2 and then another 1-1.5 for a T1
Yes, there are debates to be had but do not have those debates while completely denying the lived and documented reality of many in such absolute terms, and accept that your anecdotal experience may not be the totality of what's out the there either.
In short, try to be kind. That's not about freedom of speech, it's about fostering genuine debate and making LI a more pleasant place.
I hope you find immense growth.
Huge Registration and accommodation fee totalling to 11000 + travel expenses.
A team at least deserves to know their position in the competition regardless of qualification.
Nearest chai tapri is 400m away outside the campus.
Albeit, very nice cold coffee inside campus at cafe coffee day.
I don’t understand this at all. Why are people so blind?
This is not hate speech in anyway. Oppression of any people is evil, but no one community should be given so much bhaav over others too. Please stop it.
work life balance, daily hours, stress, going abroad
the consensus online seems to be that lawyers, even from top NLUs have terrible work life balance
i wont work in a firm as those seem to be particularly stressful, im aiming for working in a foreign company through NLU placements
is it viable as a lawyer to move to the west?
my main aim for a career is time to myself, security, and going abroad
should i grind hard for a top nlu or do pcm instead
When you say there’s medical evidence - you mean there are people who have told their doctors or scientists they are non binary. You
Don’t mean there’s any sort of test that they’ve taken that proves they have non binary brains while the rest of us have binary brains.
The hijra community of South Asia is a group of individuals who identify as transgender, intersex, or gender-nonconforming in some way and live in a distinct community often separate from cisgender society. https://www.auajournals.org/doi/abs/10.1097/01.JU.0001008828.35887.de.11
### in Hindu society, people of non-binary gender expression have played important roles for over 2000 years.
Called the third gender, evidence for their existence in Hindu society can be found in Hindu holy texts like the Ramayana and the Mahabharata, where Hindu hero Arjuna becomes the third gender. Third gender people have often been revered throughout South Asian history https://rpl.hds.harvard.edu/religion-context/case-studies/gender/third-gender-and-hijras
As colonial depictions were superseded in the twentieth century, the hijra was reclaimed as a prominent nonwestern ‘third gender’ or transgender group resisting the western schema of sexual dimorphism.12 Recent ethnographies by Lawrence Cohen and Gayatri Reddy critique earlier pathologisingoressentialisingconstructionsofthehijra,describingthehijraasa complexidentity of marginalised male-born (or rarely intersex) transvestites who combine kinship-based social organisation with Islamic and Hindu religious practices.13 Hijras may undergo castration and penectomy, which confers higher status within intra-community hierarchies
An Epistemology of Collusion: Hijras, Kothis and the Historical (Dis)continuity of Gender/Sexual Identities in Eastern India Aniruddha Dutta
Also, barely anyone from IPM made it to T1 B-Schools. Mods, please do your due diligence before marking anything contested. In fact, the question itself should be marked contested because it's not true.
https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/us-bankers-death-at-35-sparks-outrage-over-wall-streets-toxic-work-culture-5637321
When women are denied personhood they are raped and forced to become baby making machines. Whatever mis-gendering is - it’s not that.
I read butler - it doesn’t make sense still. Will you answer questions then ? About the butler article ?
Coming to the point of BSc students being treated unfairly; this is absolutely not the case. In fact non ba llb students get the most privileges like better rooms, permission to sit in the better areas of the library etc. Once you come here you will notice that there is even a particular water cooler in the acad bock which only non-ballb students get to use.
Any suggestions what can I do?
They have doubled revenue like clockwork for last 4 years, and as the base gets bigger it will be harder to keep growing at such a scorching pace
A Mount Rushmore of proper legal philosophers could and should be; Austin, Bentham, Hart and Posner.
Hi there, I'm not saying it's tiring to "adapt", I'm saying it's tiring to be an emotional punching bag. Can you address the anger I've talked about? I get that hurt people hurt other people, but I'm done. Did you see the comment someone else has made on this thread about non-binary people being exceptionally suicidal? Have you had to deal with this yourself? The first few times, anyone with a shred of humanity will treat it as an emergency. But what after that? When this has happened 10 times, I cannot do anything that will actually make a difference. I can recommend that they visit a psychiatrist and a therapist, but as a student with a busy life I can't perpetually play therapist to these damaged individuals. I have neither the time nor the emotional bandwidth. Let's be realistic, we don't have the mental health infrastructure in India to do anything about it. This is not a rhetorical question, what am I supposed to do?
I am not saying that it is difficult to use the correct pronouns. I've done that (fearfully, because these explosive people are going to come at me if I make a mistake. I haven't even accidentally used the wrong pronouns, because I'm very careful, but god forbid someone else does because my day is also going to be ruined). I am saying it is difficult to constantly make accommodations for non-binary people at the cost of my own sanity. When I say accommodations, I mean constantly making excuses for their bad behaviour because "Oh they have it so bad". I'm sure they have it bad, but that's no excuse for shitty behaviour.
While we're being completely honest on this thread, can we talk about how all the non-binary people come from privilege? I've never met a non-binary person who isn't well off. What's up with that?
Lastly, I want to say that being liberal inherently requires being open to new thoughts and ideas, and to thoughts and ideas that are different from your own. When I make these comments about non-binary people, it comes from having dealing with them and being tired of constantly playing therapist. I didn't sign up for that, and I don't know how to opt out. Before being thrust into such a role, I would have also been vehement in my support for non-binary people. I would have said, "What's it to you that they have different pronouns and life experiences? They don't have to prove to you that their existence is valid." Now, because I am forced to deal with a lot of crap that I don't want to deal with, I have these questions. Instead of scolding me for having a thought that does not fit into what you deem politically correct, it would be great if you could actually engage with what I've said. Thanks!
1-4 pqe
Penultimate year law student here. I have secured a PPO at a T1 recently and starting to wonder about LLM prospects. Is applying for programmes abroad right now a good idea? Would top UK programmes allow me to defer the offer to gain work experience? If not, does it get more/less difficult to get into these programmes once I start working?
In the alternate, how do firms react to requests for deferring one's joining by the length of their LLM, is it an outright rejection or any possibility for negotiation?
Thank you for your responses!
(1) Try to get your vehicle because metro aside noida does not have a solid public transport system but it has awesome roads
(2) Avoid restraunts pack your own lunch the restarunt culture at noida is insane and you will be broke (and diabetic) in no time
(3) Try to find an apartment near your firm
(4) If you are a women buy a pepper spray and if possible other self protection gadgets. Noida is not as bad as people may make it out to be but it isn't heaven either just stay on your guard when in public (basically Delhi but less populated)
Also be ready for a lot of intracity travel between Ghaziabad, Gurugram. Delhi etc etc
Check out both their profiles and decide for yourself.
In law firms you get yelled at far worse for far lesser
I am a student who is about to join WBNUJS this year for BSc LLB degree.
I have heard rumours about BSc being treated unfairly by admin and students body also and also a very competitive culture at the college generally which leads to many toxic incidents. Can you shed light on this and how to deal with it? I have also heard that there is a lot of alienation of certain individuals for no reason at all. This is scary to hear.
I am scared to join because of rumours about this toxic and dangerous environment, especially for BSc students and also within batches and I would really like reassurance/tips/truth on how to deal with this.
Mods please approve and seniors please help as I am unsure about choosing a college due to this and do not know how to approach a senior for this matter as scared I am.
Mine would be Aristotle, Groitus, Austin and Dworkin.
If you are truly interested in understanding, please read Judith Butler. You can start here https://www.jstor.org/stable/3207893?origin=JSTOR-pdf&seq=3
Bear in mind that women and gay people were all called crazy and attention-seeking when they questioned being treated as sub human or abnormal. Your second explanation is the one that fits. It may be tiring to understand and adapt but it is even more tiring to live among people don't recognise your personhood.
Keep in mind I’m not sure exactly what I wrote on my phone at a v late hour. But I think it was - there’s really no proof at all that it’s a real thing or that social transition actually helps people with dysphoria. In many cases it might solidify a victimised identity instead of having - distress about one’s body be a passing thing. I really worry with some of my female friends that me calling them by they/it and other neo pronouns is further harming them. They just don’t seem to be getting happier even when everyone goes along.
I also think this is one of those things where nothing you do will be enough. It’s not enough if you say the pronouns - they really want to be seen as not belonging to their sex. I don’t think it’s possible for human beings to ignore material reality.
I think it’s fairly misogynistic to think that these people alone have discomfort with sexed bodies or sexed stereotypes. And it’s misogynistic to fight those stereotypes by carving an exception for these individuals as opposed to resisting the stereotypes for all women. When you say you shouldn’t be treated a certain way because “ I’m not a girl “- what you’re saying is that it’s okay to treat girls that way.
I think you should stop apologising for yourself or guilting yourself to go along. It took me a long long time. I read every non binary book I could find watched every tv show with non binary representation and I still could not tell you that it makes sense.
You should take your doubt and scepticism seriously - don’t be afraid to have a heretical thought.
Although they doubled their revenue compared to last year, profit is only 6 cr
Is this good performance or bad performance?
I joined as a fresher, A0. She would issue paychecks personally, make several highly qualified lawyers play useless team-building games, and would critique on how our conduct, writing style and mannerisms should be - when she was not a lawyer herself.
No one questioned her means and ways. Most of the seniors would try and impress her, laugh on her not-so-funny jokes and be in her good books.
So lucky to have found my way out of there!
HNLU has improved quite a lot in recent years. The posts mentioning its decline are close to 5-6 years old.