We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
Sample this- https://www.barandbench.com/news/legal-education-reform-dr-abhishek-manu-singhvi-14-point-agenda "Strengthen 3-year LL.B programmeWhile there have been talks about scrapping the 3-year LL.B course, Dr. Singhvi said that the 3-year course should be strengthened.
> โIn our starry-eyed view of five year courses, we must not forget to strengthen the LL.B 3- year program. On par with the JD or Juris Doctor program of American and Canadian Law Schools, the Indian LL.B 3-year programme must be made more rigorous and full-time. NLUs must consider starting a 3-year LL.B degree on their campuses and open their doors to the graduates of the best degree colleges in India and abroad to spend 3 years on their campusesโ, he said."
>
> Also - https://www.barandbench.com/columns/building-windmills
> - "Finally, and perhaps most controversially, we have to recognize that the NLUs are not the solution. The NLUs have shown us what is possible when a few, determined people do their part, but in the best of times, they form a minute portion of the institutes imparting legal education. Far from becoming beacons of light as was hoped, they have instead become islands of elitism in a vast ocean. Similar to the criticism aimed at the Indian services IT industry, our NLUs are often considered to be places from which lawyers come out who would have done well anyway. Whether because of English proficiency or the economic background of their parents leaving the vast hinterland unaffected. If a portion of the funds being allocated to the formation of new NLUs and imparting quality education could be allocated to existing CLEs, then I suspect the returns for us as a nation will be much higher."
Seems like a disgruntled person posting these comments.
Peritum Partners has a decent disputes practice
Eshwars is a pretty good firm
Arun C Mohan is also an excellent choice, he takes care of disputes work for SAM in Chennai.
These are some of the boutiques I can think of.
Apart from boutiques, you can try Khaitan, AZB, SAM, JSA, Tatva, Surana, Dua Associates and HSB partners.
Do people put their reputation on the line when they recommend someone for an interview? What if that person's interview doesn't go well? Will they stop helping?
Oh and to all those who think this is a yardstick to go bye.... and are telling others to follow suit... think again. You want us to work more...pay us to work more.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/harvard-claudine-gay-bill-ackman-diversity-and-inclusion/
https://www.axios.com/2024/01/04/dei-mark-cuban-elon-musk
Nothing bad in it.
Concept of Office Report, Lower Court Details, Similarities / Tagged Matters, Listing Details etc. is unique and unparalleled. Those who are saying that DHC or some other HC is best, are not familiar with SC's website.
For every unique feature available on some other HC's website and not available on SC's' (but is relevant for SC), I will donate Rs. 10,000/- to a charitable cause of your choosing.
Sab pata chal jayega.
Your theory would mean the college sat and waded through applications of shortlisted candidates to identify their profiles and likely backgrounds (which I donโt know how youโd even identify just from the basic details you put in an application form) and then sent out offers.
Whatโs more likely is the exam pattern favours people who come from a certain background as it involves subjective, short-answer and essay type questions which most aspiring law students are not proficient at since no other exam asks for this. Itโs my theory that NLS just didnโt take people who got below a certain threshold of marks irrespective of the vacancies for whatever reason. Whether this is right or wrong is a different issue but I donโt think itโs a matter of intentional selection of only people from elite backgrounds over similarly positioned students who have done well in the exam also.
They revamped it about a year ago (or less?) and it's considerably worse now. For e.g., now you can't open two orders at once: say, if you click on the link for order for 05.01.2023, it will open in a new tab. Then if you click for the order for 10.02.2023, it will open that order in the same tab as the previous one. So you can't just click on all the orders of a case so that they open in separate tabs and you can see/print them easily. You have to click on a link, see the order, come back, click on the next link, see the order...
Also, interestingly, under the "orders" tab if you search "case wise", there's no option for 2024 yet. The latest year is 2023. Such niggles didn't exist in the previous version of the website. Don't know why they revamped something that wasn't broken.
2. Wannabe kids - I think this is reasonable.
3. Hookup culture
4. Not toooo good faculties. Some would be amazing, but some would be horrible.
5. Good faculties are leaving.
6. No enjoyment. It can come out like a jail. Like for instance, Amit Trivedi recently asked in the fest - how is the party culture in Jindal - all the students said - what party? There's no party culture in Jindal. Jindal can act extremely strict in these regards.
7. There are guard dogs on the gate - which sniff you. And security will frisk you. Now despite this, there's a lot of drug and alcohol culture in Jindal.
But all this said - Jindal is a beautiful experience. Like I'll miss being in Jindal. I'll miss everything about Jindal. It's like a strict, but beautiful second home.
Last year - around 78 got placed.
So Jindal's placements have been fine, but remember that you will be competing against 400 - 500 students.
Anything, else, I'll answer.
Honestly, law firms should be paying attention to employee well-being and do fun activities for them.
Despite all this - Jindal does provide good oppurtunities, for instance, semester exchange - (be ready to spend around 10-12 lakhs); llm pathways (where the universities offered are not good anymore - but be ready to spend around 40-50 lakh rupees); harvard/oxford 3-4 week (it seems a sheer waste of money - but be ready to spend another 10-12 lakhs). All these spending are apart from the fees you'll be paying at Jindal.
In regards of fees - 5 years back - we were paying 40lakh for everything (5 years). You don't have to worry about the actual fee (because what they tell is correct and they do offer you appropriate services). Like you will miss Jindal's food forever (even after you graduate), you have easy access to laundry, nice hostels.
But apart from this - Jindal is cracking down on all the drug culture now. And anyone even found with 1gm of drug will be directly expelled from campus.
Anything else, I'll answer.
She is student friendly
There are two possibilities: one is that there is a cash-for-admission scam (Highly unlikely) and the 2nd is that NLS is picking students based on their family background as rich and well-connected folks have a better chance of being successful after graduation and will require less help from the University.
Not releasing the data on the number of applicants and the rank list is a very big red flag. No one knows if they have complied with the reservation quotas which in my opinion, they haven't!
Mr Murthy said although he received widespread backlash on social media over his advice, a lot of "good people" and "NRIs" agreed with his statement.
https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/narayana-murthy-says-western-friends-nris-agree-with-70-hour-work-advice-4803447#pfrom=home-ndtv_topstories
- Average packages:
- Engineering & Technology: โน 21.88 lakh
- IT/Software: โน 26.35 lakh
- Finance: โน 32.38 lakh
- Consulting: โน 18.68 lakh
- Research & Development: โน 36.94 lakh
No NLU comes remotely close. Unless liberalisation happens and the legal system is upgraded to the standards of at least an upper-middle income country, NLU grads will continue to be underpaid.
https://www.ndtv.com/jobs/iit-bombay-placement-2023-24-85-students-receive-job-offers-exceeding-rs-1-crore-in-phase-1-4803405#pfrom=home-ndtv_topstories
This is nothing new for a state university, such scams are common.
Sure, you all have experience, more mature, and whatnot, can you name one inter-batch competition where LLB students have fared better? Be it, moots, ADRs, or journals (Other than batch reservation)?
It's surprising how mature people with work ex are struggling to compete against Joe from BALLB.
Read the leading torts and contracts cases (instead of relying on the summary of Bangia). Take the simpler ones - Rylands, Hadley, Victoria Laundries, Re Polemis, Wagon Mound first. Then progress to Donoghue and Hedley Byrne types.
Try reading the old English cases from the hard copy law reports - the report will often set out the arguments of counsel before the text of the judgment. First understand the facts and arguments, try and figure out how you will decide. Then read how they have actually decided.
Read 1 case a day. You will at the end of the year have become a completely different person in terms of your legal skills.
At the end of the day you should score itna ki you are not ashamed to write your CGPA when filling out a form.
-Read read and read. Do all your readings and read as many cases as you can.
-participate in everything. Don't judge an opportunity even before you participate. If you have even a bit of an interest in it, apply for it. Don't depend on the reviews of your friends. Ask your seniors.
- interact with your seniors and take advice on all things possible. This is something that I still regret. Try and interact and get close to as many seniors as possible so that once you graduate you already have a circle in the industry and you can reach out to people for advice.
That said, if you are found to be disrespectful to your professors or engaging in discriminatory/problematic conduct, you can expect seniors to have a few issues with that.
https://www.opindia.com/2024/01/who-is-suhaan-mukerji-ex-boyfriend-mahua-moitra-spied-on-lobbying-advisor-sam-pitroda-moitra-election-agent-tmc-lawyer/