We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
Any internship is beneficial for two reasons:
1. If you are unsure of what you wish to pursue as a career post graduating, internships help find out the environment for each job. That's why I suggest freshers to intern at an ngo, under an advocate, judge and in a firm; this way you get to see the inside workings and depending on where you felt more comfortable, you may pursue that field. For example, one of my students was hell bent on working at a law firm because that's all they knew, however once they interned under an advocate, they immediately loved the job, now they're practicing as an AoR.
2. If you are 100% sure that you want a certain career, that's when you can direct all your internships towards that role. So if you wish to litigate, then you can do internships at DC, HC, SC and change it between advocates who practice criminal, civil etc to see how different each practice is.
People who do countless internships are doing it only to buff up their CV. Something which I personally discourage. It's always about quality and not quantity. If you know you want a certain career, it's better to intern in those areas to test which areas work better for you. Your experience will determine how well you do in those career rather than what the word is on the streets about those jobs.
The first round follows a CLAT-style format, similar to the 2020 pattern. The total duration is approximately 45 minutes, with different sections allocated specific time limits.
The sections include English, Maths, Legal Reasoning, and Logical Reasoning. For instance, Maths has a 15-minute limit, and the timing varies for other sections. There are a total of 30 questions, though Iβm unsure if there is any negative marking.
P.S.: Before taking the test, itβs a good idea to quickly review key topics from Contracts, the Companies Act, the Indian Evidence Act (IEA), and some landmark cases. Additionally, theyβve previously asked questions from the RERA and the Transfer of Property Act (TPA).
Why people do countless internships ?
as there's very less pressure as compare to the ones appearing for first times and droppers
so go with it
Also, since money seems to be your only concern, i would recommend you go for a private job and not a public service like DJS.
https://keepupwithkaur.com/achieving-work-life-balance-changed-my-life/
Below average campus.
Bro, y'all are citing international law, but under which law is Yunus heading the govt of Bangladesh??And under which law is Yunus releasing convicted terrorists from prison and allowing the killing of minorities in Bangladesh?
https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/lead/the-sheikh-hasina-extradition-demand-indias-options/article69044282.ece
New Hampshire joins Florida, Texas, Tennessee, Nevada, South Dakota, Wyoming and Alaskaon the no-income-tax list.β
(The state of Washington recently lost this status as Democrats imposed a capital gains tax there.)
https://atr.org/tax-competition-heats-up-nationwide-as-new-hampshire-becomes-the-eighth-no-income-tax-state/#:~:text=%E2%80%9COn%20January%201%2C%20the%20State,a%20capital%20gains%20tax%20there.)
Believe it or not last year I spoke to Ranbir Singh(the founder of both institutions) about which one to join and he unequivocally suggested Delhi. I would end the thread here but here are a few more obvious reasons why one should not even consider NASLAR as comparable.
NALSAR has too much domicile , is in the middle of nowhere , admits students thru the scam that is CLAT, is barely even a law university anymore and has seen the greatest brain drain of professors in recent history. Just looking at a few threads about the pitiable state of NALSAR on legally India would give you a good picture
Given the fact you're a UPSC aspirant Delhi is the place to be. The campus has a metro 5 minutes away and there's immense connectivity to all parts of the city at ease. You can stay and intern at the Supreme Court or high court where we have numerous alumni. We also have brilliant visiting faculty and notary individuals from Delhi who come to campus regularly. The Vice President came just this year. It is liberating to be in a city. At the same time your choice for corporate remains open and you explore all other opportunities. NALSAR is on the downfall and is a suffocating place to be . I know numerous NALSARites who would much rather be here in Delhi and would even treat ur question as absurd
NLUD is a toxic place in every way possible.
NLUD alumni are not so helpful in comparison to alumni from other law school.
Choose Nalsar you will never regret your choice
2. Anyhow I'd say both groups have an emphasis on 'rationality' , 'merit' , perhaps a certain degree of edginess , a sort of self assuredness of having made it on their own to name a few.
Also, don't try too hard for AILET, it's a longshot for anyone. You've way better odds at CLAT with a good preparation.
Also don't be too fixated on your sectional performances like you've mentioned that you hoped to score in all sectionals, it simply doesn't make sense. Keep yourself adaptable to what the paper requires. Furthermore, avoid fixation on getting a tier-1 NLU, your avenues doesn't close at any of the other NLUs. Best of luck man!
That should be enough to get you through your first 3 years as an associate.
Everything else - such as knowing what to apply where - comes with practical exposure while you work on an offer document. There will be times you mess up, there will also be times deliverables feel like a breeze to get through.
Like someone has already said here before, capital markets is one hell of a field - youβll have chill days, youβll have busy days. Itβs all about taking things one day at a time, having a life outside work and the ability to see the bigger picture of things.
Cheers.
https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/suchir-balaji-openai-chatgpt-its-murder-suchir-balajis-parents-say-autopsy-shows-signs-of-struggle-7375165
for ivy league colleges like harvard etc. and oxbridge you would need to be in the top 1% of your class or (get recommendations from top people and show extra+co curricular achievements)
in general just google "LLM admissions" + "college name" and you would be able to find the process. UK LLM applications (except for oxbridge and a few others) are free. US applications are always with a fee.
And the West sees LMC and poor Indians as representative of all Indians. As simple as that
Poor lawyers spend good time with family and friends.
1. Scope - the field is definitely growing. The CCI has been very active regarding mergers and the introduction of the DVT and other metrics in the new amendments, the scope of the field is only going to grow.
Now coming to the future, that's where the problem lies. I feel that this area of law will get extremely saturated. The big name partners are young and they would be still there 5-10 years down the line. In house options are very few currently (but with the introduction of the digital competition law, it might change or it might not). But currently, the options after leaving law firms are very few.
2,3 - Best teams & top players - Ranking them overall in no particular order (would love if people working on these teams could add more)
A) SAM - Some great partners, good clientele, good pay, decent work culture.
B) CAM - Average clientele, not so great work culture afaik
C) Trilegal - After NKU's exit and roping in of two SAM partners, the team hasn't gone back to its previous glory, but better work culture now, and good pay.
D) KCO - Merger matters mostly, decent team with more than decent work culture, good pay.
E) AZB - Ram is known to be a great boss, some other partners are also good people, good clientele and pay.
F) JSA - NKU is probably the most infamous name in comp law in India, great clients, great pay, terrible work culture. Vaibhav is also a good partner to work with
G) DSK, L&L, P&A - average teams with not a lot of good work, bad pay (compared to the t1s), good partners (P&A being an exception afaik)
H) Sarvada - Best place to learn and get hands on work, Abir is a wonderful mentor, bad pay and hours though.
I) C&M - Good clientele, bad pay, bad work culture
J) Axiom - Samir is extremely well known, good work, long hours and average pay.
4 - Money - Most T1s have a standardized payscale so you'll be making a fixed amount similar to your peers in other teams. Variables depend totally on the specific team you work with, i.e., even in the same firm there might be significant pay differences.
The non t1s usually have an average pay in the range of 50-80k pm.
5. Suitability - to be very honest, it's same as any other corporate law area. You get better as you work on more matters. There's nothing specific that differentiates you from other lawyers with regards to any specific skill sets or knowledge.
Comp law is essentially enforcement + merger control. I personally find enforcement matters more fun but it's a very subjective. If the firm you work with has a good M&A practice, the chances are you'll end up getting a lot of merger control matters. A lot of t1s don't have a lot of enforcement culture, except for maybe SAM, AZB and JSA.
Overall, once you commit, it'll be a little hard to find other avenues or inhouse roles if you decide to leave the firm practice. But it's a fun, interesting practice once you start liking it.
Good luck.
Donβt j say stuff without facts. Happy New Year :))
also we have a person at work from sls-h and she gossips rather than working all day. if she was the one that got hired i am scared to imagine what the 'bad' sls-h kids look like.
- as someone suggested, disclose
- if doesnβt work out despite that, leave
In any case you are planning to stick for a year naa? So whatβs the harm in trying!
https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/gautam-adani-on-70-hour-work-week-debate-biwi-bhaag-jayegi-7370016#pfrom=home-ndtv_topstories
Feel free to verify from any judge in DJS that you know.
Else - do the math from public sources. The salary index of judicial officers after SNJPC is publicly available. The rates of DA and HRA are also public, and so are all the allowances that come with the SNJPC like petrol, transport, orderly, tech, etc. The income tax math is harder to do, but if you don't trust my source or don't know a judge yourself, you can reach an approximate amount from the public sources.
I want to make a career in Corporate and M&A but I am not getting such opportunity and need to look after my expenses on my own hence joining the NBFC (I know that I am deviating from my preferred practice area)
Will I be able to make my way back to a law firm in any team with that experience of NBFC?
Please consider replying to this thread with any suggestions or criticism I would really appreciate it.
This comment is so out of touch from reality. Till date, only a handful (single digits) people have left DJS and they are doing well because they were in DJS.
If you want government job for "naukar chakar" and "gaadi aur driver" - you can see HJS and RJS. Though officers from HJS and RJS leave those states to join DJS because delhi is delhi.
DJS is worth it if - you are are satisfied with a decent salary, good reputation in society (everyone looks up to you in your circle, neighbourhood, family), the usual government job perks (good leave policy, multiple allowances and unlimited healthcare for yourself and your family (this is a huge deal - will never have to pay a single rupee no matter what), and most importantly and also most underrated, the feeling of contributing to public.
Could someone help me out with that. It would be of great help.
Thank You
If the law firms don't milk you they can't make the insane profits that they do. You are a replaceable resource.
That said there will be a few rare exceptions and finding them and getting into such teams is extremely tough as they'll have very low attrition.
One of the reasons I feel bad is that absolute low rankers in my batch are today earning more than me because they chose corp law.
Any other information related to rejection would be appreciated.
If you are in good terms with the partner then obviously your chances are fairly higher compared to the ones applying on Portal daily..
if you really want to do law, you can do that after a good economics degree from a good college. Infact, i would say that you will be able to get more out of your legal education with an economics UG.
Merely a two-way Uber to office everyday will be between Rs 10,000 to Rs 20,000 a month. A simple meal of a pizza and Coke once a week will be Rs 1,000 a week. And prices of basic food items have hit the roof. Add internet and Netflix costs, shoes, clothes, etc.
i have worked as legal counsel at a tech firm for over a year, however, to get more exposure early in my career I am willing to switch to Law firm. My work now mostly revolves around gen corp area, I wish to explore PE/VC/M&A areas or any of them. I am finding it difficult to switch. Would it be worth to not care about the pay and join a firm as a trainee or just continue as inhouse?
Why I though of this is get more exposure early on and then get a better pay as I progress in law firm. Can you guide please?
Need to take a call carefully because it'll be a costly investment.