We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
What? Oh you meant friendliest
Govt must understand that legal industry is too small and there are not enough jobs.
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/sunday-times/bar-and-bias-whether-its-college-or-courtroom-law-still-a-boys-club/articleshow/101787396.cms?from=mdr
👆 Op-ed in today's TOI. The author, Sameena Dalwai, is a professor at Jindal. She is also the daughter of Hussain Dalwai, a two-time Congress Rajya Sabha MP and former Congress Minister in Maharashtra. So I guess this means she has high-level contacts who have verified the claims? Or maybe she heard it from colleagues or interns themselves? These are her exact words:
"I am teaching in a premier law school. Times have changed; academia is full of female faculty and female students rule the college scene. Yet sexism lives on. A legal luminary came to deliver a speech. From the podium, he pointed to our female students and said, “So nice to watch so many young girls, in short skirts...haha.” The man, then nearly 90 years old, was a legend in law and in lechery. While he harassed generations of young female lawyers, other lawyers — men and women — watched mutely."
Now, there are some clear hints she gives regarding the identity of the person:
- He delivered a lecture at Jindal during her tenure at Jindal
- He was nearly 90 at the time of the lecture
- She says he WAS "a legend in law and lechery". It means he is no more. So it's someone who passed away in the approximate age range of 87-100 in the past 10 years or so.
- She says "legal luminary" and "legend", so this points towards a very select list of top Supreme Court lawyers or judges or professors (hence, I am using "jurist" in the title).
- She quotes a remark he made at the lecture, about girls in short skirts. This, in many ways, is the biggest giveaway. Now, an alum from Jindal should be able to identify the person based on his remark.
But the broader question here is why people keep getting away in the legal profession even as #MeToo has led to resignations and sackings in other professors. Whether it's this "legendary" jurist, or a former judge who was accused by an NLU intern and got an injunction blocking news coverage (later offered post-retirement posts and a professorship at Jindal itself) or Lawrence Liang (happily rehabilitated by the elite liberal ecosystem and roped in by Sudhir as a consultant for a project).
NOTE: I appreciate the rule about innocent until proven guilty, but in the former judge's case it was reported in the media that he reached a settlement with the student that both would refrain from legal action against each other. If he is innocent, then why did he reach a settlement? Also, in Liang's case, a departmental enquiry found him liable and also said that he had harassed interns at ALF.
Also, OP should probably take up on this bet. Regardless of who wins, an asshole would lose.
For people who are saying that the NLS alumni have not spoken a word on this issue.
This is an old case and the girl couldn't prove anything beyond allegations and Twitter posts that defamed the concerned person.
The reason why NLS alums did not speak much on the issue is because she could not prove anything and I don't think it's wise to comment on allegations alone without hearing from the other side!
Stop feeling jealous from the ones who are way ahead of you.
If you wouldn't have played these cheap tricks of criticizing someone who has already reached the pedestal, you would have got placed too(maybe in some boutique law firm), and if you are still an undergraduate, this behaviour would lead to no good end results at all.
So keep hustling instead of criticizing out of jealousy:)
Rajani is a boutique law firm , totally agreed!!!!
But, I have a very concentrated practice area (Competition law, disputes, a little general corporate work)
most of my internships have been in competition law. I understand the work and I do it well. What do I do?
I have some connections in gen corp teams. Should I just join a banking/M&A/ Gen Corp team through a connection, and then move to a competition practice laterally or within the firm?
Also, at lot of the people who were hired directly from my college (during my years) through the India schemes were often given a little more exposure to the India desk/work at HSF/A&O/Links - not as formal policy, but this does exist. I'm not sure if this is still the case, but a non-India scheme hire would very possibly mean avoiding this, unless you want it.
Just saying that a TC is a wonderful opportunity you would be insane to let go of, regardless of it being 1 year (in case of India scheme hires) or 2-3 years after one graduates.
NLUJ dominated last year and the year before
has been pretty regular in vac schemes and TCs for the last few years
Also to Op - the grade freezing system is incredibly fantastic. You will almost feel like a graduate and don’t have to grind for 5 years.
From LIs archives -
https://www.legallyindia.com/analysis/amarchand-mangaldas-past-present-future-20100727-1142
For instance, On Wednesday, April 24, 2008, at 6:02 p.m., the Mumbai lawyers of Amarchand, the country’s supreme corporate legal minds who routinely dispense advice to clients worth billions of dollars, received an unusual email in their inbox. Paridhi Shroff, at the time the 18-year-old daughter of managing partners Cyril Shroff and his wife Vandana, had put out a firm-wide alert, a desperate plea for help from the lawyers who worked for her father. Paridhi was looking for someone to do her homework.
The other downside of fund formation work is the lack of exit oppurtunities. PE / M&A has much better exit opppurtunities outside of law firm - in fact, I'm not sure how fund formation lawyers get an exit from law firms other than the very very few in-house oppurtunities where those skills are required.
In short, if you are looking for placements/internships, law firms will look at your grades till the 3rd year while if you want to pursue higher education etc then your grades till the 5th year will matter.
NUJS has been the undisputed no. 3 for last 15 years, however, in the last 5 years or so after the first few batches of NLUD has found their feet, the NLUD students feel that their time has come to take on the mantle in the top 3
NLS seems to be on a pedestal which no one wants to touch, however, if you check under the hood there are plenty of problem, but it being 'the law school' people would laugh off if NLUD wants to directly dethrone NLS
NALSAR is a weird case, it is in the middle of nowhere, has decent placements, has mediocre teachers, after FM left it has little addition to scholarship, yet somehow the legacy seems to insulate it from any challengers
NUJS on the other hand, after 8 disastrous years under Ishwara Bhatt, has seen a slide in faculty quality, research output and research income. The only saving grace has been its excellent placement (which is still objectively the best in the NLU circuit). So, obviously the best target to dethrone for a rising claimant will be the weakest amongst the three, which is NUJS. However, NLUD in its haste to dethrone NUJS has made the cardinal sin of using fake data to show better recruitment, but the problem was it was so good that it even went ahead of NLS in that parameter. Then of course people came out and showed that it was mathematically impossible for NLUD to have the placement that they claimed and the things became as the OP puts 'controversial'.
So we have a rising NLUD and a legacy incumbent in the form of NUJS, using the rising power theory (which says that a conflict between a rising and incumbent geopolitical power is inevitable - eg. Japan and US pre WWII) we can predict that these troll fights between these two NLUs will continue until there is a clear domination by one. That will not happen objectively until NLUD joins clat, which they will not in the near future, so the conflict with continue. NLUD will continue to submit fake data to NIRF and other nlus will keep calling them out, NLUD trolls will deny and deflect, they will say that many people came from NUJS/NALSAR which shows superiority of NLUD, other nlus will demand proof, but this can neither be proven nor disproven withour clear comparison of the list, which is not available, someone will argue that AILET is a money grabbing exam with no clear purpose, NLUD will defend it and say it gives chance to students who has a bad CLAT day. The argument will not end until NLUD joins CLAT and we have a clear student choice being made (for example in the last 15 years IITB has dethroned IIT-Kanpur as the top IIT by student choice, but NIRF prefers IITM, you can have your pick).
https://www.hindustantimes.com/cities/others/national-law-university-in-prayagraj-clears-the-way-for-top-posts-including-vice-chancellor-and-registrar-101689078314755-amp.html
Year 2: Smoke
Year 3: Studies
Year 4: Sex
Year 5: Sleep
That’s usually how it works.
Nujs producing Chaitanya Awasthi as an amazing UPSC topper
Nalsar winning the 18th ICC mediation moot
All these are not in the news and tbh even the layer community in LI sidelined them. Are we are as a jealous bunch becoming more immature?
Which law school people are like this and who is the friendliest of all? My shortlist would be NLUD, NLIU and RGNUL.
Last couple of decade for lawyers.
https://www.barandbench.com/interviews/expansion-plans-entry-of-foreign-lawyers-and-more-in-conversation-with-tta-partners-gautam-saha-and-kunal-thakore
Or does love conquer all?
For exams - you can structure your answers and make them more methodical. The best course of action will be to keep on getting your drafts checked by the assistant professors and you will be seeing a dramatic improvement. All the best!
NLUD has a rivalry with NLSIU and NALSAR, but not with NUJS.
1. Toxic team. The people over there are the absolute worst
Also maybe don’t take this arrogant tone of “if you think Nujs is offering a mediocre course” - that’s why so many Nujs hate threads are popping up. We are not the heaven of Athena ffs
Please apply way before in advance. They only have slots for two interns every month. Two each in the Disputes and the Corporate office.
I hope this helps.
so put your everything in understanding how the exam system works, kiss up to the seniors, find out the past papers in the library, try making notes from day one, and then kiss up to the teachers who will be marking your papers and ask them if they can have a look at some of your model answers, be on the right side of everything that admin says, ignore your school friends, suck up to the alumni, learn how to be slave for the rest of your life.