We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
gives them even better street cred later on
During 2008 financial crisis when some of the firms held back offers, they offered to pay the fees for LLM course, I am sure with the firms being flush with money now something like this can be negotiated
Also, at lot of the people who were hired directly from my college (during my years) through the India schemes were often given a little more exposure to the India desk/work at HSF/A&O/Links - not as formal policy, but this does exist. I'm not sure if this is still the case, but a non-India scheme hire would very possibly mean avoiding this, unless you want it.
Just saying that a TC is a wonderful opportunity you would be insane to let go of, regardless of it being 1 year (in case of India scheme hires) or 2-3 years after one graduates.