We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
2. Organising and planning: This should address your exam difficulty. Plan your essays in advance. Essentially, a form of 'rough working'. Just draw up a list of points you will cover in each section of your answer ('Introduction' will mention 1, 2, 3, body Part A will mention these three points etc.) - a very brief plan. You can do it as a list, a spider diagram... whatever you prefer. Then just follow the plan. This can apply to your projects as well. Using the three weeks example above, your plan can include what you will write on a particular day (i.e., which part of your project you will deal with).
3. Planning and using your time well: Ensure you have mastered information about your exam pattern very well. For example, if you have a 3 hour exam, and you have to answer two questions, you know that you should be spending no more than 1.5 hours on each question. Plan in such a way as to ensure that you aren't 'borrowing' time between one question and another (e.g., still working on your first question at 1 hour and 34 minutes). If you use your time well, you could easily finish both questions (producing well-written answers) within 1 hour 15 minutes, and could have a considerable amount of time to review your paper as well.
I've been wanting to get into law firms for a few months now, and I'm a little lost as to if it's even possible. Honestly at this point I'm up for even an assessment internship if it means I can get my foot in through the door. Does anyone know of anyone else who's worked in-house and manged to transfer to firms later? Or of firms who might be open to hiring people with limited experience in Bangalore? I'm not even thinking about T1 or T2 or anything, just a decent firm where I can learn is more than enough. Any ideas about what I should study? M&A I have worked with, but VC is a mystery to me tbh.
Any help or advise or a point in the right direction will be extremely appreciated.
Any news??
Funding - more than any NLU or multiple NLUs combined, which enables good conferences and centre work.
Reputation - CAM is mass recruiter, and all alumni have become top partners at Indus, KCo, CAM, SAM, TT&A, AZB so no internship or job issues.
Infra - bad but liveable
Food - 3 days good, 2 days worst and 2 days bearable
Overall: Amazing college to be in.. good job prospects, if you can build your own knowledge well, it serves as good platform.
Ppl are completely mixing up "arrest" with "conviction". The purpose of JC is only in cases the accused can tamper evidence, influence witnesses etc. In cases where the evidence is already at hand (such as CCTV etc.) bail is the norm. If the accused is convicted, he will serve the sentence for the offence. Denial of bail as a tool to "punish" is one of the most atrocious features of our criminal justice system. How many undertrials languish in JC without their trial proceeding at all - this should shock your conscience. Instead, base minded uncultured ppl seem to take vicarious pleasure in the sufferings of others.
Optimistic:
1. Modi 3.0 undertakes pending reforms --- economy grows --- more jobs
2. Foreign law firms entry --- more jobs
3. Indian Judicial Service created --- more jobs
4. Nationalisation of NLUs --- improved standards of legal education
Pessimistic
1. No reforms, focus on Mandir politics --- economy stunted, limited jobs
2. Clown law minister appointed, no legal reforms --- no jobs
3. NLUs remain state universities --- corruption and mediocracy continues
Which is more likely? One interesting issue is who Modi will appoint as the next law minister. The present law minister, Arjun Ram Meghwal, is really pathetic and his predecessors Kirwn Rijuju and RS Prasad were also rubbish. Hope they don't become. On the other hand, who else is there???
2) Strengthening and equipping all entities involved in administration of criminal justice- police, prison, judiciary etc ; and creation of a robust grievance redressal mechanism that ensures accountability.
3) Roll out online dispute resolution for all quasi-judicial and administrative proceedings.
4) Benchmarking against the world's most liveable cities and time bound improvement in civic amenities and liveability in all cities with population above a certain level.
5) One nation, one election.
3.5 crore on school fees (KG to 12)
+ 3 crore on other expenses for the child (clothes, food, nanny, trips abroad etc)
+ 4 crores on JGLS/Ashoka/Manipal etc fees (unless your child is smart enough to get into a tier 1 NLU or IIT or St Stephen's)
+ 3.5 crores on master's abroad
= 14 crores
NOTE: To repeat, I am talking of tier 1 standards and projecting till 2050.
My LLM was in human rights. My research is tech oriented. I missed the NLS deadline, don't want to miss either of these. Please help me former students and alumni.
However there is definitely PhDs in two centres, i.e., Centre for Law & Governance, and Centre for International Legal Studies.
If you have a masters in international law or Human rights then CILS is the one for you. For others you can opt for Law & Governance.
However, one important point, there is no written exam for these centres, and they only take JRF candidates. There's a direct interview which is related to your research proposal. But only for JRF candidates. Moreover, alot of people apply, last year there were approx 200 candidates for the law & governance centre. So the competition is tough.
Prior research experience or work experience is not mandatory but will be appreciated by the board. Depending on the day and time a board may have anywhere from 5-10 members as a panel. During mine, there were 9 members and most of them were from other departments.
If you wish to pursue a PhD then you have to definitely push yourself in terms of literature review.
Note, that this year JNU has decided to accept UGC NET score as your written exam score. It's a 70:30 ratio, 70% from UGC NET score and 30% for interview. However, it's not clear whether the two centres of law will also comply with this or they will resort to their own method of allowing only JRF candidates.
Other than this, no matter what the media says, across the world JNU is a well respected institute. You will get plenty of opportunities to blossom in this place. Not only national, but even international conferences are available through JNU to present papers and research.
Any more queries, I can answer.
P.S. I applied to both the law centres but didn't get selected, however I applied in a non-law centre as well and that's how I got admitted to JNU.
Just check it out.
2. Industrialisation of rural areas
3. Tax incentives for labour-intensive manufacturing and construction companies
4. Upgradation of infrastructure in urban areas (especially Mumbai, it really needs it)
5. PCB and UCC
100% seats in 5 year law programme at Jindal Global Law School admitted ONLY on the basis of LSAT-India Test.
No student who has not taken LSAT-India Test can ever get admission in 5 year law programme.
You can meet 5 year law programme admission incharge Aditya Anand in the new admission office, T1 Ground floor.
1. Five year integrated BComLLB, BBALLB & BALLB Hons
No Admission possible without taking LSAT-India Test and qualifying the cutoff. Generally cutoff is 60 percentile in LSAT-India Test.
2. 3-year BA Legal Studies & BA Criminology programme leading to 3 year LLB in 3+3 pathway
LSAT-India/ CLAT/ AILET/ CUET/ SAT/ ACT/ JSAT-Law (Jindal own test) are all accepted in these two programs.
You can apply to admissions.jgls@jgu.edu.in for admission in these two programs.
For 5 year LLB programme, you have to take next year 2025 LSAT-India Test. No admission possible for you this year because you missed the entrance exam LSAT-India Test.
- Korean CAT
For me, it is 32L, 5PQE, manufacturing industry
Let me try once again.
ameremortalhuman at gmail dot com.
Thank you for this, and I truly appreciate offering to help me
I have been trying to get hired by any tier 1 law firm in India. I've sent over 100s of emails to these law firms and have not got any response. Does anyone have any idea about the hiring process of these law firms? or how to get through it?
People working there can give their suggestions
Thank you!
1. All of the academics on the SRC are much more senior than Sudhir. We discuss ad nauseam on this platform (which pretty much has a foot in the grave and several toes of the other one in as well) that Sudhir got a leg up thanks to MP Singh. Ever thought that even if he was a 'friend' of theirs, they might look upon him as someone promoted before his time, and not be influenced by him because of that? You have to remember that these guys, smart as they are, are Harvard/Oxford people, in unis filled with Harvard/Oxford qualified people, so no MP Singh-style favours for them. In their own countries, they have had to go through the same process of climbing the regular ladder, rung-by-rung, which Sudhir would have had to go through as well, if he had chosen to remain in the UK, and even in India, if fortune wasn't kind enough to send along MP Singh, who was smart enough to spot his potential. Also, have you thought that they may not know him very well? He doesn't live (or work) in England or the U.S. full time, remember? So there's your rebuttal to the 'friends of Sudhir' point.
2. They might, just, be independent and not influenced by anything other than their own observations and the mandate they have been given (including any fear of a backlash from Sudhir)? Also, in case you have forgotten, Sudhir/NLSIU promised that the SRC findings would be published openly this time. A nice, cranky little fool he'd look, crying about a commission he himself supported! Come on guys, get a life! Sudhir may not be a perfect administrator, but he is also far from the blithering idiot you make him out to be, so please stop trying to paint a picture you know is impossible to paint.
3. Finally, in case you have forgotten, he praises the western universities (his PR about NLSIU not withstanding). I remember this thread where folks were making fun of him for saying that universities should stick to 'fundamental first principles'. Surely, he'd look a bit foolish if he said random stuff about westerners being 'jealous' of NLSIU, when he is making the very same point that western academics (especially British ones) make all the time in response to any criticism that their law curriculums are too theoretical.
Which teams are good? Is it worth investing time interning there in the beginning of my 5th year?
My area of specialisation is corporate and M&A.
Can anyone please suggest something? Any advice, any suggestion, anything at all.
Does anyone know of any firms that are hiring? I am also open to assessment internships.
Please, please, please help!!!
LATEST UPDATE 2023
I have a lot of childhood trauma due to bullying, abuse and low self-esteem so don't have much ambition currently other than being able to afford therapy and get my mental health in order first. I tried asking this on reddit but the post failed to attract much traction. Hopefully, I get some solid advice here. I'll be forever grateful. TIA.
Act like lawyers/law students, not JNU students please