New Vice Chancellor (VC) appointments or renewals at national law universities (NLUs) punctuate 2019. While NUALS Kochi and GNLU Gandhinagar got their new VCs recently, two NLU heavyweights viz. my alma mater, NUJS Kolkata and NLSIU Bangalore are in the midst of VC selections. Reportedly, Prof NK Chakrabarti has been recommended by Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi for the position of NUJS’ VC recently and the Executive Council ratification in this regard is awaited.
Three other NLUs – CNLU Patna, HNLU Raipur, MNLU Aurangabad – are presently operating under interim administrators while renewals or new appointments are expected at NLU Odisha, NLU Delhi, NLU Assam and TNNLS Trichy in the latter half of 2019.
In recent years, VC tenures and appointments in NLUs have been contentious. Students ousted Prof SS Singh at NLIU Bhopal but the powers that be refused to learn and surreptitiously attempted to install a lowly-qualified [Ed: allegedly, according to students] academic from Allahabad University as the Director at NLIU. An alert and determined student body nipped this insidious attempt in the bud.
Although Prof Sukhpal Singh’s questionable second term as the VC of neighbouring HNLU Raipur was undone by the Chhattisgarh High Court, he was actively aided by the State Government in his last ditch attempts to cling on. The students prevailed when the then Chhattisgarh Chief Justice AK Tripathi stepped in to restore normalcy. As with NUJS, HNLU also got a retired HC judge as its interim VC.
I hope that HNLU does not go the NUJS way, where Justice (Retd) Amit Talukdar’s year-long tenure has been marked with deliberate inaction on the very issues that led to his predecessor Prof P Ishwara Bhat’s downfall. Others NLUs suffering unwelcome judicial overstay are CNLU Patna and until recently NUSRL Ranchi, which got a new VC, who reportedly faced students’ ire at DSNLU Vizag previously.
Broadly speaking, I can think of six systemic problems that have yielded regrettable VC selections in the recent past:
a. poor filtration and lack of due diligence by VC search committees;
b. highly limited pool of suitable candidates, including on account of ill-suited UGC eligibility norms;
c. opacity in the selection process leading to a complete lack of accountability;
d. non-completion of consequential inquiries against ousted VCs, ensuring that they get shortlisted/ selected elsewhere despite a questionable record;
e. closing of ranks by other VCs and influential academics, exchange of favours within legal academia, et al.; and
f. insidious influence of the state government and judiciary.
Poor filtration systems ensured that notwithstanding Prof P Ishwara Bhat’s chequered record at NUJS, he was appointed CNLU VC. Thankfully, Prof Bhat could not join after CNLU students intervened. What’s worse: despite his back-to-back exits from CNLU and NUJS, he waltzed into the KSLU hot-seat within three months. Interestingly, then freshly ousted NLIU Director, Prof SS Singh too had applied for CNLU VC-ship and has recently joined the NUJS Academic Council as the UGC representative!
Other egregious examples are the tainted ex-NLU Odisha VC Chandra Krishnamurthy, who made history at Pondicherry University before a belated resignation, and ex-RMLNLU Lucknow VC, Prof Balraj Chauhan, who was castigated by the High Court of Allahabad but subsequently wormed his way to NLU Jabalpur VC-ship and was also a part of the search committee that controversially chose Prof BP Singh for NLIU Bhopal.
NLUs will do well to remember what former NLU Jodhpur VC, Justice (Retd) NN Mathur has to say on the candidate pool. Paucity of suitable VC candidates is not only because enough suitable law school administrators do not exist or are not interested in what VC-ships at these institutions offer but also because the pool is severely limited by eligibility requirements such as 10 years of Professor-ship experience. The NLU Student Consortium may consider engaging with the UGC and the BCI on the prudence of such requirements and seeking necessary reforms. On his part, Justice Mathur correctly identified lack of understanding (in VC candidates) of the original intent behind the law school project and has stressed on the need to move away from stultifying UGC norms.
At NUJS, we forgot the cautionary tale of NUSRL Ranchi, which first experimented with interim judicial administrators. NUJS students had hoped that the Talukdar administration would ensure a swift and effective administrative rinse, but it has proven to be a disaster.
To ensure that past mistakes at NUJS and elsewhere are not repeated, the NUJS students made some wonderful suggestions, but were told that VC selection was not students’ business. The otherwise obvious suggestions made by the SJA invited focus to:
a. candidates’ familiarity and experience in administration/ teaching at NLUs and similarly-placed institutions;
b. mandatory submission of an undertaking of not having indulged in plagiarism and other academic misconduct;
c. mandatory requirement to submit a ‘Vision Document’ outlining each candidate’s credentials as well as vision for the University;
d. blind-coding and circulation of such ‘Vision Document’ for each of the shortlisted candidates to all stakeholders for the latter’s comments; and
e. inclusion of dedicated accountability mechanisms including disclosure of relevant details of each of the candidates at every stage of the selection process and video recording of personal interviews.
NLU VC selections are often shrouded in opacity (as seen at both NLIU and GNLU) and NUJS has not attempted to be any different. Earlier, I filed an RTI in this regard to the Supreme Court, which was later transferred to NUJS. Even though the obligation to furnish almost all documents concerning VC selections suo motu is well-established, the NUJS PIO, Mr Pritwish Saha wilfully dodged his obligation to provide the information sought. An Appeal to Registrar (Acting) Shikha Sen later confirmed her role in the denial of information in the first instance, thereby making the entire appeal mechanism shambolic. Aggrieved, I subsequently complained to the Executive Council seeking necessary action against Registrar Sen, which has reportedly instituted an inquiry. Opacity bolsters the absence of accountability, in turn, providing scope for questionable, even absurd appointments.
Successful second chances to NLU VCs with questionable histories are also guaranteed by the closing of ranks by other VCs/ influential academics and lack of any sort of blacklisting mechanism to tackle such tainted candidates. Illustratively, the grapevine has it that despite the well-known troubles at RGNUL, VC Prof Paramjit S Jaswal continues to be the front-runner for the top job at NLU Delhi.
Deliberate inaction on various consequential inquiries set up after the downfall of unpopular VCs is another factor that often contributes in the lack of any form of soft-blacklisting of such candidates. There appear to be many instances including RMLNLU, NLIU and, of course, NUJS. Perhaps, a strict, comprehensive disclosure policy would at least partially remedy the non-existent filtration mechanism.
One can only hope that the impending NLU VC selections will not add to this long history of blunders! As for NUJS’ fate, only time will tell...
Arjun Agarwal was elected President of NUJS’ Student Juridical Association for 2016-18, and presently works as an Associate at Trilegal, Delhi. All views expressed are personal.
threads most popular
thread most upvoted
comment newest
first oldest
first
Political interference takes place in so many layers that it is nigh near impossible for a student body to even begin to impact or initiate any change. Look at Gujarat. BhimPa is clinging to pillar and post to stay onto some made up post or the other just so he isn't unceremoniously thrown out of his residence by the new guy. NUJS is no different.
I'm bitter after all these year and it looks like nothing is set to change. Much like Arjun, I have no solution to offer, just an empty rant.
Some of their admission web page has nothing except how to get admitted as NRI/foreign national quota.
For example the website
www.nluo.ac.in/admissions-2019.
When visiting admission page for other CLAT member universities in clatconsortiumofnlu.ac.in/ , most favor admission as NRI quota where a low scoring student can get admitted. Law ministry and HRD ministry should completely overhaul NLU NRI admission process.
B. However it has Foreign National. The aspirational goal of this was to have a global reach. NALSAR had an agreement with Bhutanese govt. took around 2013/4 and we had 3/5 people per batch. Even now we have a couple of Nepalese nationals each year.
C. The reality is that it gets 90% (based on nothing but my experience) kids of Indians born abroad. However, still they pay a lot to be a part of the institute. These 10/12 slots pay worth 25/30, thus subsidising some little fractions for everyone else.
1. BCI has been under Mishra's rule for around a decade. If a distinguished lawyer headed it, things would be different.
2. CJIs like Mishra and Gogoi have shown little interest in improving legal education. One will have to wait for academically inclined judges like Chandrachud to do this.
3. Unlike IITs and IIMs, NLUs are governed by state governments and have no alumni or industry representation in governing bodies.
www.telegraphindia.com/states/west-bengal/private-tuition-slap-for-two-university-teachers/cid/1119477
I think I get it: your basic point is that you disagree the way that Arjun ran the SJA and the way Bhat was ousted without a back up plan. Plus some people are sore about him having, in retrospect hastily, having welcomed Talukdar as new VC (though in light of the sh*tstorm that had preceded it, it's perhaps understandable why the SJA would hold out a tentative olive branch to the new admin). At the end of the day, law school student politics is a messy business and it's impossible to make everyone happy.
And our general policy about more aggressive moderation when it comes to students or young lawyers at the beginning of their careers, rather than in a position of authority, still stands. However, if you have criticism, please try to put this across in a constructive way, rather than making it sound personal.
And, in any case, apart from filing a PIL he has no locus before any court. He's done more than his bit while at NUJS and even now.
Only disgruntled, corrupt and notorious entities should think otherwise.
NLU-D, be ready to welcome Jaiswal.
"I hope that HNLU does not go the NUJS way, where Justice (Retd) Amit Talukdar’s year-long tenure has been marked with deliberate inaction on the very issues that led to his predecessor Prof P Ishwara Bhat’s downfall."
Every word of it is coming true.
A very big concern and something to think on, when will the select committees keep the candidate's understanding of the objectives and purpose of creating NLUs as one of the most important criteria to select a candidate.
NLUs requires VCs who are good administrators and a visionary who can act on the vision of Late Prof. Madhva Menon who visualised these institutes as islands of legal excellence.
VC selection should be transparent and the biggest stakeholders if the institute must be allowed to observe if not indulge.
Whether Didi goes or stays, she has a history of vindictiveness and is known to take things personally. This doesn't mean that NUJS students should simply roll over and accept things. But we can certainly get smarter and also question those who seek to instigate us for their own private gains, such as a section of the faculty who face serious charges of corruption; faculty who covet power to keep making private profits; crores in DEO overpayments and dodgy contracts/tenders; and also students who think sucking up to certain teachers will accrue benefits, medals, SJA positions etc.
Unless someone has a direct line to PM or HM and they are willing to stake their political capital freely and unconditionally for NUJS, lets just pull back before reaching a point of no return. Please don't count the judiciary for support. At least not right now.
Only a constipated soul will keep droning on why PIB was removed without an alternate VC in the pipeline. Since when did any state allow students the space and capacity to choose VCs? PIB got booted because the state wanted him gone. He had become a liability. PIB failed to deliver on all those things that mattered politically and otherwise to the state and its agents in the EC and elsewhere. They used the SJA protest to whitewash and prepone the eviction and the stealthy deployment of their agents Lord Taluk and Sensational who like eager beavers set about hollowing out NUJS.
VCs are appointed or booted depending on state interests. And you really think you can lecture or compel the state to simply comply with what you want? Come on Alice, wake up and smell the coffee. We now have Starbucks in Kolkata too. If you have seen Will Smith's "After Earth" you will understand when I say this - we need to "ghost" our way past the state to secure our objectives.
Someone had mentioned about TT turning green etc. I believe their choices were limited. For more on TT's humbling by the CM and extensive collateral damages, please go through the following links. Statesman suffered it's share under a Gandhi and the Reds here. Statesman historically has been an anti-establishment paper irrespective of the party in power. Those and other reasons such as its initial refusal and later an innate inability to adapt to techno-cultural changes has led to its downward slide. Despite loss in readership, it remains a revered paper whereas TT is simply well-known.
TT related links follow below -
scroll.in/article/806409/election-brawl-its-mamata-versus-the-telegraph-as-the-west-bengal-polls-heat-up
www.firstpost.com/politics/mamata-and-media-in-bengal-dear-abp-news-crossing-didi-is-not-a-one-way-street-2787108.html
www.firstpost.com/india/will-aveek-sarkars-exit-from-abp-assuage-mamata-banerjee-2851384.html
www.thequint.com/news/india/bengals-iconic-anandabazar-patrika-group-to-sack-40-of-its-staff-abp-the-telegraph-channel-newspaper-media
www.outlookindia.com/website/story/kolkatas-abp-group-that-runs-the-telegraph-fires-700-staff-journalists-call-it-a/297811
www.newslaundry.com/2019/03/11/abp-group-to-sack-150-employees-in-third-round-of-downsizing
www.newslaundry.com/2017/02/07/the-telegraph-lay-offs-is-it-the-end-of-the-era-of-field-reporting
www.dbranlu.com/ContentPage.aspx?Id=211Bo8HmZOP2jP6eUZbo+fiqTa2CuCQtensMFrs+CljTYQ=
www.dbranlu.com/Downloads/Common_Law_Admission_Test_(CLAT).pdf
This seems to be the latest addition in the NLU universe. Well technically, it was established in 2012. NLU Sikkim and NLU UTK are still in pipeline but NLU Haryana has joined the grid. If things are as bad as their website, Arjun's piece sounds very prophetic!
By the way does anyone have any clue concerning the founding VC there and faculty, if any? Kian why not get a scoop?
NUJS is now being specifically mentioned by the state govt! Not surprised because Lord Taluk, Sensation, SS Gestapo (oh yes has quite a spy network among students), Fiery Princeling, PA and their group have enthusiastically but surreptitiously supported the "Bengali" and "non Bengali" divide despite the public protestations by a few when the amendment Bill was introduced.
Time for #OmitTalukdar #SikhaSentPacking. A successful execution will let other interlopers knows that they should be careful in sucking up to state agents in EC and elsewhere.
She has been undermining NUJS from day 1: appointing her astrologer, forcing a domicile quota, appointing her stooges in the EC etc.
NUJS must take advantage of the medical strike momentum and organise a protest. Now or never.
twitter.com/ANI/status/1139467444454473731
threads most popular
thread most upvoted
comment newest
first oldest
first