
The Chief Justice of India (CJI) Ranjan Gogoi, as NUJS Kolkata’s chancellor, via his nominee has directed the stagnated appointment process of a permanent vice chancellor (VC) to be completed by 28 February 2019, with all other senior administrative appointments, such as registrar and accounts officer, to be appointed by 31 March.
The chancellor’s nominee, Supreme Court justice AK Sikri, had attended a general council meeting (GC) that took place on the day of NUJS’ convocation, on 2 February 2019. Reacting, in-part, to a letter sent to the CJI by NUJS student representatives urging prompter action (see below), Sikri asked the university to expedite the appointments and to begin its faculty recruitment process by March.
The state law minister had also repeated those instructions to the NUJS administration, according to campus sources.
However, the GC is yet to release the minutes of that meeting to the students, continuing a long-standing grievance in the students’ battle to be included in - or at least kept informed of - the opaque decision-making processes of the university.
Case in point: former SJA president Arjun Agarwal, under whose tenure the previous VC Prof Ishwara Bhat resigned from NUJS, had written in The Wire on 31 January of the trials and trying tribulations of bringing transparency into NUJS’ (and other law schools’) affairs via blunt instruments such as Right to Information (RTI) (follow this link for copies of Agarwal’s latest batch of RTIs to NUJS).
To date, NUJS acting VC - former high court justice Amit Talukdar - has not yet called the meeting of the registrar selection committee, which was constituted on 22 December, and includes himself, and the Kolkata-based VCs of the universities of Calcutta and Kazi Nazrul.
SJA pleaded for CJI’s help
On 20 December 2018, the Student Juridicial Association (SJA) had sent a 12-page letter (see copy below) to their chancellor and CJI, copied into other officials, asking for intervention in “these times of crisis”.
SJA president Arindum Nayak and vice president Gatha G Namboothiri’s joint letter argued that without assistance from the CJI, a lack of “administrative stability and dynamic leadership”, coupled with the state government’s moves to change the nature of NUJS, “would ensure that the University enters a state of permanent paralysis”.
The state government’s amendment to NUJS’ establishing act in November 2018, would introduce a 30% state quota, relax entrance criteria and give the state government control over student fees.
The SJA said in its letter that the amendment was introduced “without any needful consultation or information with or to the stakeholders - including the faculty, administration and governing bodies”, and “creates severe apprehensions about motivated attack on independent nature of the University”.
Leadership vacuum vs vacuous leadership
NUJS has been under Talukdar’s placeholder administration for nearly a year now, since previous VC Ishwara Bhat’s resignation in April 2018.
Administratively, Talukdar has not done much of note, besides (in the Calcutta high court’s words) being responsible for the “not becoming” and “arbitrary” abrupt nuking of online courses at NUJS.
The process to find a new permanent VC too has gone nowhere, until finally advertising for a new VC in November 2018. Since then, it still seems to have gone nowhere fast. Apprehensions are also real, that the search committee is stacked in favour of finding a replacement that will prove pliable for the West Bengal state government.
On top of that, NLSIU Bangalore, as well as GNLU Gandhinagar, HNLU Raipur and CNLU Patna are looking for VCs now, placing a great strain on a limited talent pool of talented and experienced administrators.
And the longer the appointment process takes, the more like it is that stakeholders, such as students, faculty and alumni, will lose any leverage to ensure that a solid appointment is made that can do justice to NUJS institutional potential: legal education history has shown that it’s not necessarily true that any VC will better than no VC.
threads most popular
thread most upvoted
comment newest
first oldest
first
universities as well) has certain discretionary power which has been used even by Dr. Menon ( founding VC of NUJS).
May Lord redeem you of your sin.
2. Clearly the reason behind your ire against the UNICEF centre is obvious. Jealousy. You are probably a member of the Justice League yourself.
3. Nobody said Lord Taluk didn't have discretionary power. Only he himself keeps giving that excuse when it suits him. The comment was about the impact of abuse of such power on academic standard. Which is very accurate. That didn't happen during Menon, who used the power for overall long-term academic benefit of students, not the other way.
My sins are doing fine, but Justice League members' tans are in danger of getting a hiding soon enough, 'cos karma is a B***h.
These guys anyways dont do jack and just like to talk... all talk and do nothing.
The harsh reality is that the student associations need to be active and resist state interference. They also need to involve alumni. NLSIU did it when reservation was introduced, Jadavpur did it when Mamata tried to interfere. JNU does it everyday. Despite agitations, JNU is still well regarded, while Jadavpur still made it to the list of 11 institutions recommended by the Gopalaswami Committee for Eminence status (the govt chose 6 but will select the rest later).
In the case of NUJS, students and alumni around the world united when a petition was framed against Bhat, back in 2013 or so. Sadly, the petition was not forwarded. www.change.org/p/chief-justice-of-india-to-seek-urgent-intervention-against
Successive SJAs were resistant to protest and left it too late. Alumni were also not involved. The present SJA has continued the Gandhian tradition of turning the other cheek. Meanwhile, students have hypocritical by supporting incompetent "Rather Particular" faculty who bribe students with marks, while demanding better faculty on the other hand.
I'm sorry, you cannot dig your own grave and sleep in it, and then complain when the government tries to bury you.
and Arjun Agarwal if reading this to quote any such legal provisions below. They have put NUJS in jeopardy for no reason, and nujs will pay for it. If the course was illegal then they have to refund all the people who already got certificates as well as call back over 5000 certificates. All refunds will go from pockets of regular students.
Have a great day sir!
How does my observation about the NUJS image being tarnished due to this news relate to the fact that I am not in a law school or that I am a CLAT aspirant?
And if you ( A student/ alumni of a reputed law school) are unwilling to tolerate someone's opinion on a particular college just because he/she is not from a law school or because of age, then who is the one having entitlement issues sir?
As I earlier mentioned, NUJS is my second preference and is one of the best law schools in the country. Law aspirants literally fawn over the idea of making it to these top colleges. That doesn't take away our right to point out a certain flaw ( even if temporary) in that particular institution.
Moreover, I used the term "rival law schools" as I am a witness to the mudslinging and ad hominems amongst the colleges here on Legally India. I assumed you thought I was some troll trying to malign NUJS.
My only reason to be on this website is to keep myself motivated during my preparation.
And I'd like to thank you for wishing that I never end up in an NLU. I hope the contrary myself.
I wouldn't be replying to any follow up comments. Still I appreciate you taking the time to reply to a non NLU person. Grazie!
At the end of the day, NUJS will no doubt still continue (for a long time) to be one of the top national law schools, helped by its strong history and alumni network. But there can be no doubt that the administrative issues are worrying and if they don't get settled soon, there could be some (small) knock-on effects on student preferences, vis-a-vis institutions that have more solid or progressive leadership.
I think CLAT taker expressing his / her view on such matters, shouldn't immediately result in flaming him / her or suspecting them to be a troll from another NLU (though it's not unheard for trolling comments to have been made in such guise too, in the past).
In any case, good luck with the CLAT, wishing you all the best in your legal career!
By now it should be obvious to you if you read the NUJS stories on Legally India that theres some scary shit happening at NUJS. Students against faculty, faculty against faculty, VC against faculty, even the dogs are fighting each other. Not a healthy place to go to. If you are hell bent on law keep NUJS as a fall back after NLS, NALSAR, NLUD and NLUJ. I might even suggest GLC Mumbai or ILS Pune as very healthy alternatives especially if you actually do well in academics there. The only carrot NUJS really offers is a Amarchand / Luthra job and that is something any smart young lawyer can get into if she makes an effort. NUJS is a sinking ship at the moment filled with rats of all description. Believe you me its not a good place to go to.
P.S. I certainly wish I had opted for NLUJ over NUJS, seeing how the last 2 yrs of my life have been an utter waste in this hellish campus filled with the worst faculty and student leaders I could imagine.
- A current NUJS student
Lord Taluk is going nowhere till the EC lets him go or more importantly his political masters. If he ever wanted to leave or do anything right he would have done so ages ago. Just because we have not been able to clearly identify his core interest for being here does not mean Lord Taluk has none.
Btw someone (likely a vain avatar) was ranting against the ban imposed on distance and online courses at NUJS. Why don't you simply respond to the RTIs filed by Arjun? That starts with showing the relevant UGC approvals. Don't tell me you didn't get the memo?
Is V really against Taluk or simply angling for influence (as always)? So who is the pawn this time, the other Sen?
#OmitTalukdar #SikhaSentPacking
I believe the gloves are coming off. Time for another vile administration and its supporters to bite the dust. The deadwood in NUJS must go.
Support #OmitTalukdar #SikhaSentPacking #OccupyNUJS
Regarding your point about infrastructure, I agree. However, I do not believe state-of-the-art infrastructure (like JGLS) is essential for good quality education. A good library, hygienic hostel, access to prominent databases, facilities necessary for ICT in classroom, that's basically it. Most of the law grads who have studied in law schools back in the 90s or early 2000s didn't even have all these and they still have done rather well for themselves. Now if a law school can't provide these even, then that's a point of concern indeed.
1. Unexpectedly, for Trinamool Taimur & Co, a few people with good CVs applied. Possibly, these are people who want to spend 1 to 2 years at NUJS or GNLU, do some good work, and then use it as a stepping stone to get NLSIU or NLUD VCship.
2. This has thwarted the plan to appoint a mediocre puppet VC who will turn the university into a Trinamool outpost.
3. The plan is to delay until the good applicants lose patience and head to GNLU, or even a lesser NLU with a vacancy. Then, the TMC chela wins by default.
4. Alternatively, the plan could be to execute dirty tactics to make the good candidates lose out, e.g. by tampering their CVs and fudging the CVs of the bad ones, or by lobbying for seniority and Bengal domicile to override everything else, or by spreading falsehoods about the good candidates to the CJI.
law.kiit.ac.in/management-director-profile.html
law.kiit.ac.in/people/faculty/
www.dnaindia.com/india/photo-gallery-intolerance-much-bjp-youth-leader-priyanka-sharma-arrested-for-posting-met-gala-themed-meme-on-mamata-banerjee-2747891
Quote:Quote:
But precisely because he is good there will be people scheming of ways to deny him the job, including the TMC gang.
threads most popular
thread most upvoted
comment newest
first oldest
first