Hi buddy, I am from the same college and have seen my peers taking this path. I would suggest you to take up this role since it will open many other doors for you. If you do well, sometime judges refer their clerks to law firms and seniors as well. Also, other than just being clerk I would advise you to expand your network without any conflict of interest. A batch mate of mine, after clerkship got a job in the ministry as a legal consultant because of this referral. This opportunity will open many doors of litigation, its all on you how you capitalize on this opportunity. Legal profession is all about networking whether you are clerk, lawyer, counsel, in house etc... As for me, I worked in litigation, in house, law firms to understand what suits me better. You may also take up the opportunity that is coming presently and if you don't like it, then you can always leave and try something better.

I agree. In fact, NRI quota students should be given special privileges by the administration, should be treated with utmost respect by the rest of the students, and have a preference in every activity. If students can be fixated on placements and ROI (from their education), why shouldn't university administrations do the same? NRI quota students mean better ROI.

The fact that it's been extensively marked up without a fuss means that the partner knows you'll learn. You're expected to see the difference in what you've done and what he has and understand why one is preferred over the other - of there s a doubt, ask. This is how you'll learn and improve from this instance and apply the learnings going forward. Do this everytime you're faced with a new situation and you'll be absolutely fine.

Having a decent GK is a quint essential trait of a lawyer. You don't need to mug up everything under the sun but you should knkw the quint essential bare minimum stuff around law, business, commerce, polity and science and every day current affairs that at least goes to show that the person picks up the news paper and read it.

And for this responsibilities, the wife wants all the house help, maids, nanny, newest equipments which reduce any labour so what precisely is role of wife? Just asking for every good thing in life? You want your husband to provide for all this to reduce and replace responsibility which comes to you! And still behave as if you're doing a favor.

The question itself had the word famous in it, what are you smoking? And it is a victory for not just NALSAR but all NLUs. So many questions on law could have been asked, like what Jethmalani is famous for? But the question masters chose to make a question about NLUs in arguably one of the most famous game show of the country.

Every day you have posts on legally india that why doesn't no one in India knows about NLUs and finally when a gameshow that airs to every Indian household makes a question about it, some of you guys are getting butthurt only because your law school was not specifically mentioned. Chote log. That's the only word for you guys. Not every post is supposed to be a dick measuring or pissing contest. No post should be.

Hey y'all! I would appreciate it if any alumni or one who knows answers a couple of my queries regarding the degree program of GLC. I asked some of the students personally, but even they didn't have concrete answers...

Well, I'm getting a mid-tier-2 NLU through CLAT, and being a Maharashtra candidate, I'm seriously considering GLC. What's alluring to me is its location and "flexibility" - the prospectus mentions that the student is awarded B.L.S. degree at the end of the third year and this seems to be a good deal (i) if it's timely awarded and (ii) if this degree is qualifying in nature.

(i) Is it usually awarded in a timely fashion after the third year (6th semester)? What's the usual month when the 6th semester is concluded?

(ii) Is this degree qualifying in nature for (a) exams like CAT, etc., and (b) a JD program or Senior status BA (Jurisprudence) abroad?

Thanks <3

I did not know that law students did not understand basic economics. It is because of the NRI quota that the fees for the rest are lower (not exorbitant). Their fees are used to subsidize the cost for the rest, just as business class passengers "subsidize" economy passengers. NRI quota seats should be increased. When state NLUs have to contend with unpredictable state governments who have abdicated the responsibility of funding the state NLUs, the administration has to look for sources of revenue. That's why people avoid state universities.

All bought online and during sale, I use:
1. Bata: ballerinas, came about INR 500-700 and Mary Janes with Heels for 1800 but you can find it on sale now for 1500;
2. Metro: black closed wedges for INR 900-1200;
3. Skechers (shoes), the one I specifically bought during sale costed about INR 2700

Hi, I'm the guy you responded to.

As someone else has said, mental sanity over money. Yes, even if it puts me back 10 years. What I make is still sufficient for me. As long as it's sufficient, I'm fine. I'd rather have my mental sanity than earn 20x I do right now. I mean it.

The flexibility is actually a big aspect. Much better than my friends who are at law firms. If I have to go for a trip, I get to do that. If I have to attend a wedding, I get to attend it on my terms. If I fall sick, I get to focus on health rather than worry about reporting to office. (of course, I still have to worry about cases & clients - but comparatively, it's relaxed)

Then there's work satisfaction also. Not much to be said for this, I guess - I enjoy my work.

To me, your question (including the "to the extent that you fall 10 years behind" response) appears faulty. Just because there's more money in something doesn't make it desirable to be pursued. There's also big bucks in, say, medicine - but that doesn't mean I'll pursue MBBS regardless of my passions & priorities.

You have to start working on it. Go see a professional. Just ensure you don't mess up references after this. That hurts more than messing up a T1 interview. People put out their necks for you and you cannot do this to them. I am sure you're not a loser, but you can make smarter decisions. Take care of yourself and good luck.

the kate and single pump heels of louboutins are very comfortable, heels are not exactly a comfortable choice too, and had you owned a few pairs you would know that louboutins and any other good quality heels are uncomfortable in first few wears but once they break in they feel like clouds

Could you please share about the remuneration at Live Law?

Is there a work from home option? Is it necessary to relocate to Delhi office? Since the reporters and journalists report from different HCs, can one work in one's hometown? What does the work entail in that case? What would be salary then?

TITLE: COMPLACENT LEGACY-LAWYER BOOMERS ARE THE BANE OF MY LIFE

This is a weird take, I guess. But I'm dead sure the boomers have lost it. The boomers are NOT okay. One of the seniors (by years of practice only) who has been in the profession for close to three decades now, asked me to assist the said senior on a matter. It was the said senior's matter, appearance being filed just after I began associating with the said individual. I really put a lot of work into the matter, though it was neither my matter, nor my VP, nor my client. In retrospect, I shouldn't have. That's on me. Lessons learnt.

The matter in question came to be adjourned from time to time, giving the said senior LOT of time to go through my file for his arguments on admission. For nearly 5-6 months, this individual refused to touch that file. The matter came up today for admission. I regularly updated the file with recent developments. Concerned (though i shouldn't be for Not-My-Briefs), I legit had to sit that individual down yesterday to at least orally tell him what to focus on in the file, to save the senior's time even further, and ensure the individual could substantially argue on admission today. The said individual even yesterday, despite my oral briefing did not touch the file. A matter which could have been disposed at a nascent stage shall now remain pending for God knows how many years. My efforts down the drain.

This is a pattern for the said individual. Though fecking millets (peanuts is too rich for the measly payment), I get a few.

The boomers charge the clients handsomely. Clients with capacity pay. Not my concern, but that's how it is. Despite all this, these people don't even bother to look up what their junior associates have prepared for them. Juniors are spoon-feeding these individuals to no avail. How the hell do these people who don't even read the matters get clients, and those like us are thrown scraps off their table? Yep, life is unfair and all, but these boomers got no conscience, I guess. There wasn't even the slightest of an attempt made, on any of the occasions when the matter came up. The HonCt. was willing to hear out the matter on earlier occasions.

And no, before anyone asks, that was not a part of the plan.

And yes, before anyone asks, I legit searched for this thread because I really need to vent. Venting is all that I can do now, waiting at the filing department till his majesty, the department clerk makes an appearance.

I think the best think tank is the one which the Govt. favours. Not one which gives the best output.

So, VIF, India Foundation and Syama Prasad Mookerjee Research Foundation are the flavour of the seasons to come. Specifically, Vivekananda International Foundation (VIF).

Would love a link of UPSC final marksheet pdf where the NLU kids have got more marks while aam kids have got less marks in interviews.

Just type in UPSC final marksheet 2022 in google and you will get the PDF. Now just high light the NLU kids so that we all can see them getting higher marks in interviews compared to aam janta. Please paste the final link here.

Thanks!

It’s mostly the tier-1 NLU students from the big metros and some nepo kids from privileged families that have such eloquence. But yes, in comparison to other streams, law focuses much more on precise language skills. This is quite obvious in how kids from places like NLS, NLUD, NUJS, etc. excel at the interview stage of civil services and scholarship interviews.

I agree. As someone who cleared CLAT with a decent rank but scored almost zero on the GK section, what would you suggest to gain that required knowledge? To be honest, reading newspaper is very frustrating and tedious to me as i think that one needs a good knowledge of various subjects to actually understand those articles (i may be wrong, but my comprehension is otherwise quite good as i manage to read difficult articles on topics i am familiar with already)

Do Associate Partners and PAs also respond to social media posts and apply by sending CV? Recently saw this post

https://www.instagram.com/p/C2MM4x0SyIT/?igsh=MTI3Y2E2Nmd6a2s2ag==

Used to think most of these shifts are through mutual discussions or through headhunters

Firstly, the host never praised NALSAR. He just told the full form of NALSAR. Secondly, what is so surprising about knowing about the existence of NLUs when you are someone who has already completed their llb??? Lastly, the question was worth a measly 5000 rupees which shows that it was obvious that she would know the answer. Why are you insecure NLUs chaps always lookimg for validation???

Times are not changing, you dolt, experts making questions have to make questions which a law student would comfortably be able to answer. This is true for people from all areas, they are asked questions which they already have some idea about. Nothing to be proud of.

That's the problem of people like you. Sab kuch paka pakaya chaiye. Everything the government has to do, we won't move an inch. Go and study about educational systems around the world. From primary to higher education, everywhere there has been an effort from educators to change. Not politicians. In the end they only approve or decline things. They don't do the work. Majority of boards whether cbse, state or even NLUs have educators in them. They join these boards and try to change them from within. Moreover, education doesn't change for teaching. So your argument ki padha ke kya karloge is stupid. Education changes from administration. You get in the administration and change it. Harvard and Oxford weren't built by politicians or government. They were built by the professors, the students and most importantly the alumni that contribute and gave back to theire institution. Before pointing everything to the government, ask yourself how many times have you personally given back to your institutions as an alumni, whether school or University. The answer would be zero.

They say the two oldest professions in the world are litigation and prostitution. I work in the former, feel like the latter. Wmy batchmates and I, whether firms or court, work out ass off, giving 12 hours a day, living on peanuts. Each day is about politics, getting through the day, listening to your boss scream, listening to your clients scream, listening to judges scream. I regret leaving an opportunity to do btech for this. I wish as an introvert I had chosen to do CS. I would have stayed away from people, would have done something I loved and my job profile would always be in demand. I can't switch professions as I'm in my mid 30s. I can't go abroad, don't have enough money. I can't marry, cause I barely have time for my existing family. This job has just f'd me up. Moreover for what ? It's not like we're earning in crores that we can leave in 10 years. It's not like we're creating history, we're just pushing files like clerks. Respect is zero since the old hags in the court won't leave till they drop dead, and the new kids won't stop coming. We're stuck in the middle, where we aren't young enough to be the new prostitute if the market, nor are we old enough to be recognised as the men with valuable experience. Lives F'd. Seriously kids need to think before entering this position. No health, no wealth, no family, no passion, just nothingness.

Yes. Three of my batchmates. All first generation. Average kids. Now AoRs. Have around 10+ years of practice and doing great. You can do it as well. Just remember to try and intern under SC advocates before graduation and secure some sort of work post graduation. My suggestion based on my batchmates journey is; in the first two years focus on district court litigation. One year do civil, the next do criminal. Then 3rd and 4rth year, go to the High Court and again one year civil, the next criminal. 5th and final year..apply to all SC advocates through your DC & HC contacts. The fact that you did both civil and criminal litigation internships at both DC & HC would show that you're interested in litigation and not corporate. Moreover you've come from the bottom to top approach with respect to learning the way of the practice. This will help you to secure a SC internship. Then focus on it like it's your PPO chance. Even if you don't get through post graduation, ask them to hook you up with someone. One of my other batchmate requested 6 months of no-pay assessment work. After 6 months he joined the chambers. In the end, you have to work hard, build contact and prove to people you're worth the hassle. Why would complete strangers take you in their chamber when you haven't proven anything. That's why majority internships in courts and a geniune interest in practicing will get you a foot in the door for SC. Long and arduous road. But worth it. All the best !

I am currently working on a tier 2 law firm in Delhi. My in-hand in 60k. Does anyone know how to improve career progression & get a better offer? I hd applied for in house roles and they offered similar packages. The thing is my friends on other professions are doing much better than me financially. It is kinda depressing.

U don't have to study btech in iits and nits to land a good engineering job. One can do btech from a normal college and than go for mtech in a iit or nit. I hv seen a few of my friends do this. They got a starting package of around 36-40 Lacs CTC in Qualcomm and Nvidia. They were pretty avg in school too.

IIT Kgp Alum here.

Many may not like this statement but the kind effort required to go through the engineering course cannot be compared with law.

If you want to get an engineering job which pays equivalent to Tier 1 firms then your best shot is to graduate from the IITs, IIITs, NIITs. You cannot compare the difficulty level of these entrance exams with CLAT. I have given JEE, AIEEE, GATE, CLAT and LSAT. Trust me.

All jobs are taxed under the salary head, so the CTC and the in Hand amount would be very different.

If you are getting a good NLU, then I would suggest going for law.

If you want to go for UPSC, law is also a good optional subject. Much easier compared to the engineering subjects.

This is just a broad overview. Let me know if you have any specific queries.

Link: https://twitter.com/barandbench/status/1745706451509895599?s=20

(Admin, in light of some really stupid stuff that is posted on the site on a daily basis, please let us know why is this not being posted? It is for the community to accept, not accept or critique a post and not by you. We should celebrate small law school victories, and this is no one less than CJI. You can remove the bracketed part of course.)

I am getting a clerkship at DHC under a coveted Bench. However I am unsure whether to go for it or not. Any advice considering my end goal is to be placed at a firm?

Recent graduate from CLC. Have a decent CV but am not getting firm offers as of now. Some chambers are coming my way but they aren't known as such though I am sure I will learn stuff there. Any advice seniors? How do law firms view judicial clerkships as an experience while recruiting?

In India sexual harassment victims will be better off dying than fighting for justice.Like the UP judge openly asked for "dismissal" of her life.

Suno Draupadi Shastra Utha Lo by Pushyamitra

This poem written in 2012 after the Nirbhaya case

सुनो द्रोपदी शस्त्र उठालो, अब गोविंद ना आयेंगे
----------------------------------------------

छोडो मेहँदी खड्ग संभालो
खुद ही अपना चीर बचा लो
द्यूत बिछाये बैठे शकुनि,
मस्तक सब बिक जायेंगे
सुनो द्रोपदी शस्त्र उठालो, अब गोविंद ना आयेंगे |

कब तक आस लगाओगी तुम,
बिक़े हुए अखबारों से,
कैसी रक्षा मांग रही हो
दुशासन दरबारों से |

स्वयं जो लज्जा हीन पड़े हैं
वे क्या लाज बचायेंगे
सुनो द्रोपदी शस्त्र उठालो, अब गोविंद ना आयंगे |

कल तक केवल अँधा राजा,
अब गूंगा बहरा भी है
होठ सी दिए हैं जनता के,
कानों पर पहरा भी है |
तुम ही कहो ये अश्रु तुम्हारे,
किसको क्या समझायेंगे?
सुनो द्रोपदी शस्त्र उठालो, अब गोविंद ना आयंगे |
~ पुष्यमित्र उपाध्याय

The poem says, (translation)

"Leave the henna, hold your sword firmly,

Save your own honor.

Shakuni sits, spreading his deceitful game,

All heads will be put up for sale.

Listen, Draupadi, raise your weapon, for Govinda won't come now.

How long will you rely on false hopes,

From the corrupt newspapers?

What kind of protection are you seeking,

From the court of Dushasana?

Those who themselves lack shame,

How will they save your honor?

Listen, Draupadi, raise your weapon, for Govinda won't come now.

Until yesterday, only the blind king (Dhritarashtra) ruled,

Now even the deaf are in power.

The people have given their voice,

But they have fallen on deaf ears.

Who will understand your tears,

And whom will they explain to?

Listen, Draupadi, raise your weapon, for Govinda won't come now.

A judge refuses to frame an issue of sexual harassment on a woman's application..This us an actual Court of fer.Even presuming this order to be right but on a human level its just a slap in the face of a victim of sexual harassment.

RCUDA)No. 200/2017

Exh. O-
BEFORE SHRI. D. R. DANDE, PRESIDING OFFICER,
THIRD LABOUR COURT, MUMBAI.
REFERENCE (IDA) NO. 200/2017
CNR NO. MHLC01001032-2017

M/s. J. P. Morgan Services India
Private Limited. . First Party
V/s.
Smt. Praggna Pujara .. Second Party

In the matter of application for framing additional issues.

Coram : D. R. Dande, Presiding officer.
Appearances : Shri. Prashant Tawade, Representative for First
party.

: Second Party in person

ORDER BELOW EXH.U-55
(Passed on: 17/12/2022)
1) This is an application moved by workman for framing additional issues and for keeping matter at the stage of documents,so parties can admit or deny the documents filed or to be filed by each other.

2) Read the application. Perused say.

3) Heard both sides.

4) Gist of the application is that, despite of specificpleadings, Court has not framed proper issues. Therefore, for deciding controversy between the parties, it is necessary to frame additional issues. It is also the contention of the workman that,
Court after framing issues has directly posted the matter for evidence of second party. So opportunity of admission and denial
of the documents or stage for filing documents is dropped by the Court. Hence it is necessary to keep the matter for filing
documents.

Applicant second party has prayed for framing following additional issues.

(1) Whether 1st party proves it complied principles of natural justice and followed due processes and applicable laws on the
2™ party's complaints of harassment prior to termination?

(2) Whether 2” party female workman proves she was harassed, sexually and/or non sexually, by 1st party's officials/staff ?
Whether the 2nd party proves termination of 2nd party by the1st party was a retaliatory punitive victimization and unfair
labour practice against 2™ party for escalating and asserting rights of redressal and report/s in her complaints/ reporting of
harassments?

(3) Whether 1st party proves the termination order of 14/11/2016 to be termination simpliciter? Whether 1st party's proves
termination ground of loss of confidence to terminate 2nd party workman as legal, justified and valid grounds?

5) In support of her application, second party has relied on following authorities-

(i) J. K. Iron And Steel Co. Ltd. V/s. The Iron and Steel Mazdoor
Union, (SC), 1956 AIR 231

Gi) Shankar Bhimrao Kadam and Ors V/s. Tata Motors Limited
(Bom.H.C) in Writ Petition no. 5566/2017 , decided on 26" February
2022.

ii) Shri. Sunil Pralhad Khomane & Ors V/s. M/s. Bajaj Auto Ltd, Akurdi, Pune (Bom. H.C) in Writ Petition no. 4502 of 2006, decided
on 1* February.

(iv) Maddala Sai Lakshmi Vs. Medisetti Lakshmi Harass ma (Andhra Pradesh H. C) decided on 2°? March-2006- 2006 (4) ALD
46, 2006(3) ALT 708-11

(v) Makhan Lal Bangal V/s. Manas Bhunia and Ors (S.C) , decided on 3“ January 2001- 2001 (1) SCR 17.

(vi) The Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee Banglore V/s. The State of Karnataka & Ors (S.C), Civil Appeal No. 1345-
1346 of 2022 decided on 22/03/2022.

I have carefully gone through the above authorities.

6) Application is opposed by the first party by filing detail say at Exh. C-33. Gist of the say filed by the first party is that,
Court has considered the pleadings of the parties and framed proper issues. Therefore, there is no need to frame additional
issues. Present application by the second party is entirely baseless and an attempt to delay a hearing on the merits of the matter. The second party by the said application is merely seeking to abuse the due process of this Court and is attempting to have this Court frame further/additional issues for which the second party has filed
no pleadings in support. Therefore framing of any of the issues as sought by the second party would amount an overreach, inasmuch
as it is fundamental principle of law that a court my only decide the issues of law and fact as pleaded by the parties before it. The
present application ought to therefore be dismissed at the verythreshold itself.

7) Before touching to the merits of the case, I would like to mention here scope and jurisdiction of Labour Court while
deciding Reference made by Government. In that regard, two authorities of Hon'ble Supreme Court are important.

One of the questions which fell for consideration for Hon'ble Supreme Court in Delhi Cloth and General Mills Co. Ltd. vs. The
Workmen and Others (AIR 1967 SC 469) was that what are the powers of the appropriate Government while making a reference
and the scope and jurisdiction of Industrial Tribunal under Sections 10 of the Act. Hon'ble Justice Mitter, speaking for the Bench, held
as under:

"(8) Under_S. 10(1)(d) of the Act, it is open to the appropriate Government when it is of opinion that any industrial dispute exists to
make an order in writing referring "the dispute or any matter appearing to be connected with, or relevant to the dispute,.....to a Tribunal for adjudication” under_s. 10(4) "where in an order referring an industrial
dispute to a Labour Court, Tribunal or National Tribunal under this section or in a subsequent order, the appropriate Government has specified the points of dispute for adjudication, the Labour Court or the Tribunal or the National Tribunal, as the case may be, shall confine its
adjudication to those points and matters incidental thereto.”

(9) From the above it therefore appears that while it is open to the appropriate Government to refer the dispute or any matter appearing to be connected therewith for adjudication, the Tribunal must confine its
adjudication to the points of dispute referred and matters incidental thereto. In other words, the Tribunal is not free to enlarge the scope of the dispute referred to it but must confine its attention to the points specifically mentioned and anything which is incidental thereto. The word ‘incidental’ means according to Webster's New World Dictionary : “happening or likely to happen as a result of or in connection with
something more important; being an incident; casual; hence, secondary or minor, but usually associated :

"Something incidental to a dispute” must therefore mean something happening as a result of or in connection with the dispute or associated with the dispute. The dispute is the fundamental thing while something
incidental thereto is an adjunct to it. Something incidental, therefore,
cannot cut at the root of the main thing to which it is an adjunct to Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Oshiar Prasad & Ors
vs Emp. In Rel.To Mgt.of S.C.Washery ... on 2 February, 2015

(Bench: Hon'ble Justice Fakkir Mohamed Kalifulla and Hon'ble Justice Abhay Manohar Sapre) has relied on the case of Delhi Cloth &
General Mill (cited supra) and observed in paragraph no. 25 as
follows-
“25. It is thus clear that the appropriate Government is empowered
to make a reference under Section 10 of the Act only when's "Industrial dispute exists” or "is apprehended between the parties”.
Similarly, it is also clear that the Tribunal while answering the reference has to confine its inquiry to the question(s) referred and
has no jurisdiction to travel beyond the question(s) or/and the terms of the reference while answering the reference. A fortiori, no inquiry can be made on those questions, which are not specifically referred to
the Tribunal while answering the reference.”

So on perusal of above two authorities, it is ample clear that Labour Court has to confine its enquiry to the question referred
and _ has no jurisdiction to travel beyond the question referred to it.

Let me now re-produce the question referred by Government to this Court for adjudication.

8) Let me now re-produce the issues framed by me.

1) Whether the second party proves that, she falls under the
category of workman as defined under section 2(s) of the I. D.
Act, 1947?

2) Whether the second party proves that, dispute between her
and first party is Industrial Dispute within a meaning of
Section 2(k) of the I. D. Act?

3) Whether the second party proves that, her services were
illegally terminated by the first party w.e.f. 14/11/2016?

RCUDA)No. 200/2017
6

4) Whether the reference is maintainable?

5) Whether the second party is entitled for reinstatement in her
original post with continuity of services, full back wages
w.e.f. 14/11/2016 alongwith other consequential benefits ?

6) What award?

This Court keeping in the mind settled legal position regarding scope of the enquiry framed above issues.

9) So far as proposed additional issue no. 1 is concerned, second party workman is praying for framing issue that whether
first party has followed the laws applicable to second party in the complaint of harassment prior to termination?

In my view this issue is beyond the scope of the enquiry pending before this Court. Whether first party has followed
applicable laws is not a question before this Court. So, there is no need to frame additional issue as prayed by the second party.

10) So far as proposed second issue is concerned, it is pertinent to note that workman has to prove before the Court that,
she is illegally terminated from service without following due procedure of law. In that regard, Court has framed issue no. 3.
Scope of the issue no. 3 is very wide. It covers all alleged harassment at the hands of first party and its officers. She has to
prove that, she is victimized and first party has adopted unfair labour practices. So proposed issue no. 2 is covered by issue no.3.Workman has to prove that she is illegally terminated from theservice,so issue no.3 is framed by this Court .

11) Turning towards the proposed third issue. During the enquiry, second party has to prove that her termination is illegal
and first party has to justify the action of termination. So proposed issue no. 3 is also covered by issue no.3 framed by this Court.
There is no need to frame additional issue no.3 as prayed by second party. Again I have to mention that scope of Issue no. 3 framed by this Court is very wide.

12) So far as question of posting matter for the stage of documents is concerned. Both the parties have already filed
number of documents on record. Workman has already filed document below list Exh. U-6, Exh.U-40, Exh.U-46, Exh.U-51 and
Exh. U-54. However, if one or more documents remained to be
filed, workman can file it/them with her affidavit of examination in chief and prior to facing further examination in chief, other party can admit or deny said documents and the documents already filed. Considering the fact that, matter is time bound by Hon'ble
Supreme Court, we have to expedite enquiry. Accordingly, enquiry is expedited. Liberty is granted to parties to file documents on next
date. In short, there is no merit in the application . Accordingly, it is liable to be rejected. Hence following order is passed.

ORDER
1) Application stands rejected.

Digitally signed by
DNYANESHWAR
RAMESHRAO DANDE

Date: 2022.12.21
11:30:53 +0530

Date- 17/12/2022 (D.R. Dande)
Presiding Officer
SSA Third Labour Court, Mumbai.

POV: you're a woman living in today's society where you're supposed to accept men's shortcomings with the misogynistic mindset and traditions, that expects you to have kids, be married, have an exciting career, be financially independent, be emotionally independent, leave your own parents and accept your partner's parents as your own and serve and care for them all the whole neglecting your own birth parents, be healthy, kind, young, fit, smart, elegant, clean your house, be grateful........

But Haan, ladki ki demand Hui ki bande ke paas atleast finance strong ho toh she's a gold digger. Anyways, majority people just earn average income. I wonder how many will earn 5-6cr more.

I am the local college student who wrote this comment.

Firstly the amount of superiority complex you have is sad.

I wrote one advantage of being a local college student over elite nlu and privates colleges. And immidiately people lost shit and started telling local judicial system is bad because of us.

Local Judicial system is the backbone of justice system in india. You NLU sls jindal students work as lawyers in High court and corporate firms where you don't contribute anything.

Our students crack judicial services in higher number not because we are dumber. We are hardworking student comings from poorer families and doesn't have privlage of nlu rich students.

We work hard. Also our syllabus helps us. While you waste your time on moot court competitions, working, reading unnecessary legal books and researching on large theses, doing LLM in Europe. We study for Judiciary. Mugging up doesn't happen overnight. We study.

Tell your college to make your course simple like local law college? No. You won't because then you will loose privilage of campus placement and job opportunities.

So called extra curricular activities make your cv and push you to get job in a corporate company and corporate law firms.

Hello LI, I'm a 4th year law student from a mediocre college. I'm currently in Bangalore and looking to find Corporate internships in law firms which offer corporate law services. I tried emailing the HRs of every big or small law firms in Bangalore. I either get rejected or I don't get a reply. if anybody has any advice as to what kind of law firm I should apply to? or what process should i follow please help me out. As this my first post on the forum please be kind.

I have severe anxiety and due to the same could not attend the scheduled internship interview at a Tier 1.

Due to an ongoing hectic internship coupled with a major anxiety attack I fainted and ended up in the hospital.

My Uni senior who helped push my CV is pissed as I didn’t inform them nor did I pick up the HR calls.

Anybody else with similar experiences or debilitating anxiety?

Or am I the only sore loser? 🙁

I am an A-2 and work in a two person team, along with the partner. I drafted an agreement which was extensively marked-up by the partner, although the agreement had all the right mechanisms in place. He's been very kind about it and hasn't made a fuss about it. But I feel bad that the partner had to put so much time into it. What can I do to improve my drafting ? What must the partner be thinking about me. Would really appreciate insights into the situation.

I am searching for corporate law internships in Bangalore. I am quite frankly lost at how do I approach the whole issue. For context I have emailed the HRs of every big or small law firms in Bangalore with my cover letter and CV. But i received no reply. Is there any specific type of law firms I should focus on? or am i missing a step entirely?? Please be kind this my first post and I'm really nervous!

I've talked to a lot of people from various academic disciplines, including engineering, medicine, English literature, and pure sciences, I've observed a notable trend. Law students, in particular, exhibit a remarkable degree of articulateness and eloquence, showcasing an exceptional command over the English language

Makes me wonder what the reason is. Is it the law school curriculum? Or is it because they are good readers as their profession requires them to read a lot?

From a long-term perspective, take the Law Firm. The pay is less and the firm is thereby a small one I assume, but you will get good exposure to the kind of work you are interested in. 80K honestly is just decent for a place like Mumbai .

With some experience, you can easily shift to a law firm in Bombay( even in-house) for even better pay than 80K a month at a boutique or a T1 firm.

It is easy to transition from a law firm to an in-house and not the other way round. This is because an in-house environment is much slower and laidback and less challenging than a law firm. So a law firm will greatly undervalue the time you have spent at a inhouse while an inhouse will take your law firm experience very positively.

https://thewire.in/rights/home-ministry-cancels-centre-for-policy-researchs-fcra-registration

No such controversy affects Vidhi and they are getting good govt projects. So is Vidhi the best now?

I think it is for a good pair of formal footwear that will last you 2-3 years at least. If you’re looking for an even cheaper category then you’ll find it in street markets like Sarojini, Lajpat Nagar, Linking Road, Elco Market etc. Those would be between 500-1k, uncomfortable and of terrible quality. I’d rather spend once on a couple of good durable pairs rather than going through the embarrassment of my heel snapping or sole coming off in the middle of a work day.