We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
There are lots of books, but for eg, try Never Eat Alone by Keith Ferrazzi. Treat the advice like a skill - and practice it. Just because you watch a Youtube video on how to a bowl a googly, doesn't mean you can do it well (or at all) the first 50 times you do it. But stick with it and I guarantee in two years you'll be places you never thought you would be. But it has to be genuine - as in, genuine interest in other people. It can't be faked or people will sense it.
Is there any Law firm that offer Online Internship in TMT Law except Ikigai Law firm??
I wanted to ask - Is there any law firms for TMT that offer online internship?
But is this all hogwash? Remember how the Rizwanur murder case got buried and almost all the IPS officers esp the senior ones not only got off the hook but even got rewarded with plum postings? Kindness even promoted and made Ministers out of IAS and IPS folks who killed off inquiries in the much discussed and weaponized Bantala, IPS Mehta, Singur, Nandigram etc cases.
Go back further. The Left did zilch to police folks who committed atrocious excesses in the name of anti Naxal operations and Marichjhapi massacres.
Hence will the histories of gimmick and hollow promises repeat (esp when the role CBI in RG Kar is not being scrutinized) or is the wheel getting broken this time?
Domestically it happens. CBI, ED, IT, NIA, Vigilance....everyone is a sinner or will be one (e.g. TVK)
For seniors who were part of top moot teams: what actually separates an average researcher from an elite one?
What specific skills, habits, resources, or approaches should I focus on from first year itself? How do top researchers build their reputation within a law school ecosystem?
Would also appreciate advice on:memorial drafting,case law research,arbitration moots,legal writing,database usage,and becoming someone teams can genuinely rely on under pressure. Technology to be used everything which falls under research work.
No Indian uni has only online end sem exam.
My present work is largely focused on road infrastructure arbitration, with limited exposure to broader civil/commercial litigation and almost no trial court work. I am keen to join a chamber with more varied matters and better overall court exposure.
Any recommendations or leads would be greatly appreciated.
Need genuine advice please. Want to chart out my career projectory.
As a stakeholder in the system, one without a godfather or political connections, i too am embarrassed. Embarrassed to be part of a system that confers substantial advantages on the privileged while denying others panel work and opportunities, often with contempt and indifference.
I am also embarrassed by what the likes of Saurabh Bharadwaj are resorting to: openly taunting judicial pronouncements and observations made by a sitting High Court judge, even post recusal.
Context- https://youtu.be/JJ8Vr5GsvZw
I feel conflicted. I do not like the AAP, nor do I believe they were right in the manner in which they conducted themselves before Justice Sharma. Yet, ironically, it is only through their brand of politics and dirty tricks that the interests of lawyers like me ie. those without backing, struggling for work and denied panel appointments or meaningful opportunities are being indirectlyacknowledged, even if only by 0.1%.
After the 2008 fin crisis several such mergers and buyouts had happened. Even earlier when many so called universities mushroomed out of what were essentially colleges, it eventually led to a crack down and clean up.
But it is true the situation is worrisome. Chinese and Indian students along with some others bring in the moolah that kept these universities going. After all we pay 3-4 times the fee that UK national pay. Add to that the cost of living etc. Scholarships sound fancy but are meagre percentage. Also most scholarships are small bursaries and very few are what folks understand as "full scholarships".
Time to wise up.
How did one forget how Cal HC judges deemed to be anti establishment by puny little Green wo/men were heckled by Kindness acolytes inside and outside courtrooms and court premises? Did we also forget how Choti Chata police stood by and did zilch? And how can we forget how CP and the entire senior brass could do zilch with regime supported folks who put up posters against Justice Mantha including walls of Cal HC.
I personally prefer the law of contempt to be binned. After all the legislature and the executive don't have it and hopefully would never enact one for self preservation. And the judiciary often weaponizes it. But have forgotten how Kindness herself slandered judges deemed hostile to her shenanigans?
And now the gall to use court as some publicity stunt to keep her flock of wayward sheep together. Actually it started with an indulgent SC and regime friendly judges in Cal HC who gave her and apparatchiks a long rope.
#Reapwhatyousow
But there have been cases where a counsel has become a partner after 2-3 years. so alot of factor at play for this.
Also- i only have experience in direct tax. For IDT I think LKS is the only option. There are a few tier one firms with a good DT practice though.
Objectively, not a stitch-up all along (he was charged under the Biden administration); subjectively, you decide ;)
From what I’ve heard, LKS seems to offer a steeper learning curve because of the volume and variety of matters. It also appears that direct tax is a relatively larger practice there, which may translate into better long-term growth opportunities.
On the other hand, CAM is known to compensate better, though I’ve heard the direct tax team is comparatively smaller and progression beyond the PA level can sometimes be slower.
Would love to hear from people who’ve worked at either place or have insights on the kind of work, learning, and growth at both firms.
Some people have got over 5k as yearly deduction cumulatively for making mistakes, not answering the partners phone calls, coming 5 mins late to office etc
Sad state of affairs
You will make it, just know the bad feeling eventually passes if you want it to.
This is so funny
STEM departments boost rankings and their students and faculty are seen as less agitation-oriented than humanities students and faculty. Also, their employment rate is usually 100%. You probably have better job prospects as a Cranfield MSc in Aerospace Engineering over an Oxbridge MA in Philosophy or History (at least salary-wise). So KCL decided to acquire this rather than, say, SOAS or some theatre or art school. Since Cranfield is postgrad-only, they expect the people there to boost research rankings. Another advantage of STEM departments is that they can raise revenue through industrial consultancies. MIT and Stanford are obviously the gold standard, but even Cranfield does projects for aviation and military companies. They won’t be dependent on subsidies and handouts, which SOAS probably would.
Thus, OP’s concerns are more valid for pure-play humanities colleges like SOAS. For example, the UK’s top divinity school, Heythrop College, which was part of the University of London, has shut down completely.
https://www.legalitysimplified.com/ugc-calls-for-bharatiya-nyaya-sanhita-studies/
The actual UGC notification is here:
https://www.ugc.gov.in/pdfnews/1707526_Bhartiya-Nyaya-Sanhita-Studies-in-law-Curricula.pdf
Two things:
> This is the power and impact of NFSU
> Any postings on forensic sciences and NFSU are therefore unquestionably relevant on this platform
Yes, that's true, HNLU is an underwhelming and mediocre place in all terms - but the one that matters the most is peer quality and faculty quality, and they're both quite pathetic. However, your goal was getting jobs, and HNLU is not low enough in the hierarchy that this is at all an issue. If you stay withing the top 20 batch ranks, the advice goes, you are likely to get a good job. This advice exists and has been passed down for years because it IS true. Staying in the top 20 is NOT difficult to do - most peers are quite dim and quite uninterested in academics, so you'll fly into the top 20 if you just apply yourself a little (not even a lot), especially since your fluency over English seems to be alright judging from this post.
> One more thing, is that I don't want to take a partial drop as it's impossible that your CGPA doesn't get affected and in the unfortunate situation of not clearing CLAT with a desired rank, what will one do with that messed up CGPA (also the first semester matters the most, as it most greatly affects the overall average of future semesters).
This is entirely false. I took a partial drop: I studied the first semester and then gave CLAT again. I moved my rank from 850+ to 50+, while also having a batch rank of 13. I did not spend any serious amount of time on prep that encroached on my academics. HNLU is overwhelmingly chill, likely to accommodate for the very low caliber of the majority of the student body and faculty. There is really nothing to do most of the time. Besides, CLAT is a game of luck, and all your prep will be for nothing if the paper is unlucky, and if it is lucky then whatever prep you managed will be sufficient.
The second falsehood here is that first sem CGPA matters. First of all, prep may drop you CGPA by 10-20%, due to prep, from what you could have done had you applied your best effort, not more than that. Law school grades, like CLAT ranks, are mostly about luck and inherent intelligence than hard work. This difference is NOT meaningful, and you have many other semesters to recover any losses. Besides, the first sem is the easiest. Secondly, the first sem DOES NOT matter the most, it matters quite little, because there are many other semesters to go before your CGPA is used to allot internships by firms. You will have a lot of runway to course-correct.
Just take a partial drop, then if it works out and you get a good NLU, take a call (depending on your age and family financial position) on what you want to do - stay at HNLU or upgrade to what you got.
They are the real anti-nationals!! Unwilling to stop exploitation of associates even in a crisis like this!!
This is very sad to see, because candidates really take coaching material and outcomes to be gospel truth. The reality could not be further from the truth. Coaching is a business; it has no objective besides creating profits for owners. This means that inputs are obtained at lowest cost, outputs are sold at the highest cost and marketed as the opposite. Allow me to demonstrate:
I have seen how coaching centers prepare their materials. First year kids (17-18 yo) in NLS (other NLUs too) used to be paid 500-2,000/month to churn out 50+ questions weekly on the side. They obviously farm this task to AI. They obviously are only doing it to pay for their booze or parties that parents are unlikely to pay for. They obviously have NO idea what a CLAT paper is like and are just doing whatever gets them a bit of cash. The centers don't care - it's the lowest price they can pay for something that looks plausibly like CLAT questions. If the centers had to pay an adult, they would have to pay a living wage, but by farming this out to first year kids, they must only pay a nominal wage.
Coaching mocks and their outcomes are WORTHLESS. They have ZERO meaning, absolutely ZERO. There is NO CORRELEATION between outcomes there and in a real CLAT, absolutely NONE. They are a commodity that exists in the market because people are willing to buy them. That's it. You're anxious and want mocks, bad enough to pay for it, so they'll sell you mocks to meet that demand (same concept as drugs or OnlyFans). Coaching centers DO NOT care about you. Coaching centers KNOW NOTHING. Coaching centers capitalize on FUD.
But, you should know that jobs and careers first of all, should not and do not define you. You are more than just a job or exam you get at the end of your studies. And the legal jobs market is tough for a lot of people right now, so I'm sure you are not alone. Also, no one is a failure for not getting a legal or any job right now; often it is circumstances beyond our control.
And one day it might turn out to be a blessing in disguise that you didn't get the jobs you are focusing on right now, and you will discover something or someone or somewhere that will make you happy one day (even if you don't have the perspective to see that right now or the ability to look into the future, obviously).
Take it one day at a time, be kind to yourself, eat well and sleep well as much as you can, maybe go for walks or exercise to clear your head, or meditation or drawing or writing or reading fiction or comics or something else you enjoy, and think of some different options or other jobs: are you interested in the law, for instance, or do you have other careers that might also interest you?
Take some time out from the law job rat race for a week or two and find some perspective.
And perhaps consider opening up to someone in your family or some other acquaintance from home, who might understand the situation you are in and give you some support, even if you currently think they might not? Or some advisers in college, etc, perhaps? Or have you considered another therapist or a doctor who can prescribe you anti-depressants might help? It could just be the chemicals in your brain right now that are giving you an especially hard time with the stress you are under, and that does suck.
Wishing you all the very best, you are much less alone than you think you are!
Heard from few that they have taken interviews till now. Is there any idea, till when they will revert?
Thank you in advance to all.
[Moderator Note: if you are considering or having thoughts of self-harm, please consider asking for help or calling a help line, such as one of the following: https://findahelpline.com/countries/in/topics/suicidal-thoughts ]
▮▮▮
Also name a few partners who are best and hot shots in the field?
Any rising stars?
Guys, sorry there's been no updates in the bank accounts today. Apparently the cheques need only my signature...which Prince told me on asking only half an hour ago. 🤦 Anyway, we are working on alternates so that the retainers plus a few goodies should reflect in the accounts by day after (tom is bank holiday). Sorry for the delay and thanks for a fab financial year.
Hear it has gone to dogs after DJ took over as ED.
the website seems very different from what i have been hearing about her practise area.
This merger will inevitably lead to reduction and rationalization at many levels. The merger is a clear indicator of a sector-wide crisis.The merger is a clear indicator of significant structural and financial turbulence across the UK higher education landscape.
https://www.businessinsider.com/anthropic-expands-legal-ai-tools-claude-cowork-2026-5
Call them what they are: TMC supporters. And their days are numbered. They will hop across to the BJP now.
https://x.com/IndiaToday/status/2054849661752779194