We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
So far it is Trilegal I guess (16.5+3)
Drop in, if you have other helpful information.
T1 BCom colleges are
SRCC
Hindu
LSR
Hansraj
KMC
Venky
St Xavier's Mumbai
St Xavier's Kolkata
Loyola College Chennai, etc
Of course, you should prefer the T1 BCom colleges. You can always do a 3 year LLB from NLS, Jindal, DU, GLC etc if you want to become a lawyer
Ongc
Indian oil
Powergrid
Ntpc
Nhpc, etc
No idea about CLAT PG 2024.
Congratulations if you got selected.
DU is traditional govt law college. It can't provide you the education and exposure comparable to Jindal or top NLUs.
Now go read better kid.
Leave billion dollar transactions waali firm and join 'Asia's biggest professionally managed firm'.
Also helps if they are a bit progressive
Like how should one go about studying bare acts for judiciary
why are STs being given twice their population share???
why is EWS only for women? and its opening-up to all castes is absurd, since OBC-NCL has similar income criteria, and SC/ST don't even have creamy layer limitations
why are we cutting PwD reservation from 5 to 3? just to get a neat number? its horizontal anyways so your math is bad as well
legally a Pasmanda-Muslim reservation is stupid as it invites conversion hopping, much better to have as OBC sub-categorisation, or SC sub-categorisation when thats legalised
agree with no domicile reservation and exclusion of upper OBCs though
also imagine giving reservation to non-citizens, only slightly less absurd than lavender reservation ( literally just identify as NB and claim quota, you don't have to prove anything )
Jindal is only for the very rich, what you do fucks over the general middle class ( they may not be underprivileged, but they are also not privileged )
So I was looking for direct admission in jgls
Why is a so called โsenior partnerโ calling a fellow partner sir?!? How is this a professional Organization if such Ji Hazoori is still the norm! Do these younger partners also insist everyone calls them sir! Residents of such ivory towers I must say!
Chotte sardar is driving i7- aap log kya chala rahein ho!!
My budget is around 3-7L / appearance.
Here are the diagnostic criteria from the american psychological association, 6 out of these 8 is supposed to indicate gender dysphoria in children:
- -A strong desire to be of the other gender or an insistence that one is the other gender (or some alternative gender different from oneโs assigned gender)
- -In boys (assigned gender), a strong preference for cross-dressing or simulating female attire; or in girls (assigned gender), a strong preference for wearing only typical masculine clothing and a strong resistance to the wearing of typical feminine clothing
- -A strong preference for cross-gender roles in make-believe play or fantasy play
- -A strong preference for the toys, games or activities stereotypically used or engaged in by the other gender
- -A strong preference for playmates of the other gender
- -In boys (assigned gender), a strong rejection of typically masculine toys, games, and activities and a strong avoidance of rough-and-tumble play; or in girls (assigned gender), a strong rejection of typically feminine toys, games, and activities
- -A strong dislike of oneโs sexual anatomy
- -A strong desire for the physical sex characteristics that match oneโs experienced gender
Heres the link: https://www.psychiatry.org/patients-families/gender-dysphoria/what-is-gender-dysphoria
now right away I think 6 of those 8 things are just- disagreeing with gender stereotypes. cross dressing in kids is very common. If youre a boy- your mom probably has some childhood photos of you where youre trying on her clothes or youre trying on make up or something. If youre a girl- you probably remember being a kid and thinking frilly dresses are scratchy and wanting to wear boy clothes cause theyre easy to run around in.
strong preference for cross gender roles in make believe? I liked being the husband when i played house with friends- The man got to do interesting things like go to work and come home and then demand that his wife do things for him. Who wouldnt want that? Im sure there are boys who were similarly drawn to being the woman because the kid playing the wife gets to run around in the kitchen set and play with baby dolls . That doesnt prove that someone is trans- these are kids!- theyre literally playing pretend!
preference of playmates of the other gender! so little boys and little girls cant want to play with each other! most of my play mates were male! they were my best friends cause they liked the same cartoons and they were roughly my size and in my locality- thats all it takes for kids to make someone their best friend.
Boys avoiding rough and tumble play and girls not wanting to do feminine play? are we joking? some boys just dont like getting hurt- most kids dont like getting hurt. Most girls I knew would rather be out riding their bikes than sitting at home pouring tea. this is again- adherence to stereotypes.
Young girls and boys dont know what their sexual anatomy is about- unless theyve been told its dirty by the elders in their house or unless theyve been molested- they likely wouldnt feel any disgust at their private parts. I didnt know what man parts looked like until I was quite a bit older- I bet most children dont know what the opposite sex's private parts look like. So its not some inner sense of "oh I should have a penis instead of a vagina". Children dont think that clearly. but according to the DSM 5 this is a diagnostic criteria for gender dysphoria in kids too.
6 out of these 8- you can just get that by being a gay, lesbian, autistic, wild kid who doesnt like stereotypical things- its called having a personality. Not liking ones private parts can be an indication of abuse and is likely that far more than some inner gender soul.
But this is what all of "youth gender medicine" is built on. You meet 6/8 of these criteria- you get a diagnosis of gender dysphoria , you get put on puberty blockers, then 98% of the time you get moved on to cross sex hormones and then surgeries. Of course youre gonna have misdiagnosed a lot of kids. Of course the detrans rates are booming. this is not medical diagnosis- this is reading tea leaves. based on this we're supposed to be giving cancer drugs and castration drugs to young children who dont know and cannot understand what the consequences for their health and lifestyle would be?
Gender identity and dysphoria is supposed to be this mystical inexplicable thing- and its "reductive" to say its about stereotypes- but the DSM criteria sure seem to be based on stereotypes no?
its insane. Read the cass review. its long but its worth it. Listen to the shellenberger tapes on wpath and listen to people who left tavistock clinic under protest. The doctors knew what was going on- they were joking about transing the gay away.
1. Academic standards (whether marking of projects, exams and the like is strict/confirmation of absence of grade inflation, amount of studying that needs to be done per week/per day, quality of faculty (as classroom teachers), academic - extracurricular activities balance).
2. How good the NLSIU curriculum is at preparing for a career in academia in India and beyond.
3. Combination of no. 1 above and how well academics who work there (i.e., the faculty) mentor/guide students in terms of their (non-academia-related) professional career aspirations after law school (which include, but are certainly not limited to, working in India in a law firm job, working in litigation, working abroad (which in most cases means London) in a law firm).
4. Faculty qualifications (how many Rhodes Scholars, how many LLM + PhD graduates among the faculty, how many of the faculty combine impressive academic qualifications with industry experience) and research reputation (quality of publications, number of publications in reputed journals and so on).
We prescribe medicine and surgeries after clinical trials and long term follow up and rigorous diagnostic tests and we know that it will work. Itโs called evidence based medicine.
No child can consent to this stuff given how serious this is. Even if some might feel better in the immediate aftermath - they cannot meaningfully consent and theyโre often not even informed about all the risks. Thinking we should still do it is thinking that โdo no harmโ shouldnโt be the first principle of medical practice. And thinking that there should be freedom to experiment on children outside of clinical trials.
The studies are in - itโs not just the class review, itโs all the systematic evidence reviews done by Nordic countries , itโs European countries all rolling this back - there is no proof that puberty blockers and hormones and surgeries prevent suicide. This is a medical scandal.
Itโs not - I put up and study and you put up a study and we have to call it even. We can actually read studies to think through whether we buy the methods or the interpretation. Or maybe they donโt teach that at university anymore. In any case your link leads to a self reported survey that still doesnโt support your point of view. If adult transgendered people are committing suicide despite transition - why is transitioning life saving care ?
Thatโs what the NCBI study showed - that suicidality doesnโt reduce after transition.
These are adult transgendered people. Presumably theyโve started transition. Why then are they still committing suicide ? What are the comorbidities ? Is this a self report or are these tracking emergency visits like the NCBI study ?
The lie isnโt that there isnโt suicide. The lie is that there is child suicide and that transitioning prevents Suicide. There is no proof of either. The study youโve cited doesnโt prove your point.
I have had to navigate this entire exchange thinking I will be censored because even before one post you showed your bias where you assume people will be bigoted and hateful. Why is that ? Consider that youโre not as pure as you think you are.
Consider also that for those of us who have been on this side of the debate for so long - and weโve been consistently shut down because weโre allegedly โbigotedโ and โhatefulโ and being told to shut up and not think and โbe kindโ- that kind of grandstanding about โkindnessโ particularly stings.
If you thought children were being mutilated and harmed en masse, if you thought women were being raped and assaulted and murdered and violated, if you thought the few opportunities given to women in short lists and sports were now being taken away, in fact the very language for women to articulate their collective struggles was now deemed โphobicโ. And you had been trying to tell people- and instead every time you tried to speak you had to face being called a bigot and hateful and being censored and be told you were unkind all because you cared enough to educate yourself - consider how measured your words would be.
I think terfs on twitter are remarkably composed given theyโre constantly being told by an online mob to โchoke on trans girld*ckโ you have zero clue what itโs been like for those of us who have been aware of these harms for a long long time. Just go look up โterfโ on twitter and see all the abuse. Thatโs why you canโt imagine why were agitated or why we might resent being told to be kind by someone who hasnโt even bothered to understand our positions before scolding us. Doing that - thatโs bigoted if anything. Be kind is the current day version of โyouโre so shrillโ. Itโs sexist nonsense. Go on and find one truly unkind thing Iโve said.- Iโll defend all of it.
The other side doesnโt have a response. Iโve been in the same argument a hundred times now. The other side never produces evidence and never actually bothers debating or considering what terfs are saying. They just want to shame us as bigots and silence us because this whole movement is built on lies, deception and a fundamentally flawed understanding of what good people do. Iโll bet money. There wonโt be a response.
We donโt fundamentally agree with each other on anything. I know you want to think everyoneโs good - especially the men who silence women- but itโs just not true. There really are people who want to harm others and there really are useful idiots who enable them.
The only person who had had to face adhominem on this thread constantly is me. If you really go back and read the posts youโll see that but you likely wonโt.
It's okay to have such dreams. While your logic to buy a Merc at 25 with "projected net worth" is completely flawed, I appreciate your ambitions. You can definitely buy a German in your career if you stay long enough, but not so soon for sure.
, someone who isn't a student but on the other side
Suicides appear to be real and not a lie (though research on both sides will always have a difficult time isolating causes and correlation, much like the link you shared also):
https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/press/transpop-suicide-press-release/
> You cannot be accusing me of hate and ignorance and policing my tone when you cannot honestly say youve considered and read any of the literature ive brought up in this exchange before forming an opinion.
Moderating tone and stopping toxicity is actually one of the main points of moderation, so thank you for making your point in a more balanced manner. It would help the strength of the 'Terf' side if the more vocal ones on Twitter stopped assuming that all people disagreeing with them must be woman-haters or 'religious' crazy cult people, as it would behove the twitter trans activists from bashing terfs as transphobes or out of touch.
There are probably more things both sides agree on than disagree on.
That's why tone and the way you say should be important to mods, not just what you say - because the real harm both sides cause is to stop debate, because it gets replaced with ad hominem personal attacks where facts don't matter anymore.
So, how do I go about this? One way, of course, would be to apply to the big name firms, but since I don't have relevant experience, chances there seem slim. Any recommendations for T2/smaller boutiques (not Singularity types) that do good work and may be willing to take me on? Would you recommend contacting head hunters, would they be any help with this?
TIA!
Is Saraf (where a star partner is involved) doing low value transactions which are also time sensitive and urgent?
Did I notice pedestal fans in the interns area? No AC for interns? College library hi better thi yaar.
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/ludhiana/4-students-of-rgnul-killed-in-car-accident-in-patiala/amp_articleshow/110230761.cms
I too lament at what has happened to LI. The same site which gave exclusive scoops, which fearlessly took on corrupt NLU VCs and got them sacked through student protests, the same site which exposed the blatant corruption and misrule taking place under Manan Mishraโs reign as BCI chair, and most importantly the same site which gave young lawyers and law students a voiceโฆ this same site has been reduced to a cheap Reddit thread dominated by Gen Z kids โฎโฎโฎ A part of me thinks itโs some giant โDeep Stateโ conspiracy by elites like in the Matrix movies: keep Gen Z drugged on โwokiumโ so that they donโt address issues of real importance.
Check this out:
https://www.lawcrats.com/careers#list-open-positions
People have lapses of judgment. They had to pay dearly for theirs.
You will break caste, religious and sexual homogeneity through quotas. Itโs the only way. But I am a critic of existing reservation policies.
I would suggest a micro-focused reservation policy as follows:
- 20 % SC (including Dalit Christian, excluding Pasmanda Muslim)
-10% Pasmanda Muslim
- 15 % ST (including Christian ST)
- 15 % OBC (excluding rich agricultural castes like Jats and Yadavs)
- 5 % LGBTQ+ persons ( from all castes)
- 2% special quota for Rohingya Muslims with UN refugee cards ( as they are excluded from CAA)
- 3% PWD (from all castes)
- 10% women from EWS category (from all castes)
- No state domicile reservation
I am aware that this leaves only 20% seats in the open merit/pure merit category, but this is already the case in many NLUs, including NUJS and MNLU. Itโs a good enough number, as these people donโt face any social disadvantages. Also, a person in this category is free to apply to Jindal, where there is no such reservation and many such students are doing so.
In my opinion, any attempt to systematize or officially organize a system for "non-privileged" students will only fail, as strong-arming change by attempting for equality of outcomes seldom works with the government, and would be even worse in a smaller closed setting like a law school, where everyone knows each other.
What I think that anyone claiming to be "non-privileged" needs is an excellent grasp or command of the English Language. The ability to read extensively and comprehend material, the ability to write and draft cohesively, and the ability to speak in English without feeling the need to translate from their mother tongue simultaneously. If you can crack that, you can crack most of the academics and co-curriculars at law school. Even translating what is being said in certain lectures would also help out a lot.
If you want to help someone, help them. Regardless of whether they are "non-privileged" or "privileged". If your batchmate is struggling with the above-mentioned reading, writing, and speaking skills, help them out. Help them understand legal comprehension, help them identify what makes good drafting, and help them with speaking coherently. It can be something overt like literally teaching them how to do this, or something covert like saying yes to proofreading their draft CVs, emails, projects, speeches, etc. Thinking about your batchmate or junior when you come across an opportunity that might benefit them, and sharing the same with them would also help. Help your broke friend attend their moot or something by loaning them some travel money if you can or if you are broke yourself, refer them to potential sponsors.
There is no need to go out of your way to offer help to people who don't ask for it in my opinion. All of you have to do, is just make sure you seem approachable to them. Foster a relationship with your batchmates and juniors that makes them feel at least kind of secure and comfortable so that they don't get anxious to talk to you or ask for help.
In short, no need for any organized effort to help any particular class of people. Help those who need help and ask for help. Make sure you create an environment where anyone can ask you for help. That's all. Make sure you help if you care and don't fret about making others help. All of these things are basic human values or manners, but I write them down here as one tends to get lost in terms of personal values and integrity in law school. Stop seeing the world through the lens of "upper caste, heterosexual, cisgender, male, women, LGBTQ+ persons, Dalits, tribals, Muslims, etc." and start seeing it as those who need help and will ask for it and those who can help and will provide for it, out of their own volition. Trust me, if you wanna stand out amongst the law school crowd, just be a genuinely good person, and you'll be miles ahead, lol :)
Institution may also play a limited role by allowing students to bring vehicles inside the campus. Many institutions don't allow student to bring their own vehicles and so reducing access indirectly reduced the risk.
1. Star Senior Partner waiting in Managing Partner's cabin since morning all dressed up. The Star Senior Partner has nothing better to do;
2. Star Senior Partner needing Managing Partner's attention on a Rs. 8cr+ (million dollar plus) transaction is so true. I am sure the entire firm huddles up for such a large value transaction;
3. The Managing Partner choosing to continue with the PR exercise rather than attending to a 'sensitive' client matter which a Senior Partner is unable to address on his own.