We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
Why is no one answering this?
At the very most, they might be entitled to say 20% of the entire profit.
I personally only use YouTube and even then I don't look at the comment section. Lot of my time is saved from arguing.
With limited time available in a T1 life, I choose to use it to better my lifestyle including health , investing in stocks, etc.
---
Under the Letters Patent establishing the HCs of Calcutta, Bombay and Madras, the presidency towns as defined in the LP and any law subsequent thereto enjoyed the status of having their disputes directly adjudicated under the Original Side of their respective HCs. This applied to criminal trials as well till it was removed by the CrPC 1973. Today, civil trials still take place in the Original Side of these HCs. This principle has also been incorporated into the Delhi HC.
Regarding why other benches don't enjoy this privilege, it is because they are merely benches set up to deal with Appellate Side matters which arise from certain jurisdictions and for the ease of convenience of the litigants.
Junior most partner would make around 1.65 cr.
If it is Mumbai, it will be extremely cheaper - no one would care
Partners being responsible for the finances and bottom line of the team have to prioritize efficiency and financial sustainability, and such an absence can significantly impact the team's success. It's not about equality, it's about making practical decisions.
I have decent experience too. How to proceed, please suggest.
ps: I have no assessment internship/ retainership/ ppo or anything substantial in place as of now.
Work culture, people, etc?
No associate is going to spend a fortune on their wedding if they don't have generational wealth.
I am SA2, Tier I in the M&A practice - 100 hours billable/ chargeable work per month.
In short - yes, there have been wholesale exits since the beginning of 2020, after a certain scandal. Almost all the stalwarts are out except for Nishchal. A few old timers who are sticking around are NMD's friends and family (I do not include Suril in that group). Virtually all practice areas are now fossil remains. The so called foreign offices have 0-1 associates - some are just post box addresses for business cards. Most clients have taken their mandates elsewhere - to other well known firms or startups by NDA alumni. While hardly anyone from my days has stuck around, what I gather from my friends over there is that the good thing is that work is not at all hectic, but so is the career growth.
I find "Except for Parul there is no notable person in that practice area" super ironical, given that the series of exits began right after her entry. Not difficult to guess why she is the only 'notable' person left in the area!
So if you are looking at any opportunity with NDA, then first sort out your short and long term objectives and then take a call. E.g. if you plan to go for LLM in a foreign univ, then not a bad place for a year.
I am also working in a capital markets team, but my team is non toxic and work hours though sometimes rough are generally better and good.
Even as NLUs are not some magically perfect, happy ending places but still...better to do law from NLUs rather than random colleges.
Jibes of gobar chap and gau mutra (amongst others) reportedly used by her.
When called out she claims account was hacked.
See tweets here: https://x.com/ThePulkitSBisht/status/1746830015680155836
So I am in currently in class 12th with commerce and this year's CLAT as you all know was shit and nothing can be made of it other than experience atleast for me, so Should I also take class 12th again in humanities from NIOS and then give CUET with Humanities subjects as my core? And If I get a BA from Hindu college or any other DU college after doing all this would it be worth it as after BA I would also like to pursue 3year LLb(can I do it simultaneously with BA?). I want to try UPSC and JUDICIARY both as my future employment aspects. Please do share your valuable experiences and advices.
20 left
https://x.com/Smrt_aleck/status/1888073942600139269
1. Krida Legal - 25K to 30K
2. Sensato Legal - 20K to 25K
3. Chamber 20A - 25K to 30K
4. Law NK - 25K to 35K
5. AM Sports Law - 20K to 25K
What could such a gig be? Some drafting work on Upwork? Some business maybe?
How much is spent?
Is there a lot of show off?
Would like some tea (no names of people, but you can name the firm).
Profile:
Education - 90% in 12th, currently at a Russel Group uni with a high 2:1 in my first year.
Exp - No legal work experience, just looked after my familyβs real estate business during my gap year. Extracurricular - Mentoring scheme with an MC trainee, tons of open days at MC and US firms, and numerous debating and MUN awards.
My Questions:
a) Can I apply to Tier 1 law firms in India? Am I even eligible, considering Iβm only two years into my LLB in the UK?
b) If yes, do I have a chance with Tier 1 firms despite minimal legal experience or an NLU tag?
(Apologies for the lack of research, I've only just started looking into the legal market in India.)
NLUO
RGNUL
SLSP
In this case if this is true, which I'm not sure, kudos to KCO for having survived long enough and still being compared to what's been seen as a new gen law firm (and full appreciation to them for the changes in the industry they've made as this young a firm) in Trilegal, I've always seen KCO as being different from other lala firms in SCAM and others.
- Gloomy economy, high cost of living
- Air pollution, noise, traffic
- Toxic people and bigotry from all sides: conservatives, wokes, religious fanatics
- Corrupt people being rewarded
- AI taking away jobs
Should I just stay away from the news and from social media? Try meditation?
I am from a T1.5 college, top 10% of my batch, 4th year, love litigation and have interned only in lawyers' chambers till now. I secured an internship with a T2 firm [not disclosing name and location, but in a T1 city] (how they selected me - they only know) in their disputes practice, which they are known for. So this is my first law firm internship. I took this internship for the reason that I wanted to see how a law firm works and if I am cut out for it.
Coming to the interns part, of the all the interns that are in the firm at the office I am at, only one-third are in corporate, and for one of them it is their first corporate practice area internship. These people in the corporate teams always come and give work to interns no matter which practice area they are in. Today it happened to be my misfortune [no offence to those in that area - I just don't like the work, and don't want to do it] and it is quite a lot. These people know that I am in disputes, and yet they are giving corporate work. How do I deal with the same? On a friday evening these people gave me alot of work to do - that too by the weekend. I have also heard that these corporate people say that the work is urgent but it isn't, since its due perhaps a month or so later.
I am not saying that I wouldn't want to work or anything - just that I don't like the nature of the work they do and are making me do. I would rather go to court, draft petitions, SLPs, WPs, etc.,. prepare list of dates, research on propositions of law, go for arbitrations etc., but cannot do this sort of corporate advisory and regulatory compliance work. Had I been given that work for the weekend, I would not have complained. I have interned for over 12-14 hours a day in weekends in a lawyer's chamber. Thats really not an isssue for me.
Would really love some advice on how to deal with these associates and tell them no. I have already used the 'I already have work from XYZ in disputes' thing. Also, another issue is interns come first to the office, followed by the corporate people, and then the disputes - who come around 11-12ish. So there is a good chance they'll see me empty handed and assign me work saying its urgent.
Help is appreciated. Writing this in frustration at 12am while doing that clerical corporate work