We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
1. Expertise
2. Experience
in order to write about such a procedurally heavy subject
Students still are developing their basics, wrong to expect scholarship from them.
Academics, unfortunately are prevented by our weird UGC rules which bars them from actual practice, thus rendering the perspective slightly unidirectional.
As an earlier commentator said, practitioners have no tine to write.
A good chunk of the articles on CrPC/ BNSS, merely paraphrase the applicable sections and SC/ HC decisions. As another commentator states, the human rights/ Constitutional law aspect is highlighted in these articles, as opposed to hard core criminal jurisprudence.