We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
(explain ur position and what steps u took)
desperately waiting,
xoxo
What good is government policy that focuses on creating and then extracting as much wealth as possible from the top 10% to distribute to the other 90% in the form of freebies or state support without any objective to build capacity through good education, healthcare, and nutrition in the 90%. Those who create wealth are not rewarded, those who are dependent on the state are not empowered. State policy has been to offset our inability to develop human resources through technology - a systematic problem that no one wants to address. Thus, emerges our perpetual state of mediocrity.
Hi to all. I cannot describe my firm situation in great detail in order to stay anonymous, but it is as the title says. I (and a couple more) barely have any work assigned by the Partner. A small designated team regularly and intentionally gatekeeps most of the work. We are a small firm. I joined here because I wanted to get experience in a specific area, which I am unable to because the Partner, for some reason, has no intention to let us get any hands-on experience, barring a few. I have previously, on multiple occasions, been vocal with the Partner about this issue, to no avail. [+paid peanuts]
At this juncture, I am fully intent on resigning shortly and moving to a Corp practice area, preferably M&A. The issue is that I have no real experience of M&A deals or any specific related work (or I might, I just don't know what is transferable to another practice area I could showcase to my potential interviewers). I have, in my experience, drafted and reviewed various contracts and given detailed advisory on various topics, almost all of them being business/commercial/tax-related in nature.
I humbly request the more experienced folks to guide me on how to make this switch, what are some good firms/teams to apply to, and if there are any vacancies.
Further info – I am from a mid-tier NLU, having a good academic/co-curricular record. Good money would also make a huge difference in my (and my family's) life.
Spill, Please.
I have recently completed my LL.M.; however, I haven't qualified UGC NET yet. Please suggest universities/colleges that hire for Teaching Associate/Faculty Associate or Assistant Professor positions without NET or a similar qualification.
Thanksss!
Could anyone share suggestions?
Long live SILF!
Any idea on who the candidates can be?
With NKC outgoing(retiring in August),if NUJS pushes for a good VC I feel it'll definitely will be back to its former glory.
I would really appreciate insights on this.. Thanks!!
It rebranded to TLH Advocates & Solicitors.
The other Tatvas are now in shambles.
Masterstrole by Shailendra Komatreddy.
May be you can manage CSE or IT related subjects. But if math is tough for you, engineering won't be easy.
Law is good but it's vastly different. Anyone can study law and do well in it. But the money is only in tier 1 law firms and the life there is something you need to consider if you're up for it.
There's no guarantee your drop year will lead to a Tier 1 NLU. Think well and decide what you really want. Rest is noise.
https://law.careers360.com/articles/du-5-year-llb-cutoff-2025-beats-15-nlus
1. Location makes a huge difference. Delhi itself (not NCR) has three good government law schools. That creates a cluster effect.
2. The first batches have not even graduated, and this is the scenario. Imagine what will happen in 5 years.
We haven't even spoken about the NFSU Law School (Delhi Campus) with its massive funding and impact, and the INI status.
As I recall, "Khyber" mentioning - abhi toh party shuru hui hai.
The only positive about engineering is that work life balance would be better than lawyers but in terms of pay, there is no competition.
Saraf - 2
S&R - 2
Khaitan - 1
AZB - 1
Bharucha - 1
Sensato Legal - 1
Plus
One Vidhi Fellowship.
I am sure that much greater things are in the pipeline for you. All the best!
and the og victory lapping kings who recently got de merged.
Interestingly, I worked with 4 other associates who never had a problem with my work or emails. I got a callback and decided to change my team.
She had no agency or mind of her own? Have you reduced her to an object?
Y'all low T2
And frankly few of them aren't PPOs. They are AC contracts.
Forget professional ethics - lots of people with shitty relationships are rampantly having office affairs. To be honest - its all fair to catch feelings in office, we are human, but once you mix business and leisure - lots of conflicts of interest arise. Emotional control is equally low for men and women in my opinion. Women are more sophisticated going about their dysfunction, men just more raw. End of the day, Byron - the CEO was equally involved in this as Kristen - the HR head.
Thus, IP lawyers in India are very underpaid. The situation could change a bit if liberalisation takes place, but a sea change will happen only if India becomes an advanced economy like China has become. We are 50 years behind in that respect. Everyone hoped that Modi would undertake big bang reforms after 10 years of decay under the Congress, but he hasn’t done jack.
Also which is better pay wise?
I’m currently interning at a firm where I’ve noticed a concerning behavior. Whenever I ask associates for work, some of them laugh it off. Recently, one associate sent me a 237-page document very late, leaving me just 9 hours to review it. I couldn’t complete it within that unreasonable timeframe, and the next day, he called me out and laughed about it in front of others.
Am I truly at fault here, or was the timeline simply unrealistic? I’d really appreciate your honest guidance.
However some startups are working on deep tech. Maybe we may get results from some of those.
A decent engineer earns as much as a good lawyer, or even more. A decade down the line, if engineers keep upskilling, they're likely to earn much more than law firm partners.
A mediocre engineer has more prospects of growth than a mediocre lawyer.
I have told this, now you can decide.
Anyone that makes it to a top firm from that college is usually through merit and hard work.
Saw it referenced again on some recent post and wondered what happened to those folks.
True or false?
13L (fixed) + 5L (bonus)
You'll get 1-2L bonus at the max
For disputes
11L (fixed) + 5L (bonus)
You'll get 1-2L at the max
https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2024/01/06/india/extreme-heat-india-climate-ac-intl-hnk
Do you think table tennis should not be an olympic sport then?
How sad some people are man, honestly.
1. Do good internships in India until fourth year.
2. In fifth year, apply for vac schemes in London/Singapore offices of global law firms - especially MC. For this:
(a) Use LinkedIn like crazy to find all kinds of people who are working at such firms in their offices in London/Singapore: Indian-educated law graduates who did vac schemes and TCs there (your uni seniors, people from other unis (particularly NLS/NALSAR/NUJS), etc), UK-educated Indians who have achieved MC jobs, other UK-educated people who have done that, Singaporeans who may be doing a London + Singapore TC (one year in London, one in SG) at the offices of let us say, Linklaters. Ask as many people as you can from all these categories for feedback on your written applications, tips for tackling SJTs like the Watson Glazer, how to tackle interviews/assessment centres and how to perform well enough in a vac scheme to convert it into a TC offer. With the written applications, draft, redraft again, redraft again, then redraft again, till everything is perfect. Make sure that each written application questionnaire answer or cover letter is honed towards that firm. Nothing significant from one answer to the next or one cover letter to the next should be replaceable between firms, e.g., "top firms" are applicable for Links, CC and A&O Shearman. But what is special about A&O Shearman that makes it unique, the lovliest firm in the world, a heaven on earth for you? That's what you'll need to be saying. With the SJTs, just get hold online of whatever free resources you can, take up any resources that your friends/connections have and practice till your brain feels like it will explode out of your head. A lot of things re the SJT are questions about the kinds of situations you encounter in law firm teamwork life - managing deadlines, difficult clients, etc. You'll need to have great detailed knowledge of your chosen firm's ethos to answer these well.
(b) Build commercial awareness: Simple - read, read and read more. Among the newspapers, read financial/economics specialist newspapers, particularly the Wall Street Journal and the Financial Times. Make note of developments in your practice areas of interest and practice talking about them and writing about them, so you can use this knowledge, both in the interviews, and in the written applications. Read a book called Everything You Need to know about the City, by C. Stokes. Basically, read, write and speak about markets, economics, economic developments and the law firm's place in the market and in the world, as a business, until your eyes pop.
(c) Literally swallow the firm's website. Drink in the contents as though they are the contents of a glass of the best red port you'll ever find in the world. Talk to trainees, future trainees/vac scheme students etc about their experiences at the firm. That'll help you with the SJT questions on how to apply the firm's values/ethos to everyday situations.
(d) Brace yourself: This stuff's brutal. Rejection is part of the process. Stock your uni halls room, your childhood bedroom, your mum's basement - wherever you work and feel comfortable - with plenty of boxes of tissues, because there'll be a lot of crying and distress considering the rejections. For every ten firms you apply to, be ready for eight rejections, two interviews and one more rejection (and that's if you are very good). You'll see some people with two, three vac schemes on their LinkedIns. Those people were put through the grinder for that, just remember. Nobody - not even students at the Russell Group universities doing their LLB degrees there - has got magic keys for this stuff.
(e) Reflect on your internships and make sure this is what you want: The life in a large commercial law firm is brutal. Long hours, very heavy workload, little sleep.
3. When you've got that vac scheme (or multiple schemes, if you are talented and lucky enough), smash it just as you would an assessment internship in India. Make sure they're impressed enough to convert it into a TC.
4. A condition of your TC offer will be to pass the SQE. Do your best to ensure that you fulfil this the first time round, and don't need a resit of the SQE, because firms have been known to withdraw TC offers in the past from those who failed on the first attempt.
5. Do your TC, and basically remember that that is a two-year-long, more high stakes version of a vac scheme. Smash it and impress not only the M&A team when you are allocated that "seat", but the other teams, too, that you work with. Then "qualify into" M&A (talking purely based on London patterns here) as an NQ and continue.
B. Lateral route:
1. Go through the typical process for Indian law firms.
2. Get a couple of years of experience in India.
3. Develop good contacts with people in foreign law firms then.
4. Apply for lateral positions. This can also be done without an LLM - people have done it before.
They're kings.