We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
PS: Coding I understand isn't required imo, you're a lawyer after all. No?
Thinking it's better to take a drop for srcc, still finish in 4 years overall, get placement, almost no debt, could do law later on too, today I have to go to the bank for loan, would be much helpful if anyone has any advice, from my research i would be losing nothing at srcc that a top nlu provides except for maybe a really good mess
All 4 are really good, having worked in the space for some time, I'd say khaitan is probably the best from what I have heard and I work at one of these 4 firms and it isnt khaitan.
https://www.telegraphindia.com/amp/west-bengal/bjp-bengal-looks-beyond-mlas-for-finance-ministry-economist-sanjeev-sanyal-frontrunner-prnt/cid/2159937
On the one had, the PA might be correct and absolutely being mistreated (which is wrong on his part).
On the other hand, the PA might be absolutely incorrect in how she chooses to describe the situation (which is wrong on her part).
Where does the truth lie?
On this forum, we’ve actually started shooting first and thinking later, we’ve started believing all the allegations without hearing the complete story; maybe we need to rethink our approach and start questioning what we’re seeing here.
EC etc records are a fascinating trove of info. No wonder every admin has been deeply reluctant to make the entire process transparent and accessible. And our dear teach in the EC have been complicit in maintaining the opacity.
In contrast to this, there are NO slow days in Delhi Disputes if you are in a decent-sized terms in terms of filing. Days which seem slow actually bother you and you check and recheck your case-diary entry list or calendar to verify in case you missed a meeting and will be blasted for it by your seniors.
https://www.news18.com/india/covid-era-measures-after-pms-appeal-is-work-from-home-set-to-return-to-indias-workplaces-ws-l-10084249.html
idk how to go about this - I gave clat 2026 and to say it didn't go well would be an understatement because i ended up with an air 12,000.
I've always was never able to get very good grades because of the fact that i honestly used to lack discipline. i got low 80s in 10th and 12th, couldn't get through clat and also couldn't do Mhcet 5 years well. I am just....such a bucket of failure and even though i've started studying sincerely, the despair won't go away. My home life is extremely turbulent and all i want is to go to a T1 NLU next year and leave this place
I just don't know what to say... My mental health has reached an absolute all time low. I've started getting such dark, painful thoughts and have basically zero emotional support system at home. I've even started considering self harming again. This sub is always some how the one place that motivates me to keep going because of the personal stories that a lot of you share.
Plus I have all these questions like Are double droppers discriminated or treated differently socially? and.. even philosophically" if i get a good rank this time, will my previous failures still be relevant?
1. Was the "[AI generated]" flag inserted into the title by the OP or by the moderators?
2. If the moderators inserted the flag, on what basis was this done? The use of the m dash? Or the bombastic, quasi news coverage-like tone of the post? Or both? Is it that the two factors in conjunction point in the direction of AI or something? Or do you have some positive proof that this was generated by AI such as an AI detection tool? If so, what tool are you using and what is its reliability?
NB: I am not the OP in disguise. The only reason I opened the post was actually the flag, because the fact is that my career ambitions are such that what does or does not happen at a T1 disputes practice is information as irrelevant to me as Sherlock Holmes found the workings of the solar system to being a detective, though I will acknowledge that one person has given a very good answer which I hope those for whom this is relevant will find useful.
I understand LegalAI startups have a different need than traditional firms with TMT practice, but how does one make it into either? I am BO'27, any advice, leads would be of great help!
Sounds like he’s stuck between a rock and a hard place.
Why bother with explanations? Just kick him out.
Disputes work pertains to scdrc, insurance advisory (in short emails to insurers and brokers)
you will work mainly on zambian law , etc and matters pertaining to the same, since one of the firms largest clients operates over there
Culture- not like that of a conventional law firm
Internationally: Financial Times (UK and U.S.-focussed but also with good stuff about Europe and other parts of the world), Economist, London Times (UK focus), Wall Street Journal.
Also, WCC at Firms is a sham of what actual criminal work looks like in Courts. If you have the slightest inclination of practising criminal law then you’ll have to start with Chambers and at District Courts, there’s no way around it regardless of what people may tell you.
All the best!
Business Standard
Economic Times
Financial Express???
Also can you reflect on how many and kind of tasks are present on a single day (in normal course of business)
the hrs of both these firms are toooo laid back, i’ve been trying the traditional route for almost two years and i haven’t even heard back!
so if you guys have any tips or suggestions about how you scored it, please lmk thanks!
Would really appreciate any inputs.
Then again the SJA now would much rather wag it's tail to...
Let’s not justify making everyone comfortable for someone who is making someone uncomfortable. Also POSCO is not tiny - a child’s statement is taken - like in this case the psychiatric statement is submitted.
PAs pull depends a lot on the team dynamics.
2. Even if I managed to clear CAT(with good varc(98-100%ile, 22-24 Qs), & lidr(95-99%ile, 4 sets), but will necessarily have to rely on the 7-9 arith Qs(90-95%ile), cant go beyond this for quant);
3. After all this, even after putting all in for CAT, may not get anything beyond 95-98%ile(since leaving lucrative 5-6 Qs of quant); and I've literally seen people having scored beyond 99.5%ile getting rejected from even Lucknow, let alone ABC;
4. Besides those few top tier schools, the situation's not at all good for any other school, even XLRI, ISB, or FMC.
It's literally 25 Lakhs(atleast) worth of investment.and people are not getting worthwhile placements.
It's somewhat 2-3 times than a 3 year LLB from an NLU.And what happens when one gets after that-a 20 lpa CTC-where they include even stationary costs in ctc?
5. 3 year LLBs are not regarded at par with ballbs, at any NLU, I concur, except may be NLS, I dont know, you can dispute that too.
But the point is, if one works REALLY HARD, like really hard from day 1, & stays focused, he, on his own can land up in a decent job in either a some Tier(###), or stepney firm, or in-house, whatever, and then climb up the ladder, or take a lift based on his skills & his capacity to learn transferable skills.
6. Later on, if circumstances warrant, one can always do an MBA from IIMs, like an executive one.GMAT, not CAT, gmat easier than CAT; valid for 5 years; Less money(15 odd lakhs-IIMA), only a year.It can really boost a career; which may be a very good alternative to an oxbridge/US LLM(way more expensive); especially in current time when US has almost stopped fellowships for professional courses in masters level(not announced fulbright this year for prof. pg).
7. Besides I have looked up TISS MA in HRM as well.But only 60 seats, bhai.Open seats are only 15-20.Can u blv?not plaussible!!!
8. Besides, clearing CAT is something but then practice quant related work for the rest of life is not bearable for me, since it does not interest me.
So...i guess, that's it!!!
Sorry for the length!
Also, READ. READ a lot! newspapers + updates relevant to your field + anything interesting. It's always nice to be able to contribute to general chats your team may have, plus your seniors and partner will definitely notice (you don't have to chuck information down their throats, of course xD)
Dress neatly. Brand doesn't matter, but how you present yourself does matter.
Take notes during every matter discussion. Always walk into your partner's cabin WITH a notebook. This will help you clarify things and avoid mistakes while recollecting matter discussions.
Hope this helps. Good luck!
Did they hire anyone from 2027 Batch yet?
Specifically, I’m curious about whether partners experience a similar workload as the associates who I hear have no life outside work and work 24/7 or if they are able to maintain a relatively better work-life balance.
Additionally, I would like to understand the distribution and scale of transactions within the team—are multiple partners actively handling significant deal flow, or is the work primarily concentrated with RC, I do not see many deals at Trilegals deal corner that reflect any other name than RC was hoping to gain some clarity on this.
- electricity fluctuating every few minutes, making it impossible to charge devices
- water supply keeps fluctuating.
- roofs collapsing, destroying metal railings, etc. with minimal engagement by admin (except a letter claiming they have an "impeccable record" in maintaining safety, ignoring multiple other collapses)
- no support or attendance condonation for mooting
- campus events shut up by 9 pm mandatorily, irrespective of event, date, or circumstance
- faculty quality, the hallmark of NLSIU, has degraded due to the batch expansion, meaning you have [unrelated courses – redacted because the faculty is nice, but just not suited to this] forced to teach [redacted, unrelated courses].
- 30+ rooms in the men's hostel alone facing faulty fans, with worse situations faced by the women's hostels
There is so much more. A university is primarily meant to fulfill educational purposes, but a lot of people join university in the hopes of aggrandising via networking, making connections with peers, all of which is unnecessarily difficult in the face of unprecedented batch expansions that dilute the quality of learning and living in a residential space, etc.
For the "best" law school in the country, this is rather sad. Hoping to see some engagement, at least, as someone who genuinely holds this place in high stead and cherishes it.
-Drafting and all happens at all levels and even team heads give their say in the final draft more often than not (micromanagement level differs). It is NOT a one-day job unless its an urgent application. In a sane disputes team (there are less than you'd like to think), the work goes upto a Partner who reverts to the counsel/client firm and back, if necessary, for further revisions. Basic memo work is handled by juniors.
-In smaller firms, associates may get more court exposure and directly participate in briefing unlike T1s who take senior counsels just to mention or adjourn.
-Partners in these firms usually have less experience than a fresher at an advocate's chamber. If you dream of building face value as an arguing counsel, Disputes firms are definitely not it (with a few exceptions who actually became senior counsels themsleves lol). A lot of partners/senior partners CANNOT argue or are NOT CONFIDENT in arguing. (FYI, if you are a law student sneering at this, you'll realize how difficult it actually is to make relevant submissions before a High Court Bench.)
-In Bombay, some old-school firms tend to send freshers for administrative/compliance work before the Prothonotary (OS Registrar).
-Urgent tasks land on your plate all the time, especially when arbitration matters come up.
-For a lot of budding litigators, the answer for your last question is a resounding 'NO'. Most disputes work is clerical at junior levels and becomes briefing/solicitor work at senior levels. If you don't mind being a briefing counsel as part of your career trajectory, then disputes is good because you get paid better than litigation at the start. Cannot say the same for litigators with 5+ years of experience who usually start outearning their corporate peers by then. This curve, however, is very steep. Not every litigator can survive the court experience. Many prefer stability (LOL) compared to the complete uncertainty of litigation.
I hope you guys realise making teenagers think that they're very accepted in your particular group is..... Fundamentally analogous to not very good things, very different from career advice
I don't wanna join my nlu but I've got this curiosity for why people feel such a bad need to express that their top nlu is really acceptable, is it insecurity? Even after making it into a top Indian law university?
https://www.legallyindia.com/convos/topic/477937-which-nlus-have-sirmaam-culture#comment-479870
You should look into this one, to analyse this person's words-
They downplay the sir/mam culture by saying "it's just words and nothing else"
Keeps saying "it's chill" with no substance
Blames the students for being cautious, like that's just literally being prudent? Says it's a problem-- well what's your solution then?
People should forget the evidence and trust u blindly?
Refers to themselves as "all u need"
In the end equates their drug culture to being "symmetrical" this person isn't making a case for the culture/wellbeing, but that of how their nlu is 'acceptable' in comparison
I'm pretty sure this is textbook narcissistic manipulation
Oh you must be a debate and logic enthusiast, isn't it?
So should I drop out of it or like, no?
I can't help but feel that there was a certain dissatisfaction in at least one of these cases. When you favour certain mediocre people and make them de facto rulers of Jindal, but overlook the deserving ones, at some point the deserving ones will snap. Especially when they are even paid less. Supporters of the VC will say that they are leaving to head law schools and would have left anyway. I don't think so, because these are lower tier law schools. Given a choice between being a player in the Indian cricket team and the captain of a Ranji team, which would you prefer? The answer is the former, but perhaps not if you are perpetually made the 12th man in the Indian team and the Indian team management keeps selecting underperformers instead of you.
I'm from a tier 1 nlu, I've got good extra curriculars, stellar recommendations, and will be working in a sector that's fairly interesting and not very main stream. Oxbridge was never in the consideration (I know my place before any of you try to remind me of it) until one of my professors recommended that I try, and now I cannot get it out of my head.
And a few people from my college have gotten into great unis which largely focus on good grades, without really having great grades, and that's given me a new found motivation
On POCSO, unfortunately the law provides a bar to talk about it. So, to answer your question, yes, there is a factor where the accused is pretty much forced to sit back and not say a word (unless it’s in court). Actually, come to think of it, the same bar applies to the mother, who has conveniently chosen to disregard it. (Remember: this bar is there to protect the child!)
Lean In refers to a prominent feminist philosophy and a global movement centered on the 2013 book Lean In: Women, Work, and the Will to Lead by former Meta COO Sheryl Sandberg.
The core idea encourages women to assert themselves in their professional lives to achieve leadership roles, rather than unintentionally holding themselves back due to internal barriers or societal expectations.
Lean In from the inside
Wynn-Williams, who worked at Meta from 2011 to 2017, shares several incidents that she claims expose a disconnect between Sandberg's public persona and her private behavior:
"Come to Bed" Incident: Wynn-Williams alleges that during a 2016 flight on a private jet, Sandberg invited her to share the only bed on the plane, an offer Wynn-Williams found highly inappropriate and refused.
Hostile Work Culture: The author claims staffers were intentionally given excessive workloads to ensure no one had "spare time". She recounts responding to work emails while in labour and being harassed for updates during a recovery from a life-threatening childbirth complication.
Critique of "Lean In": Wynn-Williams argues the philosophy was used to push women toward "soul-depleting workaholism" rather than true empowerment. She describes Sandberg's brand as a "shtick" designed to demand obedience from subordinates.