We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
Absolutely no one for any reason should kill themselves for any thing that happens at university. No college drama is worth that at all. In my university batch there were people who didn’t graduate, women who went through sexual assault, people who took so many mind altering substances they were barely holding on, people who faced bullying, ostracisation, degradation and humiliation, people who came from messed up families- all of it. One of our batchmates died in an accident and that messed up his friends a fair bit. But not one of us committed suicide. And guess what? - years later, college is over, and all of that stuff just seems so petty. So unbelievably insignificant. These people are now doing well in their careers and most have a spouse and kids. It would have been silly and terribly short sighted to commit suicide then and not stick around for everything good that life has to offer.
We can find all sorts of things to blame it on. Drug culture , academic rigor , lack of academic rigor, love failure , career uncertainty, lost a job, failed too many subjects , assault or violence, whatever. Many of those things will not change. It’s really hard to change culture. It’s really hard to create a world where no one considers suicide. It’s far easier to identify people at risk and for those people to do some CBT so they can avoid harming themselves.
- Suicides in NLUD
- VC intruding into girls' hostel in RGNUL
- Gujarat HC issue with GNLU
- Sexual misconduct in NLS
- Politics, and dress code issues in WBNUJS
- Ragging and bullying are common
- Irregular faculty salaries in MNLU-N
- Admin apathy, no funding, corruption, entitled students, creaking infrastructure in all NLUs
The list goes on. In fact on this platform, the dire situation is underplayed and many posts are not published or marked trollish.
GNLU (like all NLUs) is a state university. This is the best you can get. Thank your stars because Gujarat as a state is doing OK economically. Imagine the plight of students studying in poor states like UP (Pragraj and Lucknow), Bihar (Patna), Chattisgarh (Raipur), Odisha (Cuttack), Rajasthan (Jodhpur), Jharkhand (Ranchi), Assam (Guwahati) and MP (Jabalpur).
To answer your specific question, of course university makes the mental health of people whose situation is already difficult worse! What did you expect? Peer pressure and a cutthroat environment where people care exclusively about themselves, young people (many of whom are appallingly unprepared for university life) suddenly being treated as full-grown adults, a shocking lack of qualified mental health professionals, admins who don't give a shit about students but only about keeping their jobs, currying favour with the right people (read: oiling politicians' backsides) and lining their pockets, a society as judgemental (if not more) than England (once again, see Oliver joking about the levels of scrutiny that the lives of even minor functionaries within the royal family are subjected to)? The mixture is lethal!
▮▮▮
https://x.com/Trendulkar/status/1838552836193321436
Advocate all you like for universities to have more qualified, empathetic, counselling staff - that I 1000000000% support, but please don't advocate for mandatory engagement with counselling. There are people for whom engagement with what is purported to be a process of counselling has caused great difficulties and done more harm than good.
Moots teach you how to research, how to frame a problem statement, how to draft your arguments, how to look for and cite sources, how to apply the law to facts, how to read, interpret and rely upon / distinguish case laws, how to present your submissions, both verbally and in written form, and most importantly (if you’re speaking) how to articulate legal arguments. It definitely helps.
Experience gained from mooting gives you an insight into certain practical aspects of the job, whatever that may ultimately be - not everything you learn will help you in a corporate law firm job, and actual litigation work / appearing in courts is nothing like mooting - but it’s a valuable experience nonetheless and I’m thankful everyday that I mooted in law school.
2) Supreme Court- 6 lakhs per appearance (final hearing)
3) Delhi High court (notice issue plus stay)-3,00,000
4) Delhi High Court (final hearing) - 5,00,000
5) Outstation High Courts- 4,00,000 (notice issue)
6) Outstation HC - 7,00,000 (final hearing)
7) Tribunal - CESTAT Delhi- 5,00,000
8) Outstation CESTAT bench- 7,00,000
9) APTEL
Appearance- 3,00,000 (notice issue plus IA hearings)
10) APTEL Appearance -5,00,000 (final hearings)
11) Additional conference - Rs 50,000
12) Settling petitions (appeal/writ/ SLP) - Rs 2,00,000
13) Written Opinion -5,00,000 (could go up depending on complexity)
14) Oral opinion- 3,00,000
15) Appearance before Departmental authority - same as that before the CESTAT ( in Delhi / outstation as the case may be)
16) Appearance before CERC- 3,00,000 (notice issue and IA hearings)/ 5,00,000 (final hearing)
17) Appearance before State Commissions- 4,00,000 (notice issue and IA hearings)/ 7,00,000 (final hearing)
Clerkage 15% plus OPE
There have been no protests against the administration even after 3 students have committed suicide in last 3 months. Students are just not well to even do that. Everyone is devastated.
While the administration had created an environment that forced the first two students to commit suicide (because of academic reasons i.e. detention or year repeat) the third (most recent) incident is entirely because of the student's personal reasons back his home. He joined just 2 months back and wasn't suffering academically. It was because of purely personal family reasons and therefore I would request you all to please stop spreading rumours about the latest incident.
As far as the first suicide is concerned, most of you have not heard anything about it because the university, despite student demand, never acknowledged the incident. He committed suicide because the university was forcing him to repeat the year twice or thrice.
The second suicide happened because of the same reason. She was detained and forced to repeat the year.
And just to tell you all, around 10 more people were asked to repeat the year who were all considering taking harsh steps. We begged the vice chancellor to use his extraordinary powers and hold special repeat examinations so that these students are not forced to repeat a year. But the VC did not agree. We told him that they are suicidal and consequences would be harsh but still the VC did not paid any attention.
It took the two suicides for the admin to take the issue seriously and bring a no-detention policy in the university by which all students can clear their backlogs before they are awarded their degree & thus no one would be detained in a year.
The latest suicide is not because of any failure of administration but the first and second ones most definitely are because of the inactions of the administration.
The student culture is also at fault because everyone is so busy in themselves, their internships, their moots, their publications, that nobody pays attention to the ones who are not able to cope with such challenges. Had we been more proactive in helping students who suffer academically and not just our elite friend circles, the first two suicides could have been prevented, which could have in turn prevent the third suicide.
I am disappointed and heartbroken looking at the student dynamics here. People have their own eco chambers and only a handful of people somehow occupy the self-righteous positions of narrative/agenda setting in the college. These folks work in the comfort of their elite woke friend circles and make all others isolated and ostracized. Difference of opinion is one thing that they ostracize people on. Further, nobody gives two f*cks about people from marginalized tier 2, tier 3 city students who may not have had equal access to such activities that have been portrayed as cool in the university.
Hopeless.
did anyone hear back??
I would love to get insights from those lawyers who have made this move and what sites would be best to use for the job search.
I would also love to hear any other insights!
Thank you.
Another thing is the tendency by Gen Y to shame Gen Z. As India progresses, each generation will naturally get more prosperous. As Gen Y become parents and give birth to Gen Beta, their kids will be even more “privileged”.
High time to end the preachy class/caste comments here by wannabe Marxists who most likely are (or will soon be) working for CAM, advising Adani and buying luxury watches.
Rant over.
1. Law schools have counsellors already. All universities have -counselling also available.
2. BCI and UGC define curriculum, attendance and teaching hour needs.
3. Co-curricular activities exist in all places.
4. Places like Jindal or NLU D have the most liberal hostel hours.
5. Teachers and admin cannot really stop students making their rights based groups. These are to be moderated by student council largely.
Look forward to suggestions which may help students to place before all universities for a good policy. We must also note, not all law schools have the requisite funding. So what can they do then?
Bump
If yes, its a good thing for L&L and I hope the firm revives
Can someone suggest the best law firms (teams) to work with in Bangalore for TMT and for M&A/PE/VC work and also talk about the A0 pay, culture and the type of work these teams are doing?
That would be super helpful, thanks!!
Now nobody is talking about Bhubaneswar.
is it one internship policy for 4th years?
HR has given me an option to choose. Please tell on the basis of usual vacancies and PPO roll outs?
------------------------
Leadership is about listening to your people. If someone vying for a leadership position is only interested in their own ideas, I think it’s safe to say they’re not ready to take charge. So much about being a good leader, I think, involves humility: Do you actively listen to your team? Do you actually let them talk instead of interrupting them? Do you take their ideas and feedback seriously? Do you hire people who are good at what they do and then trust them to do the job (ideally, better than you could)? There is no place for ego at the top—it’s lonely enough up there already.
-
Rejecting feedback
-------------------
If someone is unwilling to solicit and embrace constructive feedback, then that person is not ready to lead others. One of the most important jobs of a leader is to enable the team to deliver the best possible outcomes by creating a culture of trust and collaboration. Many people attribute the success of NASA’s first landing on the moon to a mission-first attitude—teams that feel safe to openly discuss issues, regardless of organizational politics or roles, are better able to identify and fix minor problems before they become major ones. It takes humility to admit that you don’t have all the answers but that dedication to outcomes over ego is essential to complex problem-solving. It’s incredibly difficult to innovate or lead successfully without it.
-
Know-it-all
-----------
Early in my career at the Brooklyn DA’s office, I heard from the head of homicide, a figure I deeply admired. This was my dream job, the type of case I aspired to prosecute. However, as I listened to this individual speak, I realized they were a “know-it-all.” They exuded an air of absolute authority, convinced they knew everything about everything.
At that moment, I understood this wasn’t true expertise but a facade. No one knows everything. This type of inflated ego, believing in one’s infallibility, doesn’t belong in leadership. It stifles growth, prevents collaboration, and ultimately hinders the leader’s and team’s success.
A “know-it-all” leader, blinded by their perceived omniscience, fails to recognize their limitations. This lack of self-awareness is detrimental to both the leader and their team. A leader who believes they possess all the answers stifles growth and innovation. They are unwilling to seek input from others, missing out on valuable perspectives and expertise.
Effective leadership requires a willingness to learn and adapt. A humble leader understands that they don’t have all the answers and surrounds themselves with a capable team. They foster an environment where diverse viewpoints are welcomed and collaboration is encouraged. This approach allows the team to leverage each member’s strengths, leading to greater success than any individual could achieve alone.
By recognizing and embracing their own limitations, leaders open the door to personal and collective growth. They create a culture of learning where everyone feels empowered to contribute their unique skills and knowledge.
At the place I am currently, I am paid well but the environment is not sustainable in the long term. However, the new place pays around 40K less than the current place. How do i ask them to match up? Please advise (I am afraid they won’t consider me if I put it outrightly)
I am shocked to see not a single junior showing me quality at what is supposed to be their main job. I don't see anyone being able to sit on their laptops for hours even if the deadline's literally the next day. Things are might appear stale on the outside, but inside its now rotten to the core.
any views?
better than slaves at mumbai
at least there is work life balance
if VC would have gone to boys hostel without the notice would it be that problematic as this one?
so, are you saying women are lower then men and cant be put on equal footing as that of men?
do you think women are not independent and strong enough to handle that? why the special cater?
also, just wondering if the same uproar would have been caused if a women VC would have entered boys hostel.
women need to chill out
it does not do shit. partners don't care about moot - ask me, i've done some great ones and performed well at them.
The kind of law school whose name, when uttered, makes us sit up and take notice is willing to put a shit tonne of money into research in the type of areas you so glibly look down upon. You don't even need to do GBP-INR converting on oanda.com or using the UK foreign ministry (FCDO) exchange rate, the CER, to know how much money is being put into this. Tell me, would a law school of world-wide repute be willing to put the amounts you are proposing if this learning was so useless? And note, this is a law school well known for commercial law, not legal philosophy.
https://www.kcl.ac.uk/study-legacy/funding/yeoh-tiong-lay-centre-for-politics-philosophy-and-law-phd-studentship#maincontent