We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
What about NUJS?? Maybe a push for National Importance status for NUJS? Or a funding increase? Or more land?
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/kolkata/state-to-send-iiest-upgrade-proposal-to-centre/articleshow/132371286.cms
SQE is also like that. It just proves to some hiring managers a positive image. That too if the hiring manger is based out of London or Dubai. These days for Indian roles, hiring managers are based out of India itself.
The salary is below industry standards, starting at just 5 to 6 lpa, and even after 2 years the pay will only be around 10 to 12 lpa. But my professor told me that the brand value your CV will have after getting in will be as good as what you would get at a tier 1 law firm or a major MNC's legal team. This role is based out of Trivandrum - which is also a disadvantage considering its a tier 3 city.
So the advice she gave is simple: work on prodigy for less than 2 years, and then go for a jump with a substantial hike.
Engineers at Infosys are also underpaid, but after 2 years they jump with good hike to other companies. As a lawyer, you would be fully eligible and have much better offers than the average engineer when you make that jump, because that 'Lawyer at an MNC' brand can open doors at other MNC companies that usually never hire fresher lawyers.
If you are considering the Infosys LPM program for a Legal Analyst role (based in Pune or Gurgaon), it's recommend to avoid it. Despite the 'legal' title, you will not be treated or valued as a lawyer; the role functions much more like a generic process executive. This is different from Prodigy exam. You will be assigned to a specific client account doing highly repetitive, non-legal tasks with very little actual legal work. Because of this, the pay is low, and making future career jumps back into other legal roles will be difficult. This above was told by an ex - Infosys Legal LPM lawyer to an intern who was there.
If you apply outside, you first mail the faculty. Then if and when the faculty approves then you apply at the University, which inturn asks the faculty if approval was given. Here all of us, irrespective of specialisation give the same entrance, and same interview and then are thrown to any random professor.
NLS is 30th july
what about others?
Also this is now in a way also linked to opening up to allow foreign firms, assuming it happens in our lifetime 😝
And ig this is India's only LLM program with good placements.
Reviews? Looking to apply
singularity legal as well
Background - 24 y old , with science background did a year in bsc zoology after giving neet twice then dropped out to do some business and trading, joined bsc physics on the side a year later , then currently while finishing my final year gave clat as I found a lot of stuff surrounding the legal side of M&A, VC interesting, I had a liking towards the legal profession for few years but due to financial constraints and not being from a legal family I was unable to commit to it back then
Now I get that I am a older student and 2 out of 10 top firms might reject me completely on the basis of age ( cause of ageism, still I have heard that law firms don't care that much ) .
So I request anyone here if they can guide me , specially nujs alumni or any suggestion or anything on how to manage stuff , how to intern, which co curriculars would help, how is Calcutta HC( heard not good), also i have a keen interest in policy think tanks as well ( but currently more interested in the financial side of things)
PS- anyone asking why ballb, cause NUJS don't have llb, wanted to be with my single mom ( I lived in Delhi for 5 years) , plus I am more comfortable in my city,
Please moderator help
Over the years, I had had the privilege of interacting with some exceptionally hardworking partners, principal associates, senior associates, and associates at law firms from SLS, Pune. One lesson has become abundantly clear. Your network is your social capital. Your college can open a few doors, but the relationships you cultivate determine how many more remain open.
After all, today's conversation could very well become tomorrow's client, referral, mentor, or opportunity. People invest in people long before they invest in credentials.
What genuinely surprises me is how underrated networking and interpersonal skills continue to be in law school. We spend years mastering statutes, precedents, and drafting, yet often overlook the art of building trust, nurturing professional relationships, and having meaningful conversations. In today's legal profession, being technically competent may get your foot in the door, but emotional intelligence, curiosity, and the ability to connect with people are what keep you in the room. Also, underrated is having fun at workspace, while also cracking quality and deadlines.
One thing I will always be grateful for is the Symbi alumni community. The partners, in particular, have been incredibly generous with their time, remarkably approachable, and genuinely invested in helping students grow. And also the base in UK, US and Singapore. Folks at NYU, Oxford, Cambridge and Harvard. Folks securing scholarships and TCs abroad. Folks cracking deals at law firms and companies. And every symbi hustler, finding their space in this world! Perhaps that generosity is something they themselves inherited from those who came before them, and they continue to pay it forward.
You don't need to know everything. You simply need the courage to reach out, ask thoughtful questions, and start conversations. More often than not, you will discover that people are willing to help far more than you expect.
Your degree may introduce you, but your reputation, relationships, and character will carry you the rest of the way.
Shout Out to Akshay Malhotra, Gouri Puri, Abhilash Chandran, Roxanne, Nikunj Maheshwari, Anjan Dasgupta, Kunal Chandra, Neeraj Menon, Gautam Chabra, Gautam Singh and Richa Choudhary!
On weekdays, as I have seen many people do, they go out, drink until 3 or 4 a.m., come back, sleep for a few hours, and then head straight to the office or court. Throughout all of this, they never seem to complain about a hangover, sleeplessness, or anything else. They appear as energetic as possible, and their focus at work also seems to be very good.
Whereas I face a different problem. The moment I sit for a while, whether I am looking for case law, sitting in court while other matters are being heard, or drafting something, I just fall asleep.
So how do these individuals manage it, and what is the difference? Because I have seen many of them, a great many.
https://x.com/i/status/2076526634954608812
Raste ka silk...sastey mein...
That is what it has come to.
Both are good for IP litigation.
WOW
Truly wtf - are you insinuating that reservation category students do not have any inherent merit and are only there as DEI selections?
Or just mechanical checking work? Clerks who think they are hotshot lawyers because they wear suits and have law degrees?
Yes, I support England. They may have committed human rights violations but not in the scale of the Argentinians. And they did many good things too. Their team is multicultural.
This post is on behalf of associates in a tier 1 practice. This post is for senior members of the profession - those who are in the law firms.
Everyone knows what goes around in the firm and how much pressure and gross injustice is there in the firm. Some of the posts (hopefully by senior members) are very helpful in giving tips and tricks on navigating the career in law firms. I have been grateful to read those.
I wanted to reach out and ask an significant aspect which is often overlooked - the first steps in drawing boundaries or standing up for yourself is the most difficult. There is fear and anxiety around it. You may say if this is the case - then this is not the profession for you. But I am sure there are juniors who are stuck and hard working and sincere yet unable to take this first step.
What can be some helpful advice on navigating this aspect of the profession especially since any sort of boundary is heavily looked down upon and also getting to terms on the consequences that may follow.
Also, I noticed a very critical problem - most of the juniors get a solid advice that if your health is facing an issue then quit or change. But the afterward point is missing. The problem is - it is same everywhere. Setting the ground to zero and doing it over doesn't help. So any of the seniors who have navigated this please could you shed the light on such stories. What are the options genuinely available?
PS:- I would hope whoever responds to is serious and would want that there can be an honest discussion on this aspect. Just being truthful and genuinely getting some advice would actually help some of younger members of the profession. So, please if possible be truthful if you cannot just read what others have to say. Thank you.
- Around 8 hours work in office
- Around 2 hours work at home
- Maybe 1 hour free time for Netflix and reading
- Sleep at midnight
More realistic IMO than some of the reels being put up by NLU grads (college is important because NLU grads are recruited flock to law firms and it's important not to mislead them by giving a false and rosy picture).
https://www.instagram.com/varalika_mendiratta/
Tough, but keeps me happy. Also, took some time, but has worked out pretty great so far.
https://iirfranking.com/ranking/top-law-colleges-in-india
The problem with caste quotas is unfair implementation ie, creamy layer hogging the benefits. In that sense, it reeks of the same problem as NRI quotas. Among the true deserving candidates, there may be some who are not be able to compete very well at the outset - after all upliftment is an intergenerational process. But keeping them out is the real disservice.
https://www.instagram.com/p/Dassp0KAetm/
Many students from the 5-year LL.B. programme are opposing this introduction because, according to them, most of the older students just come to the university, attend classes, and leave without actively participating in campus life.
Shouldn't we reconsider introducing the 3-year LL.B. programme in NLUs? After all, Prof. N. R. Madhava Menon had clearly argued that the 3-year LL.B. was not the ideal model, which is why the flagship 5-year integrated LL.B. programme was introduced. If that was the vision behind establishing NLUs, then what is the point of introducing the 3-year LL.B. programme now?
Do we have a vote on most deserving? and daddy curried favours for my gown?
Cmon...ppl deserve to know who is responsible for this nationwide fiasco...
The initial test was conducted on 27 June. Unfortunately, the test management was not handled well. The examination platform kept crashing throughout the test, and many candidates lost a significant amount of time. Some candidates reportedly lost 30–40 minutes, while I personally lost around 15 minutes due to technical issues. As a result, I was unable to complete the test properly.
After the exam, I emailed the HR team and the concerned coordinators explaining the issues faced by candidates. It appears that several candidates raised similar concerns. Subsequently, Infosys arranged a re-test for candidates who were affected by the technical problems or were unable to complete the examination.
The re-test was conducted on 11 July. This time, the experience was much better. The test was managed more efficiently, the platform functioned smoothly, and there were no major technical disruptions. Overall, the administration was significantly improved compared to the first attempt.
Regarding the test pattern, the questions were largely based on the Legal Executive job description and the areas mentioned during the information sessions. Candidates should focus primarily on core legal subjects. Topics included Contract Law, Mergers & Acquisitions, Arbitration, CPC, CRPC, and other foundational legal concepts.
Apart from the legal questions, there were approximately 2 to 5 questions on English grammar, logical reasoning, and reading comprehension. The comprehension section included passage-based questions where candidates had to read a passage and answer questions based on the information provided.
The exam consisted entirely of MCQs. There were 120 questions to be completed in 90 minutes, so time management is extremely important.
As far as I understand, the selection process involves multiple elimination rounds. Candidates who clear the written test move on to the Group Discussion round, followed by the Interview round. Candidates who successfully clear all stages are then issued offer letters.
I am still awaiting the results of the test and have not yet received any update regarding the next stage of the process.
My suggestion for future candidates is to thoroughly revise the subjects mentioned in the job description, practice MCQs, brush up on English and logical reasoning, and work on speed, as the time limit is quite challenging.
Hope this helps anyone preparing for the next Infosys Protégé recruitment cycle. If anyone has already received results or updates regarding the next stage, please feel free to share them in the comments.
Legacy has now upgraded its team by hiring an ex-KCo lawyer along with 3-5 new associates.
They have also added another PA from Kanga. Their Bombay and Chandigarh teams remain intact and unaffected.
I am having a major question in my mind will my age will be a barrier during the placements ?
Btw I am giving numerous mocks of CLAT and scoring very good
And previously i hold a UG degree and a was an aspirant for SSC CGL and many more govt exams also I know about NLSAT but The major fear is of PLACEMENTS in that 3year llb program also entrance is more though then CLAT / AILET
From the outside, the matters seem quite interesting, but once you're there, you realise that many of the cases are 5–10 years old and are either not getting listed or have no effective hearings. The partners also tend to micromanage everything, even the emails you draft.
A funny incident: one of the associates vetted a contract using ChatGPT and then sent it to the partner saying they weren't sure about it. The partner simply replied, "Go ahead," without even reading it, and then asked me to proofread it because I had prior general corporate internships at Tier 1 firms.