We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
The scene remains grim if you are not from the colleges like above or JGLS/ILS/GLC
https://www.barandbench.com/news/corporate/cam-disputes-partner-shaneen-parikh-resigns
bro the ragging culture is pretty much dead now, the new first years lived in a new hostel, the second years lived outside the campus, no one since our batch has partaken in much ragging per-se, its pretty chill nowadays and honestly, its fine that way, the sir and ma'am culture is honestly taken a little too seriously by third party viewers, just substitute it with bhaiya didi, its not that deep honestly, a lot of us just ask our juniors to call us by our names, its pretty subjective.
NLIU otherwise is pretty chill, good batches coming up, our 2nd years, the 27' batch is pretty good, our batch is polarising but pretty decent, our juniors are a little circumspect though, the face value of NLIU's "culture" has caused a major downturn in the crowd coming here, which seems like a problem to me.
Otherwise, NLIU, with our alumni base is all you need tbh, I interned in King Stubb and a couple of other firms which should've been out of my reach, but due to our alumni, it was seamless.
Nashe hain, but thats symmetric across law colleges in general.
I don't believe this message is a genuine first year student (F) for a second. More likely to be our A bhaiya himself than anything else.
In case it is a first year, you've subscribed to the wrong parts of NUJS, man. Didi/bhaiya culture, justifying violence because someone felt bad they got turned down, this really isn't what this college is about โ although I can't blame you for having felt that way.
Sweet and welcoming seniors were always the ones to look out for during our early years too, because a lot of the times these people were nicer and sweeter to juniors because nobody in their batch liked them.
Do they have viable and workable deals at the delhi office? Planning to switch to TT&A from mumbai due to personal reasons, any inputs on the TT&A delhi office is appreciated
Thanks
I am scoring well in AILEt, have my doubta abt the interview stage...
What is actually gonna be messed up is how the new set of lawyers for the state will handle the matters. Given the earlier tmc regime's practice of not giving proper instructions and not caring about matters pending in HC, the new set of lawyers will face a huge challenge.
Regardless, no dearth (there is, but not as bad as no one can be named) of talent in Cal HC Bar. If the BJP does its magic like it did in UP and Assam with the development of infra and economic development, Bengal would rise, and so would the work in Cal HC and the work culture, fee schedules etc would become better. The future looks postive.
NLSIU / JGLS/ IIT KGP
NALSAR/ NLUD/ NUJS
DU/ BHU/ SAU/ JNU
GNLU/NLIU/NLUJ/HNLU/ RML/ RGNUL/ NUALS/CNLU
Jamia/ AMU/ SLS Pune
Listed 20 institutions in no order or ranking but any of them can develop you academically if you are committed.
Some of the institutions donโt offer 5 year law like IIT or a law degree itself like JNU but provide good research environment and ecosystem where you can utilise your full potential.
Hope this helps.
If you want a shiny tag which 4 people will know about then go for an IIMwala MBA after writing CAT.
Sanjay Basu vs Union Of India And Ors on 28 April, 2023
-------------------------------------------------------
By its order dated 11th April, 2023 the Supreme Court after setting aside that part of the impugned order by which this court declared that the petitioner would not be required to attend the office of the Enforcement Directorate was set aside and the entire application sent back to this court "to decide the main writ petition in accordance with law".
...
It appears that during the search and seizure operation carried out by the Enforcement Directorate in the residence of the writ petitioner certain articles like laptop, mobile phones etc. were seized by it from his custody.
In respect of this seizure on 29th March, 2023, the said authority issued a show cause to the writ petitioner under Section 8 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. With the notice was enclosed reasons in support of it under Section 8(1) of the said Act. He was asked to file a written reply to it on or before 18th May, 2023, as to why the said articles should not be permitted to be retained by the Enforcement Directorate. In paragraph 4 of the said statement of reasons attached to the notice it was mentioned that the writ petitioner received Rs. 83.25 lakhs from Pincon Group of Companies and the firm which he runs Aquilaw received Rs. 23 lakhs. In the 4th last line of paragraph 4, it was specifically stated that the said sum received was "for providing legal assistance". However, the statement added that no official engagement letter issued by Pincon in favour of the firm or the writ petitioner could be produced or is available.
...
> In the meantime the petitioner shall file a reply to the show cause notice without prejudice to his rights and contentions. The adjudicating authority under the P.M.L. Act may proceed to adjudicate whether to retain the articles or not but keep the adjudication in a sealed cover and not communicate the same pending a decision in this writ application. This is so because the validity of the whole action of the Enforcement Directorate is under challenge in the writ and prima facie only a receipt of Rs. 83 lacs by the petitioner and Rs. 23 lacs by his firm from Pincon is on record. The petitioner claims it as professional receipt.
https://indiankanoon.org/docfragment/57816064
Will be grateful to you always :) Thankss
Beyond the usual optics, bells and whistles of "development for student and academic welfare" whether it will be business as usual under Nandi and BJP remains to be seen.
'
I feel insecure about my knowledge, my drafting, my understanding. I feel that a 2026 grad paralegal of this firm is far better than me. I was hoping to brush up my skills while over court vacations. Please advice, would be eternally grateful.
Thank you!!
Mailed to HR, or what?and What's generally unique in your CV?
I'm interested in banking area as a whole!
From my knowledge there is not enough tax work in law firms besides Vaish in Delhi and Vaish pays peanuts. All the other big law firms do have a tax practice but they dont have enough work. They basically do Tax Due dilligence, EPF advisory, PMLA and Black money act. Maybe Try Dhruva consultants. They are a 100% tax firm.
Just go with your own thing man. Will be much better off in the long run.
Take the time to read it. Find details below:
Caroline Morris and Cian Murphy, Getting a PhD in Law (Hart 2011). Obviously, this is a slightly old book and discusses a very different context from India, but I feel the nuance it goes into in terms of supervisor vs. university etc is worth looking at.
I am looking to intern at a Cap Marks Team this October, but I am not in the fag end of my law school to look for bigger names, and cant go to mumbai for personal reasons, any recommendations on T3 Cap Marks firms?
Honestly some GC team recs are also appreciated :))
And the thing is, every associate was supposed to go on with a regular working day on the morning they heard of her demise while coming to office. every bbody was made to work the entire day, โฎโฎโฎ
Iโm a qualified Company Secretary and a Lawyer from a state university. I was fortunate to secure an assessment internship at a law firm, which later converted into a full-time role.
However, over the past 5 months, there has been significant attrition in the firm - almost everyone who joined with me has moved on. While I understand that movement is a part of the profession, the current environment has started to feel increasingly challenging (lack of seniors, micro-management, detrimental policies, etc) and I find myself a bit demotivated.
Iโve been actively exploring opportunities and have been cold-emailing HRs and Partners, but havenโt had much success so far. I also feel hesitant about resigning without another offer in hand, given practical constraints.
I understand that these things take time, but I would really appreciate any guidance, suggestions, or leads that anyone could offer.
Thank you in advance!
On a separate note, do some digging you'll find people shifting from KLA to BLC but not a single case of the opposite happening.
This is the best and simplest piece of advice I received from an Associate, which stuck with me.
Instead of approaching tasks academically, trying to show off unnecessary skills, always keep in mind this ultimate goal and be efficient rather than flamboyant in your work, and your senior will greatly appreciate you for it and keep you in his good books.
Also, be cheerful and interactive with the team at large. At the end of the day, they're not just looking for a topper to join the team and not collaborate; they're essentially deciding whether you're a person they want to sit next to for the next couple of years through long nights and difficult moments who can handle the stress.
All the very best!
Can someone from CAM please describe the nature and extent to which Legora is being used in the transactional practice areas?
Is it really being implemented wholly for documentation and research or is it still just a buzzword for PR?
Also, if yes, what's your review of it, is it helpful and do you think this will affect hiring for upcoming batches?
Thanks!
YOUR HEALTH, YOUR KID AND YOUR PEACE IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN ANY MATTER OR ANY WORK.
REQUEST YOU TO PRIORTISE WHAT MATTERS MORE. PLEASE STOP STRESSING, THAT IS THE LAST THING YOU NEED TO AT THIS CRUCIAL TIME OF YOUR LIFE.
WORK TO LIVE AND NOT LIVE TO WORk.
YOURS TRULY,
GEN-Z FRESHER
Of all the pressures law school already has, its genuinely not reasonable to have such strict attendence policies. I hope the SC passes an order stopping this. There have been many instances where even genuine reasons for lack of attendnece have not been met. A student told the UG chair (โฎโฎโฎ) that they were suicidal and her response was "everyone is suicidal lately". I have given up hope
Hi, I did a 4 month internship with KCO, my call back was extended and the feedback was positive however I wasnโt told when Iโll have the interview scheduled. Any information is appreciated. Thank you:)
Also, people who are good at heart donโt lose control in anger and assault people. โฎโฎโฎ
Heard in CB they've made a few Associate Partners/Partner & a Senior Partner! Can anybody confirm?
What I was not prepared for was the sheer volume of work and the environment. The stress is honestly unimaginable. The workload never seems to end, timelines are constantly unreasonable, and there is zero regard for personal boundaries. What makes it harder is that most of the pressure comes from โseniorsโ who, in reality, have lesser PQE than me. Work is routinely dumped without context, accountability is pushed downhill, and when something goes wrong, it feels like Iโm the first person to be thrown under the bus.
Thereโs a constant sense that people are waiting for you to slip up. There is no room to pause, reflect, or even breathe. My personal life is practically nonโexistent at this point, my health has deteriorated significantly, and I find myself constantly anxious and exhausted. Iโve reached a stage where coping with this level of toxicity feels increasingly difficult.
To the seniors and peers on this forum who have spent much longer in this profession, especially in disputes: how do you manage this? Is this something one simply learns to live with, or does it get better with time? At what point do you decide that the cost is too high?
Would really appreciate any honest perspectives or advice.
TLDR: HOW TO LIVE A LIFE WHILE WORKING IN A LAW FIRM?
Iโm a 2024 LL.B. graduate currently trying to move into data privacy roles. I have around 10 months of experience in US pre-employment compliance (background verification and health screen vetting typa work), but Iโve been trying to pivot into privacy for a while now. Iโm currently between roles, so using this time to upskill and figure out the right entry point.
Over the past few months, Iโve tried to build some practical understanding. worked on things like DPIAs, RoPA, basic gap assessments, privacy policies, and have been reading up on GDPR and the DPDP Act and collecting certs. Still very early stage, but trying to make the shift properly now.
Iโve been seeing a lot about Tsaaro Consulting and their career change / apprenticeship-type roles, so wanted to ask people here whoโve been through it or are in similar roles:
- 1. What actually helps in getting shortlisted for these roles?
- 2. How much do certifications vs practical work/portfolio matter at entry level?
- 3. Is the exposure there genuinely useful for moving ahead in privacy, or is it more surface-level?
- 4. Are there any other entry-level options for a privacy fresher?
Would really appreciate honest inputs, especially from people who started from a similar position.
Thanks!
Now i wanted to know whether if i am able to crack the latter 2 should i join either, or wait this year for nlsiu next year?
[N.B. there are only 22 oprn seats for me, & competition is huge, may 2-2.5k].
My understanding is that wasting another year is not optimal since it would go waste, rather it is better to get in an NLU and work as hard as possible from day 1 itself.
My assumptions for corporate law firm/in-house jobs are somewhat stable in the sense i researched a lot, but i concur that i need to know a lot many things for even coming to a conclusion for pursuing one.
I am naturally inclined to academia, otherwise.
Please advise and give genuine advises please , not like there are no scope for 3 year llb, tier 3 colleges are scam, or go to DU, BHU (which i cant since they wont provide hostels, & i'm not from these cities). Please give genuine practical advises.
Thank you!
https://x.com/advsanjoy/status/2051491617761284488
- LLB from Jogesh Chandra Choudhuri College of Law, Kolkata.
- Total declared assets: 8 crore.
From SuperLawyer:
"While in college, he was an active participant in the student political body of the University and gradually grew along with it. He became the General Secretary and subsequently President of the Studentsโ Union. He is also the youngest member to have been inducted into the Trinamul Congressโ Party Core Committee. Currently he practices at the Calcutta High Court."
https://superlawyer.in/sirsanya-bandopadhyay-advocate-calcutta-high-court-building-career-in-litigation-experience-politics
https://in.linkedin.com/in/sirsanya-bandopadhyay-786932183
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/uttarpara-election-results-2026-tmcs-sirsanya-bandopadhyay-vs-bjps-dipanjan-chakraborty/articleshow/130643812.cms
https://www.myneta.info/WestBengal2026/candidate.php?candidate_id=1847
The contents of the communication are not only disappointing but deeply troubling. The attempt to rationalize administrative inaction under the guise of โfeasibilityโ and โlegal constraintsโ is both unconvincing and evasive. It is entirely reasonable to ask: what exactly is considered unfeasible? Is it the basic academic autonomy of allowing students to choose their honours papers? Is it the recruitment of qualified subject experts? Or is it the provision of fundamental infrastructure and amenities expected from a residential university?
Students have repeatedly witnessed arbitrary and regressive decisions that undermine both academic growth and professional preparedness. The removal of attendance considerations for moot participation, the lack of serious engagement with placement concerns, and the absence of a supportive academic environment reflect a systemic disregard for student priorities.
The administrationโs portrayal of meetings as consultative platforms is misleading. In reality, these spaces offer little room for genuine dialogue. Students are either not given the opportunity to speak or are ignored when they do. More concerning is the reported conduct during the last meeting, where the SBA President, upon raising structural concerns and suggesting administrative reshuffling, was met not with reasoned discussion but with hostility and remarks that can only be described as intimidatory.
With the recent disclosure of documents, policy proposals and communications by the student president, the question of accountability has become clearer. Students have consistently acted in good faith, submitting proposals with the genuine intent of constructive implementation. The administrationโs continued inaction reflects not constraints, but a lack of responsiveness and commitment to student welfare.
Further, the presence of double standards and instances of inappropriate personal remarks directed at students raise serious concerns about professionalism and institutional ethics.
The situation demands urgent and meaningful reform. It is imperative that those in positions of authority are held accountable, and that structural changes are considered to restore trust, transparency, and academic integrity. The future and legacy of the institution depend on the willingness to acknowledge failures and undertake comprehensive corrective measures.
These people are not rightists or leftists, they are SELF-ists.
https://x.com/RahulGandhi/status/2051338192729846210
This evening Mamata will call a press conference. I feel there is a strong likelihood of a petition before the Supreme Court, with Kapil Sibal arguing.
โฎโฎโฎ.
CATEGORY ONE: Ministers and AG:
These ones are out immediately.
1. Biman Banerjee, WB Assembly Speaker and TMC MLA
2. Bratya Basu, WB Education Minister and TMC MLA (now ex-MLA: lost his seat)
3. Moloy Ghatak, WB Law Minister and TMC MLA (now ex-MLA:also lost).. his removal is big as he was the one pushing for a campus in his constituency Asansol)
4. Chandrima Bhattacharya, WB Industries Minister and TMC MLA (now ex-MLA, also lost).
5. Kishore Datta, Advocate General (pre-Covid the SJA openly clashed with him and criticised him in a letter: shared on LI at that time)
Itโs very likely that Swapan Dasgupta will be included, as one of the major ministers (Education Minister, most likely). Possibly Sanjeev Sanyal as Finance Minister, if he is parachuted from Delhi.
The next AG could be a certain NLSIU alum from the older batches who is close to the BJP (not sharing the name now). Or perhaps an older and highly distinguished Senior Advocate, who was not part of the TMC ecosystem (not sharing the name, but his area is mostly commercial law).
CATEGORY TWO: Supposed legal โluminariesโ
These ones will be out soon after:
6. Kalyan Banerjee, TMC MP
7. Sanjay Basu, founder of Aquilaw and right-hand man of Abhishek Banerjee
8. Ashok Kumar Deb, WB Bar Council Chairman and TMC MLA
9. Justice (retd) Jyotirmoy Bhattacharya, Chairman, State Human Rights Commission
10. Sandipan Ganguly, Senior Advocate close to the TMC regime
11. Ratnanko Banerji, Senior Advocate close to the TMC regime
In the past, legends like Justice Ruma Pal, KK Venugopal, Gopal Subramanyam, Dipankar Gupta were on the GC. What the BJP could do is appoint high-profile senior counsels of national stature who are part of the BJP ecosystem, like Harish Salve, Mahesh Jethmalani, ASG Vikramjeet Banerji, Pinky Anand, Aman Lekhi etc. Or even the Attorney General and Solicitor General. Another option would be retired SC judges close to the BJP: there are several. An ultimate troll move would be to appoint J Sai Deepak. ๐ฎ
CATEGORY THREE: Academics
12. Surya Prakash, NLIU VC
13. Poonam Saxena, former VC, NLUJ
My money would be on Raj Kumar of JGLS, since he is now firmly pro-BJP. Alternatively, they may simply invite tier 1 NLU VCs.
Those who will stay on are ex-officio national appointees, like the UGC Chairman, BCI Chairman and IIM Calcutta Director.
https://www.nujs.edu/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/GC-15012026.pdf
Where does this leave Menaka? No way sheโs getting a second term as RS MP, given that the seats will be reduced and allocated to the heavyweights who lost in the election, including Mamata herself? So will she be satisfied being a one-term MP, or will she join another party?