We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
Pretty pathetic that this happened really. No one deserves money to clear AIBE or probation.
Panag and Baby- 1
Yet most of them seem to apply for jobs to law firms that advise predatory capitalist corporations. These firms are also cheerleaders of the Modi govt.
Make this make sense?
All inputs appreciated
2 ICICI Bank
1 SAM
Anyone here interned at Clarus Law Associates? Howโs the corporate exposure?
What about reservations ? Thatโs the animating reason for the government to do this. Are you arguing in a country like India there isnโt someone who would claim a trans identity to get reserved jobs and seats ?
If you truly think that the government shouldnโt get to define who gets benefits that it gives out and shouldnโt demand any accountability from beneficiaries- I can only assume youโre a child who has had everything handed to them and had to work for nothing.
Start with your money- give it to whoever asks without asking them why they need it or who they are.
State law doesnโt not uphold a religious belief here. If you are part of a religion where you believe in Xenu and believe in thetans and that anyone who disagrees with you is a suppressive person. You have a right to believe it. You do not have a right to demand special treatment for your beliefs or that the state co-sign your faith.
Hereโs a radical idea - if you want to be a day scholar- do a program that allows that.
We really REALLY need funding lol.
- They rarely get tickets, whereas elite university grads abroad get lots of opportunities and hold high office
- Post Menaka Guruswamy, a new bar has been set and NLU grads are now looking for tickets
Primarily those who are actually completely first gen and have no well established advocates in their family, while on the other hand there are also first gens whose parents are not lawyers but they have one of their blood relatives as a well established advocate and even if they enter litigation, they will get the benefits of a 2nd gen.
P.S. - One of my batchmates relative is standing cousel for government in gujarat high court. He claims to be first gen like me but he has done his internships since 1st year under top notch adovcates and even 1 High court judge.
Welp guess life is unfair and unfairer in law school.
If I start a new law firm, the lalas with their 500 lawyer firms can afford to undercut rates & quotes of my 10 lawyer firm in the race to bottom. They can cross subsidise non profitable rates, my boutique firm cannot. This will eventually limit my scale or drive me out of business.
I cannot move to SG or HK overnight because I'm not qualified there. Obviously, moving abroad is much more lucrative and desirable, hence, Indian lawyers are making beeline for those jobs.
SG and HK jobs are lucrative and desirable precisely because SG and HK are hyper competitive free markets. Legal services in India is not a competitive market with all its collusion and barriers to entry.
On the point about repetitive work: allocation depends on skill, reliability, and performance. Those demonstrating capability are entrusted with more substantive technology law and complex litigation work. At the same time, broader exposure is available depending on team requirements and individual ability.
In terms of mentorship and team culture, the environment is professional, collaborative, and hands-on. For the most accurate perspective, it is advisable to speak with current team members.
As far as PPOs are concerned, the process is aligned with the firmโs standard policy. Internships are routed through HR, and PPOs depend on performance, availability, and team requirements.
Work allocation is driven by client needs, timelines, and competence. Different team members lead matters based on the nature of the task and their experience.
Where should one even begin litigation or advisory? And in cities like Delhi/Jaipur, are there firms/chambers that genuinely take law interns for tax work?
Would appreciate any guidance from people in the field.
This the typical profile? Also, what's the pay like?
Can all the kind people here give honest review. I have been selected for both and they are on overlapping dates. Idk which one to choose
PQE 11 years
Just keep griding for international/National level competitions. NLIU won't give you the T1 thrill anymore. At max its tier 1.5
https://www.barandbench.com/news/corporate/jsa-snaps-up-three-cms-induslaw-corporate-partners
Also suitable lunch options while interning there.
It's absolutely stupid!
MF: 4.47L
Stocks: 2.75L
Bonds: 11.65L
Indian lala firms do 1/4 or 1/10 or 1/20 or whatever. Consequently, Indian firm lawyers are seriously underpaid as a percentage of revenue generated compared to their counterparts in say Singapore or Hong Kong. Singapore and Hong Kong don't restrict foreign law firms now, do they?
https://x.com/IndiaToday/status/2041374925970440650
According to Wikipedia, the TMC got around 2.9 crore votes and the BJP around 2.3 crore votes last time: so a difference of about 60 lakh votes.
Would appreciate any thoughts, Thanks!
I am interning there in June, my second corporate (?) internship, would really appreciate any information about the firm.
Moderators, I feel sorry for you and am surprised at you. I am sorry that you have to endure tripe like this. At the same time, you are supposed to be following your publication guidelines. Those state that content being published should provoke thoughtful discussion. That implies a degree of selectivity. Either change the guidelines to reflect that even nonsense like this falls within your ambit, or actually follow the guidelines. You, I and all who read this site know what the purpose behind such a post is, and what it devolves into. Albert Campion so beautifully says when asked about his capability to "talk bilge" even in the most serious and pressurised of situations that he "learned to talk the language by reading advertisements". Margery Allingham, who wrote the Campion books and is therefore the creator of the self-styled "Uncle Albert", would have surely written "advertisements (and Legally India)" had she lived to learn of this website and what it has become. Sorry for the repeated references to "golden age of detective fiction" novels (have been a huge fan since I was a kid), but those of you who waste your time posting such things are what Mr Gaunt, one of the primary characters in Ngaio Marsh's Roderick Alleyn novel Colour Scheme, would describe as "an insufferable bore". Is that really what you want your legacy to be?
https://www.opindia.com/2026/04/meta-india-compromised-pro-congress-leadership-scrutiny-facebook-anti-modi-propaganda/
Also, not to guess which NLU you're from, but if it's one of the T-1s with heavy reservations - that explains why the crowd might not be too ambitious. And this is not coming from a place of elitism - and I hope it doesn't put an elitist thought in your already borderline-superiority-complex-suffering head. I say this from personal experience of being at a T-2 NLU and missing T-1s by a hair, most of my peers that come through a domicile quota had law as their literal last career option - and are only pursuing it because CLAT was a piece of cake with reservation.
I think I've addressed all 3 concerns that you flagged - academics, mooting, and peer group. I was in the same position that you were in back in first year, and I'm in my final year now - I spent my years in a law school that I initially deemed to be too "easy" for me chasing challenges - you find ADRs too easy? Go for a proper moot, one of the big 3 - jessup, elsa, vis. You find your crowd too unambitious, go for paper presentations, meet people that challenge you intellectual - the sky is your limit, literally nothing is stopping you from seeking out experiences that make your time at law school worthwhile.
Your use of the word "publication" (or "publications") is wrong, and if taken as correct, makes a total nonsense of the word. This is not your fault: indeed, you have abided by the nonsensical understanding of "publication" that has taken hold in India's appalling excuse for a legal education environment. In a country with a true understanding of academia, "publication" means only one thing: a journal article published in a journal which takes you through a process of anonymous, double-blind peer review. Nothing else is a publication, in the truest, most beautiful sense of the term. Yes, the word "publication" can be stretched to cover articles in some student-run law journals, but only in those and in no others. The exceptional journals of this kind are: Harvard Law Review, NYU Law Review, Yale Law Journal, University of Chicago Law Review and Columbia Law Review. (This is coming from someone who hasn't taken a degree at any of the universities whose names are associated with the mentioned journals.) Thus, no blog posts, no "NLU journals"... none of these are "publications", and describing them on your CV as such, while taken as correct in India, is not correct at all.
Therefore, unless Indian law firms are expecting you to have articles published in journals like Law and Philosophy, Public Law, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Cambridge Law Journal, the Law Quarterly Review, Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence, etc, you have not much to worry about. And if they do expect, that's unreasonable, unrealistic and silly: the next H.L.A. Hart or J. Raz ain't never joining a law firm. Hope this helps.