We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
There is a danger that an inquiry, if at all, will get saffron/Pinkwashed.
Then again the SJA now would much rather wag it's tail to...
EC etc records are a fascinating trove of info. No wonder every admin has been deeply reluctant to make the entire process transparent and accessible. And our dear teach in the EC have been complicit in maintaining the opacity.
If you want to run them down, there is plenty ammo. Maybe there is a smoking gun here too. If yes, don't wait for a mewing SJA. Get the numbers, organise the facts and secure due direction from the new govt to undertake a proper forensic audit of NUJS finances including this one.
Just begin with the Justice PN Sinha Inquiry report. Follow the crumbs.
When the origins of these endowments among others are deeply suspect and the subsequent history then you get this.