We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
Either way — this one's for the students lurking here who have romanticised the idea of a Tier 1 disputes team. We see the LinkedIn posts about the big wins, the Supreme Court appearances, the landmark judgments. But no one talks about what Tuesday at 11pm actually looks like.
So — disputes lawyers at T1 (CAM, SAM, AZB, Trilegal, KCO, NDA, whoever) — please indulge us this weekend. Genuinely curious:
On any given day:
- How many matters are you actively juggling? Is it 3 or is it 13?
- What does the task list actually look like — research notes, written submissions, plaints, replies, vakalatnamas, cause list tracking, client calls, all of it at once?
- Is drafting a whole plaint or a writ petition a one-person, one-day job? Or does it go through 5 people over 3 weeks?
- Who does what — what does an A0/A1 handle vs what actually goes to the SA or partner?
- Is court attendance a regular thing or mostly for seniors?
- How many "urgent" tasks land on your plate after 7pm?
Also — is disputes at T1 actually what students imagine it to be? Or is it mostly document review, research memos, and chasing advocates on record?
Drop your honest take. No names needed — that's what this forum is for. You'd genuinely be doing a service to every law student who's building their entire career plan around "I want to do disputes at a T1."
-Drafting and all happens at all levels and even team heads give their say in the final draft more often than not (micromanagement level differs). It is NOT a one-day job unless its an urgent application. In a sane disputes team (there are less than you'd like to think), the work goes upto a Partner who reverts to the counsel/client firm and back, if necessary, for further revisions. Basic memo work is handled by juniors.
-In smaller firms, associates may get more court exposure and directly participate in briefing unlike T1s who take senior counsels just to mention or adjourn.
-Partners in these firms usually have less experience than a fresher at an advocate's chamber. If you dream of building face value as an arguing counsel, Disputes firms are definitely not it (with a few exceptions who actually became senior counsels themsleves lol). A lot of partners/senior partners CANNOT argue or are NOT CONFIDENT in arguing. (FYI, if you are a law student sneering at this, you'll realize how difficult it actually is to make relevant submissions before a High Court Bench.)
-In Bombay, some old-school firms tend to send freshers for administrative/compliance work before the Prothonotary (OS Registrar).
-Urgent tasks land on your plate all the time, especially when arbitration matters come up.
-For a lot of budding litigators, the answer for your last question is a resounding 'NO'. Most disputes work is clerical at junior levels and becomes briefing/solicitor work at senior levels. If you don't mind being a briefing counsel as part of your career trajectory, then disputes is good because you get paid better than litigation at the start. Cannot say the same for litigators with 5+ years of experience who usually start outearning their corporate peers by then. This curve, however, is very steep. Not every litigator can survive the court experience. Many prefer stability (LOL) compared to the complete uncertainty of litigation.
1. Was the "[AI generated]" flag inserted into the title by the OP or by the moderators?
2. If the moderators inserted the flag, on what basis was this done? The use of the m dash? Or the bombastic, quasi news coverage-like tone of the post? Or both? Is it that the two factors in conjunction point in the direction of AI or something? Or do you have some positive proof that this was generated by AI such as an AI detection tool? If so, what tool are you using and what is its reliability?
NB: I am not the OP in disguise. The only reason I opened the post was actually the flag, because the fact is that my career ambitions are such that what does or does not happen at a T1 disputes practice is information as irrelevant to me as Sherlock Holmes found the workings of the solar system to being a detective, though I will acknowledge that one person has given a very good answer which I hope those for whom this is relevant will find useful.
Some guidance please from skilled and experienced ass kissers.
Also can you reflect on how many and kind of tasks are present on a single day (in normal course of business)
In contrast to this, there are NO slow days in Delhi Disputes if you are in a decent-sized terms in terms of filing. Days which seem slow actually bother you and you check and recheck your case-diary entry list or calendar to verify in case you missed a meeting and will be blasted for it by your seniors.
Also, WCC at Firms is a sham of what actual criminal work looks like in Courts. If you have the slightest inclination of practising criminal law then you’ll have to start with Chambers and at District Courts, there’s no way around it regardless of what people may tell you.
All the best!
W.r.t. WCC, I have not directly worked/interned with or seen these teams up close and personal but from what I've caught on from classmates/colleagues, most teams actually don't do proper WCC as much as they do mainly compliance work. As you've rightly pointed out, core criminal practice cannot be equated to WCC teams as the myriad procedures/courts/work remains unknowable to a WCC Associate. However, good WCC teams do seem to give you weighty matters in PMLA/SARFAESI for example so that's that.