Ha, ha..........that way courts have given up on the consortium on a smooth conduct of CLAT. Every year, they mess up.

And now the NLUs have become a place to perish. Let's not get there. This is not a trivial matter.
https://theleaflet.in/leaflet-reports/they-have-not-come-here-to-die-an-epidemic-of-student-suicides-plagues-indias-national-law-universities

You will not get hired. A primary reason why law firms are willing to pay 23-24 year olds large salaries is the expectation (some bosses say it outright, few imply it) that the associates will work through the night, and sometimes 2 or 3 days with barely any sleep. Post 30, you don’t have the health to squander away even if you’re willing to. This is particularly true at the “tier-1” firms.

Another comment here accurately describes hurdles from a partnership PoV but that assumes people think that far into the future - which no one does when hiring a fresher. The other thing that’s relevant is that a 34 year old has lived live a fair bit and will be presumed to not put up with the garbage behaviour many partners engage in. Young adults who’ve never made money before are much likely to put up with that kind of behaviour.

Additionally, while most law firm partners lack emotional awareness, they also will know that hiring you will be a recipe for friction that will likely be unavoidable - a 27 / 28 / 29 year old SA or PA will direct your life more than you can think right now. Call you at 10 or 11 PM asking for a draft by noon the next day. No matter how much one denies it, egos will come into play when you work the hours law firms do.

I won’t bring up the reductions in hiring due to perceived efficiencies from AI - and yes, they have begun no matter what people tell you. Legora and Harvey aren’t cheap. The money has to come from somewhere.

All of these factors can only be overridden or dispensed away if you get a good partner who is open to unconventional thinking about how lives are lived - and law firm partners like that are exceedingly rare. So, this comes down to the question - are you willing to spend 3 years going you law school when your only chance of success will require immense luck, in this context.

Also, your diplomas and understanding of economic theory will not help your cause. Law firms don’t care about that stuff, much. I’m sorry if my phrasing is a bit blunt. This is not to discourage you or downplay your achievements, knowledge and lived experiences - which I am sure will be more rich and will have helped build more character that most law firm ghouls have. This is an honest opinion of someone who is over 30, and has experienced multiple firms including having a say in hiring exercises.

Hello, many men are accused every day with little to no evidence. Some had the gall to say that we all should do away with the due process during #metoo. In light of that, not having to face the same level of scrutiny that men have always faced when in positions of power by women seems, concerningly, yet another privilege.

So throwing around words like 'patriarchal insecurity' and moralising after calling me an irredeemable dolt (with horrible spelling) doesn't make your position on this issue any better. Rather, it just deflects from the real issues. We have all seen enough 'where there is smoke, there is fire' comments from women. Women set those standards. Here, someone has spoken about the smoke. Look for the fire.

Your rush to defend the unnamed woman in this unnamed team without an inch of uncovering what may have happened speaks volumes on how you would adjudicate gendered disputes. It's prejudging it. In simple terms, women too should face a process of scrutiny rather than squirming out of their responsibility. All of this should actually trigger a talk with HR. Again, women set those standards.

Finally, someone with power over someone else and the larger team is, by default, to be held to a higher standard. The optics of a team and disaffection shown by a team should be something a partner should have a reasonable idea about. That comes with the territory of being a partner. At least a good one.

Does anyone know why Anchal Dhir is leaving CAM for Anagram? I thought she is loyal to Cyril

https://legal.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/industry/cam-partners-anchal-dhir-and-shubham-rastogi-join-anagram-partners-with-their-teams/130279931

My firm (T1-ish Mumbai) hired a PA and promoted him to partner. However, he has no associates under him. An A0 is supposed to join in three months, but till then he has to work alone.

Understandably, the new partner is not happy with his situation. He’s relying on interns and keeps on borrowing associates from other teams. I’m curious if anyone else has witnessed something like this.

Can someone explain how mass movement of partners (along with their associates) from one law firm to another actually works in practice?

Had a few questions around this:

1.Do partners typically take their clients along? What happens in cases where the client was originally referred by the old firm?

2. How do they handle fee mandates with clients when they move — do they renegotiate or just continue on similar terms?

3.How are conflicts managed, especially if the new firm already has clients who are competitors of the incoming partner’s clients?

4.What happens to the partnership / LLP agreement of the old firm, and how does onboarding in the new firm usually work?

I know it varies case to case, but would be great to understand what the usual market practice looks like.

Hi, I have an upcoming internship at Khaitan Bombay in the B&F team. Could anyone share about the working culture, work load, general atmosphere etc there? While I am not specifically looking for a PPO (don't want to move to Bombay), I do want to work in a team where associates actually take the time to interact with you. Also if anyone has any advice about the kind of work given to interns in B&F teams, I would really appreciate hearing about it. Thank you!

Hi, i work in data privacy at a big 4. The scope is crazy and you can do very well. However, its difficult to break into as a newbie/fresher. The pay is average. I have 3 years of work experience and my pay is about 14LPA ctc.

Privacy pillar is a privacy automation tool company and rather small. If you join you’ll work only around privacy automation and not laws. However i do understand we dont always have a choice and sometimes have to make do with what we can find.

Please let us not speculate or say anything. Please keep faith in the college administration and in the state government and police. Please wait for their formal statement, after they have conducted a probe.

I would like to emphasise that the NUJS administration gives students access to counselling faculties and has a zero-tolerance policy towards ragging.

Ajay has been a valuable member of the firm. He has served CAM well. We wish him all the best in life and all success in his future endeavours."

Served CAM Well…. REALLY he served? When will these people realise that they are NOT gods and people are NOT their servants. Pathetic.

KCO Noida is an excellent place to work, especially in terms of quality. There is a Senior Associate (initials VG) whose work is truly exceptional. She is highly dedicated and consistently goes the extra mile, particularly in mentoring and guiding junior team members, reflecting both strong quality and work ethic.

It is charmingly naïve to imagine that Kamra would struggle to afford the fees of Senior Advocate Navroz Seervai. Those whose interests he so diligently advances, under the comforting disguise of comedy and citizen-centric discourse, are hardly short of resources. They would not only remunerate him generously but also ensure that his pronouncements are buttressed by suitably aligned legal counsel. In this sense, he is less a satirist and more the Suhel Seth of the self-styled left: a performer cloaked in the language of dissent while serving a predictable ideological constituency.

My objection, however, is not to ideology itself. No political philosophy, be it left, centre, or right, is inherently malign. What matters is the calibre and integrity of those who profess it. On that count, contemporary Indian politics offers little reassurance. The traditional left is electorally irrelevant, while the broader left-of-centre space is burdened by a legacy of dubious stewardship: from the corruption-tainted tenure of Lalu Prasad Yadav to the dynastic and often troubling political ecosystems associated with Mulayam Singh Yadav, the governance controversies under Mayawati, and the criminal-political nexus epitomised by the late Atiq Ahmed.

Compounding this malaise is the persistent inability of Rahul Gandhi to articulate a compelling or credible alternative. His reliance on alliances with politically compromised actors (like some of the names mentioned above), coupled with the insistence on branding the coalition as “INDIA”, and the not so subtle coercion of public discourse to adopt this nomenclature, betrays a disquieting disconnect from political reality. It reflects not strategic acumen, but a reliance on symbolism in place of substance.

The difficulty with figures such as Kamra is more fundamental. There is a discernible asymmetry in his critique: while his satire relentlessly targets Narendra Modi, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), and the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), it remains conspicuously silent on the failings of the political actors he implicitly supports. This selective scrutiny lends the impression not of independent satire but of advocacy guided by a predetermined brief. Whether motivated by ideological alignment or patronage, the effect is the same: a narrative that champions one side while shielding it from equivalent examination.

And yet, even with this awareness, one cannot entirely dismiss his effectiveness. As a communicator, he possesses a remarkable ability to captivate and mobilize his audience. In that sense, he resembles a modern-day pied piper, leading his listeners with wit and conviction, even if the destination remains open to question. In a country like India, where the legal and political consequences of outspoken dissent can be significant, it is difficult to imagine anyone operating at this scale without substantial financial backing and the assurance of robust legal cover.

Brand = "The best and No.1 University in India for law & legal studies" for 7th consecutive year. No. 35 in the world for law & legal studies by QS world ranking. A 12th standard passout not having much awareness would consider these facts as illustrated on their website to be the "brand" only for which they will be paying 60 lakh+ as per latest fees.

Jindal has absolutely nothing to worry about. The college is filled with children of law firm owners, Senior advocates, rich businessmen and CEOs, IAS officers and politicians. In fact, tons of early NLSIU alumni send their children to Jindal. I can name at least 10 of them.

These kids will land up in the top of firms in India. Many will go on to study abroad and join law firms abroad. Their future is absolutely secure, much more than the future of even the top NLU grads from regular middle class families

So chill.

Someone once told me that in a course that recruits to Britain's Special Air Service (a unit of their special forces) get told on their introductory course by their instructors something like, "We aren't gonna try and recruit you. We're gonna try and kill you". At least those buggers are honest. Thank you for one small display of honesty which effectively translates to, "You are just a disposable resource. We don't give a fuck about you". Be like your SAS recruiter counterparts all the time. At least then, people will be able to make informed choices about whether they really want to work for law firms or not. You don't care whether the people under you live or die. You know what? Let me say the quiet part aloud (as I don't work in this sector) for all the people who feel to scared to: just as you don't care about them, even they don't care about you either. To the extent that some of them do, it's because they're too soft hearted for their own good. Now get back to your glorified sweatshop which nobody outside the legal profession has ever heard of and hope you manage one day to learn something out of causing so many people so much misery.

The firm reflects a stagnant environment with minimal scope for growth for young lawyers. The founding partners separated within a year, indicating internal differences, and the current leadership also appears unstable. There are continuing concerns regarding work culture and professional ethics.

Head of North India is an administrative designation and not a supervisory role. Akila and Ravi are senior partners (and are designated so) who were never interested in managing day to day operations of CAM noida. Head of North India tag will be offered to someone who is super loyal to the high command. In my view it will go to Ritika Rathi for her special abilities.

Hi, as someone who is graduating in 2027, I feel it is apt for me to reply here, the Placement scenes are quite ok over here obviously, not as great as other private colleges across India (please note this is in spite of Christ being in the heart of a tier 1 city). We have had decent campus placements especially in BO 23 and 25, The BO 26 was quite subpar tbh (not shitting on the batch but it was not as great as compared to previous batches). Honest suggestion as another person commented earlier only join Christ if you have no choice or if circumstances forces you to, the faculty except 1 or 2 is below average or bad (most of them are inexperienced llm passouts), so even if you score high in academics, when you go for internships you will realize how bad it actually is i.e the teaching in Christ. Externals are not supported much in college. It is your prep and hardwork which gets marketed as a collective win through instagram or linkedin lmao (truly communist in a weird way, marx would be proud). Therefore, I heavily suggest turn back if you can, no suffering is worth coming to Christ (ironically it is hell where youre rewarded nothing). Only good thing may be that it will prepare you for the toxic legal environment which you may face when you enter the practice lmao. Mods dont mark this is trollish, this is simply how I would describe Christ as

If NLUs decide not to offer the BA-LLB combination, then most would have to close down (including NLS, NLUD, NALSAR, and WBNUJS). BA-LLB has been their flagship programme, and will remain so - while the world moves on. Anything else would be severely disruptive, hence they do more of the same.

These NLUs are trying to move ahead, looking into their rear-view mirrors.

I’m a data privacy enthusiast and really keen to deepen my understanding of this field. I’d love to connect with people here who are working in or exploring areas like data protection, privacy laws, compliance, or privacy engineering.

any one can shed more light on the Culture, domain of work and hw much does the Job Pay ?

any idea about a company called Privacy Pillar that is Actively Hiring in this Sector?

Hey bro, the anxiety is understandable. However, you shouldn't worry about getting HNLU (or any T2) for that matter. Yes, compared to the T1s, getting a good job is difficult but it isn't impossible.

HNLU has a lot of alums placed in extremely well-to do positions. If they could do it with a fraction of the resources the college possesses at present, I see no reason why the present batches would not get into similar positions. Hnlu peeps get jobs beyond AZB. So many of our seniors past and present have been placed in firms like Trilegal, SAM, CAM, JSA among others. Yes, a lot of credit has to go to their own efforts and hard work. However a lot of them landed that job because the RCC managed to laboriously mail these firms for internships in the first place (Exceptions do exist, not everyone gets a job due to the RCC). If they could do it despite the T2 tag, you could do it too.

HNLU is no decline as of now. To contrary, I believe the college is currently going through a really good period. Numerous moot wins and qualifications, mid rankers bagging great jobs, the 3rd and 4th years bagging really good internships with latter having started converting them into PPOs very recently. If they could do it, I see no reason why you wouldn't be able to do the same. Yes, the college has some problems; the admin being the biggest of them all. However, despite the structural limitations, the college seems to do well and possibly better in the future.

As someone who has close friends in the other T2s and in a few T1s, unlike a lot other colleges (especially in the T2 range), the senior-junior culture is largely healthy. There's a strong culture to get into corp across batches and its hard not to find someone who hasn't attempted to specialise in specific practice areas may it be disputes, gen corp, comp law, or even TMT. If they could do it, what's stopping you?

Choosing the college wouldn't necessarily meaning closing the doors on the onset, more accurately you leave the door ajar. The college gives you a few opportunities to work upon. To fully open the door, you'll have to work; sometimes you'll have to work harder than your peers in T1 NLUs to get the same opportunities. This is the sole reason why T1s are T1s, and T2s the T2s. The door is ajar, if you're smart about how you structure your academics, your internships, and ultimately your work ethic, nothing will stop you from opening that door. Countless alums have done it in the past, seniors are doing it in the present, and many will be doing in the future.

Light Lo bro

The firm takes interns via the contact route. If you're applying 4-5 months in advance, the HR will ask you to resend the application 2-3 months before the required month only to end up sending you a crude slots filled month. This has happened to multiple people from what I have heard