No one is regulating sex. You can still have it. The only thing universities are doing is setting rules for people who choose to live within their campuses.As private institutions that seek to limit their liability- theyre entirely within their rights to make rules about sex segregated housing. It's the opposite of libertarian to demand universities build you rooms to have sex in and provide you with condoms and contraceptives and sexual and relationship counselors. You lot are the statists.

You likely should tell people youre still in school. I would have been less impatient. its a forum most commonly used by lawyers or to-be lawyers. You should be a little more open minded if you want to be a lawyer someday. Start by assuming the best of your opponents in political life and in debates like this. Address the best argument from both sides and youll sharpen your own argument.

There is no absolute right to free speech. That was never my argument. I have repeatedly told you what I think is a reasonable restriction—incitement to violence. Hurt sentiments however sincerely and deeply felt simply are not a reasonable restriction. You have just used weasel words when youre not clear about your position. The proposed bill will jail people for saying things about caste/ religion/ language/ ethnicity etc. That's what I was debating. If you want to change the question to something else- you should tell people youre engaging with rather than simply move goalposts.

Great day for NLS. Love this comment.

Senior Congress leader BK Hariprasad also argued that the caste census would provide the much-needed empirical data to take reservations beyond 50 per cent. “If the argument is that reservation hits merit, then Tamil Nadu wouldn’t be India’s top state in terms of human development index,” he said. “States with low reservation such as Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, Bihar, Uttar Pradesh.......they’re the BIMARU, or sick, states.”

Unlike the west, very few here take education loans on their own, majority of them are funded by parents. So, for most colleges/institution, primary stakeholders are not students but parents. So, they listen to what your parents think is appropriate policy. You need change, fund your own studies or else no matter how many of these conversations take place, nothing will change.

Focus on specific partners/teams. You learn from the seniors and colleagues you work with. The law firm is just a brand, nothing more. the name of the law firm does not automatically guarantee quality or that you will emerge as a better lawyer. If you're a junior, I'd suggest you actually try to work with partners who are sticklers for quality, process and rigour. There's a bunch of threads here which will give you names of partners who are 'difficult', 'toxic' etc. and while I'm the first to admit its not easy working for someone like that, it definitely makes you a better lawyer because that forces you to pull up your socks and start drafting better. Also, because usually these partners are difficult you are forced to handle more responsibility and that makes you learn the ropes quicker. Spend 2-3 years in such a team and you'd have 'paid your dues' and will be thereafter easy to move to greener pastures.

For M&A/PE I'd say Shishir V, Raghubeer M, Ashwath R (AZB generally), Ravindra B.

Hi everyone! I'm graduating next month and looking for fresher roles in gen corp teams of firms. I have interned at multiple T1 firms. If anyone is aware of any such role in their teams, I request you please push forward my candidature. I am ready to intern for an initial period for the sake of evaluation. Thanks, and any leads would be appreciated.

Grok is wrong in Cons with respect to waqf by user thing regarding future claim as omission of waqf by user past claim of heritage site/ undocumented sites. as waqf by user by its self require document as per both 1995 and 1954 act. If waqf boar believe that certain land is used for religious purpose then its deemed to be part of waqf board

Can someone genuinely come clean about what is happening at Spice Route Legal? For some law students who love and are passionate about technology law - specialised firms such as these seem to be a terrific option to start our careers. Plus, the pay is great too. However, legallyindia seems to be bent on hating the firm. This is not a PR post - just a curious law student who loves everything tech law.

Can someone please clarify with good faith and reasonableness - should law students who love technology law consider this firm?

Bro, at this point Indian universities are like — 'study all the adult problems, but live like you’re in Class 8.' Mixed hostels? ‘Beta, sanskaar!’ Privacy? ‘Go to the library.’ Honestly, it’s not that deep — stop controlling your kids, they are adults, treat them like one ffs

You might as well think of it like this — as if that offer was rescinded by the firm, not because of your worth or abilities, but because life’s redirecting you somewhere better. You knew your value when you made that choice, and that hasn’t changed because a couple of firms said no.

It hurts now, and it’s okay to feel that. But trust that this isn’t the end of the story — it’s just a chapter you’ll look back on one day and be proud you got through. Keep searching, keep applying, and keep going. The right opportunity is probably just around the corner. This too shall pass

I dont know why one would say that! I think Sudhir K, Tarunabh, Arun T, Rohit De, Lavanya, Shyam Balaganesh, Umakant, and many others have quite proven themselves to be extraordinary scholars. There isnt a conference they could go into and not be treated as peers by the best academics in the world.

Here is my two cents' advice (I have seen people who have zero experience in internships, and all have ended up in T1 law firms).

How?
Let me tell you. Join a basic boutique firm. These law firms should not have to be the best, but they should have lots of work. They must be at least relevant in the market. The responsibilities will be on the higher side and overwhelming as you join as a freshie. But you have to play it risky in order to gain from it. Stick for a year. And start applying at T1 firms. They are always on the lookout. There might be a possibility that you might be approached by job hunters yourself.

In this world of merciless people, there are firms who are more than willing to hire associates with zero experience. But you got to do your research. There is no hard and fast rule to get a job, at least in the field of law. Various dynamics exist, but you have to punch at the right time. So, you're basically playing your odds.

Good Luck

Good Night.

do from NUJS part time mode, it provides the best support and compresses the coursework into 3 weeks per six months, puts it dtrategically during court holidays. Many judicial officers from WB and other states have completed or pursuing their Phds here. IMHO it is the best place to do phd part time in India

Applies to law?

https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/bombay-shaving-company-ceo-shantanu-deshpande-on-why-employees-in-their-40s-are-losing-jobs-8159380/amp/1

Delete Jindal from this list, and I think you are okay (speaking as someone who knows two Jindal Law School grads on a personal and professional level, and an ex Jindal student who transferred to law school in England because according to them, Jindal is a "first order scam").

RIP ▮▮▮ inbox. Please have some common sense and do not do this to partners. He is a gem of a person and does not deserve the assault on his inbox he is about to get. @LI team - please sensor out ▮▮▮ name, and also his references in the other comments.

Have you ever heard of:

- Tarunab Khaitan?

- Shamnad Basheer?

- Shyamkrishna Balganesh?

- Sudhir Krishnaswamy?

- Dev Gangjee?

- Lavanya Rajamani?

- Surabhi Ranganathan?

What exactly is wrong with you? Please do not put down a model of legal education which is among the best in the world, just to personally satisfy your own insecurities. This model has produced scholars of global repute, some of whom are household names in their respective fields. How many such did the pre-NLU, supposedly more rigorous, model of legal education produce? Okay, B.S. Chimne and Upendra Baxi. Great. Fill in at least five more names, I challenge you. Surely, if the pre-NLU model is that good, we can get seven names of legal scholars of global repute who were educated within it? After all, it had 40 more years of experience than the NLU model!

There is lot of stress in Cap market and lot of money. Partner makes 3 to 5 crores, PA makes 60 to 80 lakhs, SA makes 40 to 60 lakhs and Associates makes 20 to 40 lakhs (Average salary in CAM, SAM, KCO, Trilegal, JSA, TTA, Link Legal, B&P, CB and S&R). There are some other firms as well like ELP, Saraf and C&M. Guess their salary structure will be similar.

How does wokeness come into the equation? We are talking about a basic biological and emotional need and how the university is preventing that. What does that have to do with being woke? In fact, it’s a very libertarian argument to oppose regulation and support autonomy. The very antithesis of wokeness, which is pro-regulation and statist!

Same. As far as I have thought about it for the last two months, like someone said here, be open to litigation. That’s the best bet right now, why? , because you can and will get some assessment thing or a junior associate position somewhere (have been trying to get one too). Next, don’t go for UPSC OR JAG. It’s the almost 1.5 months till the next upsc exam, people have been trying to crack it by studying for years so not a viable option.

JAG? very less seats and less means 5 or less than that so again you shouldn’t do that either. If you are completely against litigation, then search for state exams that upsc conducts. For corporate or banking sector, most of the companies need some amount of working experience so that won’t help either.

So rn LLM is a maybe, you can go for litigation, or to buy some time, apply for the posts of legal researcher in courts.

The thing is gold is not just property for hindus as can be seen when selling gold at home is not even seen as a good thing during crisis. Even poor families buy gold. So no u can't take the tirupati gold or any gold in hindu temples for that matter but the government has already taken away property from hindu temples as highlighted by one other comment

College isn’t making decisions about your autonomy. You are. You’re grown adults - talk to your parents about asking the university to relax these rules. Or providing a blanket permission for you to do as you please.

All university is trying to do is limit their own liability. Y’all go out , party, get drunk , drive , assault each other whatever- until it’s all fun it’s just between y’all. But the moment something goes wrong your parents are shouting at university administrators and you’re demanding they protect you from being charged with crimes.

You either want freedom with all of its responsibilities or you don’t. I don’t care either way. Most administrators on campus couldn’t care less if you have sex or get drunk. What they care about is whether they will have to deal with consequences of your actions.

There may be good faculty that get attracted to this place. It's because only NLS is doing hiring of faculties at a massive scale. Apart from NLS, noone is hiring, and if they do, the unreserved posts are 2-3 and 30 people with a PhD apply. In traditional universities, you've to know people to get in.

I asked 2 people who moved from NLU to the private university. They said they can't deal with all the sarkari ways of doing things. I would personally prefer a public university to teach, but all of my applications have resulted in failure.

Go for it. NLS BA is awesome. If you are at all smart, you should be able to get through the postgraduate LLB degree they have. Being at one of the country's best unis for that long is always, always an advantage, which will outweigh any temporary advantage you may think you might gain by "learning the law" earlier at NLUJ by doing BALLB there.

NLUJ ain't a bad uni, but NLS is international class. Just remember that.

This team is top heavy with 2 partners completely dependent on a senior partner also they couldn't bring enough business to retain its newly hired associates last year, and they even ditched an Associate without even informing while moving to Phoenix. So please be very cautious of joining such team.

https://www.businesstoday.in/personal-finance/tax/story/1-person-working-for-50-finfluencer-questions-indias-broken-tax-burden-471839-2025-04-13

What happens when just 2% of people fund an entire country’s income tax system? According to Akshat Shrivastava, founder of Wisdom Hatch and a popular finfluencer, it’s like “one person working for a family of 50.”

In a post on X, Shrivastava argued that India collects enough taxes from just 2% of its population — and nothing from the remaining 98%. The burden on a small minority, he suggests, becomes unbearable when taxpayers are confronted with “massive corruption, lazy people unwilling to work… and poor quality of life.” The result, he says, is deep frustration.

Three things law schools need to do:

1. A guest house on campus where student couples can also book rooms on an hourly basis (for a reasonable rate).

2. 24x7 availability of condoms and contraceptives on campus (e.g. vending machine)

3. Availability of sexual health and relationship counsellors. At least one a week.

Sorry, continuing the above chain....

Not being biased. I WILL SAY that there are a few exceptions to whether students like or dontl like a faculty. But more or less the faculty is pretty amazing and we enjoy the discussions and conversations in class with them.

Unlike most NLU's or public unis they're very easily reachable and most faculties know most students at a very personal level because the batch size is very small. Any insight from these faculties knowing students very well, makes it a plus point.

Direct link to the faculties in college - https://www.bitslawschool.edu.in/faculty (you will find all the data for "qualifications" you would like to see)

Apart from that regardless of the public opinion or external judgements. In a student's capacity I would say, I love the faculties at my college. They're easy to access, communication doesn't feel like a brick in throat. They're flexible and are always ready to teach.

PS: You will find students sitting with faculties during lunch and dinner in groups discussing everything- from college academics to articles to general life or teaching since the students want to listen to them talking about topics.

The faculty is well paid because, again an assumption but the expense our faculty makes is not something which is possible by just any professor who is at 7th CPC. Coming to your friend's point, i have no idea which professor you're talking about.

Talking about how well qualified the faculty is. Feel free to refer to the link below and analyse by yourself. That being said, the students love the faculty. Again to stay unbiased I WILL SAY there are

Pointless and fallacious argumentation. Just because one set of religious laws may have certain shortcomings, that itself won't justify another equally inefficient set of laws for another religion. No doubt the Waqfs need to be regulated and this placid minority appeasement be done away with.

I’m so sorry but I feel so so done with this college, so done, i know i have people but can’t burden them anymore, i genuinely want to leave this place and have made my mind, will figure out where I have to live, as i am indirectly disowned by my parents, will not die in this shitty ass place, I can’t burden anyone literally anyone, feel so so lonely, don’t even have a home outside college and didn’t knew college would get this bad, worked so hard for this college and it gives you nothing, literally nothing, it breaks you completely from inside, completely, insaan ko insaan nahi samjh paati hai ye jagah, pata nahi life mei aage kya karunga but will be not in this place for sure. Job lagegi, economic stability ayegi, theek hai bhai, but mere ko nahi chahiye kuch bhi, mai marna qabool karunga but apna zameer nahi bechunga jitni bhi zindagi hogi, ander se khokhla kar deta hai yaar, kisi ko nahi samjha sakte tum, kisi ko bhi.

When I said only speech against "state" should be protected. I meant that only speech against state should have ABSOLUTE protection. In no way does that mean that speech against non state actors shouldn't be protected. Just that it shouldn't be absolute. What are you even on about