Luthra promotes 2 to partner & introduces new pre-partner rung

Luthra & Luthra has promoted managing associates Anirban Bhattacharya and Lokesh Shah to its partnership in Delhi and Mumbai respectively, according to Bar & Bench.

Bhattacharya, specialising in white collar crime, company law, litigation and arbitration, had joined the firm in 2006 from Paras Kuhad Associates, having graduated from ILS Pune in 2004.

Shah works in direct tax and joined the firm in 2012 from BMR & Associates where he was a legal director. He had completed his chartered accountancy qualification in 2003 and a bachelor of commerce from MKS College Mumbai in 2002.

According to Bar & Bench four managing associates were also promoted to the newly-created “partner designate” rung, which the firm’s managing partner Rajiv Luthra described as a “partner in watch”; four managing associates became partner designates: Abdullah Hussain, Ashish Prasad, Koshy John and Vasudev Dibbur.

A total of 22 senior associates were promoted to managing associate level: Aditya Periwal, Ankush Mahajan, Aneek Bangabash, Divya Vig, Karan Mitroo, Mrigha Solanki, Pulkit Sharma, Ravi Dubey, Rohit Raghavan, Saurabh Tiwari, Shikhar Kacker, Siddharth Srivastava, Surya Bala, Tulika Sen, Yohan Balan, Shiv Sapra, Anant Garg, Chethana Deepak, Kanika Chaudhary Nayyar, Mumtaz Bhalla, K. Sumalatha Kanoj and Wasim Beg.

Bar & Bench reported that Abhiroop Lahiri, Ashish Pareek, Hina Doon, Reshma Vaidya, Neha Gulati, Anupam Kishore Sinha, Ashish Chandra, Cauveri Birbal and Kapil Madan were lifted to senior associate level.

At the beginning of this year, Luthra promoted two to its partnership.

A Luthra spokesperson did not respond to a request for comment since yesterday, as Rajiv Luthra and senior partner Mohit Saraf were not reachable for comment immediately.

Other Big Six promotions:

Comments

Secret Shiv-Fan 22 Jul 2014, 16:50
+17 -4
Congretulations Shiv! May you keep defying the convantions and persaptions abt Pune-Grads.You are proof that we have if in us too. And, bravo to LL for extending their large heart to Pune grads too, by treating them at par with premium law univ grads, with promotions .. There is however that little thing about estipends for non-nlu eshtudants. That should be released with ratrospktiv effact.
Well wisher 22 Jul 2014, 18:21
+8 -7
Congratulations, good to see the promotions, hope L&L is well on its way back up! :)
Yash 22 Jul 2014, 19:15
+9 -1
Congratulations everyone from Bangalore Team! Such nice people to work with :)
30 23 Jul 2014, 02:58
+3 -4
Kian,

Any news about AMSS promotions, both Delhi and Mumbai regions?
Time 23 Jul 2014, 07:06
+8 -5
There was a time when Luthra/ AMSS promotion announcements played tag with each other (who will blink first) as presumably both were neck and neck in the race to the finish for the top law firm of the country.... clearly we now know how that race (and dream) ended!!
Ex Luthra 23 Jul 2014, 03:51
+12 -0
Happy to see so many familiar names on the list...big congratulations to all!
HC 23 Jul 2014, 04:44
+4 -1
Well Done Shiv. Though delayed but very well deserved. You will surely go the distance.
Not Dumb 23 Jul 2014, 04:52
+11 -6
Designate Partner? WAITAMINUTE... weren't Managing Associates deemed to be partners in waiting and assessed on the parameters now forming part of the assessment criteria for this new position?

Great job at dangling the carrot... one more hoop to jump through!

If thats the case then why do this with 4 guys and whilst promoting 2 guys straight through?

Either you are partner material or you are not...
Tamaasha 23 Jul 2014, 05:35
+25 -4
all the designations that Indian law firms have invented are quite frankly a joke - staring with senior associate designate, senior associate, managing/principal associate designate, managing/principal associate, and now partner designate before becoming a salaried partner and then perhaps someday an equity partner. What is next "equity partner designate". Indian law firms need to grow up and stop dangling the carrot and making a fool of themselves.
Tamaasha 23 Jul 2014, 05:38
+15 -5
Also if the argument is that you need to reward an associate who is doing well there are better ways and the ones that are not should be given a clear message in their evaluations - all these positions end up creating an unpleasant work enviornment for associates both who are made up and those who are not.

Indian law firms could learn from US firms where either you are an associate or a partner (or perhaps a Counsel if you are senior enough and not generating your own work) and no tamaasha in between.
Scooter- 23 Jul 2014, 07:23
+6 -10
Arent we suckers for designations? Whats the harm if that makes people feel good about themselves? whats the need to ape the west for everything. And why just look at the US. UK firms have these designations? Especially on something which is so inconsequential.

The need to have these newly made interim designations is basically to correct the unjustifiable expectation of making partner in 7-8 years, as was the case a 5 years back. That was the need of the hour when firms required to grow partnerships. Now that the seniors in these big firms have grown to huge numbers, unless a distinction is made, everyone will have to be made partner. Which definitely cannot be sustainable.
Harish Specter 24 Jul 2014, 02:38
+2 -1
[quote name="Tamaasha"]Also if the argument is that you need to reward an associate who is doing well there are better ways and the ones that are not should be given a clear message in their evaluations - all these positions end up creating an unpleasant work enviornment for associates both who are made up and those who are not.

Indian law firms could learn from US firms where either you are an associate or a partner (or perhaps a Counsel if you are senior enough and not generating your own work) and no tamaasha in between.[/quote]

Harvey was a Sr. Associate at Pearson Hardman and now he is a name partner!
Scooter- 24 Jul 2014, 15:26
+2 -2
Alan Shore is not even a Partner
Really? 24 Jul 2014, 03:50
+12 -4
How many more layers can you create? From what I know, the following hierarchy exists:
Intern
Associate
Senior Associate
Managing Associate/Counsel/Of Counsel
Partner Designate/ Associate Partner
Executive Partner
Equity Partner
Managing Partner

There is still scope for some other designations based on variations of the words Intern, Associate, Senior, Managing, Designate and Partner (Executive and Equity included):

Intern Designate
Associate Designate
Senior Associate Designate
Managing Senior Associate
Senior Managing Associate
Managing Associate Designate
Counsel Designate
Associate Counsel
Managing Counsel
Associate Partner Designate
Executive Partner Designate
Equity Partner Designate
Managing Partner Designate (to my mind this one probably makes the most sense)

Go ahead and get creative. It gives everyone a reason to celebrate.
yep 24 Jul 2014, 05:05
+6 -6
'Really?' you seem to be really jobless. didn't get promoted kya?
Anshul 23 Jul 2014, 10:54
+4 -2
Congratulations Cauveri Birbal!
Lok 23 Jul 2014, 13:22
+1 -5
Congrats lokesh
secret admirer 23 Jul 2014, 13:41
+4 -0
Congrats siddharth. Your hard work and dedication has clearly paid off
ajeya 23 Jul 2014, 18:16
+14 -5
22 senior associates promoted to managing associates and 9 associates promoted to senior associates. Guys my geometry might have been weak but I have a pretty uneasy feeling about this inverted pyramid.
TruthChecker 25 Jul 2014, 11:57
+12 -1
Most associates who quit over the last 2 years included those very worthy of getting promoted to SA. Luthra was stubborn about having 'read' the market right and not hiring aggressively to compensate for the massive attrition. We later found out the truth - the firm's revenues were dwindling and staying in business was a bigger concern. This has resulted in a very top-heavy firm, nearly across all teams.

There are fundamental problems with the current set up here. There is an entire 'rung' of lawyers missing. The client gets a poor bargain as the billable work to be done by an A1 is done by an SA, to be done by an SA is done by an MA, and so on. At times, the client is charged more 'rationally' and while designations may seem flattering the nature of work done by an MA is only at par with that of an SA in another firm. All that while work and revenue target expectations make life utterly miserable for the MA/SA.

It only makes sense to have so many Partners/ MAs when there are more and more teams to nurture and sufficient work to feed them. Sadly, neither hold true for Luthra. Surely, those who've been promoted perhaps deserved the reward for sticking out in the trenches, but surely there are bigger issues not addressed before we can return Luthra to the pre 2013 era.. still a far cry from competing with the likes of AMSS, AZB.
Guest 24 Jul 2014, 06:20
+5 -4
Indian firms need to increase the track... perhaps add a year of training upfront... then associate for 4 years (or a total of 5 if you remove the training)... senior associate for another 3 years...

Then 1-2 years at managing associate level (truly partner in watch) - from there you either become partner or counsel/of counsel.

An approximately 10 year track to partnership from NQ.
Guest 24 Jul 2014, 11:34
+2 -8
How is it that there are no caustic comments about Luthra following this article? Why the exception to the regular practice of Luthra bashing?
Scooter- 24 Jul 2014, 15:27
+4 -0
We were all waiting for you for your suggestion
Time 25 Jul 2014, 09:04
+8 -0
Because this time they did something or at least part thereof right and gave due (most of it) to the deserving!

It now seems that Big man RKL has taken the reins back in his hand... high time that the free fall was arrested.

Hope the the damage caused by those who thought that they were bigger than the Firm and considered themselves to be the ultimate power center(s) in the Firm. is undone soon and the Firm regains its position at the top. Now if only some (ill mannered and insecure) partners were to leave,the Firm would be THE place to be at once again.