Username:
LegallyIndia
Total Comments:
2141
Featured:
29
Filter By
Showing 50 comments
Please discuss / rebut / counter the points / arguments made by OP rather than attacking the OP with ad hominem / personal insults and posts will be published.
Very few firms or organisations or companies are all bad or all good, but there are bound to be pockets of misery and excellence everywhere...
Dear repeated comment poster, please stop spamming this thread and wasting your and our time with the same messages about how terrible Mahua is.
Not possible - the above review was so forthright (and impossible to corroborate), the post was rightly reported and the name of the firm had to be redacted...
Thank you for your participation and glad it was helpful and interesting. All the best!
No, unfortunately not - the copy we downloaded is after the names in the first column were jumbled.

If someone does have a backup copy, can they please share a link or upload it somewhere, we'll try to find a more robust / temporary hosting solution for this file
You mean, "as a [not] explosive Twitter thread has not gone viral"? Because that thread is definitely NOT viral :)
For joining a PSU or interviewing for one? And you are asking for must-reads, apart from sector-specific literature about the business sector that a PSU operates in, presumably?
Upvoted for T-1 heart! :)

(looks are important but also overrated and not as important as you might think)
The point is, defending against an 'inside job' - especially from a techy who built the systems - is very very hard for many places (even for someone like the NSA).
Is there a lot you can really technically even do to prevent data being exfiltrated by an internal leak by a disgruntled insiders, let alone a person in the techie team?

Point is, if the NSA didn't manage to stop Ed Snowden, how will a law firm?
Please provide a breakdown of at least some of the offers received, otherwise this post will be marked as contested or redacted.
Because a lot of comments - and many of which in this thread aren't even about FM - are clearly trollish, while a few about FM that are not published are abusive or not factual. Criticism is fine, just do it in context and not in an ad hominem manner.
Newsflash, none of these people are football clubs, no one needs to stand with any of them, and none of them care about any of us... :)