We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
So a lot has been written by many scholars on the above topic, the problem is not only obscenity but also the objectification in the name of choices and somehow imposing the fashion choices of West upon India through subtle marketing and the right wing has pointed it out which made sense to a large section of population hence the retreat.
So in a comment someone has argued that go to Jindal or other Top college it is a very normal dress.
However Jindal belongs to India and the right wing was simply saying (impliedly) that the Ad does not reflect Bharat.
India that is Bharat or Bharat that is India. In my humble opinion, India and Bharat still are two different realities.
The ad team must have realised that they were unable to sense the culture prevalent in India and that it is impossible to defend it after a group calls it out because 99% of population will not wear that Dress during Rakhi and I would be glad to be corrected if Kurti/ Saree has been replaced by Bralette in India that too especially during Traditional ocassion.
Now on Capitalism and it's impact on fashion choices:-
I will argue on boys because that is ofcourse safer option, if you observe recent ad trends for example Veet Men hair removal cream starring Varun Dhawan in which he argues for clean chest without hair is better while asking what's your choice, now if through marketing companies establish that boys/Men with chest hair are worst in attractiveness everyone has to buy that product because it is natural to have hair on chest but one cannot sell a product then.
You can sell a product when you can establish that your body/culture is not normal and it needs to change.
anyways, if i grind hard for clat and get into a top 5 nlu, is it realistic for me to work towards and expect an inhouse career or at most 2 years in a firm and then inhouse? or is it something thats relatively rare/too luck based like maybe a psu job?
i will reeally appreciate all replies
Why is TaxnTrade wanting to be hived off? Because (i) TnT are the most profitable practices within ELP and they have been subsidising the rest. (ii) the two Co-Founders (SAN & Sword) hold the bulk of the equity and take home most of the profits, though they do not bill much but spend a lot on marketing themselves. The due diligence by Dhruva has been done with a lot of fanfare, drumbeating and is being unnecessarily prolonged, just to reduce ELP's brand value. Ultimately, whatever Dhruva pays SAN and the Sword for the ELP brand, will be based on its value, after the degradation that the brand is currently undergoing. SAN evidently doesn't want to play second fiddle to the TnT partners, the senior most of whom are around 10 years younger than him. However, he doesn't have a choice. Why is it that SAN and the Sword are unable to force Dhruva's hand and compel them to make an offer for the ELP brand right away? Because, there is no other buyer on the horizon. It's Dhruva or nobody and the TnT partners want an exit.
If SAN and Sword were to give up a decent percentage of their equity, if SAN could agree to cut down on his personal marketing (all those business class trips to various foreign jurisdictions to speak on topics he has little clue about), if RJ, NS and SN could be given more control over the management of ELP, TnT will probably stay on and will say goodbye to Dhruva . SAN and Sword's plan to set up a new company that will give AI services to the ELP rump that will be left behind after the TnT exit, to pay advisory fees to that AI company which will then become a unicorn from which SAN and the Sword will exit from at a huge profit and valuation, is just a pipe dream that only those who do not do actual legal work can nurture. It is also ruining the careers of so many young lawyers.
Please wake up and smell the coffee SAN-Sama and Sword-Sama!
Thank you
Everything is changing very fast in positive manner.
If money is no bar, its a great choice. If money is a bar its not worth to pull out an education loan. Simply speaking its better off to stay at somewhere else because the FEES no denying is ABSURD.
You will make great contacts here, great networking and loads of opportunities including internships and exchange programs.
Ask me smtg specific if u have anything..?
Separately, Genius Messiah also introduced multiple undergrad courses, overstretched the faculty and resources and diluted the brand.
So, No. Its not because of reservation. And certainly not because of the Govt. Its because GM wanted to get into the local good books to sponsor his grand expansion plans.
I wanted to solve tough problems at the intersection of law and tech. Went through very different pathway of trying to build legal tech products , strategize it , under stand it way deeply( sometimes obsess over it) and fail at it. It gives that balance between innovation, legal ,building thrill and if you went well the freedom to work remotely with decent enough pay( a intersection of job satisfaction and work life balance rarely possible in lndian legal industry) I converted few legal tech roles which were low paying though the work was interesting(that was my first criteria to apply ), though not joined . Later on , I got a balanced one. Just to give an idea , if you are good at it , you can also get around 50k for even less than 3-4 hours of work everyday, remotely. But the tough part is to find these opportunities you have to go pretty deep into legal tech job market as well as good at what you do and not bluffing. In general, get around a lakh for normal office work hours. The salaries mentioned above are for freshers. Don't go towards law firms innovation teams in terms of learning but can give a good idea of user and adoption experience.
The reality is the job description and roles for the legal tech are still evolving atleast in Indian legal tech market.
Your best bet is to leverage your alumni network.
If you want to leave law entirely and shift to creative writing /arts/film etc there are people who have done it, but keep in mind that it involves a lot of financial privilege.
For examples of people who have done this you can look up Kavitha Rao and Ajay Patri. Gautam Bhatia also does it part time but he still does legal work on the side.
A3 (last year) - 24.8 (fixed) + 7 (bonus).
Salary partners parasite on other teams including corporate or tax or cap markets or become execution partner doing all the good work for the equity.
Generally salary partners in early years not much expected to bring clients but just to execute and generate billable.
Everything dynamic is subjective depending upon the firm and team structure.
2. Yes, if the team likes you, you are most likely getting an assessment. BLC genuinely operates on merit (at least that is what i felt during my time there).
3. Yes, the procedure is same across offices.
All the best!
https://lnkd.in/p/d8T3zstU
https://lnkd.in/p/dJqapkfg
How has been ur exp so far
There is this partner who doesnโt have her/his own clientele but is essentially vulturing over the work given by people in higher management (there is no real management, just one dude controlling everything).
Basically, they put these kinds of partners on a PIP. I was also surprised because I always thought these law firms were experts at removing/firing associates lower down the professional chain who were unable to deliver work on time or whose work or behaviour did not align with the firm.
But yes, PIP. They give partners who are not meeting their targets some time to improve and also try to train them, basically. (Rather, they should give this training and development to associates instead of someone who doesnโt know anything and has somehow become a partner.)
No. Celebrities get red carpet treatment. We only get T1 UG student treatment. Such treatment is earned by all T1 UG students at their UG institutions, across universities and even in different degrees.
You are simply not an NLS UG student. You surely didn't expect that your shortcut would magically deem you one? Surely the world is not so naive as to distinguish trivially between you, who are a UG student of elsewhere, and a BALLB kid, who is a UG student of NLS?
'Special' here implies 'arbitrary benefit'. The reality, however, is that they get ration, deserved benefit in consideration for their higher quality and abilities.
> They all hate each other.
Do they hate each other or do they sleep with each other? This requires clarification.
Contrast with ISB, Ashoka and Azim Premji...
It is good to see the moderators having an open mind on this.
Good luck fellas, hope you find synergy at Cynergy!
Many more ELP partners have quietly stuck deals, but will leave only after collecting their balance (60%) bonus, which will be paid only by Diwali.
Can anyone clarify why the Court decide to do this? Thanks.
However I believe the people/associates within the office are nice and mind their own business but yah they donโt care to ensure that interns get meaningful work apart from the lit team.
Nevertheless, it seems futile to blame batch size increase in lack of employment opportunities. The students who got into NLS would otherwise would have been in NALSAR/NUJS/etc. They are still the same bright students. The larger problem is concentration of Indian corporate legal market in the hands of a few large firms. If the legal market is to grow, more and more partners would have to break away and start their own botique firms (there are already some who pay around 1LPM which is good enough launching platform to grow). This will ensure that even lower ranked students from good law school get placed.
The second problem is people wagering all their bets in corporate placements, that too in tier 1 law firms. There is more to law than M&A at one of the LALA firms. I am not asking you to give up everything and start doing legal aid work, but if you know your batch rank is not good enough for a t1 law firm - diversify to a smaller firm which may pay 80k-1LPM to freshers, but atleast you will have a job. I wont name any places, but a person motivated enough can hustle through and easily find them.
Though batch size of gnlu was almost double but let's seeeeee
Don't hold your achievements nluj and gnlu peeps, tell us who won this yearrrrr
Campus Infrastructure and Basic Amenities Protests: Students staged aggressive on-campus protests over long-standing issues like severe water shortages, power fluctuations, and failing hostel infrastructure.
Administrative and Policy Backlash: Tensions erupted between the student body and the administration regarding rigid, unforgiving attendance rules resulting in year-backs, steep cuts to activity funding, and a mass resignation of student representatives.
Expansion and Batch-Size Debates: The rollout of the alternative 3-year LLB program and regular BA program alongside the flagship 5-year B.A. LL.B. course, coupled with significantly scaled-up overall incoming batch sizes, fueled continuous debates over internal equity, campus crowding, and mounting placement pressures.
Its downhill journey has well and truly caught pace.
Until we get a reliable confirmation that such a meeting happened, this report should be treated as FAKE NEWS.