We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
Hilarious to see the jealous comments criticising her. She is a Rhodes scholar Oxford PhD celebrated all over the world because of her role in the 377 case. She was named in the TIME 100 and a portrait of hers is at Oxford because of her role in that case: which also makes her one of Oxfordโs greatest alumni, because only such people are given the honour of having their portrait at Oxford.
Oh she doesn't engage with widespread problems like shelter and putting food on the table of every Indian. Basically every politician doesn't, but YOU point it out in this case because on some level you just can't stand people who may fundamentally exist in a different way than you. "Useless marker ". Bitch please, let me call your heterosexuality a useless marker and you being a man a useless marker.
She is far from perfect, yes she is very entitled and a nepo kid. Call her out for that sure. Linking her passionate push for "identity" politics to that is ridiculous, bad faith and bigoted. Because by your logic then any minority issue is a useless marker and that's just a sad inhumane pov. Hope these words can get across to you and how your comment is both, unhelpful and actively hurtful.
They still did the best amognst all law schools but tough times definitely. NLS closed at second best with slightly lesser numbers than NUJS but they had 60 more people in their batch
He marched with a swagger and struck mighty poses.
The crowd smiled politely, applauded on cue,
While everyone quietly knew what was true.
And if this reminds you of any legend in particular...well, that's entirely between you and your imagination.
And every IV treat ever of course.
As for why many left, a few of them take up academia as a trial- if they can work out not.
Seriously, time to move team, book and all. This BS is never ending. Fact is, the banger is broken. The rust has eaten away the body. The new lick of paint is another attempt at keeping the racket going.
Automatic promotions till SA and then no growth. She actively creates hostile situation for counsels to make them leave or just does not promote to partner.
Team is otherwise nice except for this one SA (lateral hire) who is known to be horrible throughout the firm.
Amount of work is usually low but, the team operates weirdly with multiple level reviews which tends to create an artificial environment of having more work.
Overall, do not choose this team if you want to learn, or have some growth in your career.
P.S.: All of the above is second hand information so, take it with a grain of salt or verify yourself.
https://x.com/Cockroachisback/status/2085328754243707150
Legitimate excuses, I guess. But I want to see where they are AFTER they make enough money to cover their expenses. Will they stick to their word and pursue a career in human rights? ๐ค
Big money in banglore this year?
Uff yeh gehraiyaan
metrics and contributing to the decisions on the new structure to be โฆ when was the last time a consulting firm added value at a law firm
In India ?
However, many of my batchmates have already interned at firms like Dhir & Dhir, Dua Associates, Hammurabi, Khurana & Khurana, etc. While I know everyone's journey is different, it's made me wonder whether I'm putting myself at a disadvantage by not focusing on more traditional law firm internships.
My long-term goal is not to build a career at a law firm. I'm more interested in data privacy roles, particularly in-house or with organisations like EY, Deloitte, or similar consulting firms. My current plan is to gain one or two strong law firm internships (preferably in technology law/privacy) and then focus primarily on in-house or consulting internships aligned with data privacy.
For those working in technology law, data privacy, or in-house legal roles, does this seem like a coherent path? Or would you recommend spending more time building a traditional law firm profile first?
I'd really appreciate any insights from practitioners or those who have followed a similar path.
Made about 31-31.5L as an A2 (including bill share)
- "Push yourself to be a better intern"
- We also want to know your hobbies
- Be honest about your faults
- Maybe there is burnout, but clients are demanding too
- Work ethic is important
Also, great work by GNLU to have this podcast series! Currently the best such initiative among all the law schools. The student hosts are also well chosen: smart and good communication skills.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QqoOUHuAZtk
Everything else trade, litigation, corporate etc you can just acquire-hire at higher salary.
Sad to see how Suhail messed it up with his need to control despite not being a top 3 biller. If he had just lets the economics reflect in the management and let Rohit take over as RSโ rightful heir none of this would have happened.
Sociology was meant to complement economics by researching into issues like how government policies are working on the ground, what problems are faced by rural communities in areas like health, education etc. Instead, itโs become a farce. Instead of doing serious research, people write articles sitting in their desk lazily bashing capitalism and the non-left, calling them fascists etc. And of course non stop gender politics insisting that men can give birth etc.
Although they are promising a "fair" enquiry, such an enquiry looks tough as the case has become the ultimate academic culture war. Depending on whether you follow the right-wing or the left-wing, this man is either an intellectual giant being defamed by racists, or a woke fraudster. Nothing in between. My guess is that the enquiry committee will take some middle ground. Ask him to go on compulsory leave without pay for 1 year, but reinstate him thereafter.
https://x.com/AITC_Parliament/status/2084929023113908495
Magar yeh to koi na jaane
Maybe this answers