We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
Thank you
Everything is changing very fast in positive manner.
If money is no bar, its a great choice. If money is a bar its not worth to pull out an education loan. Simply speaking its better off to stay at somewhere else because the FEES no denying is ABSURD.
You will make great contacts here, great networking and loads of opportunities including internships and exchange programs.
Ask me smtg specific if u have anything..?
Separately, Genius Messiah also introduced multiple undergrad courses, overstretched the faculty and resources and diluted the brand.
So, No. Its not because of reservation. And certainly not because of the Govt. Its because GM wanted to get into the local good books to sponsor his grand expansion plans.
I wanted to solve tough problems at the intersection of law and tech. Went through very different pathway of trying to build legal tech products , strategize it , under stand it way deeply( sometimes obsess over it) and fail at it. It gives that balance between innovation, legal ,building thrill and if you went well the freedom to work remotely with decent enough pay( a intersection of job satisfaction and work life balance rarely possible in lndian legal industry) I converted few legal tech roles which were low paying though the work was interesting(that was my first criteria to apply ), though not joined . Later on , I got a balanced one. Just to give an idea , if you are good at it , you can also get around 50k for even less than 3-4 hours of work everyday, remotely. But the tough part is to find these opportunities you have to go pretty deep into legal tech job market as well as good at what you do and not bluffing. In general, get around a lakh for normal office work hours. The salaries mentioned above are for freshers. Don't go towards law firms innovation teams in terms of learning but can give a good idea of user and adoption experience.
The reality is the job description and roles for the legal tech are still evolving atleast in Indian legal tech market.
Your best bet is to leverage your alumni network.
If you want to leave law entirely and shift to creative writing /arts/film etc there are people who have done it, but keep in mind that it involves a lot of financial privilege.
For examples of people who have done this you can look up Kavitha Rao and Ajay Patri. Gautam Bhatia also does it part time but he still does legal work on the side.
A3 (last year) - 24.8 (fixed) + 7 (bonus).
Salary partners parasite on other teams including corporate or tax or cap markets or become execution partner doing all the good work for the equity.
Generally salary partners in early years not much expected to bring clients but just to execute and generate billable.
Everything dynamic is subjective depending upon the firm and team structure.
2. Yes, if the team likes you, you are most likely getting an assessment. BLC genuinely operates on merit (at least that is what i felt during my time there).
3. Yes, the procedure is same across offices.
All the best!
https://lnkd.in/p/d8T3zstU
https://lnkd.in/p/dJqapkfg
How has been ur exp so far
There is this partner who doesn’t have her/his own clientele but is essentially vulturing over the work given by people in higher management (there is no real management, just one dude controlling everything).
Basically, they put these kinds of partners on a PIP. I was also surprised because I always thought these law firms were experts at removing/firing associates lower down the professional chain who were unable to deliver work on time or whose work or behaviour did not align with the firm.
But yes, PIP. They give partners who are not meeting their targets some time to improve and also try to train them, basically. (Rather, they should give this training and development to associates instead of someone who doesn’t know anything and has somehow become a partner.)
No. Celebrities get red carpet treatment. We only get T1 UG student treatment. Such treatment is earned by all T1 UG students at their UG institutions, across universities and even in different degrees.
You are simply not an NLS UG student. You surely didn't expect that your shortcut would magically deem you one? Surely the world is not so naive as to distinguish trivially between you, who are a UG student of elsewhere, and a BALLB kid, who is a UG student of NLS?
'Special' here implies 'arbitrary benefit'. The reality, however, is that they get ration, deserved benefit in consideration for their higher quality and abilities.
> They all hate each other.
Do they hate each other or do they sleep with each other? This requires clarification.
Contrast with ISB, Ashoka and Azim Premji...
It is good to see the moderators having an open mind on this.
Good luck fellas, hope you find synergy at Cynergy!
Many more ELP partners have quietly stuck deals, but will leave only after collecting their balance (60%) bonus, which will be paid only by Diwali.
Can anyone clarify why the Court decide to do this? Thanks.
However I believe the people/associates within the office are nice and mind their own business but yah they don’t care to ensure that interns get meaningful work apart from the lit team.
Nevertheless, it seems futile to blame batch size increase in lack of employment opportunities. The students who got into NLS would otherwise would have been in NALSAR/NUJS/etc. They are still the same bright students. The larger problem is concentration of Indian corporate legal market in the hands of a few large firms. If the legal market is to grow, more and more partners would have to break away and start their own botique firms (there are already some who pay around 1LPM which is good enough launching platform to grow). This will ensure that even lower ranked students from good law school get placed.
The second problem is people wagering all their bets in corporate placements, that too in tier 1 law firms. There is more to law than M&A at one of the LALA firms. I am not asking you to give up everything and start doing legal aid work, but if you know your batch rank is not good enough for a t1 law firm - diversify to a smaller firm which may pay 80k-1LPM to freshers, but atleast you will have a job. I wont name any places, but a person motivated enough can hustle through and easily find them.
Though batch size of gnlu was almost double but let's seeeeee
Don't hold your achievements nluj and gnlu peeps, tell us who won this yearrrrr
Campus Infrastructure and Basic Amenities Protests: Students staged aggressive on-campus protests over long-standing issues like severe water shortages, power fluctuations, and failing hostel infrastructure.
Administrative and Policy Backlash: Tensions erupted between the student body and the administration regarding rigid, unforgiving attendance rules resulting in year-backs, steep cuts to activity funding, and a mass resignation of student representatives.
Expansion and Batch-Size Debates: The rollout of the alternative 3-year LLB program and regular BA program alongside the flagship 5-year B.A. LL.B. course, coupled with significantly scaled-up overall incoming batch sizes, fueled continuous debates over internal equity, campus crowding, and mounting placement pressures.
Its downhill journey has well and truly caught pace.
Until we get a reliable confirmation that such a meeting happened, this report should be treated as FAKE NEWS.
Sr. Adv. / Counsel - Gaurav Pachnanda, Gourab Banerji, Nakul Dewan, Rishab Gupta, Vyapak Desai. While these names are known when it comes to arbitration, you can also consider chambers which do a mix of arb and commercial litigation - Darius Khambata, Zubin Behramkamdin, Zal Andhurjiya, Ritin Rai, Amit Sibal, and I'm sure you'll find other LI threads which mention more such chambers
About potential and saturation, ngl lot of people claim to specialise in arbitration on linkedin nowadays so the field is saturated in terms of the volume of people trying to break into it vs. the number of meaningful opportunities. But arbitration is obviously expected to grow even more in the coming years, and there is no denying that quality lparcatocers would be needed in future. And understand this, no matter what specialisation you choose, the top is always vacant. You beat competition by authenticity. You you are not seeing it as a linkedin buzzword and really enjoy it, it should not be difficult for you to break in. You're from a T1 NLU, leverage that well. Take up relevant co-curriculars. Don't let anyone discourage you. Work hard and i'm sure you'll reach great heights. All the best!
https://x.com/gautambhatia88/status/2092916975500763506
As for the dress, very commonly worn these days by trendy youth. Go to any metro city, or an upscale college like Jindal and Ashoka. It’s very standard dress.
Big fuss over nothing.
Welfarism and populism always means more seats.
But I'd really like to know how accurate this report is. I myself use Claude, but have to double check everytime it generates a draft for accuracy.
Would you recommend a 1 person team to evaluate some of these platforms?
Go on: show me the verified, authoritative statistics demonstrating that Indian law firm partners are not as I describe. Do that.
The whole world knows this.
Constant performative conversations are insufferable.
NLUs now: 🥴
https://www.legallyindia.com/convos/topic/494321-the-debacle-of-nls-increased-batch-sizes
The convocation fiasco adds to the list of reasons why NLS should never be nationalized.
I agree with the post above. The contrast is so visible. On the same day, NFSU School of Law declares the IDDRC operational (led by Justice Dave), inaugurated by the CJI earlier in February 2026. This is a great milestone for the NFSU School of Law in creating this national asset for India, while NLS is busy with such petty and narrow-minded affairs.
A good analogy would be what Mamata did to the Tatas by opposing their coming to WB (for frivolous reasons) and the consequences it has faced since then on the state's investment climate.