We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
Everything in the previous paragraph takes your post at face value - that you are actually telling the truth. I note this because there are things that seem very unusual about what you say - and I am coming from the point of view of a visibly disabled person who attended the type of flashy western university (whose disability support system is very good) that Jindal/JGLS would be trying to emulate to climb up the rankings:
1. First of all, in many circumstances, people with laptop kind of arrangements wouldn't have that in isolation. They would have it along with another arrangement, that is often called a "separate room". That's literally what it says on the tin - they'd be in a different room from the non-disabled students. Among other things, that helps invigilate them better.
2. You'd have to be the world's biggest prat to allow in internet-enabled laptops for in person examinations that didn't allow access to materials. Why! At my university, I couldn't even carry in my own laptop! (Even if I had turned the internet off.) I was given one of theirs to take my exams on. And, while my own laptop had an Indian keyboard, that was one hell of an inconvenience, because the placing of the @ symbol and quotation marks on a British keyboard compared to an Indian one are very different - an important point to note for lawyers taking exams.
Jindal as a university and JGLS as a law school may (does) have many faults, but you are making a very tall claim: that they are making elementary mistakes in walking a path that the type of universities they are aspiring to beat in the global competition do not make.
Moderators, please have this deeply provocative, problematic and irresponsible post removed, unless the author of it is able to provide proof in some form of what they are saying, or unless they give a written undertaking to you (privately is fine) that they will put their accusations before the appropriate authorities. Put a moderator note on the post to flag it as unverified material unless and until the one who wrote this helps resolve the issue one way or the other.
For a PPO at Tri, the presentation plays a huge role. Good luck!
Like with all good things, many make the absolute worst of it.
It's growingly common practice in my batch at JGLS for able bodied students to obtain a "fake DSC." I personally know of students who suffer from no actual ailment but do have an extra friendly family doctor who can tinkeringly create whatever is needed. These students then use the committee to claim relaxations such as alternative assessments, extended submission timelines, extra time for in person exams, and the worst of all, I have seen students bring internet enabled laptops to physical mid term examinations, and google their way through the same paper everyone else is writing (with extra time too). Of course it is undeniable that there are disabilities that are not visible, and I am not judging students for not having a visible disability. I just personally know and have heard students admit, with some pride even, on how they gamed the system with their DSC support, without actually having a condition or needing support. Since grading is relative, these relaxations really do have quite an impact, and in addition to the general student body, it's the students with genuine, especially non visible disabilities, who now get to deal with more side-eye every time they use the support they're entitled to.
bro even after we leave office by 10ish we have to work till 1-2 researching some basic drafting proofreading, responding to emails, planning, etc. .................zzzzzzz, feeling sleepy, bye. (sorry timesheets bhi bharni hai)
Attendance, projects, internships, placements and exams - how cruel the world is that it only demands you improve yourself everyday ! How unfair - none of the previous batches has to do any of this- they were all just given law degrees for watching Netflix and laying about near the lake !
I am so done with the chase man. 4 years of law school seem to assessed solely by whether one manages to get employed. Worse, I am so clueless about what to do if I don't. Can't skip classes and intern endlessly. Neither do I want to, to only be disappointedly informed about a lack of vacancy in my last week of internship. Years of co-curriculars, decent grades, publications and genuinely thinking maybe I like law, only to be unemployed. Familial responsibilities, peer pressure, the fear of not bagging a corp job when that's what you have looked up to right from your first year when your seniors would flex it - all of it is just getting to me. God, please, just give me a job. I really don't have it in me to keep stressing over it.
It's a remarkable piece of software. Like it or not, it's here to stay. Might as well understand how it operates and derive what benefits you can.
The extent of dependency is fair though. But that is its own separate issue.
It's absolutely impossible for her to be an adult who can make her own decisions and her own mistakes, and an extremely intelligent and successful professional at a law firm where the starting salary is like $500,000 per year, who chose of her own free will to have an adult relationship with her boss, either because she was genuinely attracted to the intelligent, powerful law firm partner, or because she thought she might get some career advantage out of it. It's also impossible for colleagues (even bosses and subordinates) to date and get married and have successful relationships - it's always only the man taking advantage of the weak and helpless woman.
Why hasn't this man been arrested and executed yet??? There's video proof of his actions!!
my cgpa right now at the end of sem 6, year 3, is a little below 7/10 and the average needed is at least a 7.5
i also am still in the process of writing my first research paper (because acc to me im supposed to find an entirely novel gap that no one has thought of before fully) and i havent done an international moot yet, didnt win at national ones i did before either.
it just wasnt the best time. i do have some decent internships though
so yes i have 2 more years to go and i will do my best, however, right now i just feel like i am doomed and wont get a job. i seriously considered going back to law school again.
so well can you please help me out and tell me if that is in fact true that i have failed and wont get a job.
What is the likely course of action next, will they call me to just submit the photos, or will it get rejected outright? Or is there a chance that they overlook it, please let me know, thanks in advance!
and how likely are they to get converted into an internship, and if so, how? what is the process?
thankyou!
thankyouu.
All of us marinate in this misery but 2 saal mein sab theek ho jayega kuch nahi hota - all it indicates is that after 2/3 years you would get to do unto others what was done to you.
It sucks. It will continue to suck. There will be days/months where you may be better off but the terrible days will more than compensate for them. Hold on for as long as you can or want to. Everybody works in firms only for the money.
Current understanding is that itโll be 3 hours long with bare acts being provided. Can anyone whoโs given this round help me with what kinda questions I can expect? What kinda prep should I do?
Thanks!
Will doing a pg diploma from nls help me out in enhancing my cv. Also can it increase my chances of getting job as assistant professor at a good institute.
kindly share your experience with the course.
thanks!
Let me assure you most male married partners have unhappy lives and wives and would be tethered only for the sake of their kids. And most juniors if they feel someone is coming on to them know how to avoid these situations. Youre law associate and cant be this ditzy.
I am sure Wachtell will deal with this because its now public. Thankfully, American orgs will also realize this is between the male partner and his husband. Quite hard for the junior to say i was coerced when youre liplocked in the middle of central park.
Like with all good things, many make the absolute worst of it.
It's growingly common practice in my batch at JGLS for able bodied students to obtain a "fake DSC." I personally know of students who suffer from no actual ailment but do have an extra friendly family doctor who can tinkeringly create whatever is needed. These students then use the committee to claim relaxations such as alternative assessments, extended submission timelines, extra time for in person exams, and the worst of all, I have seen students bring internet enabled laptops to physical mid term examinations, and ai their way through the same paper everyone else is writing (with extra time too). Of course it is undeniable that there are disabilities that are not visible, and I am not judging students for not having a visible disability. I just personally know and have heard students admit, with some pride even, on how they gamed the system with their DSC support, without actually having a condition or needing support. Since grading is relative, these relaxations really do have quite an impact, and in addition to the general student body, it's the students with genuine, especially non visible disabilities, who now get to deal with more side-eye every time they use the support they're entitled to.
sqe2 exemption is quite easy, sqe1 is a bit difficult
https://www.instagram.com/p/DbJTDNasii9/
Thanks
predominantly - disputes and GC
You people are either stupid or malicious to say that they fastened during sleeping hours. Obviously the fast was during office hours. 6 hours is not as easy as you think. Some people did not drink water. Maybe it sounds easy to you, but it was just a small, symbolic gesture of support, amidst the pressure of studies, moots etc.
What have you people down to support the movement? Or are all of you BJP supporters?
T1 lawyers are great at emails.
Perhaps even better at briefing notes.
And decent at passive aggressive negotiation.
Watch them stand before a court to see them shudder.
want our country also to be ruined like Bangladesh and Nepal. One of these politicians frequently travels abroad and meets anti-Indian figures, including those who support terrorism. He is reputedly very close to George Soros and has been receiving huge funds intended to destabilize our country over the past decade. "
https://x.com/LiveLawIndia/status/2080326332215665128/photo/1
Wachtell must act, given that it is widely considered the world's best law firm.
The solution is simple. Get high GDP growth asap. Reduce taxes. Abolish bureaucracy. Improve ease of doing business. Privatise PSUs. This alone will solve most of the problems.
Considering majority of their clients have a big say in government policies aka having government support, they can't risk losing them and see their competitors/peers getting a share of their pie.
https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/supreme-court-lawyers-recite-constitutions-preamble-seeking-justice-for-students-cjp-thanks-them-101784805678763-amp.html
https://www.ndtv.com/video/the-real-issue-is-lost-harish-salve-s-blunt-take-on-neet-protests-political-drama-1131130
About four months ago I placed at a national essay writing competition RGNUL ran in collaboration with Dhir & Dhir Associates. The advertised prize was an internship at the firm. I am still waiting for it.
What I have done, roughly in order:
- emailed the firm's internship and careers inbox
- emailed HR
- messaged HR on LinkedIn
- emailed the responsible associate directly, short and polite
- called the firm and tried to get put through to the right person
- went back to the student coordinators at RGNUL who organised the competition
Response to nearly all of it: nothing. No dates, no confirmation, not even a rejection.
Eventually I connected with one of the partners and messaged them on Linkedin. To their credit they replied immediately and said an associate would call me that same day. They named the associate. No call came. At 5 PM I looked up the associate's number and called him myself. He picked up, said he would call back, and hung up.
He called at 8 PM and spent the call shouting at me for having contacted the partner. Not for getting anything wrong, just for escalating. I had already emailed him about this internship. I had emailed the careers inbox, HR, other associates and the RGNUL coordinators. Nobody took responsibility, which is exactly why I went to a partner, and the partner was the only person who actually replied. The associate then told me the firm only offers virtual internships and asked me to message him on WhatsApp. I did . This was about 2 weeks ago. Nothing concrete since.
So, four months in: no dates, no offer letter, and the only real interaction I have had with the firm was being shouted at for following up.
I am posting because prize internships are advertised as a genuine part of what you get for months of work on a submission. If the firm cannot or will not honour it, the organising college should say so upfront rather than leaving students chasing an inbox for a third of a year.
Has anyone else had a competition prize internship simply never materialise? Did putting it in writing to the college's committee get you anywhere, or is there any point escalating further?
Obviously, it is hard to argue that Britain is a model for democracy these days (no country should be having seven prime ministers in 10 years), but this kind of mentality that your comment displays is taking us in the direction of the opposite dangerous extreme: a personality cult. Therefore, please revise your ideas.
SC:
- NA
Bom HC:
- Justice Revati Mohan Dere, LLM Cambridge (now CJ of Meghalaya)
Delhi HC:
- Justice Pratibha Singh, LLM, Cambridge
- Justice Prateek Jalan: LLB Cambridge, Bar at Law from London, LLM Michigan,
Cal HC:
- Justice Arijit Banerjee: LLB Cambridge, Bar at Law from London
- Justice Moushumi Bhattacharya, LLM Cambridge (now in Telangana)
- Justice Rajasekhar Mantha, LLM King's
- Justice Ravi Kapur, LLB Leeds, Bar at Law from London
- Justice Lapita Banerji, LLB Leeds, Bar at Law from London (now in Punjab)
Allahabad HC:
- Justice Siddharth Nandan, LLM Warwick
Could you shed some light on the CTC that may be expected (Fixed+ Variable) for a SA/MA role in the KCO IP team, if the move is from a Tier 1 IP to KCO?.
Moved back to my place and left the big city behind for good.
Happier for it.