We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
Also, would it be advisable to combine a LegalTech focus with a TMT practice, similar to the model followed by teams such as Nikhil Narendran's at Trilegal? Do you see long-term growth and opportunities in this intersection of technology law and legal innovation?
Would love to hear your thoughts.
Even other firms like Kco and CAM have innovation teams that don't really build their own solutions. If you're genuinely interested in building something in the legaltech space, joining a startup is probably your best bet.
Knowing your way around AI tools like Claude Code is another thing tho – I think every lawyer, not even specifically TMT ones, should be dabbling in this and try to automate their work as much as possible; because if you don't, the guy next to you will and he'll be able to do significantly more work than you.
I wanted to solve tough problems at the intersection of law and tech. Went through very different pathway of trying to build legal tech products , strategize it , under stand it way deeply( sometimes obsess over it) and fail at it. It gives that balance between innovation, legal ,building thrill and if you went well the freedom to work remotely with decent enough pay( a intersection of job satisfaction and work life balance rarely possible in lndian legal industry) I converted few legal tech roles which were low paying though the work was interesting(that was my first criteria to apply ), though not joined . Later on , I got a balanced one. Just to give an idea , if you are good at it , you can also get around 50k for even less than 3-4 hours of work everyday, remotely. But the tough part is to find these opportunities you have to go pretty deep into legal tech job market as well as good at what you do and not bluffing. In general, get around a lakh for normal office work hours. The salaries mentioned above are for freshers. Don't go towards law firms innovation teams in terms of learning but can give a good idea of user and adoption experience.
The reality is the job description and roles for the legal tech are still evolving atleast in Indian legal tech market.
is there anyway to connect with you?