We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
Olympic ke baad to vaise bhi aana hi padega.
More generally, the rank list merely makes the interviews a possibility. It’s not like the UPSC. It’s up to the discretion of the office to then further select people to interview based on the CV. Being on the rank list doesn’t entitle anyone to an interview automatically. I don’t understand the ‘non-transparent’ critique since discretion is inherently somewhat random and subjective? A person can like or not like a CV for any number of reasons. It’s like asking a law firm HR to list out why they liked or didn’t like a CV. Sure, rank is one objective metric but it is not the determinative factor here specifically because of the nature of the job, where you’ll be working out of a judge’s house and the relationship is a bit more interpersonal than a regular one of a boss and employee. Maybe a judge wants to encourage clerks from marginalised backgrounds, or the candidate has done some research that is relevant to their usual roster. All this can’t be captured by rank alone.
The registry clerkships do rely more heavily on rank so if you’re not dead set on a judge’s office, those recruitments will also happen later so keep an eye out.
Yeh sirf citation nikalna jaante hai (:
Instead of writing pointless posts like this, maybe try doing something useful yourself. Your words just show how useless and insecure you are. May you achieve something in life
All things considered in your 20s my advise would be to stick wuth a tier 1 and gradually look for a shift when priorities change and responsibilities increase. T1 is definately easier in your 20s than any other stage.
Rml doesn’t even have a useful RCC, just namesake bs. You’ll also find better peers at NALSAR AND NLUD , 100x better than whatever rml has rn. And academics are a joke at rml.
news
I'm really disgusted to see the pro-NKC posts being put up here by vested interests.
Trilegal is consistent in terms of quality.
Are there any other tier 2 firms which provide good work and exposure? I am trying to shift from in house.
be punctual, stay the course, do not show favortitism (although you may have favourites), use examples/analogies to explain concepts (this is the true mark of a good teacher), provide feedback, have an easy go attitude (esp outside class)
try out empirical research (if you are interested), it is sorely lacking, publish only in scopus (it is not a marker of quality, but is required for promotion), do not publish a book until you feel that you have acquired some idea/knowledge in the field, keep in touch with the industry, ultimately law is a practice oriented subject so it has to have some practical utlity (not just Kelsen), focus on how the impact of the law is and try to bring in the why
In other news, Pakistan will chair a committee on anti-terrorism at the UNSC.
https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/pakistan-secures-key-roles-unsc-committees-should-india-worry-10060462/lite/
🤭🤭🤡🤡
The nation wants to know
1 - S&R
1- AZB
2- CAM
1- KCO
1- Bharucha
Option 1: high pay in T1, demanding work hours, boring practice area, mean boss.
Option 2: 40% less pay in T2, chill work hours with weekends off and generous annual leave, interesting practice area, chill boss. Added bonus is corporate membership of a sports club and travel abroad for conferences.
Also what is the ratio of distribution of time given to academics and no academic activities?
Which societies/committees should we apply for in the first year and tips to get selected by them?
Email: stolenisubracers@proton.me
[Moderator note: Be sensible and do your due diligence etc before meeting anonymous people you meet online in real life]
https://www.barandbench.com/news/bci-committee-chair-cyril-shroff-to-examine-concerns-rules-entry-of-foreign-lawyers-to-india
The committee will be chaired by Managing Partner of Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas, Cyril Shroff and will comprise Ajay Bahl (AZB & Partners), Suhail Nathani (ELP), Sandip Bhagat (S&R Associates), Mahesh Agarwal (Agarwal Law Associates) and Amit Kapur (JSA) as other members.
Looks like BCI has ditched Trilegal founders to be a part of this. Hope that the Committee engages in full deliberations with all stakeholders including think thanks, students and young lawyers.
Also easy escape for CMS-Indus arrangement as the article notes that one of the functions of the Committee is
"To propose safeguards to prevent foreign lawyers or firms from circumventing restrictions and engaging, directly or indirectly, in the practice of Indian law through structures such as alliances, referrals or partnerships"
This may affect unverifiable word on the streets on collabs like Sidley-KCO , A&O Shearman-Trilegal etc
"A few little birdies told us two foreign firms are exploring the opportunity seriously - one that reminds you of the address of a well-known pipe-smoking detective and another known for its mid-market M&A practice."
"One of the birdies, however, mused: “What if a foreign firm just cherry-picks the star partners of a bunch of Indian firms for its Indian operations?” Hmmm...the plot will only thicken from here"
MC Insider | A startup founder's bet on longevity and foreign law firms circle India https://share.google/w8i7CU0vROM85YpGd
Need some actual, helpful advice on how to carve out time to have a life, to work out and be healthy (nothing absurd wrt fitness goals – just health), etc.
The real friend(s) will be the ones who will criticise you and try to correct your ways - not in public but in a personal space. They will be the ones who will be brutally honest with you. They will be happy with your success, but also ready to correct your ways if possible. Secondly, never have too many expectations of your friends. This EXPECTATION destroys a lot of friendships and relationships. Always have the bare minimum expectations, and you will see the world to be a better place to live. Third - this is my personal take - always make friends with whom your career goals don't align. This will save you from future heartbreaks and jealousy. You guys won't be competing with each other. That should be your end goal.
At last, enjoy life a bit. heartbreaks, betrayal, and jealousy are part of life. They teach you whom to trust and whom to love and from whom you should always maintain a safe distance. Learn from the mistakes. Don't frown upon them.
Happy adulting, Kid!!!
I honestly didnt actually care that she called me a madrasan or charged me a higher rent. I just thought- oh shes stupid, and moved on with my life. Higher rent was justified because I was a practical stranger to her with no one in the city that could vouch for me. I shrugged it off as cost of doing business. Maybe because I'm an actual adult who doesnt whinge about microaggressions. I dont need to be endeared to north india. I have my home town to be endeared to. You cannot have a high trust society with increased migration. Those two things are opposite to each other. You can have a baseline level of trust. I've left phones, laptops, wallets in autos a number of times in bangalore and theyve always been returned to me or left at the police station. I have had parents and relatives collapse with a stroke on the street and strangers have put them in the hospital and left them with their belongings and stayed till I got there. Theres no cameras or at least no one monitoring cameras in most supermarkets. Thats a high trust society. It just is one in which you will still feel like an outsider because you are. Why do you never think about what you're doing to endear yourself to those who are already in the city? apart from complaining and calling us bigots?
I have mostly worked in DR teams but am open to working in other teams too, if available. Thanks in advance! :)