We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
Very few are trained to think like business-facing legal leaders.
We’re exploring a premium finishing school for a small, curated cohort of final-year law students who don’t just want a job—but want a long-term path to becoming a top-tier General Counsel.
This is not about:
❌ black-letter law
❌ exam prep
❌ placement coaching
This is about:
✅ how GCs actually think
✅ how legal advice is shaped by business, risk, power, and judgment
✅ how careers are built deliberately—not accidentally
✅ how credibility is earned inside boardrooms, not courtrooms
Think of it as a bridge between law school and real-world leadership.
We’re currently testing interest and pricing for:
• a short, intensive, cohort-based programme
• live sessions + practical simulations
• taught by people who’ve actually done the job
If you’re a final-year law student (or know one) who would be interested in something like this, drop a “GC” in the comments
You still have some time before graduation and not to mention, after graduation wherein you can still do assessment internships/ask for callbacks or pick up trainee/junior associate positions to work towards a full time role.
NEVER LOSE HOPE OR DO ANYTHING EXTREME, you have plenty of chances to upskill and make the best of your education with or without an offer in hand before graduation. Now is the time to work on your CV, your Cover Letter and yourself and not leave any stone unturned!
tbh there’s basically 3-4 reasons why ppl do clerkships.
first is using it as a springboard for disputes practice. i literally know 3-4 folks who walked into azb, sam, kco etc right after their clerkship. second is getting into chambers of top SAs. know a first gen guy from a lesser known college working w one of the best SAs in SC after 2 years of clerking. massive W.
third is getting that LOR for LLM apps. fourth is treating it as a part time gig while prepping for judiciary. and yes it counts in the 3 years experience rule. LRs were smart enough to protect their interests while drafting that judgment lol. (but if you plan on doing this don't disclose that in your clerkship interview for obvious reasons)
jjj
but ngl there is no written guarantee of a t1 disputes job. entirely depends on ur networking game. if ur smart enough it’s def manageable. i know a former judge who personally made sure all his LRs got placed after he retired. real mvp.
source: done judicial internships and talked to like 10-12 clerks about this so i know the tea. Hope this helps.
Being a woman doesn't mean they are not prone to lying, you can lie irrespective of the gender you are.
In fact there are numerous such cases which by appeals in HCs have found the statements of alleged "victims" in such cases to be purely malicious and hearsay to frame their men partner.
Moreover, "—" using this emdash only goes to show that you have used AI to generate such a response. Please be unbiased as a legal professional, it's the least expected thing from you.
1. Join the disputes practice of a t-1 firm (I personally know many who are working at SAM, AZB, KCO Delhi disputes after SC and DHC clerkships for 1-2 years)
2. Join the chambers of Sr. Advs. I know of a guy (1st gen and not from a NLU / or famous private college )who got into the chambers of one of the best Supreme Court Sr.
3. Getting an LOR for an LLM abroad (LOR of a judge carries a lot of weight for admission committees at top institutions like Oxbridge, Ivy, etc.)
4. Treating it as a part time gig while you prepare for the Judiciary Exam. Yes! clerkship period is calculated
as a student who has interacted with him,
calm down.
My bet is on VKT. Who else?
Poverty is the mother of philosophy.
I am A0 at T1 law firm in capital markets having about 8 months experience. I wish to switch my practice area to general corporate. I am totally fine with starting from scratch. I had done many general corporate internships back in law school (if that helps).
Please guide me how to start, what to do. I would really appreciate some insights.
My last three internships have all been in-house, and now I’ve received a callback offer for a 3-month in-house internship right before I start my 5th year. There’s also a real possibility of converting this into a PPO, which makes it tempting.
That said, I’m a bit conflicted. I don’t have any Tier-1 law firm internship experience yet, and I’ve often heard that switching from in-house to a law firm later isn’t very easy. Because of that, I’m unsure whether continuing with in-house is the right long-term move.
So now I’m stuck between two options:
- Do I continue with the in-house role and try to convert it into a PPO?
- Or should I pivot at this stage, try to secure a law firm internship, and aim for a firm callback instead, even if that means taking some risk?
I am well ahead of my txn law peers ie I'm “semi-technical” in finance, meaning I can actually follow the maths instead of just name-dropping bullshit linkedinwala jargon.
Thinking back on how I picked up theory + asset pricing + valuation math + LBO + Black Scholes etc over the years:
- - Damodaran’s YouTube lectures (gold obviously): https://www.youtube.com/@AswathDamodaranonValuation
- - Cochrane’s Asset Pricing (literally skip all the math): https://www.johnhcochrane.com/research/books
- - PE/VC modeling MBA course I took in a sister institution (USA)
Now I’m trying to get “semi-technical” in CS/AI because I want to VIBE CODE some management and billing apps for my firm... And because my clients seem to think computers can do what I can do now...
- - I’ve done some vibe-coding with GPT5-Codex on ChatGPT.com/codex and made my team a calendar manager in less than 2 days
- - Thinking if I should start a course track with Harvard Law School "CS50 & AI for Lawyers"? Worth the time? https://cs50.harvard.edu/hls/2025/winter/
- What is the CS course track? What is the Damodaran of AI?
- Any books? podcasts? anyone can recommend?? tia
ps: pls don't the stupid childish explainer videos--I want the serious stuff like the Damodaran series
Presumably there is some correlation with success... maybe? ;)
Most Asst. Profs. in Indian universities would struggle to get any meaningful tenure at any half-decent US/UK university. We do have some excellent Professors of the Practice though, full-time academics not so much.
But, we climbaround a toxic adjunct culture by hiring APs like so across the country, in our "top legal schools"...
The forums exist for this explicit purpose--that we can co-exist in anonymity with ass-0-ciates. Our generation invented the forums.
And without the flame-warring of LinkedIn and Twitter: so yes, Legally India is the only place that a partner seriously reads and writes in.
Other colleges thst you might consider after RML if judiciary is your goal - NLUJ, GNLU, NLIU
Campus isn't small per se, from.omw end to the other is about a km. It's just that much of the campus is under construction.
It would negatively impact your chances of number of students are high for placement.
You have so much to study in law school that it does take the life out of you. You can reach areas like MG Road in about 40 minutes by metro, but you'll not have time to do stuff.
SC ST
OBC (Non-Creamy Layer)
EWS
Domicile
Foreign national
NRI
PWD
J&K
North East
Armed Forces
Women
Transgender
https://youtu.be/4P4Iee1WaAc?si=T7HWR_uRQWts9YnC
can you please suggest me any good resources especially for the part B
CNLU peeps, please give us the tea!!
my aim is corporate law or in-house counsel
please tell me how are the current students doing and how will it be in future also
thanks for the help
If any junior is facing issues, please privately bring it up with the partners and ask that you not be outed to the team for bringing concerns. From what I know, the KCO partners are decent enough to give you that benefit. This advice should also work in every other competition practice, expect may be at ▮▮▮. Also not all partners are made equal, use your brains before approaching.
In your discussion, bring specific examples which you think were wrong and should not have happened or what you think can happen better. Targeted feedback will help the partners address issues. If you are not comfortable bringing it up with the partners in general and feel you will be targeted, speak with someone you trust. In KCO you can consider speaking to Anshuman one-on-one. Of what I know of Anshuman, he is a super standup guy. Every firm have a few decent guys who would be willing to help you. Other examples being Harman in SAM, Bharat / Toshit in AZB, Dhruv / Vijay in CAM, etc.
No workplace is good or bad in perpetuity. This KCO team is quite small compared to its peers and they have a tremendous amount of work. In these circumstances, people tend to behave badly, but that is no excuse. Bring issues up, so solutions can be brought forward.
Don't expect people / seniors to notice issues that are affecting you on their own, that never happens in any workplace. Even if you think toxicity is apparent, it may be apparent to you but not to others. Everyone, including partners, is busy with their own set of issues and toxicity.
Once you have brought forward an issue, give a few months before you expect improvements. Nothing changes overnight. Even for seniors, it takes a lot of time to make folks break / change habit. Even where partners need to change, they need time to break habits - even when they are entirely aware that change is needed. Change is hard.
When you bring issues, it is entirely possible that partners wont agree to your assessment of the situation. What you feel as toxicity or wrong, may not be the case. As juniors, you may not have enough experience or context to assess all behavior. Most people think they are victims in a situation, but often that is not the case. People always tend to look at their agony through rose tinted glasses. If you bring an issue with a partner, please keep an open mind. If may very well be possible that the issue lies with you or with you and the third person.
Finally, you may not just be a fit in a team. Don't be afraid to leave and go elsewhere. Not all workplaces are meant for everyone.
Can someone please tell me what are my chances in those teams in those Firms, and what kind of questions I can expect in the interview?
Chapter 2: https://www.legallyindia.com/convos/topic/237709#comment-237709
Chapter 3: https://www.legallyindia.com/convos/topic/238910-chapter-3-the-resistance
I hope you don't plan to have children or that you get a little more mature before you do. No one is saying he shouldn't be accountable. Just that accountability can come with compassion. It has nothing to do with wealth. If you think that people baying for his blood wouldn't bay for a poorer young man to be hanged, you are very wrong. The parents' emotions are understandable but in the long run they are harmful to their own healing: https://www.ldsliving.com/just-let-go-one-lds-mans-story-of-tragedy-and-the-power-of-forgiveness/s/71058 . And there is a good reason that these emotions do not drive justice.
https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/bill-gates-noam-chomsky-seen-in-fresh-pics-from-epsteins-estate-9843279/amp/1
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/nov/22/noam-chomsky-jeffrey-epstein-ties-emails
Most likely you will just a rap on the knuckles and it will be done. If in case the firm comes down harder than that, then just know that you are in a workplace that is really not a fair one (especially considering you are an A0 and nobody checked your work).
Don’t fret. Be kind to yourself. You will be fine.
Though the wise man was an A0, chill!
1. Is this how VCs of all govt universities behave in India? Suck up to politicians in such a cringe manner?
2. Are certain NLU VCs the same?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=riPbR0p-GNMhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6YFwfhjayEc
There’ll be many more mistakes you commit in future so learn to deal with them and figure a way out. So long as it can be fixed, it’s recoverable.
2. Very Chill work culture, mainly researching related to Arbitration and Construction Laws.
3. He loves to interact with interns, made them part of regular client meetings, good exposure.
4. He'll take you along to witness Arbitration Proceedings as well.
5. Not so much to learn, but definitely a good place to gain exposure and experience how broad law actually is, specially in your initial years.
(I have interned during summer 2023).
When did you get it?
2. Yes
3. NUJS and then NLUJ
Let’s analyse this purported “loss” without jingoism and with actual substance.
Where, precisely, did our speakers fall short—and how did those failures lead to a loss of votes?