We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
YOUR HEALTH, YOUR KID AND YOUR PEACE IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN ANY MATTER OR ANY WORK.
REQUEST YOU TO PRIORTISE WHAT MATTERS MORE. PLEASE STOP STRESSING, THAT IS THE LAST THING YOU NEED TO AT THIS CRUCIAL TIME OF YOUR LIFE.
WORK TO LIVE AND NOT LIVE TO WORk.
YOURS TRULY,
GEN-Z FRESHER
Also, people who are good at heart don’t lose control in anger and assault people. ▮▮▮
https://x.com/advsanjoy/status/2051491617761284488
These people are not rightists or leftists, they are SELF-ists.
Mailed to HR, or what?and What's generally unique in your CV?
I'm interested in banking area as a whole!
And the thing is, every associate was supposed to go on with a regular working day on the morning they heard of her demise while coming to office. every bbody was made to work the entire day, ▮▮▮
From my knowledge there is not enough tax work in law firms besides Vaish in Delhi and Vaish pays peanuts. All the other big law firms do have a tax practice but they dont have enough work. They basically do Tax Due dilligence, EPF advisory, PMLA and Black money act. Maybe Try Dhruva consultants. They are a 100% tax firm.
Just go with your own thing man. Will be much better off in the long run.
Take the time to read it. Find details below:
Caroline Morris and Cian Murphy, Getting a PhD in Law (Hart 2011). Obviously, this is a slightly old book and discusses a very different context from India, but I feel the nuance it goes into in terms of supervisor vs. university etc is worth looking at.
I am looking to intern at a Cap Marks Team this October, but I am not in the fag end of my law school to look for bigger names, and cant go to mumbai for personal reasons, any recommendations on T3 Cap Marks firms?
Honestly some GC team recs are also appreciated :))
I’m a qualified Company Secretary and a Lawyer from a state university. I was fortunate to secure an assessment internship at a law firm, which later converted into a full-time role.
However, over the past 5 months, there has been significant attrition in the firm - almost everyone who joined with me has moved on. While I understand that movement is a part of the profession, the current environment has started to feel increasingly challenging (lack of seniors, micro-management, detrimental policies, etc) and I find myself a bit demotivated.
I’ve been actively exploring opportunities and have been cold-emailing HRs and Partners, but haven’t had much success so far. I also feel hesitant about resigning without another offer in hand, given practical constraints.
I understand that these things take time, but I would really appreciate any guidance, suggestions, or leads that anyone could offer.
Thank you in advance!
On a separate note, do some digging you'll find people shifting from KLA to BLC but not a single case of the opposite happening.
This is the best and simplest piece of advice I received from an Associate, which stuck with me.
Instead of approaching tasks academically, trying to show off unnecessary skills, always keep in mind this ultimate goal and be efficient rather than flamboyant in your work, and your senior will greatly appreciate you for it and keep you in his good books.
Also, be cheerful and interactive with the team at large. At the end of the day, they're not just looking for a topper to join the team and not collaborate; they're essentially deciding whether you're a person they want to sit next to for the next couple of years through long nights and difficult moments who can handle the stress.
All the very best!
Can someone from CAM please describe the nature and extent to which Legora is being used in the transactional practice areas?
Is it really being implemented wholly for documentation and research or is it still just a buzzword for PR?
Also, if yes, what's your review of it, is it helpful and do you think this will affect hiring for upcoming batches?
Thanks!
Of all the pressures law school already has, its genuinely not reasonable to have such strict attendence policies. I hope the SC passes an order stopping this. There have been many instances where even genuine reasons for lack of attendnece have not been met. A student told the UG chair (▮▮▮) that they were suicidal and her response was "everyone is suicidal lately". I have given up hope
Hi, I did a 4 month internship with KCO, my call back was extended and the feedback was positive however I wasn’t told when I’ll have the interview scheduled. Any information is appreciated. Thank you:)
Heard in CB they've made a few Associate Partners/Partner & a Senior Partner! Can anybody confirm?
What I was not prepared for was the sheer volume of work and the environment. The stress is honestly unimaginable. The workload never seems to end, timelines are constantly unreasonable, and there is zero regard for personal boundaries. What makes it harder is that most of the pressure comes from “seniors” who, in reality, have lesser PQE than me. Work is routinely dumped without context, accountability is pushed downhill, and when something goes wrong, it feels like I’m the first person to be thrown under the bus.
There’s a constant sense that people are waiting for you to slip up. There is no room to pause, reflect, or even breathe. My personal life is practically non‑existent at this point, my health has deteriorated significantly, and I find myself constantly anxious and exhausted. I’ve reached a stage where coping with this level of toxicity feels increasingly difficult.
To the seniors and peers on this forum who have spent much longer in this profession, especially in disputes: how do you manage this? Is this something one simply learns to live with, or does it get better with time? At what point do you decide that the cost is too high?
Would really appreciate any honest perspectives or advice.
TLDR: HOW TO LIVE A LIFE WHILE WORKING IN A LAW FIRM?
I’m a 2024 LL.B. graduate currently trying to move into data privacy roles. I have around 10 months of experience in US pre-employment compliance (background verification and health screen vetting typa work), but I’ve been trying to pivot into privacy for a while now. I’m currently between roles, so using this time to upskill and figure out the right entry point.
Over the past few months, I’ve tried to build some practical understanding. worked on things like DPIAs, RoPA, basic gap assessments, privacy policies, and have been reading up on GDPR and the DPDP Act and collecting certs. Still very early stage, but trying to make the shift properly now.
I’ve been seeing a lot about Tsaaro Consulting and their career change / apprenticeship-type roles, so wanted to ask people here who’ve been through it or are in similar roles:
- 1. What actually helps in getting shortlisted for these roles?
- 2. How much do certifications vs practical work/portfolio matter at entry level?
- 3. Is the exposure there genuinely useful for moving ahead in privacy, or is it more surface-level?
- 4. Are there any other entry-level options for a privacy fresher?
Would really appreciate honest inputs, especially from people who started from a similar position.
Thanks!
Now i wanted to know whether if i am able to crack the latter 2 should i join either, or wait this year for nlsiu next year?
[N.B. there are only 22 oprn seats for me, & competition is huge, may 2-2.5k].
My understanding is that wasting another year is not optimal since it would go waste, rather it is better to get in an NLU and work as hard as possible from day 1 itself.
My assumptions for corporate law firm/in-house jobs are somewhat stable in the sense i researched a lot, but i concur that i need to know a lot many things for even coming to a conclusion for pursuing one.
I am naturally inclined to academia, otherwise.
Please advise and give genuine advises please , not like there are no scope for 3 year llb, tier 3 colleges are scam, or go to DU, BHU (which i cant since they wont provide hostels, & i'm not from these cities). Please give genuine practical advises.
Thank you!
- LLB from Jogesh Chandra Choudhuri College of Law, Kolkata.
- Total declared assets: 8 crore.
From SuperLawyer:
"While in college, he was an active participant in the student political body of the University and gradually grew along with it. He became the General Secretary and subsequently President of the Students’ Union. He is also the youngest member to have been inducted into the Trinamul Congress’ Party Core Committee. Currently he practices at the Calcutta High Court."
https://superlawyer.in/sirsanya-bandopadhyay-advocate-calcutta-high-court-building-career-in-litigation-experience-politics
https://in.linkedin.com/in/sirsanya-bandopadhyay-786932183
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/uttarpara-election-results-2026-tmcs-sirsanya-bandopadhyay-vs-bjps-dipanjan-chakraborty/articleshow/130643812.cms
https://www.myneta.info/WestBengal2026/candidate.php?candidate_id=1847
The contents of the communication are not only disappointing but deeply troubling. The attempt to rationalize administrative inaction under the guise of “feasibility” and “legal constraints” is both unconvincing and evasive. It is entirely reasonable to ask: what exactly is considered unfeasible? Is it the basic academic autonomy of allowing students to choose their honours papers? Is it the recruitment of qualified subject experts? Or is it the provision of fundamental infrastructure and amenities expected from a residential university?
Students have repeatedly witnessed arbitrary and regressive decisions that undermine both academic growth and professional preparedness. The removal of attendance considerations for moot participation, the lack of serious engagement with placement concerns, and the absence of a supportive academic environment reflect a systemic disregard for student priorities.
The administration’s portrayal of meetings as consultative platforms is misleading. In reality, these spaces offer little room for genuine dialogue. Students are either not given the opportunity to speak or are ignored when they do. More concerning is the reported conduct during the last meeting, where the SBA President, upon raising structural concerns and suggesting administrative reshuffling, was met not with reasoned discussion but with hostility and remarks that can only be described as intimidatory.
With the recent disclosure of documents, policy proposals and communications by the student president, the question of accountability has become clearer. Students have consistently acted in good faith, submitting proposals with the genuine intent of constructive implementation. The administration’s continued inaction reflects not constraints, but a lack of responsiveness and commitment to student welfare.
Further, the presence of double standards and instances of inappropriate personal remarks directed at students raise serious concerns about professionalism and institutional ethics.
The situation demands urgent and meaningful reform. It is imperative that those in positions of authority are held accountable, and that structural changes are considered to restore trust, transparency, and academic integrity. The future and legacy of the institution depend on the willingness to acknowledge failures and undertake comprehensive corrective measures.
https://x.com/RahulGandhi/status/2051338192729846210
This evening Mamata will call a press conference. I feel there is a strong likelihood of a petition before the Supreme Court, with Kapil Sibal arguing.
▮▮▮.