Note: This is a very rambly account of my very first impressions interning at a large law firm. It is amateurish, shortsighted and somewhat one-sided, but I post it anyway because I know many of my friends and classmates experience the same first impressions and face the same difficult career choices. I have occasionally exaggerated for comic effect, and no offence is meant.

It’s a beautiful day outside.

And by beautiful, I mean, of course, that it’s pouring angry grey bullets of water outside. Because the monsoon is the nicest weather in Mumbai. (If you think something else, we can agree to disagree on this.) When it isn’t raining, slate blue water sparkles in the sun with the faint silhouettes of ships bobbing in the distance. God’s in his heaven and all’s well with the world. Or something like that.

It’s a beautiful day all right. So what do you do? You do what’s obvious.

You take yet another sip of the craptastic office-machine coffee and bury your nose in yet another file. When you take your nose out, a few hours later, your eyes are pink with the strain and there are ink marks on your fingers from the cheaply printed documents the Tehsil office sent. You never want to hear the phrase ‘Articles of Association’ ever again, and you want to cause physical injury to the next Nominee Director’ you see. It doesn’t take a doctor to know what you’re suffering from, it simply takes a law student who has ever interned in the corporate department of a reasonably large firm. You, my friend, have been felled by the Due Diligence scourge.

The problem with students having aspirations toward corporate law is, they don’t really know what the job involves. All they see in their ickle, romantic minds, is the vague image of a Dude with great hair, wearing something with a logo on it and striding importantly past the hoi polloi at airports, leaving them in a cloud of expensive perfume. It’s a mix of all those car ads where men with good hair and great teeth are always sipping champagne inside their cars and driving on excellent roads with beautiful women next to them.

The funny thing I found out is that - it’s true. There are some differences of course. Corporate lawyers tend to look more like Tiku Talsania than Christian Bale for example, and rather more tend to be balding than you’d expect. But a large part of the impression is true. They do have the cars, and they can get the women. They wear the suits and talk in that special lingo (“we’d like to leverage that equity so we can shift our paradigms”) that no one else really gets, so you do come away suitably impressed.

Sold on that lifestyle, you push GPAs and pull strings, levers and your daddy’s hands to get an internship at Awesome & Awesome LLP. You spit-polish your shoes, throw a tantrum until the presswalah creases your pants to perfection, part your hair so you look like Imran Khan and even shave. You land up at work, your arms outstretched, ready to take on the world.

Instead, you take on a three-foot high pile of files. Mr Bored McJaded (Associate) explains. “Diligence”, he says. You are puzzled, but proceed to exercise your rather expensively earned legal acumen on spotting spelling errors, adding up figures and correcting numbering and formatting. You take it all back to Mr Bored, eager to find out what happens next. What happens next is diligence. And what happens after? Diligence. What about after that? I hate to kill the suspense, but diligence it is.

One week down and you’re an old hand at this diligence stuff. You look at the new files presented to you every day, with a jaundiced eye. You can spot a spelling error at fifty paces. You deliberately make offhand comments like “Oh, that minutes book hasn’t been initialled..it’s a Section 291 violation” to impress the new interns, with an air suggestive of Soli Sorabjee casually pointing out a gamechanging flaw in Ram Jethmalani’s argument in some high profile case. The highest point of your day is when you realise that Property X does not have the relevant Zone certificate. You quickly make a note on a colourful Post-It which comes as part of the endless supply of fancy stationery your office supplies you.

Whenever you zone out (once every ten minutes), you idly surf the internet and chat with your fellow sufferers in large legal sweatshops, who agree that most of the Important and Glamorous work they were expecting to see, seems to be the correcting of spelling errors with Staedtler pencils and the highlighting of arithmetic mistakes with expensive German-made highlighters. You decide to investigate the situation and approach Mr Bored McJaded. Without looking up, he says “Diligence”. And you say “What happens after?” And he looks surprised at your question. “The making of a comprehensive report on every aspect.” he says. And then? “We make a term sheet with a list of issues” he says. And then? “You use it to negotiate, and you draft your contract” he says. Ah, so THATS where all your work goes, then! And here you were thinking that all your diligence simply ends up at The Great File in the Sky. You are reassured… there IS more to corporate law than diligence! Relief.

So this negotiation, do you bang on tables and bargain actively? you ask. No, he says. We sit around a table and discuss files. What is all this nonsense, what are you imagining. We are not a fish market.

Duly chastened, you slink back to your seat and watch as your friends in Litigation departments of firms babble excitedly online about twisted arguments and hard-won adjournments and fights with Judges and cross examinations. They post photos of their grimy, sweaty selves shading their eyes from the cruel sun outside Courts. They tell stories of funnily drafted divorce plaints and property disputes dating from 1986 where the most bitterly fought-over asset is a Sumeet mixer-grinder. Every day it’s a new case.

You read it all, sit back in your comfortably padded, ergonomically designed chair, shut your eyes as someone turns the airconditioning up, and, for the first time, really truly wonder about the career choice you’ve (almost) made.

Comments

nandiireywal 16 Jun 2010, 00:50
+0 -0
Nail. Head. Smash.
Anonymous guest 16 Jun 2010, 01:25
+0 -0
awesome!! so true!!
folly_nariman 16 Jun 2010, 02:02
+0 -0
@nandii - thanks! what now, though?

@sameena - thanks :)
Anonymous guest 16 Jun 2010, 04:45
+0 -0
You are awesome. This is inspirational. And yes, this is true. Entirely true. So true, it makes me wonder what the hell, I've been doing as a corporate lawyer for so long now!!

Nandii: Folly is SERIOUS competition. I am seriously considering switching loyalties! :)
Anonymous guest 16 Jun 2010, 18:33
+0 -0
Sheer brilliance.HILARIOUS. This has really truly made me wonder about the career choice I've (almost) made.
Anonymous guest 16 Jun 2010, 19:32
+0 -0
While most lawyers agree that corporate law practice is boring (esp. when compared to litigation), we also make the mistake, as students, of not noting that corporate law entails eye-for-detail and thorough ‘diligence’ in work. Good solicitors have a great eye for detail and are very meticulous. Also, good firms do offer great learning experiences (aka big ticket transactions) e.g. at Awesome & Awesome LLP :D (of course, junior lawyers do a lot of grunt work, and they watch seniors negotiate and learn by observing).

This is just another perspective. I do agree with your post, which is very well-written.

Mr Bored McJaded
Anonymous guest 16 Jun 2010, 19:41
+0 -0
This is awesome. Fantastic post. And so so true! I salute you.

Nandii: For the first time, you have some really serious competition. I'm seriously considering switching loyalties to Folly! :)
Anonymous guest 16 Jun 2010, 20:10
+0 -0
fantastic post...awesome !!
nandiireywal 16 Jun 2010, 20:22
+0 -0
@Folly- Now you make a decision. Do you want to chase your dreams or sell your soul?

@Koolkat- Would't blame you if you did! This is easily the best post in terms of writing that I've come across on LI yet. :-)
folly_nariman 16 Jun 2010, 21:34
+0 -0
@mr bored - absolutely true; it struck me as soon as I began thinking as well, that great litigators are as painstaking in their work as transactional lawyers have to be. I quite enjoy this work now, these were just the initial impressions. Thanks for your comment. :)

@koolkat - high praise! thank you :) i have great regard for nandii's writing; it was his post on recessionary times that inspired me to put something up on internships.

@nandii - i love to exaggerate to effect; it's not quite as dramatic as that.. i like corporate work, and on consideration i think i'm better off in a firm. As i recollect my own litigation internships, i realise i didn
t really enjoy them. this is simply an instance of grass being greener i guess :)
folly_nariman 16 Jun 2010, 21:39
+0 -0
@4 - thanks! i wrote this post to provoke exactly that wonderment ;)
Anonymous guest 16 Jun 2010, 23:23
+0 -0
i totally appreciate and understand what this intern is saying --- been an associate a while and "high points" in corporate law are ridiculously 'low' (the high point will very of then be the lack of zoning cert - totally agree as we hunt for "issues" to report to the client)

but the grass in not so much greener on the other side... at the junior levels even litigation work is dull and boring and grunt work - the wonderful "plaints" and "adjournments" sound inspiring but when you have to do it it can be equally mundane... thats really the nature of legal work i would say.... just stick it out and get to a more senior position where you dont have to stick your neck in the diligence files...
Anonymous guest 16 Jun 2010, 23:32
+0 -0
And to boot initial Lit pay compared to corporate work is usually (except a few places) well need I even go there... Chalk and cheese, black and white, apples and oranges... anything with more contrast?
folly_nariman 17 Jun 2010, 05:46
+0 -0
@11 - i've decided to do just that; that is, if I'm ever offered a job like this one. Things do get better, or so one hopes. :)

@12 - NLS and JGLS, or is that argument still going on here? :P
Anonymous guest 17 Jun 2010, 10:41
+0 -0
Love the post.

Big fan of genuinely good writing.
Not a fan of themes chosen to solely to boost viewer-ship.

Mr Folly, you'd have the award for the competition if it were up to me.

Hope to read some more very soon. I'm sure you're going to make more than just a crazed bunch of wannabe law students read LI blogs.
folly_nariman 17 Jun 2010, 17:04
+0 -0
thanks very much for that,though i think i may be too late for the competition; fact is i'm only two posts down ... I hope to come up with more very soon. :) Wondering what to write on.
Anonymous guest 17 Jun 2010, 20:46
+0 -0
@folly
good work, can feel the emotopm flowing dowm :D
Anonymous guest 17 Jun 2010, 23:27
+0 -0
Dude, you're way too bright to do corporate law. Take a training contract if you get one and use it to impress people/see europe/save cash (unlikely). Don't bother with India. Trauma can't be shrugged off that easily, and the long-term effects on your health and sanity could be really, truly scary.
Anonymous guest 18 Jun 2010, 03:59
+0 -0
@16 -:)

@17 - well plans have always been to settle in india, but i've never encountered such a passionately divergent opinion...perhaps i should give it more thought.
Anonymous guest 18 Jun 2010, 08:01
+0 -0
Dude ! Go for a writing career !
just amazing stuff...
folly_nariman 18 Jun 2010, 19:34
+0 -0
@16 - er :D thanks

@17 - ha, i doubt saving cash would be an objective if i were in europe :D ive always wanted to settle in india, but i find such passionately divergent opinions that i know that decision needs more thought.. and thanks for the compliment :)

@18 - thanks!
Anonymous guest 14 Jul 2010, 22:36
+0 -0
Nailed it! Funny thing - I read this blog at my internship while researching on the contracts act. i can now say i made the wiser choice. :p
folly_nariman 23 Jul 2010, 07:24
+0 -0
well i wrote it just after an internship and i'm yet to see if my choice was a wise one. :)
Anonymous guest 28 Jul 2010, 23:06
+0 -0
Hey Folly. The grass ain't that green this side of the fence. Over a litigation career of about 15 years, if I have to do a bit of time accounting, I reckon that I must have waited, on an average, anywhere between 45 - 55 minutes for every minute that a matter was 'argued'! For the better part, one waits for one's matter to take off - it having been so poised for several hearings cos all pleadings are complete and counsel and court have slowly exhausted all possible reasons for adjournments (a case was once adjourned cos the MRTP Commission member wanted a commercial copy of the Specific Relief Act instead of the photocopy of the Act which was supplied by counsel!) Nine on ten, when you are ready, the matter does not take off. The one time you are coasting and hoping things will slide, the Judge decides to make an example of you - and still adjourns the matter after roasting you nice and proper. For every 'interesting point of law', you plod through hundreds of routine recovery matters, family disputes, mind-deadening writ petitions arising out of government contracts, tenancy matters, labour disputes. One tenant eviction suit or a bitterly contested divorce is enough for asking that ten years be knocked off from time to be spent in hell. Many of these are before really dis-interested and sometimes perverse judicial officers. Supreme Court is a proper barbecue in summers while most High Courts are mazes where you really feel thrilled if even one air-conditioner in a hall half the size of a basket ball court is making a feeble attempt at chugging along. Orissa High Court is particularly delightful in summers. And of course, you gotta wear the coat, gown and band even when it is 40 degrees in the shade! And the lower courts! Especially the criminal courts. Ah! What joy it is to spend some QT there. A real test of one's character, as Calvin's pop would note. Not to forget the daily commute between courts, if you are really successful (!) and have matters in several courts! Several have been the occasions when I really thought that the corporate teams had it so good! I would trade a due-diligence over a recovery suit any time! Sit at your desk and not bother about traffic unless you had to visit client site. Rarely, if ever, get into a hostile situation or have irritable judges bark at you. Air-conditioning is NEVER an issue. Feel/know that tangible work has got done when a deal is closed or a draft is signed off. But then, the moment passes and I know that litigation was a conscious choice I made and the waiting and the discomfort were always on the cards. Just the way I am sure that several of my friends who are in the corporate world have made their conscious choices and are ok with the ennui that must inevitably set in with time. But hey, all of the above was just getting stuff off my chest, inspired entirely by your post. You write well. Keep it going.
folly_nariman 31 Jul 2010, 20:40
+0 -0
Thank you for that comment, I've never really got to hear in any detail what it is to litigate. This was enlightening, and..er..frightening :)
Anonymous guest 2 Aug 2010, 07:20
+0 -0
Beautiful piece of writing.. Simply amazing.. Flummoxed to read all this after spending 2 months of internship doing diligence exercises, there are ppl who think the same.. I am amazed..
Anonymous guest 2 Aug 2010, 14:46
+0 -0
I agree with @15:

Corporate law and Litigation are two mirages in the desert. We sit on either side of them and longingly look at the other side, glorify it and lament our personal choice. Truth of the matter is that both fields are entirely unprofessional, disorganized and exploitative. By the time you get to know this, you have already invested so many years in the legal career, that you have no choice but to resign yourself to your fate. Some lucky ones with clarity are able to negotiate a career change. The rest of us just slog through the boredom, exploitation, corruption, inefficiency and lack of professionalism, only to subject the next unsuspecting generation to the same when our time comes at the top.

If you ever delve in Litigation, the first thing that will hit you (though it might take a while) is the embarrassment of being paid in the same range as domestic servants. And that is a very tough pill to swallow. And as @15 has mentioned, 95% of your time is wasted. You actually only do productive work for maximum one or two hours a day.