Last week, a nine-judge bench continued to hear arguments on whether a fundamental right to privacy exists. Our posts discussing last week’s hearings can be found here and here. Today, arguments were advanced on behalf of the states of Maharashtra,...
Continue reading
Experts & Views
by sflc_admin | August 1, 2017A historic nine-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court of India has been hearing arguments for and against the right to privacy in the matter of K.S Puttaswamy v. Union of India for four...
Continue reading
©Republished under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported (CC BY-SA 3.0) Licence
Yesterday, a nine-judge bench continued to hear arguments on whether a fundamental right to privacy exists. Our posts discussing yesterday’s hearings can be found here and here. Today, arguments were advanced on behalf of respondents, which has been covered in...
Continue reading
by sflc_admin | July 27, 2017Arguments before the nine-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court on right to privacy (in the matter of K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India) ran into its fourth day today. Read our previous updates...
Continue reading
©Republished under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported (CC BY-SA 3.0) Licence
Yesterday, a nine-judge bench continued to hear arguments on whether a fundamental right to privacy exists. Our posts discussing yesterday’s hearings can be found here and here. Today, arguments were advanced on behalf of respondents. This post covers arguments made...
Continue reading
On the 19th of July, 2017, a nine-judge bench was constituted to determine whether there was a fundamental right to privacy. Hearings continued on the 20th and the 26th of July. Our post discussing the hearing on the 20th of...
Continue reading
by sflc_admin | July 26, 2017Today was the third day of arguments before a nine-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court in the matter of Justice K.S. Puttaswamy and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors. [W.P.(C). No. 494/2012],...
Continue reading
©Republished under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported (CC BY-SA 3.0) Licence
On the 19th of July, 2017, a nine-judge bench was constituted to determine whether there was a fundamental right to privacy. Hearings continued on the 20th and the 26th of July. Our post discussing the hearing on the 20th of...
Continue reading
Second in our series of Employment Law blogs on the Maternity Benefit Act. The earlier piece was published here. The Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 (MB Act) was amended by the Maternity Benefit (Amendment) Act, 2016 (MB Amendment Act) which became...
Continue reading
©Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas
By
Rajat Jain, Advocate
Vaish Associate Advocates
This Article has been published by TAXMANN on July 22, 2017, [2017] 83 taxmann.com 235 (Article).
Background
Despite the fact, the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 came into force on 19.05.1988 (hereinafter referred as...
Continue reading
Doubts are often expressed by Principal Employers on their liability vis-a-vis the Contract Labourers engaged in the Principal Employer's Establishment through Contractors. Strictly speaking, for the purposes of the Employees' Provident Funds & Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, the term "Establishment" is...
Continue reading
Yesterday, a 9 judge constitution bench of the Supreme Court of India was set up to hear arguments on whether there is a fundamental right to privacy under the Indian Constitution, following from an order of a 5 judge bench...
Continue reading
by sflc_admin | July 20, 2017Today, a nine-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court continued hearing arguments on the existence of a fundamental right to privacy, in connection with the matter of Justice K.S. Puttaswamy and Ors. v. Union...
Continue reading
©Republished under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported (CC BY-SA 3.0) Licence
Yesterday, a 9 judge constitution bench of the Supreme Court of India was set up to hear arguments on whether there is a fundamental right to privacy under the Indian Constitution, following from an order of a 5 judge bench...
Continue reading
On the 6th of July, the Supreme Court passed a judgement in the case of Alka Chandewar v. Shamshul Ishrar Khan [Civil Appeal No. 8720/2017]. The Civil Appeal arose against a judgement of the Bombay High Court where the High Court...
Continue reading
Most popular articles
- Cyril Amarchand promotes 11 to equity partnership after long process
- After year wait, HNLU finally gets new VC: Prof VC Vivekanandan from...
- NLS students go on media offensive vs ‘hostile’ admin, ‘Orwell...
- NLU Shimla EVICTS all students from campus after food, infra complai...
- JGLS hires 22 NLU LLB grads • 30% of fac hold NLU LLBs • Full li...
- NLS alum association pleads with CJI to conclude VC appointment of a...
- Hemant Singh’s Charter opens Mumbai office to focus on Adani, Gree...
- Must Oblige, My Lords: Some of the advantages of archaic language
- Vedanta metals+power GC Jasmeet Wadehra joins Visa as South Asia leg...
- Fresh senior counsel Ritin Rai (DU ‘95) takes tenancy at UK barris...
Latest comments
-
After year wait, HNLU finally gets new VC: Prof VC Vivekanandan from Bennett/Nalsar
-
Bro no one from HNLU ever got the Rhodes. Wake up ! (4 hours ago)
-
-
NLS students protest over admin possibly stacking EC against Sudhir vote with BCI members
-
And you know this how? (1 hour ago)
-
Was there any NLU that was involved? (1 hour ago)
-
-
NLU Shimla EVICTS all students from campus after food, infra complaints spark yet another NLU protest [UPDATE-1]
-
NUJS 30% domicile quota to land in 2020
-
Reading that write-up gave me an eyesore (1 hour ago)
-
are these the grounds?!!! good luck with that. (Yesterday)
-