Yesterday, a nine-judge bench continued to hear arguments on whether a fundamental right to privacy exists. Our posts discussing yesterday’s hearings can be found here. Today, the hearing concluded with arguments advanced on behalf of the states of Rajasthan and Haryana...
Continue reading
Experts & Views
(NLSIR Announcement is below)The National Law School of India ReviewSubmission GuidelinesAbout NLSIRThe National Law School of India Review (NLSIR) is now accepting submissions for its upcoming issue – Volume 30(1). The NLSIR is the flagship law review of the National Law...
Continue reading
Yesterday, a nine-judge bench continued to hear arguments on whether a fundamental right to privacy exists. Our posts discussing yesterday’s hearings can be found here. Today, the hearing concluded with arguments advanced on behalf of the states of Rajasthan and...
Continue reading
by sflc_admin | August 2, 2017On day 6 of the hearing to decide the fate of right to privacy as a fundamental right in India, Supreme Court’s nine-judge bench in the matter of K.S Puttaswamy v. Union of Indiaheard...
Continue reading
©Republished under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported (CC BY-SA 3.0) Licence
Last week, a nine-judge bench continued to hear arguments on whether a fundamental right to privacy exists. Our posts discussing last week’s hearings can be found here and here. Today, arguments were advanced on behalf of the states of Maharashtra,...
Continue reading
by sflc_admin | August 1, 2017A historic nine-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court of India has been hearing arguments for and against the right to privacy in the matter of K.S Puttaswamy v. Union of India for four...
Continue reading
©Republished under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported (CC BY-SA 3.0) Licence
Yesterday, a nine-judge bench continued to hear arguments on whether a fundamental right to privacy exists. Our posts discussing yesterday’s hearings can be found here and here. Today, arguments were advanced on behalf of respondents, which has been covered in...
Continue reading
by sflc_admin | July 27, 2017Arguments before the nine-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court on right to privacy (in the matter of K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India) ran into its fourth day today. Read our previous updates...
Continue reading
©Republished under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported (CC BY-SA 3.0) Licence
Yesterday, a nine-judge bench continued to hear arguments on whether a fundamental right to privacy exists. Our posts discussing yesterday’s hearings can be found here and here. Today, arguments were advanced on behalf of respondents. This post covers arguments made...
Continue reading
On the 19th of July, 2017, a nine-judge bench was constituted to determine whether there was a fundamental right to privacy. Hearings continued on the 20th and the 26th of July. Our post discussing the hearing on the 20th of...
Continue reading
by sflc_admin | July 26, 2017Today was the third day of arguments before a nine-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court in the matter of Justice K.S. Puttaswamy and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors. [W.P.(C). No. 494/2012],...
Continue reading
©Republished under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported (CC BY-SA 3.0) Licence
On the 19th of July, 2017, a nine-judge bench was constituted to determine whether there was a fundamental right to privacy. Hearings continued on the 20th and the 26th of July. Our post discussing the hearing on the 20th of...
Continue reading
Second in our series of Employment Law blogs on the Maternity Benefit Act. The earlier piece was published here. The Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 (MB Act) was amended by the Maternity Benefit (Amendment) Act, 2016 (MB Amendment Act) which became...
Continue reading
©Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas
By
Rajat Jain, Advocate
Vaish Associate Advocates
This Article has been published by TAXMANN on July 22, 2017, [2017] 83 taxmann.com 235 (Article).
Background
Despite the fact, the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 came into force on 19.05.1988 (hereinafter referred as...
Continue reading
Doubts are often expressed by Principal Employers on their liability vis-a-vis the Contract Labourers engaged in the Principal Employer's Establishment through Contractors. Strictly speaking, for the purposes of the Employees' Provident Funds & Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, the term "Establishment" is...
Continue reading
Most popular articles
- NLS Bangalore students mourn 2nd student suicide in just over two ye...
- DSK co-founder Satish Kishanchandani, 2 partners to start up new fir...
- First(ish) Indian firm to open China office: PSL bets on ‘crazy’...
- CAM’s Delhi comp, TMT partner Rahul Goel joins IndusLaw to oversee...
- ELP finance partner Deep Roy leaves, destination TBC
- Phoenix closes Chennai office as partner Saipillai, litigator Joseph...
- RGNUL VC Jaswal says he’s listening, as long-running discontent ti...
- NLS ‘02 grad Manas Chandrashekar gets Lathams partnership in Hong ...
- All-equity, all-partner start-up Ira expands to 7 with 2 more Anand ...
- Top smartphone maker OnePlus lifts ‘14 Christ grad Maitrayee Sanya...
Latest comments
-
DSK co-founder Satish Kishanchandani, 2 partners to start up new firm with high ‘happy quotient’
-
NLS Bangalore students mourn 2nd student suicide in just over two years • SBA works on mental health asssistance
-
Downvoted by mistake (Yesterday)
-
NUJS students win access to 1.8GB of long-hidden admin meeting minutes from Madhava Menon times to date (nearly)
-
RGNUL student protests win on all counts: Controversial suspensions revoked, inquiry against AO, student body, extended curfews [UPDATE-1: The NCW Complaint]
-
Bobde has a two year stretch as CJI. (56 minutes ago)
-
Not gonna happen. (2 hours ago)