Yesterday, a nine-judge bench continued to hear arguments on whether a fundamental right to privacy exists. Our posts discussing yesterday’s hearings can be found here. Today, the hearing concluded with arguments advanced on behalf of the states of Rajasthan and...
Continue reading
Experts & Views
by sflc_admin | August 2, 2017On day 6 of the hearing to decide the fate of right to privacy as a fundamental right in India, Supreme Court’s nine-judge bench in the matter of K.S Puttaswamy v. Union of Indiaheard...
Continue reading
©Republished under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported (CC BY-SA 3.0) Licence
Last week, a nine-judge bench continued to hear arguments on whether a fundamental right to privacy exists. Our posts discussing last week’s hearings can be found here and here. Today, arguments were advanced on behalf of the states of Maharashtra,...
Continue reading
by sflc_admin | August 1, 2017A historic nine-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court of India has been hearing arguments for and against the right to privacy in the matter of K.S Puttaswamy v. Union of India for four...
Continue reading
©Republished under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported (CC BY-SA 3.0) Licence
Yesterday, a nine-judge bench continued to hear arguments on whether a fundamental right to privacy exists. Our posts discussing yesterday’s hearings can be found here and here. Today, arguments were advanced on behalf of respondents, which has been covered in...
Continue reading
by sflc_admin | July 27, 2017Arguments before the nine-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court on right to privacy (in the matter of K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India) ran into its fourth day today. Read our previous updates...
Continue reading
©Republished under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported (CC BY-SA 3.0) Licence
Yesterday, a nine-judge bench continued to hear arguments on whether a fundamental right to privacy exists. Our posts discussing yesterday’s hearings can be found here and here. Today, arguments were advanced on behalf of respondents. This post covers arguments made...
Continue reading
On the 19th of July, 2017, a nine-judge bench was constituted to determine whether there was a fundamental right to privacy. Hearings continued on the 20th and the 26th of July. Our post discussing the hearing on the 20th of...
Continue reading
by sflc_admin | July 26, 2017Today was the third day of arguments before a nine-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court in the matter of Justice K.S. Puttaswamy and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors. [W.P.(C). No. 494/2012],...
Continue reading
©Republished under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported (CC BY-SA 3.0) Licence
On the 19th of July, 2017, a nine-judge bench was constituted to determine whether there was a fundamental right to privacy. Hearings continued on the 20th and the 26th of July. Our post discussing the hearing on the 20th of...
Continue reading
Second in our series of Employment Law blogs on the Maternity Benefit Act. The earlier piece was published here. The Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 (MB Act) was amended by the Maternity Benefit (Amendment) Act, 2016 (MB Amendment Act) which became...
Continue reading
©Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas
By
Rajat Jain, Advocate
Vaish Associate Advocates
This Article has been published by TAXMANN on July 22, 2017, [2017] 83 taxmann.com 235 (Article).
Background
Despite the fact, the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 came into force on 19.05.1988 (hereinafter referred as...
Continue reading
Doubts are often expressed by Principal Employers on their liability vis-a-vis the Contract Labourers engaged in the Principal Employer's Establishment through Contractors. Strictly speaking, for the purposes of the Employees' Provident Funds & Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, the term "Establishment" is...
Continue reading
Yesterday, a 9 judge constitution bench of the Supreme Court of India was set up to hear arguments on whether there is a fundamental right to privacy under the Indian Constitution, following from an order of a 5 judge bench...
Continue reading
by sflc_admin | July 20, 2017Today, a nine-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court continued hearing arguments on the existence of a fundamental right to privacy, in connection with the matter of Justice K.S. Puttaswamy and Ors. v. Union...
Continue reading
©Republished under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported (CC BY-SA 3.0) Licence
Latest comments
-
First NLS grad takes silk: White & Case partner, Jessup legend Dipen Sabharwal becomes elite senior Queen’s Counsel in UK
-
Indian Law Partners, NA Shah help UK realtor giant Savills enter India more deeply
-
NUJS brings #nationaliseNLUs movement to life with NLU consortium and law day demonstrations
-
Nalsar ‘08 alum Manish Aggarwal gets partnership at global lit disrupter Three Crowns LLP
-
Shardul Amarchand tax, GST partner Sandeep Chilana to leave next year, firm hunts for replacement
Most popular articles
- First NLS grad takes silk: White & Case partner, Jessup legend Dipen...
- Byju calls on SAM for giant $540m fundraise from Trilegal, AZB clien...
- Argus, SAM, AZB act on Bandhan-Gruh Finance acquisition (with HDFC i...
- Nalsar ‘08 alum Manish Aggarwal gets partnership at global lit dis...
- Cairn GC Nitin Banerjee elevated to Vedanta group GC, plugs gap of 3...
- Radiant-Max merger: Double-AZB, NDA, Luthra collaborate to create 3r...
- Singhania Partners promotes Abhimeet Sinha to full partnership, Gunj...
- MZM Legal promotes lit partner Waseem Pangarkar to senior partner
- IndusLaw Bangalore down one more litigator, as partner Nikhilesh Rao...
- Indian Law Partners, NA Shah help UK realtor giant Savills enter Ind...