Law. The very word evokes fear, awe, and respect in our minds. If not for the sake of the man-made law, we certainly bow before the natural law, as ordained by the Almighty. As I narrate this story, I see Law lying in front of me, bare, dry, whining away its life. It has been devastated by the vicissitudes of life. It has been dilapidated by the very forces which have created it. Innumerable number of times has it tried to bring itself back to life, and innumerable number of times has its spirit been quashed to meet a miserable death. Its highest manifestation through the Constitution of India has been left with no meaning at all. I would like to highlight a simple incident which transpired with my friend, to highlight the gravity of the situation.

She, along with some of her classmates, and seniors, who are incidentally boys and Muslims by birth, but no less than good, humble human beings, were captured in a picture (which is ‘indecent’ by no known measures in the world). This photo was uploaded on a leading social networking site. One of the people on her friends’ list saw this apparently ‘disgusting’ behavior of hers, and promptly, ‘in her interest and benefit’, reported this ‘immoral’ behavior of hers to her father. And all hell broke loose, she was blasted left and right by her father, who tagged her as a girl who completely destroyed the great amount of trust and faith he had reposed in her! She tried to convince him; but in vain. She at last conceded; in that she had to forcibly take off the picture from the site.

Now, what is the use of flamboyantly declaring in our ‘Paramount Parchment’, our ‘Founding Deed’, that the ‘Right to Equality’ forms an invaluable part of the conscience of our Constitution!? What is the use of the existence of such a non-existent law?! What is the truth, if any, behind the pronouncement that India is a free country?! Are we really free? When a well educated parent forces his well educated daughter to behave like an uneducated, primordial aborigine (in fact, to behave like a lesser aborigine), can it be said that we live in a free country? Law, time and again, has seen such pathetic failure of its, only to be further pushed far deeper into the abyss. It shows on the face of all of us, that we, the so called ‘independent’, ‘sovereign’ people of the world’s largest democracy, have been a miserable failure, inasmuch as, we have failed the very law which governs us. When the very rudder which sails the ship to its destiny is broken, and torn, it is very foolish of us to expect the ship to reach its destined port. Even after more than half a century of our independence, we find ourselves in such a stinking ditch, wherein there is a full fledged functioning anarchy, oblivious of the essence of what is ‘Law’, though having a fleeting glimpse of its existence in the English language(Touch Wood!). In this sea of multitudinous educated goofys, the treasure of Law has been lost. Hopes of finding it are very bleak. It can be found, if only, all of us work out a navigation, in a determined and revolutionary way! The preposterous failure of Law has to be elevated to an unparalleled and unmatched wonder of the civilized society!

We, the People of India, do hereby enact, adopt, and give to ourselves, this solemn responsibility, of revamping the messy situation our Dear Law is in, and declare ourselves to be a progressive society, working to create a modern history!

Amen.

Comments

Guest 12 May 2011, 19:21
+0 -0
A very confused post. Unnecessarily things have been tagged and included. Looked like a rip off from a 90s Bollywood thriller. Unexpected from the author who has several good posts to her credit. Needlessly blaming parents has become a habit. A parent may admonish his child/ son/ daughter, and may have well founded reasons to do so. What has the Constitution got to do with it? Article seems messed up....
Guest 14 May 2011, 09:13
+0 -0
article is good..but the very first line is contrary...when there is fear..there cannot be a point of respect.n when there is respect there cannot be a dint of fear...

is it that u respect LAW because u fear it or u FEAR law because u respect it?
responsible citizen 14 May 2011, 15:09
+0 -0
its not the failure in the law...its the people who follow the law are a failure...we cannot blame law always...if we as lawyers are so much concerned in finding problems then why do we fail to be a part of the solution...we can always blame the law at every point of time that law is very partial..but what is our role?..we tend to forget that..our role is to aware people and to make them a reasonable person...

n i really appreciate the point picked up by the anonymous guest...
VADLAMANI AMAR BABU 15 May 2011, 05:23
+0 -0
THE people always criticizes law ,they never follow the law. The people who are making laws in councils they are not obedient at law ,what about the people who sending them by the process of elections not fully aware of law .they don't know why they are participating in elections and electing the leaders as their representatives in councils .they don't know what is the purpose of elections . It is really role of the advocates to aware the people and make them a reasonable persons. '' AS WE ARE ,THE ADVOCATES ARE SOCIAL ENGINEERS ''
pranushak 15 May 2011, 09:12
+0 -0
Ok..:) May be the point that 'fear' and 'respect' cannot exist is true. It is well-taken. Here, I would like to highlight why I feel both can coexist. Some times, respect comes out of fear. And fear, out of respect. This is where 'awe' comes into being. Though, on a higher philosophical base, what the anonymous guest said is absolutely right. In the case of Law itself, for example, anti-social elements come to respect law because they fear its sanction. Similarly, people come to respect God, because, since childhood, a fear element for God has been seeded in their minds.
In the society, a person may not steal or murder, not so much because he respects Law in itself, but because this respect of his has been carved out of the fear!
pranushak 15 May 2011, 09:15
+0 -0
In the above comment of mine, please read the first sentence as, '...'fear' and 'respect'cannot 'coexist'...and not just 'exist'.
Apologies for the mistake.
pranushak 15 May 2011, 09:32
+0 -0
# 1-
The author opines that, the Constitution has been failed by the people like those mentioned in the post. And the author very well embraces the fact that parents are to be respected, they do what they do for the well being of their children. But, when the child is enjoying no 'well-being', but only suffering moral decadence, then things are to be sorted out. If not as a criticism vested against them, let it be seen as a humble and passionate cry from a child, who is stuck between the new liberalism and the old conservatism.
Anshumaan 15 May 2011, 10:05
+0 -0
@ to anonymous

hey yr...we are just students or rather lawyers...its very difficult for everyone to write or describe each n every smallest of small aspects of LAW..no one has yet defined what is LAW so many eminent jurists failed or when they defined they were criticized severely...please be a bit liberal on every bloggers n i m included too!!..:D
pranushak 15 May 2011, 13:55
+0 -0
Okiee..:) :)
Ramnath 16 May 2011, 12:37
+0 -0
confused post.. not all parents are same, some are bit concerned and strict..constitutional equality stretched to the extremes.. and again equality rights do come with certain reasonable restrictions :)
Guest 16 May 2011, 13:03
+0 -0
However keep writing.. critics will always make you improve.. :)

ramnath
pranushak 17 May 2011, 13:08
+0 -0
So be it then..!! :)