CLAT: Old schoolCLAT: Old school

The Rajasthan high court yesterday passed an interim order scrapping the Common Law Admission Test (CLAT) age limit. It asked CLAT 2015 convenor RMLNLU Lucknow to modify its application software so as not to reject applications of candidates above the current age limit and to upload the high court’s interim order on CLAT’s official website.

Advising the CLAT core committee to “avoid” defending its decision to allow only general candidates who are less than 20 years old (or 22 years old in the case of scheduled category candidates), to appear in the entrance test, Rajasthan high court chief justice Sunil Ambwani and justice Prakash Gupta ruled:

“We are of the view that it is a fit case, in which we should grant interim order, directing the Organizing University namely, Dr. Ram Manohar Lohiya National Law University, c-Core Committee of Common Law Admission Test, Lucknow, not to reject the applications of the students/applicants to the Common Law Admission Test, 2015, on the ground that they have crossed the age of 20 years, in case of general category candidates, and 22 years in case of SC/ST and persons with disabilities. Their applications will not be rejected, and that the software for applying online, will be suitably modified, not to block the acceptance of the applications of such students.”

NLSIU Bangalore first year students Kshitij Sharma and Abhishek Rao, who were interning in the Rajasthan high court during their vacation from college, had filed a petition in the high court asking it to permanently scrap the age limit.

Sharma said that during their internship they had noticed that several CLAT candidates were petitioning to the court individually for their CLAT applications not to be rejected despite having crossed the age limits. Each of the individual candidates successfully obtained the relief.

He said: “I was just sitting in the court one day and a matter of CLAT was going on in that court. Someone had personally filed a petition that his application should be accepted. So anyone who was filing a personal petition, the court was allowing them. So then I thought that people who do not know that their rights are getting infringed [are disadvantaged]. So we filed this PIL.”

Sharma and Rao, who were appearing in person, had argued that the founding statutes of none of the 16 national law universities which admit students through the CLAT state an upper age limit for appearing in the entrance test.

The court stated in the order:

“Prima facie, we are of the view that considering the withdrawal of Clause 28 of Schedule-III appended to Rule 11 of the Rules of the Bar Council of India Legal Education Rules, 2008, not only on the ground that the Bar Council was not competent, but also the Bar Council felt that the Rule is ultra vires the provisions of Section 7(1)H and (i), 24(1)(c)(iii), and (iiia) or 49(1)(af), (ag), and (d) of the Advocates Act, 1961, and also arbitrary, as it introduces invidious classification by dividing the class of students artificially creating a class by prescribing the maximum age limit for admission in Law Courses, and further on the ground that there is no apparent object to be served in prescribing the age of 20 years. Considering the fact that a large population of the country lives in rural areas, which also forms talent bank, from where the students can be drawn for admission, to the top Law Colleges in the country[…]”

Advocate General of Rajasthan RN Mathur was appearing for CLAT 2015 convenor RMLNLU Lucknow and asked the court for time until 12 March to file a reply and to fix a date before CLAT application deadline 31 March to dispose of the matter.

The court said:

“We are of the view that in this case, the Organizing Universities must collectively consider and take an informed decision, in advising the Organizing University in respect of the maximum age to avoid the Organizing University to defend the matter, in the writ petitions in the High Courts across the country. The Organizing Universities may sit together, review their decision in the light of the observations made by us in this interim order. As and when such decision is taken, the Organizing University is given a liberty to approach the Court for fixing a date for hearing.”

The Allahabad high court had directed CLAT 2014 convenor GNLU Gandhinagar last year not to reject the CLAT applications of two 21-year-old candidates on the ground that they had crossed the age limit fixed by the core committee.

But CLAT 2015 convenor RMLNLU’s vice chancellor Prof Gurdip Singh had in November told LegallyIndia that the core committee had resolved to keep the age limit rule unchanged.

Click to show 14 comments
at your own risk
By reading the comments you agree that they are the (often anonymous) personal views and opinions of readers, which may be biased and unreliable, and for which Legally India therefore has no liability. If you believe a comment is inappropriate, please click 'Report to LI' below the comment and we will review it as soon as practicable.
refresh Filter out low-rated comments. Show all comments. Sort chronologically
Like +13 Object -17 A 05 Mar 15, 14:26  controversial
Bad move. CLAT will become like IAS now. 30 year old villagers from Bihar getting in after 10 attempts.
Reply Report to LI
Like +17 Object -10 jackal 05 Mar 15, 17:57  interesting  controversial
you are one elitist snob. wonder what you've ever achieved in life. what's wrong in entering the services at the age of 30? Gaurav Aggarwal, the past year's topper was 30. also, what's wrong in being from a village in Bihar? you do realize that the first president of independent India was a bihari villager, do you?
Reply Report to LI
Like +12 Object -4 Guest 05 Mar 15, 21:38  interesting
Do you want a toddler from South Delhi to become an IAS? Get a life.
Reply Report to LI
Like +12 Object -5 Amused 09 Mar 15, 11:47  interesting  controversial
Quoting A:
Bad move. CLAT will become like IAS now. 30 year old villagers from Bihar getting in after 10 attempts.

You said it. A guy or a girl, persistent even at the age of 30 years, do fulfill their dream of getting into Civil Services and that too from backward villages where there is no electricity or any facilty at all.

Wonder what a posh ass like you has done so far in life besides writing stupid comments.
Reply Report to LI
Like +12 Object -5 Guest 05 Mar 15, 14:39  interesting  controversial
This is no doubt commendable, but what's intrepid about it?
Reply Report to LI
Like +11 Object -3 kianganz 05 Mar 15, 14:58  interesting
Most law students wouldn't dare attract the wrath of the CLAT convenors (and their college admin) in a writ, I dare say...
Reply Report to LI
Like +39 Object -1 Ha Ha 05 Mar 15, 16:26  interesting  top rated
My son graduated form NLS 15 years ago. He's grown two horns after completing his law. He even boasts that his law degree is B.A.;LL.B (Horns). Now, even I can study there, complete my law and show him ki uska baap kaun hai.
Reply Report to LI
Like +1 Object -1 Manisha 05 Mar 15, 20:31
My Daddy strongest!Proud of you Dad!
Reply Report to LI
Like +9 Object -0 Outsider 06 Mar 15, 10:41  interesting
What exactly is the legal effect of these interim orders, I wonder? The CLAT Committee has not paid any attention to similar orders earlier and given the pan-Indian nature of the examination, it can even be argued that a Supreme Court order, rather than one from any of the High Courts, may be better suited in terms of applicability.
Reply Report to LI
Like +0 Object -1 Death at NUJS 08 Mar 15, 11:47
Please cover this story. It is front page headlines in today's Telegraph newspaper:

The VC must give answers.
Reply Report to LI
Like +0 Object -0 anon 08 Mar 15, 13:05
TV news says that senior students accused of ragging. The VC has told the newspaper that students have given "inconsistent" accounts.
Reply Report to LI
Like +1 Object -0 Guest 10 Mar 15, 15:26
So how does the law entrance work? the CLAT test is really too easy for any 20+ person- esp someone with work ex... or a brain.
Reply Report to LI
Like +0 Object -0 lol 14 Mar 15, 20:03
And considering that the older person gets the higher rank in case of a tie..they should give preference to the younger person who decided to willingly go for law as his first choice after highschool instead of the thirty year old who's choosing the field of law as a backup..they should go for the 3 year llb instead..but considering that a person is already that old, a 5 year degree might not seem that feasible since an MBA is just 2 years and provides the same level of renumeration..set the age limit between 23-25 if you really want to up the age limit.. And why just law? Do it for every other field too..If 25 year old people have an edge over teen law aspirants, then so do 40 year old teachers with a degree and a good grasp over +2 PCM, when pitted against engineering aspirants..
Reply Report to LI
Like +0 Object -0 Studious 06 Jul 15, 15:51
So does this mean that a 21 yeat old can appy for the CLAT next year which will be conducted by the CNLU?

Is the supreme court verdict binding on all the successive universities that will conduct the CLAT?

Or will the upper age limit be back next year. Please respond because I don't have a clear idea.
Reply Report to LI

refreshSort chronologically Filter out low-rated comments. Show all comments.