ok , so first of all you can't be a judge in your own case , congratulations to you on successfully cracking the clat , i have no qualms about any of the two scenarios , retest or no retest both are cool with me , my only motive is to make you understand that it's under the discretion of the honourable supreme court whether it will happen or not and if the supreme court directs for the same you will be obliged to comply with the same , heard of the aipmt judgement well i would suggest you take some time off and go through it , i am in no way suggesting that that the circumstances in both the cases were the same but same as this years CLAT , aimpt 2015 had instances of spying reportedly 50 people . were accused of wearing spyware and using unfair means to cheat during the exam , roughly 6 lakh people gave the exam which is 10 times the clat aspirants , ranjit kumar appearing for CBSE contended that the retest is not possible a lot of students like you contended the same that its unfair to conduct a retest because of a few irregularities , now the no of irregularities in this case is much higher as compared to clat , there are videos suggesting incidents of cheating , the supreme court mentioned in its judgement that the retest is a price to be paid for maintaining the sanctity of this exam , think of the students appearing for clat 2019 what impression they will have on the legal institution While observing that the re-test would cause severe inconvenience to all involved in the process, it justified its decision by holding that it is the price stakeholders would have to suffer in order to maintain the impeccable and irrefutable sanctity and credibility of a process of examination.

"Also, without paying that price, the ranking and merit positions between candidates, would not necessarily reflect sincere candidates' innate worth and capability because cheaters might bump them out of the ranking. " these were the exact words of the supreme court judgement , so you need to understand that justice should not only be done but also seen to be done , just imagine your plight if you were at the receiving end of clat fiasco what would you say then , jus because you got lucky doesnt mean that you have the right to damage the reputation of other people involved in providing justice to all the candidates , whatever will be the judgement of the supreme court will be binding on all till then get a life and stop posting such comments

She responded to ad hominem with ad hominem. What's wrong with that? She's a Nalsar grad and she is conducting a summer school for prospective CLAT applicants. What she's written is true on all counts.

I am so glad to see law school alumnis like you fighting for the right of clat aspirants, despite all the hopelessness created by so called law gurus bu giving their cut offs and publicly announcing that just like every other clat season..the people behind clat fiasco would go Scott free and students would be forced to take admission in non nlus despite all the year round toil, I have faith in the Supreme Court despite all the goof ups justice would vf served