And thus goes the saying by Frederick Douglass: Where justice is denied, where poverty is enforced, where ignorance prevails, and where any one class is made to feel that society is an organized conspiracy to oppress, rob and degrade them, neither persons nor property will be safe.

I fail to understand the point of allowing a process and then subjecting it to the outcome of a case. It's almost as if the outcome of the case is predecided and whatever is happening now is just to create a facade of justice. Why not hear the matter and then decide on whether to proceed with the counselling? If the committee has indeed asked for the removal of a question, the same will lead to a change in ranks. Furthermore, allowing the same concurrently will clearly prejudice the outcome of the case. What's done is done, the wise men will say.

The reliability of the forthcoming merit list is already questionable when it is well reported that level playing field was denied to all the candidates.
Had the SC stayed the publishing of the merit list and seat allotment now, at least some semblance of a fair CLAT 2018 would have remained.
It has now just been reduced to fait accompli..
CLAT 2018 would be remembered not only for its mismanagement, technical glitches, petitions in courts etc. but also for probability defying coincidence (less than 1 in a million occurances), observing especially the well trumpeted about the first three positions being scored by three friends .. and who knows there may be more of such"coincidences"may be hidden down the line which could have missed the limelight ,in the awaited list on the 7th june.When it is already well established in media/social media about the arbitrary handling of the time extension of the exam centres and incompetent invigilators, and mismanagement of the exam process by the organizing NUALS and its contracted company, doubts should have been quashed logically and at least a few steps to transparency could have been made by the honourable SC.Those who got the benefits are not going to approach any grievance redressal mechanism.

And all those who have been put at this disadvantage will have lost some sense of justice even after joining the sentinals of our honorable judicial system...

It seems the outcome of the CLAT 2018 is not being decided by the players(candidates) but the referees, all by themselves

...

Ok. New issue. Not only are these blundering buffoons at NUALS not publishing the pdf of the merit list, they haven't even published the allocation lists. What is it exactly that they have to hide from us? Dhandlebaazi much?