NUJS Kolkata students have filed Right to Information (RTI) requests for the report of the law school's 16-years-overdue review, as the administration has not made the report public even two months after it was submitted to the Chief Justice of India (CJI).
The RTI asks for a copy of the report, the date on which the review commission had submitted it to the CJI and a copy of all the communication the commission has made regarding the report to any public office since after the report was submitted to the CJI.
The CJI, who is also the NUJS chancellor, had constituted the law school's first ever review commission comprising of professors Faizan Mustafa, Mohan Gopal and Lalit Magotra on 24 December 2016, and we understand from authoritative sources that the commission had submitted a finished report to the CJI towards the end of November 2017.
When we contacted NUJS vice chancellor Prof Ishwara Bhat on 19 December 2017, during the law school's winter break, he confirmed that the commission had submitted the report but added that he had not yet seen it.
NUJS opened for the academic session in January and since then students have approached the administration for a copy of the report but have been denied it, they have told us.
Bhat did not respond to calls and messages seeking comment since last week.
VC at NUJS for six years now, Bhat has two no-confidence petitions against him by the law school's students.
That's one of the reasons that the observations of its first ever review commission in its 16 years of its existence are of particular significance to the students.
NUJS graudate Shambo Nandy commented when contacted: "I had visited NUJS last week when I was in Calcutta and got to know that the Review Commission has already submitted its report.
"However, on enquiring from several sources, I also got to know that a copy of such report is yet to be placed before the Executive Council / General Council. In fact, no one I spoke to could say where such report could be found.”
threads most popular
thread most upvoted
comment newest
first oldest
first
www.telegraphindia.com/states/bihar/law-students-dread-liquor-arrest-hiccups-208072
How is it moral policing if boozing is regarded as a criminal offense?
Those students got what they deserved. Creating a ruckus after getting drunk deserves to be punished. If the incompetent hostel authorities can't curb this nonsense in the interest of studious students then it's better that such matters are reported to the police instead.
I hope you'll have the same reaction when some drunken idiot misbehaves with the females in your family.
1. It is wrong and unwarranted to approach Supreme Court CPIO for this matter. NUJS is state university. Proper procedure for filing RTI is with university authorities. Appeal may lie to the Learned West Bengal Information Commission, which has fully functional website where appeal can easily be submitted online.
2. The report is meant to be first shared with Honble VC and Executive Council before shared with students, furthermore there is no obligation to share with students as it is classified document. it is full discretion of Honble VC and Executive Council to share or not.
3. We have seen many example of unwarranted interference by alumnis in state of affairs at NUJS. Without justification petitions are being filed. Some alumnis think they have some god gifted privilege where they should be automatically faculty of NUJS just because they are alumnis. This seems to be root cause of some frustrations.
4. Please see for yourself that numerous improvement have taken place at NUJS as stated by student body itself. Here is the proof: sja.nujs.edu/newsroom/2017/11/05/nujs-receives-state-of-the-art-infrastructure-upgrades
So who you will believe? First hand student report praising VC and infrastructure upgrade, or unwarranted gossips?
1. The report is commissioned by the CJI as ex-officio Chancellor. SC CPIO is entirely competent to release it. Who are you to decide which forum the RTI should be directed to?
2. Read the piece first. VC already has the report. In fact he had been asked to show cause on the basis of it, which he confirmed during convocation ceremony rather unceremoniously. He will sit on it forever if allowed to do so. And for EC to decide, it needs to be placed before the EC, which only the VC can do as the chairperson. Plus, who died and made a report commissioned about a statutory body by another statutory entity 'classified'? Are you high?
3. Better the alumni to have such privilege rather than half the incompetent people as faculty members and in the administration. Plus, your misconception about the attractiveness of a faculty position at NUJS currently is rather blatant. Aren't you people getting even 3 candidates for professor posts for the last 5 years?
4. None of the SJA reports praise VC. The so-called upgrade was long due. And still woefully inadequate. You seem to be part of the Admin. Haven't you people been preparing a room into a 'model lecture hall' for the last 5 years?
5. Again, certainly not you. True facts, indeed!
But when did GNLU win Jessup?
If you can unearth the report of the Fact Finding Committee constituted by CJ, MPHC to inquire into state of affairs at NLIU, it'd be a great help. As per my sources the report has completely vindicated the protesting students and caused much furore in the General Council meeting held recently. The Director has been sent on leave again but has still not resigned (which you incorrectly reported earlier)
threads most popular
thread most upvoted
comment newest
first oldest
first