RDA now PXV: Launches Mumbai, hires 3 lockstep partners, elects MP

Less than three-year-old firm RDA Legal has re-branded to PXV Law Partners and started an office in Mumbai by relocating its newly elected managing partner Rohit Das, while hiring three lateral senior associates from Amarchand, AZB and P&A as lockstep partners.

Managing and co-founding partner Rohit Das has relocated to Mumbai with a senior associate and an associate. They are currently based in temporary office space in Churchgate while closing negotiations for roughly 1,000 square foot of office space in South Mumbai’s Nariman Point, with the idea to expand quickly.

Das said: “For a full service national law firm Mumbai is a significant place to be both from a commercial angle and strategic point of view. It was the right time to go for Mumbai.”

He added that they would initially focus on corporate, finance and litigation work, targeting both local and longer-standing clients. “We have got a good response of new local clients and organisations we’ve been working with nationally - a lot of their transactions are routed out of Mumbai.”

Re-brand and structure

Effective 1 January 2011 RDA has also adopted the name PXV, which is short for Peak Fifteen and was the name of Mount Everest when the mountain was first surveyed, explained Das.

“For a professionally managed firm there are a lot of issues if you have a named partner, especially if you have a lockstep model,” he said. “There is a greater sense of ownership in the firm and it is more neutral and professional.”

Last month the firm also held its first management committee elections and Das was unanimously elected by the rest of the partnership to continue as managing partner for a two-year term.

Since April 2010 PXV, or RDA as it was then called, operated a 20-year lockstep, explained Das, with every equity partner advancing and accruing five points per year up to a maximum equity share equivalent at 100 points unless the advancement is vetoed by a “substantial majority” of the rest of the partners.

He added that none of the partners, including himself, were currently above the six-year level on the 20-year lockstep. “We wanted to keep ourselves low in the lockstep to give more equal opportunity to other members of the firm,” said Das. “We are quite young as a law firm and each of us needs that incentive and career path.”

Partnership expansion

Three new partners have joined PXV on its lockstep in the past six months swelling the ranks of the firm’s equity partners to seven, in addition to non-equity salaried partner Anuj Sahay.

Former AZB & Partners Delhi senior associate G. T. Thomas Phillippe and Amarchand Mangaldas Mumbai principal associate Deepto Roy joined PXV in December 2010, and P&A Associates senior associate Shobha Singh in August of last year.

Roy said: “My intention is to develop energy and infrastructure practice in PXV. The firm already has that practice and I would look to develop it both from inside [that is to expand the team] as well as service the existing clients.

“It was a great learning experience at Amarchand and to leave the largest firm to join a start up is quite a challenge in terms of the responsibilities and work.”

Roy spent five-and-a-half years with Amarchand Mangaldas in its projects and infrastructure team after graduating from NUJS Kolkata.

Singh had completed three-years with P&A Law Offices in Delhi, before which she was an in-house counsel at ICICI Bank in Mumbai for two years after completing her LLB in 2005.

Singh told Legally India that she was excited to be a part of the new venture and great vision and would focus on restructuring the corporate transactional division of the firm.

AZB Delhi managing partner Ajay Bahl said: “Thomas informed us that wanted to be an entrepreneur and start practice on his own with some friends. We wish him the best and he continues to remain on very good terms with us.”

Amarchand and P&A spokespersons or partners were unavailable for comment at the time of going to press.

The firm was founded in April 2008 and has offices in Delhi of around 12 lawyers and roughly eight lawyers each in Bangalore and Kolkata.

PXV, or RDA as it was then called, also has in place a lockstep equity partnership since April 2010, and has a best-friend referral relationship with French firm DS Avocats.

Comments

Anonymous guest 18 Jan 2011, 05:51
+0 -0
Way to go, guys! Have known Rohit and some of the other partners from law school days, and am very happy, though not too surprised, about their extremely rapid advancement. All the best for the coming years!
Anonymous guest 18 Jan 2011, 13:51
+1 -0
Go PXV, go Rohit Das!
Anonymous guest 18 Jan 2011, 14:54
+1 -0
Congrats Deepto! one of India's best project finance lawyers in the last 5 years...
Anonymous guest 19 Jan 2011, 14:39
+0 -0
Go RDA. Despite the neutrality of the new name, I like the old one better. It just sounded way better. May be because I am a die-hard Rohit Das fan from NUJS
Anonymous guest 19 Jan 2011, 17:48
+0 -0
I agree on the name part of it. It could have been more innovative and somewhat related to the profession. but barring this kudos to Rohit Das, who is managing (his) partner(s) well.
Anonymous guest 19 Jan 2011, 18:08
+1 -0
all the best deepto.....

and to LI-"at the time of going to press"..seriously!!! how jali!
Anonymous guest 19 Jan 2011, 20:50
+1 -0
The unbelievable story of PXV continues to grow. Yet another proud moment for all of us who know the brilliance of the team that pxv has. They have not even scratched the surface of their full potential yet
Anonymous guest 22 Jan 2011, 05:13
+0 -0
Some of the not-so-rosy facts are as follows (1) all the existing "partners" are from NUJS and that makes it seem more of an old boys' club of sorts, (2) Apart from Roy, none of the others has any experience of note - Das himself has less than two years experience in any firm other than his own, Thomas joined AZB quite late into his career and Singh has only the LPO experience of pathak, (3) The firm has renamed itself into something that sounds like a chemical, thereby losing whatever little goodwill the four years of the RDA named carried. Long term viability of such a firm would be very low.
Anonymous guest 22 Jan 2011, 17:44
+1 -0
@ Jasmine: It is always interesting to see people go a shade of sickly ‘green’ at the entrepreneurship of others. It says a lot about the person making the comment. But in the interest of civility and a good argument, do note the following.

(1) all the existing "partners" are from NUJS and that makes it seem more of an old boys' club of sorts; {Response: Nothing wrong with that. Some of the top corporations were started by people who went to the same university – Google (Brin and Page were at Stanford together); Facebook (Harvard). In a partnership, you need people you trust as partners, so what better way to start a law firm.}

(2) Apart from Roy, none of the others has any experience of note - Das himself has less than two years experience in any firm other than his own, Thomas joined AZB quite late into his career and Singh has only the LPO experience of Pathak; {Response: At his level, Roy is one of the best project finance lawyers in the country. Das, in his short stint at Amarchand, is still ‘the’ benchmark of associates at Amarchand - and who is to say that the experience of establishing and running a law firm does not constitute experience. Thomas, prior to AZB was at Trilegal – you should consider checking up your facts. And Pathak & Associates is an LPO – seriously?? – then damn they pay well for an LPO!!}

(3) The firm has renamed itself into something that sounds like a chemical, thereby losing whatever little goodwill the four years of the RDA named carried. Long term viability of such a firm would be very low. {Response: I concede. Agree with you on this one.}

It is always easy to tear something down - it's much harder to build it up.
Anonymous guest 22 Jan 2011, 22:52
+0 -0
Arvind

Interesting responses, but perhaps you will concede that -

1. Having all the partners from one institution creates a perception issue in an Indian law firm. This is not the US and law is not the IT industry where it is reasonably certain that talent gets recognition and pale geeks writing code may through hard work go up the ladder. On the contrary, Indian firms such as Amarchand, etc. are quite the reverse and remain rooted as a family business often with a layer of NLSIU partners in between That itself is a burden to overcome for every non-NLSIU associate. Hence my belief that many talented (non-NUJS) graduates who have a choice may not want to associate themselves with P15.

2. The lack of experience is undoubtedly the biggest stumbling block. everything in India works on contacts and contacts are established only through experience. Even senior associates with 10 years of experience in reputed firms have difficulty sourcing work, so unless Das has a benefactor, I don't see his firm breaking into the same league as even ARA Law.

Roy has a good reputation for being a capable lawyer in Amarchand but there are many capable lawyers. to say he is one of the best project finance lawyers in the country after five (or is it six) years is being too generous.

P&A is for the most part an LPO and the bulk of their revenue comes from abroad. No doubt they pay well but that is a reflection of how successful the LPO business model is. Time spent in P&A is as good as time spent in Borneo (metaphorically). As for Das being a benchmark, surely you are taking that too seriously.

My belief is that a few more years in the industry would have equipped this lot far better and given the backgrounds that the partners have, there is nothing in it for even an SME company to choose them for advisory services. Perhaps their goal is to be an LPO - that might well work out. Mainstream legal practice - very doubtful.
Anonymous guest 23 Jan 2011, 09:57
+0 -0
i agree with no. 8 comments. i am working in a leading law firm for 6 yrs and ppl not from nls banglore are treated as if they are part time lawyers!!! nls grads with 3-4 yrs exp are made sr. associate only becoz most of the salaried partners are their seniors. so rda is repeating this trend all over again.
Anonymous guest 24 Jan 2011, 03:36
+2 -0
Maybe this new firm would succeed, maybe they won't. But at least these guys have left their otherwise prospective careers and taken a risk for a venture they believe in. While we are busy online branding some leading law firms as LPOs or cribbing about discrimination in law firms, they are toiling away to achieve their goal. Hats off to that spirit!
Anonymous guest 24 Jan 2011, 04:16
+0 -0
how come such few nalsar and nujs grads open their own law firms or go into alternative careers? perhaps they are not as adventurous as nlsiu students.
Anonymous guest 26 Jan 2011, 03:44
+0 -0
Actually many nujs / nalsar grads did start private practice andm with senior advocates, etc. but after few years of struggle and low pay they all joined companies or law firms. it is just too much difficult without and 'uncle judge', 'grandfather senmiors' or 'family practice' to prosper
Anonymous guest 30 Jan 2011, 18:36
+2 -0
Have been following the comments on this post with some interest!! I cannot believe that we have gotten so critical of first generation entrepreneurial talent. I do understand that managing a law firm is not just another business and you must have adequate legal acumen, knowledge and analytical capabilities. Everyone at PXV seems to fit that bill. If you are a lawyer, you know you do not have to spend years at 'BIG' law firm to develop it. If you expect people to work for decades at established firms like amarchand, azb etc., before setting up their own practices, then we will never have a new firms with younger talent and healthier environments! Why should anyone wait to get jaded before starting a firm with ideals that they believe in? Things like all partners coming from the same university are non-issues and its ridiculous that someone is even bringing them up....It just shows the calibre of people and how pessimistic they are in outlook! The very rebranding of RDA to PXV is evidence that they want to be more democratic in approach and lets hope that they continue the trend even after they grow in size. Encourage new talent and be happy for others success who have dared to break away from the path well travelled!
Jyoti 31 Jan 2011, 01:52
+0 -0
"Things like all partners coming from the same university are non-issues"

Very idealistic. Try telling that to any group of associates in a white shoe firm and you'll have a riot on your hands. I suppose this sort of thing never strikes anyone until they are themselves in such a soup - and feeling like an outsider is in a closed group can be very frustrating - I know about it as a 'brown' face clerking for a 'white' american judge and his staff of upper class WASPs (white-anglo-saxon-protestent).

That's why an organisation should not only be fair but must appear to be fair. You cannot instill confidence in the lower ranks when the entire upper management is from the same univ and perhaps even the same class (or same ethnic, religous, linguistic or income group for that matter). It may not be well known but many of the best firms (and law schools) worldwide deliberately have a diversity policy to avoid this.

With such a setup, I believe the new firm will have a hard time attracting students from places other than NUJS.
Anonymous guest 5 May 2011, 07:30
+0 -0
Jyoti, i agree that diversity at the top management level will definitely make an organization "seem fair" and on a long term, maybe it will indeed contribute to making it a fair organization! I have no doubts that there must be some merit to the diversity policies that you are talking about. What i meant to say by saying "partners coming from the same univ" are non-issues is essentially that this is a new firm and they have just started...and i am pretty sure that they will diversity eventually and its a non-issue at this stage! Instead of beating them down right now, give them some time...if they continue to be so close-grouped after 3-4 years, your comment will be well-founded at that stage. Starting a new firm or venture must definitely involve a great deal of financial commitment and similarity in work ethic. You would therefore start it along with people who share a rapport and also a similarity in vision - that may in most cases end up being colleagues or alumni...whats there to criticize in that! Like i said, if they continue to be close grouped after a few years, your criticism will have some basis at that point.
Anonymous guest 31 Jan 2011, 04:57
+2 -0
If liberalisation happens then these young firms will benefit. they are not family owned and will be happy to tie up with foreign firms. mark my words, startups like this will multiply post liberalisation and wiil do well.

India needs more Rohit Dasses and fewer Shroffs and Khaitans!!
abc 25 Jul 2011, 06:02
+0 -0
Why are people being so critical?
Isn't trilegal an example of a small firms making it big?
It all depends on how well they work and how well connected they are..