First NLS grad takes silk: White & Case partner, Jessup legend Dipen Sabharwal becomes elite senior Queen’s Counsel in UK

India Jessup winner Dipen Sabharwal takes highest honour of the UK bar
India Jessup winner Dipen Sabharwal takes highest honour of the UK bar

White & Case London partner and illustrious NLSIU Bangalore alumnus Dipen Sabharwal has been bestowed the prestigious Queen’s Counsel (QC) tag by the bar of England & Wales.

It is the latest inroads graduates of India’s first national law school have made into global legal practice, after now regularly featuring in international partnership promotions (besides senior counsel designations in India now).

The 2001-graduate Sabharwal is well-known in the NLS and arbitration community, having been part of the team to win the Jessup moot in 1999, at which he has also been a judge since 2003.

He also heads White & Case’s EMEA disputes section for international arbitration, having been promoted to White & Case’s partnership in 2012.

He specialises in international commercial, construction and investment treaty arbitrations, and is triple-qualified in England, New York and India, and often works for Indian clients.

On top of that, he was Radhakrishnan Chevening scholarship, under which he completed a BCL at Oxford University in 2002, which he followed up by an LLM from the University of Michigan Law School in 2003. Plus, he also lectures at King’s College London and is the India Rapporteur for the Institute for Transnational Arbitration, according to his White & Case profile.

This year, Sabharwal was one of four solicitor advocates working at law firms to have taken silk alongside 104 barristers, as it’s colloquially described in the English bar in reference to the silk gowns worn by QCs.

The others, according to the Law Society Gazette are Sabharwal’s fellow White & Case partner and international arbitration co-head Aloke Ray (who appears to be of Indian origin, as well as Allen & Overy partner Mark Levy and boutique Fietta LLP principal Stephen Lewis Fietta.

The solicitor advocate stream of the bifurcated legal profession in the UK was created by reforms in 1990, to allow solicitors (e.g. lawyers working in law firms) to enjoy higher rights of audience before the courts of England & Wales, which was traditionally the reserve of barristers.

The QC tag, much like being a senior counsel in India, is mostly an honorary ceremonial designation bestowed to the most meritorious experienced practitioners at the English bar after application, though - much like becoming a senior counsel - it can carry with it a significant uplift in fees a lawyer can charge.

Update 13:52: Sabharwal commented: “As an international arbitration specialist, I spend a significant amount of time doing advocacy.

“I am delighted that this advocacy has been recognised through my appointment as a QC. I have been leading teams over the last seven years as a partner so I don’t expect the designation to change my practice dramatically in the short term.

“In the common law world, however, the title of QC stands as a badge of quality and excellence for both peers and clients, and I am very grateful for my designation.”

Comments

PanWala 11 Jan 2019, 07:32
+3 -1
"besides senior counsel designations in India now" - and elevation of higher judiciary!
Chaiwala 11 Jan 2019, 07:35
+3 -22
Is he son of ex CJI Shabharwal ?
Anon1234 11 Jan 2019, 08:30
+5 -0
No connection
No 11 Jan 2019, 08:43
+36 -1
No he is not. Please dont make statements that imply that hes achieved this through reasons other than hard work.
Fact 11 Jan 2019, 08:43
+5 -0
No. Chetan Sabharwal and Nitin Sabharwa are his sons.
This is super 11 Jan 2019, 07:42
+34 -0
This man's achievements are great. God bless him.
VGJ 11 Jan 2019, 07:50
+7 -0
Congratulations Dipen! Great news and well deserved, I'd say!
Remarkable 11 Jan 2019, 08:42
+50 -1
Remarkable achievement. Purely as a result of hard work. No "connections" political, uncle, father etc. UK authorities do not see if you are affiliated with a political party, too young, too old etc. Pure meritocracy. Very very well done Dipen.
Chaiwala 11 Jan 2019, 12:07
+14 -16
Ona separate note, I am highly impressed with your so naive statement !
Bill Carson 15 Jan 2019, 06:19
+3 -1
@Chaiwala: Hi, since I am genuinely curious as to why you find the claim on 5.0 so naive.

Other readers may kindly enlighten me too on the above aspect.
Guest 11 Jan 2019, 08:45
+54 -15
A QC designation is infinitely more prestigious than our compromised Senior Advocate designation. It is an incredible feat that a graduate of an Indian law school has attained this. The gap between NLSIU and other NLUs just got even bigger!
Query 11 Jan 2019, 08:48
+12 -2
Is he a British citizen? Is it possible for Indian citizens to be QC? If he is an Indian citizen, then please seek comment from SILF, BCI and the anti-foreign law firm brigade!
kianganz 11 Jan 2019, 08:54
+6 -0
I am not sure about his citizenship (though the time he's lived in the UK, it would have been quite easy to become naturalised), but I'm pretty sure nowadays QC is open to anyone qualified as an English solicitor or barrister. Restrictions on nationality (for Europeans in any case) would also probably be illegal under EU law (Brexit notwithstanding).
lacy2 11 Jan 2019, 10:42
+12 -1
Oh wow, Daddy
intl partner 11 Jan 2019, 12:10
+16 -0
Remarkable achievement and great to see that how hard, focus and determination pay off
Well done Dipen - hats’ off
NLS 11 Jan 2019, 13:05
+41 -4
NLSIU should not have denied him his Student Advocate Gold Medals. Wish they honour him at least now.
Medals 12 Jan 2019, 05:08
+5 -17
Who got it in his batch and why was he denied?
Doesn’t matter 13 Jan 2019, 14:54
+23 -1
How does it matter
Typo 11 Jan 2019, 15:50
+7 -6
Kian. He is not the first NLSIU grad to take silk. He is the first NLSIU ahead to take “international” silk. Pls modify. Regards, Your fav tipper ;)
KoP 11 Jan 2019, 17:56
+3 -0
What a phenomenal achievement!
Guest 12 Jan 2019, 04:48
+9 -32
Here are the 10 biggest achievers among NLSIU alumni so far (in no order):

1. Dipen Sabharwal: for becoming QC
2. Vikramjit Banerjee: for becoming ASG
3. Menaka Guruswamy: for activism + advocacy
4. Shyam Balganesh: first to be professor of a top law school (Penn)
5.Nandan Nelvigi: first to be partner of a big international law firm (White & Case)
6. The founders of Trilegal
7. Shekhar Saraf: first to be HC judge (and likely for elevation to SC, from Cal HC)
8. Shamnad Basheer: for academics + activism, for founding IDIA and winning Infosys Prize
9. Lawrence Liang: for founding ALF and winning Infosys Prize
10. Tarunabh Khaitan: for academics, winning Letten Prize

Honourable Mentions: Arghya Sengupta, Shwetasree Majumder, Sudhir Krishnaswamy, Aditya Sondhi...
Guest 12 Jan 2019, 07:49
+18 -4
I have a bone to pick with the NLU alumni who are actually engaged in academics abroad. Not only NLSIU alumni, but those from other law schools too. Now, these are undoubtedly brilliant people, doing stellar work. My only issue is, why aren't they trying to do similar work in their own country, trying to improve the legal education herein, which all of us know can do with a helluva lot of improvement! Law isn't like hardcore science that you don't always have the necessary facilities to do good work here. These people can't be solely motivated by the money, for a person good enough to become a professor at an Ivy League US college is definitely good enough to get a foreign law firm job to earn plenty more, if money had been their primary motivation. Further, these are people who have chosen academics over industry, so possibly they consider teaching as a vocation to varying extent. So don't they consider themselves at least a little bit obligated to improve the state of legal education in their own country since they obviously have the ability to do it? I'm not talking about a sense of nationalism or patriotism necessarily. These are people who have been through a faulty system here and still emerged with sufficient idealism to stay in academia. I wonder then why this is not a direction they eventually consider to spend more time on, to do their bit to improve it for future generations of law students. It would be interesting to have a normal, sane discussion on this point. Imagine how the NLUs will benefit if these are the people who get to call the shots here!
Ra 12 Jan 2019, 11:21
+26 -1
Everyone knows that NLU alumni don't teach in India because:

1. Low pay
2.Big teaching workload. Also made to teach subjects outside their specialisation.
3. Mediocre, dictatorial, corrupt, nepotistic and insecure VCs. Other faculty colleagues (who are from non-NLU backgrounds) are also resentful of NLU alumni teaching.

Right now, only JGLS has a large number of alumni from tier 1 NLUs, while there are smaller numbers at NLSIU,NALSAR, NLUD and NUJS. And some are teaching in Azim Premji, IIM Bangalore and IIT Delhi.
Guest 12 Jan 2019, 13:14
+14 -1
You just mentioned all the systemic problems that are there in Indian legal education as such. If even these people, who have the capacity to try and rectify these issues in the long run, then who will? And how will these problems ever get solved then? Low pay can't possibly be a very important factor for reasons I've mentioned already. As for teaching workload, I would like to disagree. At least in most tier 1 NLUs, the teaching workload of a teacher if not exactly comparable to leading UK or US universities, is certainly much, much better than all other legal educational institutions in India. If teachers aren't being allowed to teach their choice of subjects, that's because of lack of quality teachers. Which again is because the good ones interested in academia are choosing to stay abroad. Personally, I think the ones choosing to stay in india and trying to do their bit for their alma mater or other law schools deserve the accolades more from that perspective. Which is not to belittle what work these people have done.
Guest 13 Jan 2019, 19:23
+9 -4
I think you over-estimate an academic's idealism; a professorship in an ivy league college is a much cushier position than slaving through a top firm or becoming a human rights lawyer or a top litigator or politician.

Academics is a less challenging career, and you can opinionate to your heart's content without any fear, especially if you have tenure and a top University at your back.

American academics may not be as well paid as BigLaw partners (or even associates), but they don't have to deal with the burn-out either, and their positions and opinions are respected, with excellent opportunities in politics (in India at least), later.
XYZ123 12 Jan 2019, 08:13
+42 -2
Some concerns about your list.

2. Vikramjit Banerjee as ASG - it is a political designation, and not many people are impressed with his performance as a counsel wearing a senior gown. I would rather mention people like Gaurav Agrawal and Dayan Krishnan, as they have far more impressive achievements in court.

7. Shekar Saraf - We hope he becomes a SC judge, but given that he has just been elevated and has a long way to go, it is highly speculative to say "likely for elevation to SC".

Points 2 and 7 show you don't have much clue about litigation.

9. Lawrence Liang - found guilty of sexual harassment by a POSH committee. Deeply shameful for an NLS alum. I known his challenge is pending, but having been found guilty after due inquiry, he certainly does not deserve any accolades
Guest 13 Jan 2019, 19:29
+2 -30
I think Menaka Guruswamy's litigation credentials are pretty top rate. Agree with the rest of your assessment, though.
Guest 14 Jan 2019, 12:06
+6 -4
Am curious why the MG disdain?
Alias 12 Jan 2019, 08:16
+22 -7
Raj Shekhar Rao
Fixed That For You 12 Jan 2019, 09:21
+20 -3
That's a very subjective list, of course. Here are some people you may not have considered:

1. Lavanya Rajamani (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lavanya_Rajamani)

2. Sandeep Sreekumar (http://www.baruch.cuny.edu/wsas/academics/philosophy/ssreekumar.htm) (will feature on a lot of lists by actual alumni)

3. Vikram Raghavan (https://www.linkedin.com/in/vikram-raghavan-131b898)

4. Sandeep Gopalan (https://www.huffingtonpost.com/author/sandeep-gopalan)

5. Naiyya Saggi (https://yourstory.com/2017/08/babychakra-naiyya-saggi-young-indian-mothers/)

6. Sanjay Bavikatte (https://www.christensenfund.org/about/staff/sanjay-bavikatte/)

7. Nandan Kamath (https://superlawyer.in/nandan-kamath-founder-lawnk-building-illustrious-career-sports-law-ipr/) (was supposedly good enough to have a realistic shot at playing cricket for India)

8. The late Rahul Cherian + Amba Salelkar (both have done a lot of work on disability laws in India)

9. Nithyanandan R (ex Infosys GC)

10. Sachin Malhan (https://www.ashoka.org/en-IN/people/sachin-malhan)


Apart from this, there are several others who have done stellar work and remain unsung on LI, like Suresh Jagirdar, Srinivas Raghavan, Rahul Rao, Trideep Pais, Shrimoyee Ghosh, Mrinal Satish, Rajshekar Rao, Warisha Farasat, Dayan Krishnan, Azmul Haque, Gitanjali Brandon, MS Srikar, Somnath Vatsa, Krishna Udaysankar, Priya Narayanan, and many others.

PS- not to forget the foreign students, some of whom are now MPs, Ministers and Judges in their home countries.
Fixed That For You 12 Jan 2019, 12:44
+18 -0
PPS: Not to denigrate any of the alumni on your list, or to make claims that my list has better achievers.

I made a set of different names to make the point that your list of "10 biggest achievers ever among NLS Alumni" will not be considered a representative list by many of the alumni, and does not do justice to several other alumni who have done very well for themselves in their chosen fields.

Lastly, cheers for Dipen, who has made an extraordinary career for himself!
Guest 12 Jan 2019, 15:54
+12 -0
so sorry to hear about Rahul bhai. RIP.
Law School 12 Jan 2019, 23:21
+3 -27
I would put Arghya Sengupta in the top-10 and remove the founders of Trilegal from the list. Frankly, Arghya's achievements are, professionally and academically, much more significant. Agree with the rest of the list. Some very significant achievements indeed!
Crap 13 Jan 2019, 10:09
+23 -3
Batshit crazy comment. Vis-a-vis removing founders of Trilegal.
Lawschoolite 13 Jan 2019, 04:02
+25 -3
There are a large number of law school grads who are not "media friendly" but have been successful in setting up their own independent practise and are doing really well. That was the original ethos of NLS, to contribute to the bar and there is very little focus on such people. For example dayan, nikhil nayyar, joseph pookkat, prashant mendiratta, gopal sankaranarayan, rajshekhar rao, senthil jagdeeshan, siddharth dave, jayant mehta, gaurav agrawal, samar bansal, uttara babbar, rohan thawani,sanjoy ghose, liz mathew, and many more in Delhi and other places. Not to forget those who left law and did well in other walks of life. Such people also deserve a big round of applause as they enhance the NLS name in a very tough environment. And they don't indulge in paid promotions either, which is where you see most big law partners and some others. Your list contains some genuine achievers but is also highly suspect on some names- mong and tanaji for example. I think it's not right to create a list of "greatest achievers" when u don't know everyone else and what they are doing.
AION 12 Jan 2019, 10:50
+8 -35
What about Raghubir, Ashwath, Yash, Arjun, Jatin, Gunjan, Ashwin and Reeba?
Indie 12 Jan 2019, 12:34
+47 -0
Let them prove themselves outside the comfort of a big law firm and then maybe yes.
Hmmm 12 Jan 2019, 12:58
+26 -1
I don't think any of these people would vote for themselves for a "Top 5 Achievers of their Batch" in a secret ballot. There are outstanding academicians, litigators, GCs and overseas lawyers that are their contemporaries, and throwing up a bunch of (mostly Amarchand) law firm partners won't change that.
BION 12 Jan 2019, 17:20
+22 -1
Ya right ... and how exactly has this bunch of big firm lawyers contributed to society, policy, law or legal education ???
Guest 13 Jan 2019, 07:52
+19 -2
For that matter, how does a QC do that either? It will be wholly dependent on the sort of cases he accepts and works on.
Philos-loafer 14 Jan 2019, 07:20
+10 -3
Your contribution to this planet is not measured by the harvest you reap - rather it is measured by the seeds you sow. The names you have mentioned are capitalistic harvesters. What have they accomplished in life that makes this world a better place?
Wah 14 Jan 2019, 11:49
+4 -0
Wah a thinker just like me. Please contact me.
Guest 14 Jan 2019, 12:09
+14 -1
By the same logic, what has a QC, the ASG or the international law firm partner contributed in that direct either? The recognition on those grounds probably belongs to those who are quietly doing their work somewhere without any need or expectation of such accolades.
Question 12 Jan 2019, 13:37
+5 -14
Founders of Indus?
AION 12 Jan 2019, 15:16
+4 -15
And Shuva.He should definitely make it.
Guest 12 Jan 2019, 19:05
+2 -0
Kian, in response to some of the above comments, is it possible for LI to do an audit of exactly how many NLU alumni are teaching at NLUs? We keep hearing boasts from NLUD, but I think NSLIU,NALSAR and NUJS actually outnumber NLUD on this count.
Noojie 13 Jan 2019, 07:58
+7 -1
NUJS currently has 5 LLB alumni from various NLUs as permanent faculty members and another 3 teaching on contractual basis with comparable workload. There's also an LLB alumna from a tier one UK university teaching on a contractual basis. I'm simply giving the numbers here and not commenting on teaching ability, which varies among these people. This number is slightly more than 25% of the current total faculty strength including permanent and contractual faculty.
not for long 14 Jan 2019, 07:19
+0 -0
it won't be for long though.
Noojie 14 Jan 2019, 12:07
+3 -0
I wasn't dealing with predictions, simply existing and verifiable facts.
Noojie 13 Jan 2019, 08:29
+7 -0
NALSAR currently has just 3 NLU LLB Alumni teaching there as per their official website. I can't say if there is any contractual faculty member who belongs to that group, but has not been mentioned in the website. NLSIU has 2 NLU LLB Alumni as permanent faculty and 3 others on an ad-hoc basis (I believe with comparable workload). Again, this is as per their official website, so I may be missing out on the names not mentioned therein.
NLUD as per their official website has 4 NLU LLB Alumni teaching there as permanent faculty, while there is one as a Research Associate (not sure whether this person teaches there too full-time). So now the numbers are all out in the open, provided Kian publishes this.
Guest 13 Jan 2019, 10:51
+3 -0
At NLUD, 2 of the 4 NLU alum faculty members have left. Only Aparna and Anup left now, and who knows how long they will survive, especially after RS retires this year. There is no Research Associate NLU graduate AFAIK. NLUD does have many NLU alum in its research centres, again mostly run by the NLU alum faculty members. Not sure how long they'll go on now that the NLU faculty have started leaving. But NLUD also has some very good non NLU alum faculty members - for eg Arul, Yogesh, Daniel, A K Rai. So focusing only on NLU alum faculty members is a faulty metric.
Noojie 13 Jan 2019, 11:51
+4 -0
The original question wasn't about how good the faculty in a law school was, but about how many NLU alum are coming back to join Indian law schools and where. At least that's what I thought. The ones you named as good and from non-NLU background are definitely good people. An NLU background isn't even any guarantee, far less an exclusive one, of having good quality teaching prowess.
Mrinal Satish and Chinmayi Arun are the other two NLU LLB alumni I'd found on the website. Don't know if they have left already, as you are saying. Can be true. There's also a research associate listed on the website who's from an NLU, Ankita.
Guest 14 Jan 2019, 20:13
+0 -0
My bad. Ankita Sangwan does not teach so most people at NLUD don't know much about her. The NLUD website hadn't been updated to reflect the departures. On the original question, there is an assumption that counting NLU alum teaching in law schools is a worthwhile exercise, and that there is some value (even if it is only brag value) in having more rather than fewer NLU alum on the faculty. And that's a faulty premise IMO. But I do believe that law school need to do more to attract AND retain ALL good faculty. On that front, nearly all NLUs are doing a bad job. The attrition rate of good enterprising, research oriented faculty (NLU educated or otherwise) is quite high across all law schools.
Noojie 15 Jan 2019, 07:26
+3 -0
You won't get any argument to the contrary from me on that count. Fully agree. The NLUs are entirely VC-centric institutions, so the only way reforms can happen is also if a good academic with progressive outlook are handed over the charge. The people who are actually responsible for the current decline are the Central Government for their lack of cogent policy on legal education and the Executive Bodies in charge of these NLUs who do the shoddiest job possible.
NLS Aluminium 13 Jan 2019, 06:24
+39 -1
First we had this non sense of law school rankings which plagued this website for years. Now we have this utter nonsense of rankings of best students of NLS. This will just boil down to another chest thumping, ego flattering exercise - and I dare say, you just cannot fathom the immensity of ____ that non NLSites will not give to this rubbish.
Guest 13 Jan 2019, 12:15
+11 -3
I agree with the comments that ranking successful NLU alumni becomes flawed because the "media friendly" ones get ranked higher. This also applies for the discussion about NLU alumni in teaching. As someone has pointed out, there is a misconception that NLUD has many NLU alumni teaching. This is merely because Legally India gives them lots of publicity while ignoring many quiet achievers. I think Super Lawyer is better than Legally India in this regard.
green lantern 13 Jan 2019, 14:04
+21 -0
stop wasting time and watch netflix atleast it is destressing
accha 14 Jan 2019, 20:38
+4 -2
Go GNLU!!
RMLNLU 15 Jan 2019, 12:52
+0 -4
RML k alumni ka koi scene hai near future me is tarah famous hone ka?
Guest 15 Jan 2019, 14:10
+6 -1
Kya pata, CM ya PM hi na ban jaye!
RML Alum 17 Jan 2019, 08:37
+3 -3
We do have some good alumni. Just that they have been out for not more than 6-7 years. So even the best ones are just at A and SA level in T1 law firms, etc.

Give them another 5-10 years. I believe we will have a stellar RML lobby.

That said, I guess in terms of PCS-J selections, RML is definitely leading all NLUs. So, we already seem to have good alumni base in lower judiciary. Pls correct me if I am wrong.
Iukyy 18 Jan 2019, 20:12
+2 -0
Nobody care's unless you make a million per annum.
First world problema 26 Feb 2019, 19:40
+3 -0
Whatever. Takes much more to be a great lawyer with proven to be results, don’t you think?