Dua starts tax practice with ex-Deloitte director, as partners get Beemers

Ashutosh Mahajan
Ashutosh Mahajan
Exclusive: Dua Associates launched a tax practice in the firm’s Gurgaon office after appointing former Deloitte Haskins & Sells tax director Ashutosh Mahajan and a team of five Deloitte chartered accountants (CA) and one former PricewaterhouseCoopers in-house lawyer last month.

Mahajan will head the tax practice with a focus on litigation, transaction advisory and mergers and acquisitions.

Dua Associates managing partner Ranji Dua said: “We consciously took a step toward developing a focused tax practice in Gurgaon. Most of our corporate practice has already moved to Gurgaon even though we do have two or three corporate partners in Delhi.”

Mahajan – a 1991 qualified CA – has more than 20 years of experience in dealing with taxation. He spent the initial half of his career at companies including Onida, the Sriram Group, DLF and LG Electronics. From 2001 to 2005 he worked for the Big Four consultancy Ernst & Young. For the last seven years he was with Deloitte, where he also managed the company’s India-desk in New York from 2007 until 2009.

Mahajan told Legally India that ideas around the new practice first started brewing in 2007, even though he had long had a relationship with Dua who had advised on the corporate side of E&Y’s deals.

“It was not very apparent at that time in terms of discussion, but there was some idea around it,” he said adding, “Mr Dua was always keen on setting up a tax practice. During the initial part of his career he was strictly involved in some major tax issues.”

He finally joined the firm on 1 August this year, eyeing it as a “challenging place to practice in tax”. He does not hold equity in the firm, it is understood. The rest of his team joined on 1 September.

In August cars, including BMWs, were bought for several partners out of firm profits, according to a source with knowledge of the firm. Dua declined to confirm this but said: “Our firm is very different. We are a very very democratic firm. The partners decide and see how they wish to spend their earnings. If someone wants to drive a better car they can.”

Luthra & Luthra also offered a choice of cars including the BMW 3 series to five partners with the firm in 2011.

Former Dua & Associates lawyer Vinod Joseph re-joined the firm as a salaried partner in Mumbai in January 2011, after eight years in the UK. Dua declined to confirm the firm’s current partnership size.

“As a matter of policy, we do not speak in public about matters related to the partnership. We believe that they are private and just between the firm and its partners,” he said.

Comments

Kishen 17 Oct 2012, 18:50
+0 -0
Hmmm..are these people qualified as lawyers also? Wonder how they can practice at a law firm like Dua which is a regulated entity.

Ideas anyone?
to kishen 17 Oct 2012, 23:49
+0 -0
How is Dua a regulated entity???
Kishen makes sense 18 Oct 2012, 06:06
+1 -0
Dua is regulated by the Advocates Act and the BCI Rules, which don't permit lawyers to have multi-disciplinary partnerships i.e. with chartered accountants etc. If a person is qualified as both a CA and a lawyer, he can therefore maintain any one licence to practice. Legally, he cannot practice both. But he can use the knowledge of one subject (CA) while providing service based on the other subject (tax law/company law). CAs are permitted to practice certain areas of law in some limited ways. A law firm can retain/hire a CA as a consultant to provide tax advice but a CA can neither be made an equity partner, nor can he sign of on legal opinions on areas CAs are not permitted to practice.

However, this rule is often flaunted and people flirt closely with the legal limits. Big 4 tax firms are claiming to have litigation and M&A practices. Not sure if they are limiting themselves to tax aspects only - doubt so.
to kishen 18 Oct 2012, 08:40
+0 -0
That's exactly, the new hire from Deloitte has not been designated a partner. Other big law firms too hire CAs as executive director. In other words, a senior consultant.
Undercover 18 Oct 2012, 08:44
+0 -0
Mr. Mahajan did not join Dua Associates as a partner. His team is a part of Dua Consulatants which is a Pvt. Ltd. body. Mr. Mahajan is the "Tax Head" and not a partner as only lawyers can be partners in a law firm. But that does not bar a firm from engaging other professionals as non-partners.
ap 17 Oct 2012, 21:54
+4 -0
Other firms like AZB Mumbai are also planning to follow these things and give things like cars, flatscreen tvs and watches as gifts...
desi dude 18 Oct 2012, 06:10
+2 -0
HMT watches, and hero cycles?
MA 18 Oct 2012, 09:48
+7 -0
What is the big deal on this? NOIDA based international law firms have already given porsche and lamborghinis to thier family members and all partners and associates have contributed for the same by foregoing their salaries for months and years!
Kishen 18 Oct 2012, 19:56
+0 -0
This is baffling..the BCI opposes the entry of foreign law firms citing the Advocates Act (wrongly as it were, cos the Advocates Act says nothing about practice by foreign firms of foreign law) but they have no problems with a well known firm hiring a non-lawyer who is announced to the world as heading its tax practice "with a focus on litigation, transaction advisory and mergers and acquisitions" ?? This may be technically not a breach of the act but one would expect better from a law firm.
Yeah . . . . 19 Oct 2012, 05:20
+0 -0
Be the next Balaji. File a PIL.
Grow up Kishen 19 Oct 2012, 06:15
+0 -0
Kishen, although I supported you above and agreed that lawyers cannot have multidisciplinary partnerships, I cannot believe you are so naive. Or are you commenting for the heck of it? What do you expect from law firms? That they will not make use of loopholes in the law? Fyi, accountancy firms have, for ages, hired partners from law firms to head their litigation and M&A practices. Yes, accounting firms have these practices! The foreign law firm issue is not something the BCI is worried about – it is the effort of some very influential law firm partners that has created a notion that foreign firms are bad / they cannot practice in India. Nothing stops foreign firms from doing foreign law work or Indian law work through Indian lawyers.