Protect courts’ ‘lady officers’ from hostility, SC: The Supreme Court told off Gujarat district and high court judges for not protecting a female junior judicial officer from unwarranted inquiry and getting her job terminated for extraneous reasons. Reinstating her, the SC held: “We would like to take this opportunity to emphasise that the high courts must see to it that the hostile work environment for junior judicial officers, particularly the lady officers, is eliminated.” [PTI]
Judge disposes 382 cases in few words: Justice K B K Vasuki of the Madras High Court disposed of a possible-record 382 criminal original petitions in a single day by passing a common order of two sentences. The judge, in essence, told cops to investigate the crimes before it. Of the 382 petitions, three were filed in 2009, 29 in 2010, two in 2011, 37 in 2012, and 311 this year. [New Indian Express]
Jain arbitration: The Jain International Organisation – an NGO that was inaugurated last week, has started the International Settlement Forum (ISF) - an institutionalised arbitration service at its Churchgate office in Bombay. ISF will deliver quick decisions within a few weeks to people of all communities - the only condition is that the parties must agree to abide by the verdict. [TOI]
Foreign editors’ fate hangs: The Delhi high court on Friday reserved its decision on the issue of foreigners holding editorial position in Indian newspapers. Politician Subramanian Swamy’s petition had questioned S Varadarajan holding the position of editor in the national daily The Hindu, without being an Indian citizen [Mint]
Bombay HC to examine mass juvenile release: The Bombay High Court has suo motu decided to hear appeals against the order of the Juvenile Justice Board (JJB), Pune, which disposed of 82 cases in a single day on September 16 last year by releasing juveniles on probation after recording the plea of their guardians although they had attained majority [PTI]
threads most popular
thread most upvoted
comment newest
first oldest
first
Lastly, will the Supreme Court bring a case of contempt against this man for bringing such a venerable institution (one of the pillars of the govt.) into disrepute? It is quick to do this in case of ordinary citizens. At least, if it publishes the findings of it's committee, that will send the message to the whole world that we in India are really serious about sexual harassment - be it of women or men!
COME ON SUPREME COURT! SHOW THE WORLD YOU CARE! SHOW THE WORLD THAT YOUR POLICY REGARDING SEXUAL HARASSMENT IS "ZERO TOLERANCE FOR NONSENSE".
If his guilt is proven, then I too shall run onto the streets with vicious rhyming banners. Or send coloured panties to his lordships residence.
threads most popular
thread most upvoted
comment newest
first oldest
first