The 15th All India Bar Exam (AIBE) has been postponed yet again, this time to early 2021.
Online registrations for AIBE XV, which is held in physical test centres, have been extended to 3 December 2020, with the exam slated for 24 January 2021, according to a notification of the BCI on the AIBE web site.
Even in non-pandemic days the BCI’s compulsory AIBE was very rarely held on time so precisely no one will be surprised by the latest postponement in the midst of continuing national and global Covid-19 mayhem.
And although the Common Law Admission Test (CLAT) had pulled off a bigger physical exam than the AIBE, the BCI does not seem like the type to consider alternative ways of holding the exam.
However, this total six-month delay now may leave 2020 graduates keen to practice in the courts in a bit of a lurch, seeing as technically having passed the exam within two years of graduation is obligatory before being allowed to do practise. Then again, no courts are fully operational these days and who knows whether the AIBE requirements will be completely enforced at this time.
Correction 18:41: As pointed out by a commenter, the BCI has passed a one-year amnesty this year until 31 March 2021 about passing the exam.
The exam was originally scheduled for 16 August but was postponed indefinitely in July 2020.
Then, in August, a tentative new date was announced for 8 November 2020.
threads most popular
thread most upvoted
comment newest
first oldest
first
It's Kian's choice why he finds you persuasive. You really don't have to engineer the down votes.
I only said that someone had loudly claimed and personally assured that certain BCI documents will become available on Monday and other related claims. I merely stated that its Thursday today and the only BCI documents that I have are: (1) a BCI list last updated till Dec 2019 which shows that NUJS had affiliation till 2010-11 academic session with no mention of the number of undergraduate seats allowed; and (2) BCI certification dated Sep 3, 2020, which states that NUJS has been granted affiliation from 2019-20 to 2023-24 academic session.
The other valuable document is a letter circulated by the VC which claims that BCI has given affiliation from 2013-14 to 2023-24 academic sessions but there is no supporting documentation (yet) for 2013-14 to 2018-19. Btw what about 2012-13?
Just troll me back with the relevant documents when the dear VC gives them to you.
It also means that BCI drive to weed out "fake lawyers and degree holders" is itself a sham. What is laughable is that a BCI team comes to do inquiries in NUJS and fails to detect that the university did not even have BCI affiliation! This among numerous examples elsewhere underlines that BCI is a joke when it comes to its role as a regulator or legal education.
Maybe with the Bihar elections done, the Atmanirbhar govt will find courage and political space to effect regime change in BCI. Not that HECI is going to be any different from a dressed up UGC.
www.barcouncilofindia.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/List-of-Law-Colleges-having-approval-by-the-BCI.pdf
If you check the list, most of the NLUs including NLSIU, NUJS, GNLU, HNLU etc donot have an affiliation currently. New rules specify renewal every 5 years but no one does.
What else can you expect of a 'professional' organisation which does not even have a complete list of members under it?
BCI gave us another Mishra. The Iron Judge
And because this is really nothing, admin lapses go unreported and unpunished and soon we have entrenched institutional cultures of extractive NLU administrations. As they say, all things begin small.
This really isn't anything.
The BCI's stranglehold over legal education and the legal profession in India needs to be diluted a bit imho. The Government must play a bigger role in legal education especially. And the dumb opposition to foreign law firms needs to end. If Indian lawyers can qualify for practice in England & Wales, U.S., etc., then British and American lawyers should be allowed to do the same. The legal sector needs liberalisation and the Government has a duty to implement it.
You should rather worry about NALSAR and NUJS cutoffs falling drastically.
With BCI, the central govt, irrespective of the party in power, has always chickened out whenever the BCI protested whittling of its role as a regulator of legal education. I seriously do not understand how BCI can take credit for NLSIU and name dropping some ex-SC/HC judges here and there in some committees as reasons for being allowed to continue as a regulator for legal education.
Now that BCI has AIBE, legal education should be taken away from them. Anyone who graduates AIBE gets to practice in Courts (only).
I truly like most of the work @Kian does man
But now LI needs to get rid of the OBVIOUS bias it has towards certain law schools (Re: NLUD)
Then again, given the general state of media in Atmanirbhar land is it fair to single out Kian? Plus he hasn't staffed for reasons best known to him. There is only so much Kian can and will do.
No wonder Kian does not waste time covering the "usual stuff" that goes on in and is expected of NLUs. Only when there is a big clamour, does it become "safe" to publish inconvenient pieces
threads most popular
thread most upvoted
comment newest
first oldest
first