Rape is defined as a forced sex with a woman without her consent under by a man under section 375 of Indian Penal Code. Forcefully doesn’t only mean that it should be physical, it can be mental also. This law was codified in the year 1860, when it was a belief among the society that a man cannot be raped. Moreover, it was also a belief not only in India but also in England that only a man can commit this offence against the women. But, what if a person forces a man to have sexual intercourse without his will, what should the definition of this offence. It cannot said to be rape, because if we are including male category under the category of victims under the definition of Rape, then we are changing the law itself and it is the job of parliament, not ours.

Forced Sex with a Man

Lord Macaulay didn’t miss the chance to include section 377 which prohibits unnatural offence and under that category, if a man have sexual intercourse with another man would be charged under this section but again Lord Macaulay missed to define as to what would be the offence if a man who becomes a victim of forced sex by another man. The recent decision of Delhi High Court legalizes Gay sex but even though it is not clear as to what punishment would a person would get if he forcefully indulges in a sexual activity with a man. You might be wandering as to how can a male be raped, but statistics shows that in the year 1997, 342 men were raped in UK. Now, it would not be possible to ignore that a male cannot be raped. If it is possible to legalize homosexuality, then it must be possible to have a provision against Male rape ( Don’t go on the terms ‘Male Rape, it has been used for the convenience ). This crime was recognized in UK only in the year 1994. Before that it would not have been possible to recognize this crime.

Problems of Male Rape Victims

It has been came to light from the study conducted on the ” Crime Against Man ” that it is very hard for a man who has been a victim of sexual violence with dignity in the society. On one hand, our society provides sympathy to female victims of this crime, but on the other hand no such sympathy is available to male victims. It has been found that there are quite a large of man who tried to kill themselves after these incidents. Moreover, a man who has been sexually molested since his childhood is not able to develop confidence in himself and again it becomes very hard for him to live in the society with dignity. We talk about right to equality but is this law actually been applied among all persons. It would not be wrong to say that our law favours women as it has been framed keeping in mind the patriarchal notion of the society, where crime are committed against women.

It has also been shown in a study that victim of male sexual violence are not able to maintain their further relationship with anyone. They try to keep themselves isolated from the fear of getting humiliated. These victims sometimes suffer from a mental disorder throughout their life. It is justifiable to leave these persons who have become a victim of sexual violence alone, because law doesn’t favour them. Don’t they have any right to live with dignity as other persons do. The law should include a provision which provides relief to such man who have become victim of sexual violence so that it would be easier for them not only to get justice but also to use the medical facilities.

Sexual Violence against Male and India

As stated above, there is no provision under Indian law which could provide relief to man who has become a victim of sexual violence. The Indian Penal Code was drafted when the general view of the society was of patriarchy but as the time has passed, the notion of patriarchy has been challenged from time to time. The concept of patriarchy believes in the heterosexual relationships but this notion has been challenged by Naz Foundation before Delhi High Court and indeed they have become successful in this attempt. Then, why it is not possible to have a provision in India which would provide relief to the victims of male sexual violence. Well, it is not possible for a common man to do that, it should be considered by our law makers.

Our Indian Constitution provided Right to Equality, Right to Life and Personal Liberty which includes Right to Live with dignity, then why it is not possible for a victim of male sexual violence to live with dignity in the society. It would not be correct to say that, males do not become victims of sexual violence in Indian. Indeed, they become and frequently but these incidents do not get reported as other news which keeps these incidents buried. Moreover, these victims hide these incidents from the fear of getting humiliated in the society. They have certain questions in mind ” What would society think? that a man has been raped ”, and they are not wrong in this regard. Until and unless a step similar to that which has been taken by Naz Foundation takes place, it would not be possible for victims of male sexual violence to get justice.

Blog Link - http://www.cogitasocietatis.blogspot.com/

Facebook Page - http://www.facebook.com/pages/Cogita-Societatis-The-Social-Blog/195915737086694

Comments

Anonymous guest 15 Feb 2011, 18:34
+1 -0
If a man forcefully sexually assaulted by a man then it would become an offence under section 377 I.P.C. After judgement of Naz foundation delhi high court allowed sexual intercourse between same sex but by the consent of the partner. Thus if a man saxually assault other man without consent then it will fall under the catagory of unnatural offence. But if a man sexually assaulted by a woman then no where in I.P.C. the provision for punishment to such a offender has been given.
cogitasocietatis 15 Feb 2011, 18:57
+0 -0
Yes, you are correct that Delhi High Court said " The provisions of Section 377 IPC will continue to govern non-consensual penile non-vaginal sex and penile non-vaginal sex involving minors."

but,this section has remained ineffective, because there are hardly any cases which are being reported even after having several such incidents. It is necessary to make these provisions effective otherwise it would remain like a dead body.
lex suprema 15 Feb 2011, 20:39
+0 -0
i think s 377 plus conti if read together then it can gv the same protection to male victim..but then possibility of a male being a victim is v thin..but then again it cant be rules out in toto
lex suprema 15 Feb 2011, 20:40
+0 -0
Typo
*ruled
Anonymous guest 15 Feb 2011, 21:43
+0 -0
Emphasise should be given on making such a law which will define and punish the offender of male sexual assaulter other then those fall under the catagory of Sec. 377 I.P.C. Also provision should be made in such a way that they will put a mandate on police officers to register F.I.R. against such offenders. Like it has been given in the Naz foundation case that police authorities do not react proactively in such cases.
cogitasocietatis 15 Feb 2011, 22:41
+0 -0
@lex suprema and Rajinder. This issue is not confined to section 377 but what would be the remedy to man when he is sexually assualted by a woman ? And Court can only advise government over this matter as it is not empowered to enact a law. It can only interpret a law.
pronoy 15 Feb 2011, 22:50
+1 -0
In our modern society both man and woman are equal. There is no discrimination between man and women but in some cases women has extra-privilege, such is the case of rape. As per Section 375 IPC sex done with a woman by a man forcefully without her free consent is a case of rape. Again section 377 IPC is for unnatural sex i.e. sex with a man by another man. The summary of Hon,ble Delhi High order is that if sex is done by man with another man forcefully then it is punishable. BUT the actual question is what about a "man raped by an woman". The way woman has dignity in the same way man also has dignity. A man has every right to safeguard his chastity and sanctity against any forceful and deceitful sexual assault by an woman. In present day in is quite natural that a man has been forcefully compelled to have sex with an woman whether by seduction or intoxication. There should be a provision for punishment of sexual offence like woman committing rape of a man.
Anonymous guest 16 Feb 2011, 02:44
+2 -0
@Cogitasocietatis- that is what i emphasised on my first comment that what is needed for now is that to enact such a law which will punish a female to sexually assault a man. Rest of the things are already in I.P.C. and many times Honable Supreme court has interpreted the same.
cogitasocietatis 16 Feb 2011, 19:12
+0 -0
yes, rajinder you are absolutely correct and this is what we need to think about
Anonymous guest 16 Feb 2011, 21:05
+0 -0
It is important that protection be given to men in situations when they are forced by females to undergo sex.
Not that females are only raped, men are raped by women as well and there are numerous incidences where men unwillingly undergo sex with women.
As far as man to man sex is concerned, a sex without consent will be governed by 377, provided there is penal insertion.
Anonymous guest 19 Feb 2011, 03:45
+0 -0
ha ha!

unable to comprehend how a man can have sex with a woman without his consent.

Will "it stand" before a court of law?
Guest 13 Jun 2011, 14:54
+0 -0
Hahahaha.. I too feel the same as the Anonymous guest who commented as #11.

How can a man have sex with a woman without his consent??

For child sexual abuse, there's a bill coming up this year which deals sternly with pedophiles.

Vivek